Bangladesh caretaker government overturns use of ‘sir' to address female officials
The interim administration, headed by the Nobel peace prize winner Muhammad Yunus, took office last year after the former prime minister was overthrown by a student-led uprising, forcing her to flee to neighbouring India.
A statement issued by the press wing of the caretaker government late on Thursday said the directive mandating the use of 'sir' for women in official roles had been 'annulled'.
'During Sheikh Hasina's nearly 16-year-long autocratic rule, a directive was reportedly issued requiring public officials to address her as 'sir',' it said. 'This practice extended to other high-ranking women officials, who were – and still are – being called 'sir', which is clearly odd.'
A new committee has been formed to revise other protocol-related directives, the statement added.
A female official told AFP that the caretaker government took the call without consulting the women in public roles.
'The tradition began during Sheikh Hasina's tenure, but many women officers supported it, finding the address gender-neutral,' said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Hasina, 77, who has defied orders to return to Dhaka, faces several charges at Bangladesh's international crimes tribunal for alleged crimes committed during a crackdown on the protests that led to her toppling. Responding to the charges, Hasina's Awami League party condemned the trial process and said the tribunal was a 'kangaroo' court.
Up to 1,400 people were killed between July and August 2024, according to the United Nations. Prosecutors claim that Hasina held overall command responsibility for the violence. She has denied all allegations against her.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Tulip Siddiq's trial exposes the depths of corruption in Bangladesh
However bad the summer recess has been for the Government, it's been considerably worse for Labour MP and former Treasury minister Tulip Siddiq. Having resigned from the Government at the beginning of this year after she became the subject of a corruption inquiry in her parents' native Bangladesh, the Hampstead and Highgate MP is now, in her absence, on trial there, along with a number of other members of her family. If found guilty she faces life imprisonment. The details of the charges say less about Keir Starmer's unfortunate tendency to lose ministers accused of dubious conduct – Siddiq's resignation was preceded by Louise Haigh's departure as transport secretary after a historic charge of fraud was unearthed, and succeeded by the resignation of homelessness minister Rushanara Ali after she was accused of evicting tenants of her privately rented property then hiking the rent by £700 a month – than it does about the regrettable political culture in Bangladesh. The allegations against Siddiq were investigated by the Prime Minister's standards adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, who found no evidence of 'improprieties'. And Siddiq herself has vigorously insisted on her innocence, recently pointing out on social media that she has yet to be contacted by the Bangladeshi authorities with regard to the accusations made against her. The 'so-called trial' was 'a farce', one that was built on 'fabricated accusations and driven by a clear political vendetta'. 'I have never received a court summons, no official communication, and no evidence. If this were a genuine legal process, the authorities would have engaged with me or my legal team, responded to our formal correspondence, and presented the evidence they claim to hold. 'Instead, they have peddled false and vexatious allegations that have been briefed to the media but never formally put to me by investigators.' Siddiq is accused of influencing her aunt, Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted as Bangladesh's prime minister last year, to secure a plot of land in a suburb of the capital Dhaka for her family members. Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) is also investigating a separate case against Siddiq and her family over allegations of embezzlement of £3.9bn. But here's the kicker: Bangladeshi authorities estimate that about £174bn was siphoned off from Bangladesh through corrupt means while Hasina was in power. But this sort of endemic, cultural corruption is not confined to one family or party. Corruption has been endemic since the country was founded. According to Transparency International's 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index, in which the country perceived to have the most honest public sector is ranked first, Bangladesh ranked 151st out of 180 countries. There is some good news, however: of eight South Asian countries, Bangladesh manages to emerge as less corrupt than Afghanistan. Of course, the rest of the world should welcome any moves that any of these kleptocracies make to clean up their governments, especially if, like the UK, they are providing tens of millions of pounds a year to them. But it can hardly be denied that the truth of the allegations against Siddiq and her family has been lost amid the petty rivalries of competing political dynasties in that unfortunate country. Just as history is written by the victors, corruption charges are brought by whoever benefited from the latest coup. Bangladesh's interim leader, Muhammad Yunus, refused her offer to meet when he recently visited London. 'Even my offer to meet… Muhammad Yunus during his recent visit to London was refused,' Siddiq wrote. 'Such conduct is wholly incompatible with the principles of a fair trial that we uphold in the UK.' It would be patronising and condescending to make excuses for the obvious failings of Bangladesh's political and judicial cultures. Free and fair trials should be the standard practice across the globe, but it seems clear that Bangladesh still has some way to go. Meanwhile, anyone who might expect Siddiq to attend her own trial and to risk never being allowed to return to her native UK must have an over-optimistic and unjustified confidence in the justice system there.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Pakistan to create new missile force after four-day conflict with India
Pakistan is creating a dedicated missile force in the aftermath of a brief military conflict with India earlier this year. Shehbaz Sharif announced the creation of the Army Rocket Force on the eve of the Independence Day on Wednesday. "It will be equipped with modern technology," the prime minister said of the new force, which he added would prove to be a milestone in strengthening the combat capabilities of the army. India and Pakistan stepped back from the brink of war in May after a four-day military conflict left dozens of people dead in artillery shelling as well as drone and missile attacks. A Pakistani security official said the force, dedicated to deploying missiles in the event of a conventional war, was proposed to have its own command in the military. Mr Sharif claimed the conflict with India concluded with a decisive victory for Pakistan as he praised the military leaders for their swift response, according to the Associated Press of Pakistan. 'India forgot that wars are not won with weapons alone but with the spirit of the nation,' he said. The Pakistani military claimed to have shot down six Indian fighter jets, including the French-made Rafale, during the initial clashes. India also claimed to have downed the rival country's jets in a dogfight that reportedly involved over 125 aircraft, making it the largest aerial battle since the Second World War. US president Donald Trump, who has repeatedly claimed credit for brokering the ceasefire that ended the conflict after four days, said last month up to five fighter jets had been shot down, without clarifying which country's. India confirmed on 31 May that it had lost jets during the conflict, but refused to clarify their number or nature. While Islamabad acknowledges the US role in the ceasefire, India claims it was agreed between the two militaries. The conflict began when India launched airstrikes on Pakistan, claiming it was punishing the neighbouring country for orchestrating an attack in the restive Himalayan region of Kashmir that left 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists, dead in April. Pakistan denied involvement. In his address on Wednesday, the Pakistani prime minister said his country's nuclear arsenal was "not for aggression" but 'only for defence purposes". This appeared to be a pivot from the aggressive statement made by Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, about the country's nuclear capabilities. The military leader reportedly told members of the Pakistani diaspora in Florida that Pakistan was "a nuclear nation' and 'if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us". He also warned that if India built a dam on the Indus River, Pakistan would destroy it 'with ten missiles". "We have no shortage of missiles," he added, according to The Print. India on Monday criticised the remarks as 'nuclear sabre-rattling', noting it was 'regrettable' that they were made in the US, a key partner for New Delhi.
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Pakistan to create military force to supervise missiles after India conflict
ISLAMABAD, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Pakistan will create a new force in the military to supervise missile combat capabilities in a conventional conflict, apparently a move to match neighbouring arch-rival India. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the creation of the Army Rocket Force late Wednesday at a ceremony held in Islamabad to commemorate the conflict with India in May, the worst in decades. The ceremony was held a day ahead of Pakistan's 78th Independence Day. The force "will be equipped with modern technology," Sharif said in a statement from his office. "This force, capable of targeting the enemy from all sides, will prove to be yet another milestone with regard to further strengthening our conventional war capability," he said later in a speech broadcast on Thursday by local TV news channels. He did not give any further details. A senior security official, however, said that the force would have its own command in the military which will be dedicated to handling and deployment of missiles in any event of a conventional war. "It is obvious that it is meant for India," he said. The two nuclear-armed nations have kept upgrading their military capabilities, fuelling a longstanding rivalry since their independence from British rule in 1947. Tension between the two countries soared in April over the killing of 26 civilians in Indian Kashmir, an attack New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denied involvement. A conflict erupted in May that saw both sides using missiles, drones and fighter jets, before it ended with a cease-fire announcement by U.S. President Donald Trump.
