
‘Biggest damage to Pakistan was to their surveillance capabilities': Amit Shah on ‘Operation Sindoor'
Union Home Minister Amit Shah said Friday that Pakistan will not be able to fight a 'war with complete information' for a long time 'in view of total destruction of its surveillance infrastructure' in India's strikes in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Pakistan earlier this month.
Shah, who is on a two-day visit to Jammu – his first since India's 'Operation Sindoor' strikes – was addressing the Border Security Force in Poonch, the town that was hardest hit by cross-border shelling in the aftermath of the strikes.
The strikes were in retaliation to the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people — including a Pakistan national — were killed. Border tensions between India and Pakistan escalated in the aftermath.
In his speech, Shah, who arrived in the Union Territory Thursday, referred to a report that was received from Director General BSF in the aftermath of the strikes. 'The biggest damage on the Pakistan side has been the destruction of its surveillance capabilities,' he said. 'You selectively destroyed their entire surveillance network, which the enemy may take 4-5 four years to re-establish…Woh ab lambey samay tak sampuran jankari wali ladai nahi lad payega (It will not be able to fight a war with complete information about the other side for a long time),' he said.
When Pakistan attacked India's residential areas in the aftermath of the strikes, the BSF in Jammu Frontier destroyed more than 118 of their posts, he said, adding that 'completely destroying or causing extensive damage to such a large number of posts in just three days is a very big thing'.
'This means that even during peace time you continued keeping surveillance on their `vidunsak' (destructive) infrastructure. You kept this precise information in mind and also made preparations about how to cause maximum damage within the shortest possible time,' he said.
The BSF faces the first assault on the country's frontiers, he said. 'That is why every child in the country also knows you as the first line of defence of the country,' he said.
During his visit, Shah also met families who lost their loved ones in the cross-border shelling when border tensions escalated. At an event organised in Poonch to give job offers to those families that saw deaths in the shelling, Shah said that India's defence mechanism will become stronger 'in view of the deeds of the terrorists and Pakistan'.
'The entire sequence of events has showcased India's defence policy and has shown to the entire world that it will not tolerate any sort of assault on its citizens,' he said, adding that any attacks will be responded to with 'much more precision and severity'.
Hundreds of terrorists were killed in the strikes, Shah said, saying this was the 'perhaps the first time that India's defence forces destroyed a terror headquarters linked to various outfits in Pakistan'.
'This befitting reply could be possible only due to the bold political will and decision of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, coupled with accurate information by our intelligence agencies and our defence forces' courage and precision strike capabilities,' he said.
He went on to say: 'Under that policy of responding to every terror attack with the same swiftness and severity, India had destroyed terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on the night of May 7. We had attacked terrorists, but Pakistan took it as an attack on itself and proved before the entire world that it was harbouring terrorists and it had been a safe haven for terrorists'.
There was neither any attack on Pakistan's army camps nor were their civilians killed 'as the Indian forces had in a precise and calibrated response' to Pahalgam terror attack, he said.
'But what Pakistan did – shelling residential areas of Jammu and Kashmir the next day – is baffling,' he said. 'And when Pakistan attacked our civilians, the Indian defence forces gave befitting reply and destroyed nine of their air stations and damaged their striking capabilities, making them ask for a ceasefire.'
Prime Minister Narendra Modi had already made clear that terror and talks cannot go together, just like 'blood and water cannot flow together', he said.
No compensation or job can make up for the loss of human lives, he said. 'This is just a gesture to express the feelings of the Jammu and Kashmir government, the Centre and the people of India. It is to say 'we are with you',' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
political line newsletter speech I hate, but must defend
Unless we defend the rights of both Vijay Shah and Ali Khan Mahmudabad to say whatever they want to, neither can be defended rationally ------ There are two Special Investigation Teams (SIT), each comprising three IPS officers investigating two people, on the directions of the Supreme Court of India: Madhya Pradesh's BJP Minister Vijay Shah and Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad. The SC order has specified that the SIT in Madhya Pradesh must be of directly recruited IPS officers from outside of the State cadre. The implied equivalence of these two cases in the SC approach — that the police can investigate alleged criminality premised on the idea of excessive speech —has been disconcerting for many people. Those who were outraged by Mr. Shah's comments, which the SC rightly described as 'crass, thoughtless,' wanted legal action against him. Broadly, the same set of people were also outraged by Haryana police arresting Mr. Mahmudabad. The interesting spectacle of six IPS officers trying to parse through the sentences of two people to investigate criminality in them leads us to the question: what exactly is freedom of expression. Can there be selective freedom of expression? Should hate speech be allowed in a civilized society? If some speech must be restricted, who gets to decide what is allowed and what is restricted? As we have seen in recent days, the Congress government in Karnataka and the BJP government in Haryana have different standards of what speech can be allowed. We need to defend the rights of both Mr. Shah and Mr. Mahmudabad. Free speech cannot be restricted to what one person likes; hate speech cannot be defined as what another hates. Unless free speech is absolute, including — and especially — for views that are dissenting and offensive, there is no meaning in it. A police inspector or a random political actor can initiate a case, and the rest will depend on the social capital and relative power of the side that claims to be aggrieved and that of the alleged aggressor. A free speech supporter cannot call for punishment of Mr. Shah and protection for Mr. Mahmudabad. Article 19 of the Indian Constitution guarantees that all citizens shall have the right to 'freedom of speech and expression,' and then goes to add multiple caveats. 'Reasonable restrictions' on free speech include 'the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with Foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.' This is echoed in criminal laws and Mr. Mahmudabad was actually arrested on charges of endangering the country's sovereignty and integrity and promoting enmity between different groups, among others, under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Article 19 also gives citizens the right to 'assemble peaceably and without arms,' again with caveats similar to those mentioned above. As it happens, the government of Assam has decided to arm indigenous communities. In this case, the state is abdicating its role of providing security and encouraging select groups to arm themselves. This is not new. In Kashmir to fight back separatists, and in Chhattisgarh to neutralise the Maoists, local communities were armed. The broader question is the power of the state to decide what are legitimate arms and what is legitimate speech. In the US, people have much more power than in India to bear arms and to speak freely. There are restrictions there too, but they are more narrowly defined. Arbitrary measures are not unheard of, but some dependable precedents are in place, evolved through judicial disputes over the decades. But the Republicans and Democrats both want to restrict speech in the US — they differ on what kind. Antisemitism and Islamophobia are recurring grounds for restricting speech in many contexts in the West, including by the state. In India, commenting on Hinduism or nationalism can be adventure intellectualism these days. The default liberal position, however, should be that all speech is allowed. If there are any restrictions, they must withstand objective reasoning. Federalism Tract: Notes on Indian diversity Tongue lashing Kamal Haasan is set to enter the Rajya Sabha. But he made news for other reasons. His statement that Kannada is born out of Tamil triggered a reaction in Karnataka. In fact, for all the talk around Dravidian languages and culture, the linguistic pride of each State and conflicts between regions within States have been politically consequential. The Telugus wanted separation from the then Madras State, and their struggle led to the linguistic reorganisation of States. Telugus in Telangana later wanted a separate State for themselves, and they got that. The idea that any language is born from another language is a fallacy that few linguists would take seriously now. Languages interact and migrate along with the people who do the same. The idea that Sanskrit is the mother of all, or many Indian languages, is a common and misplaced notion. Having a heavy load of Sanskrit vocabulary in a language (for instance, Malayalam, my mother tongue) does not make it the child of Sanskrit. It is a more complex process, as linguist and author Peggy Mohan says. I hope, Mr. Haasan watches this too.


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fadnavis draws parallels between Op Sindoor & first column raised by Ahilyabai Holkar
Nashik: At a gathering in Ahilyanagar's Chondi on Saturday, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis drew a comparison between women's involvement in Operation Sindoor — India's response to the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 tourists — and the pioneering women's military unit established during Ahilyabai Holkar's reign. During the commencement of Ahilyadevi Holkar's 300th birth anniversary celebrations, Fadnavis said: "Ahilyadevi was the first queen who raised the first column of women soldiers, taking the mantle of defending the Swarajya in their hands. Today, we can see how the women performed in Operation Sindoor at various levels." He added, "Just as Ahilyadevi, known for her military prowess and strategic leadership, started manufacturing weapons indigenously, our country has manufactured Brahmos, used by India to destroy the air bases in Pakistan during the operation." The chief minister shared an anecdote about Ahilyadevi's progressive stance on dowry, where she implemented a ban after encountering a father's difficulty in arranging for his daughter's marriage due to dowry demands. Fadnavis stressed on his govt's commitment to following Ahilyadevi's example of uplifting disadvantaged communities, stating, "Our govt is also committed to the development of the deprived and will ensure the upliftment of each and everybody." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esse novo alarme com câmera é quase gratuito em Franco Da Rocha (consulte o preço) Alarmes Saiba Mais Undo He talked of Ahilyadevi's water conservation efforts through the construction of stepwells, which continue to serve local communities even today. The CM also said, "State govt has decided to construct such ponds and wells, as constructed by Ahilyadevi, in Chandwad, Trimbakeshwar, and many more locations as part of the Adishakti Abhiyan."


The Hindu
42 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India does not send dossiers any more, we only give a befitting reply, says Nadda
Bharatiya Janata Party national president J.P. Nadda on Saturday (May 31, 2025) said a safe and strong India is marching ahead under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership after the display of the nation's power during Operation Sindoor. 'The operation has only been halted, while the fight against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism will continue,' Mr. Nadda said. Mr. Nadda was on a day's visit to Jaipur to participate in the celebrations marking the 300th birth anniversary of Ahilyabai Holkar, the former queen of the Malwa kingdom, attend the BJP's 'Tiranga Yatra', and interact with the party workers. He spoke at two functions at the Rajasthan International Centre (RIC) and the Entertainment Paradise Hall, besides addressing the BJP workers at the Sanganer airport. Mr. Nadda said India had made it clear through its surgical strikes [in Pakistan], air strikes and Operation Sindoor that a 'befitting reply' would be given to the attackers by entering their own territory. 'India does not send dossiers [to Pakistan] any more, like the one after the 26/11 attack. Modi ji doesn't complain, he executes what he says,' he said. The new normal The BJP president said the Operation Sindoor, which had demonstrated India's military capability, had handed down a punishment to Pakistan 'beyond its imagination', as promised by Mr. Modi. 'Nine terror hotspots, including the headquarters of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Jaish-e-Mohammed, were destroyed in 22 minutes. Eleven air bases [in Pakistan] were also destroyed. This is the new normal,' he said. While affirming that Operation Sindoor would continue as long as Pakistan nurtures terrorism, Mr. Nadda called upon the BJP workers to apprise the people of the party's national security policy, and come forward to defend the nation. Disburses aid At the women's empowerment programme at RIC, Mr. Nadda flagged off 150 Kalika patrolling units of the Rajasthan Police and transferred financial assistance to the beneficiaries of Lakhpati Didi Yojana, Lado Protsahan Yojana, SC/ST pre-matric scholarship scheme, and the distance education scheme. He also launched the Swasth Nari Chetana Abhiyan and the Garbh Pathshala Yojana on the occasion. Mr. Nadda, who holds the Health & Family Welfare portfolio as a Minister in the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government at the Centre, said the culture of politics had changed in the country after 2014. 'Instead of blame game, every section of society is being empowered now,' he said. 'Modiji has made accountability and responsibility the new definitions of politics. We are willing to give report cards for our work… The double-engine government in Rajasthan is engaged in public service with its new schemes for all sections of society,' Mr. Nadda said. Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma, Union Ministers Gajendra Singh Shekhawat and Bhagirath Choudhary, former Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje, and BJP State president Madan Rathore were among those who attended functions along with Mr. Nadda. Mr. Nadda also visited the Raj Bhavan to meet Governor Haribhau Bagade.