Satellite Image Hints at North Korea's Biggest Military Factory
North Korea has begun work on what could become the country's largest military production facility, according to analysis of satellite images captured by Planet Labs.
The planned site is expected to dwarf the nearby weapons-producing machine factory—where leader Kim Jong Un recently praised efforts to modernize the nation's defense industry.
The project comes amid heightened tensions with U.S.-allied South Korea, as Pyongyang continues a steady spate of ballistic missile tests and expands the Kim regime's nuclear missile program and naval capabilities.
North Korea's munitions factories were "operating at full capacity" last year, according to the South, whose defense ministry says the country has delivered millions of shells and rockets to Russian forces fighting against Ukraine. Pyongyang has also sent thousands of troops to aid in that conflict, now in its fourth year.
Newsweek reached out to the North Korean embassy in China by email with a request for comment outside of office hours.
Satellite photos analyzed by the North Korea-focused specialist website NK News show that several buildings have already been demolished in preparation for new construction.
Based on a 3D rendering displayed during Kim Jong Un's recent visit to the existing factory near the new site—in the city of Huichon, Jagang Province, about 80 miles northeast of Pyongyang—the new facility is estimated to eventually boast at least twice the floor space of the current plant.
If the planned complex ultimately matches the scale shown in the illustration, it will cover between 12 and 25 acres, although this would require the demolition of an additional dozen large structures and some leveling of the surrounding mountainside, NK News reported.
The U.S. and South Korea believe the North is receiving aid—including technical assistance and parts for weapons manufacturing—in exchange for its military assistance to Russia.
North Korea, like other socialist states before it, maintains an unofficial "second economy" built largely on arms production.
Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Un's grandfather and the country's founder, prioritized the development of this munitions industry as part of a dual policy of economic defense and growth, fueling the rise of the second economy, or an unofficial military economy.
However, North Korean defectors who previously worked for the regime have said resources are prioritized for the second economy over the people's economy, according to a report by the analysis group 38 North last year.
Colin Zwirko, senior analytic correspondent for NK News,wrote: "Only a few factory buildings in the country feature a single, uninterrupted production floor of a comparable but still smaller size, like the Taedonggang Battery Factory in the capital or the newly remodeled Kumsong Tractor Factory, but the new Huichon Ryonha facility may become the largest to boast an explicit military production function."
North Korea is almost certain to continue its military buildup, which it says is necessary to deter "provocations" by U.S. and South Korean forces.
However, South Korea's newly elected president, Lee Jae-myung, has signaled he aims to ease tensions with North Korea. Last week, for example, he ordered the shutdown of loudspeakers broadcasting daily anti-North Korean propaganda near the border.
Related Articles
North Korea Airbrushes Commander From Photos After Warship FailKim Jong Un Doubles Down on Destroyers for North Korea's NavyNorth Korea Rejects Trump's Letter to Kim: ReportUS Ally Seeks China's Help in Dealing With North Korea
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
3 hours ago
- Atlantic
Trump's Trouble With Tulsi
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Back in March, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard delivered a view of Iran to the House Intelligence Committee that was in line with Trump-administration policy: hostile toward Tehran, but also skeptical of the need for American intervention. Unfortunately for her, though, things have changed in the past three months. 'Iran continues to seek to expand its influence in the Middle East,' Gabbard said. Nevertheless, she said, the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear-weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' (Presumably she was referring to Ali Khamenei and not his long-dead predecessor, Ruhollah Khomeini.) That may have been President Donald Trump's view in March too, but this week, Trump told reporters that Iran is on the verge of getting a nuclear bomb. When asked about Gabbard's testimony, Trump dismissed it. 'I don't care what she said,' he said. 'I think they were very close to having one.' This kind of harsh dismissal of American intelligence was a hallmark of Trump's first term in office. Shortly before his inauguration, he compared intelligence agencies to Nazis, and somehow things got worse from there. He infamously sided with Russia's Vladimir Putin rather than the intelligence community on the question of Russian interference in the 2016 election, accused former officials of treason, and reportedly clashed with DNI Dan Coats over his unwillingness to take his side in political conflicts. That problem was supposed to be solved in his second term. Rather than choose someone like Coats, a former senator who had experience with intelligence, or his successor, John Ratcliffe, who claimed he did, Trump nominated Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic member of Congress who had endorsed him for president. (Ratcliffe, having proved his loyalty to Trump in the first term, was named CIA director.) Gabbard shared a few things with Trump: an odd affinity for Putin's government, and a public stance of opposing American intervention. But above all, her qualification for the job was that she, like Trump, bore a huge grudge against the intelligence agencies, making her an ideal pick in his Cabinet of retribution. Now the limits of this approach to appointments are coming into view. Gabbard's beef with the IC was her sense that it was too belligerent and interventionist, especially with regard to her pals in places such as Syria and Russia; she was also angry because she had reportedly been briefly placed on a government watch list for flying. Gabbard opposes foreign wars, and it appears that she doesn't want intelligence to implicate her friends overseas. But when the intelligence points against American intervention, as it does with Iran, she is happy to stand behind it despite her skepticism of the analysts. Trump, by contrast, doesn't want the intelligence to complicate his choices at all. The president was fine with the IC assessment from earlier this year, when his line was that he opposed wars and would keep the United States out. But now that he has made a quick shift from trying to restrain Israel from striking Iran to demanding Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER'—a baffling demand of a country with which the U.S. is not at war—and contemplating American attacks, the conclusion that Iran isn't that close to a bomb is a real hindrance. Politico reports that Trump was annoyed by a video Gabbard posted earlier this month in which she warned about 'political elite and warmongers' risking nuclear war, and she was reportedly excluded from a Camp David meeting. (The White House has insisted that all principals are on the same page, though Trump's dismissive comments about Gabbard earlier this week are telling.) Cutting out the DNI at a crucial moment like this is an unusual choice, though the role has never been well defined: Although it was created to sit atop the U.S. intelligence agencies and coordinate among them, officials such as the director of the CIA have often wielded more power. Trump's saber-rattling has created rifts within the MAGA coalition, as my colleagues Jonathan Lemire and Isaac Stanley-Becker reported yesterday. In reality, Trump was never the dove that he made himself out to be. He has consistently backed American involvement overseas. During the 2016 election, he claimed that he had been against the Iraq War from the start, placing the idea at the center of his campaign even though there is no evidence for it. As president, he escalated U.S. involvement in Syria, backed the Saudi war in Yemen and vetoed Congress's attempt to curtail it, and—in one of his major foreign-policy successes—assassinated Iranian General Qassem Soleimani. Throughout his first term, he treated the troops as a political prop. These tendencies have become more pronounced in his second term, though Trump's favorite places to send troops remain within national borders: in the streets of Los Angeles or parading through Washington, D.C. He launched a series of major strikes against Yemen's Houthi rebels, despite the misgivings of his dovish vice president, and then abruptly stopped them when it became clear that no easy victory was forthcoming. This is the crux of the matter with Iran too. Although he may be hesitant about American involvement overseas, Trump loves displays of strength. He sees one in Israel's attacks on Iran, and he wants in on the action. Whether the MAGA doves believed Trump really was one of them or simply hoped they could persuade him in the moment is something only they can answer. But his actions this week show that his real resentment was not toward intervention or even intelligence itself. It was toward anything and anyone who might restrain his caprices. Today's News The Federal Reserve will hold interest rates steady. Earlier today, President Donald Trump called Fed Chair Jerome Powell 'stupid' and contemplated installing himself at the Reserve. Trump said that he 'may' or 'may not' strike Iran, adding that 'nobody knows' what he's going to do. The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors. Evening Read The Dumbest Phone Is Parenting Genius When Caron Morse's 9-year-old daughter asked for a smartphone last year, her reaction, she told me, was unambiguous: ' A hard hell no.' Morse is a mental-health provider in the Portland, Maine, public-school system, and she was firmly against smartphones, having seen how social media and abundant screen time could shorten students' attention spans and give them new anxieties. But she wanted her children to have some independence—to be able to call friends, arrange playdates, and reach out to their grandparents on their own. She also needed a break. 'I was so sick,' she said, 'of being the middle person in any correspondence.' So when her daughter turned 10, Morse did get her a phone: a landline. Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Read. In her new book, Murderland, Caroline Fraser offers a provocative argument about what creates serial killers. Listen. Clifton Chenier changed music history. On the centennial of his birth, musicians from across genres are paying homage to the King of Zydeco, Reya Hart writes.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Putin says Russia Can Broker Peace Deal Between Iran and Israel
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. 🎙️ Voice is AI-generated. Inconsistencies may occur. Russian President Vladimir Putin offered Wednesday to help broker a peace deal between Israel and Iran. Putin was taking questions from international journalists on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum when he was asked about Iran. Putin said it was a "delicate issue" but he has shared peace proposals with Iran, Israel and the United States. "In my view, a solution could be found," he said. This is breaking news, more updates to follow.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Who is Mark Walter? What to know about the new Lakers owner
Who is Mark Walter? What to know about the new Lakers owner For the first time since 1979, the Los Angeles Lakers' ownership will be leaving the Buss family. But the new owner should be an extremely familiar face for Los Angeles sports fans. According to a report from Shams Charania on Wednesday, the Lakers are entering a sales agreement between the Buss family and billionaire Mark Walter. The reported sale is expected to go for a jaw-dropping $10 billion, and Jeanie Buss will retain her role as Lakers governor. As for Walter, the CEO of Guggenheim Partners, there's a lot we already know about him when it comes to sports ownership. He's the Dodgers' primary owner Walter led the $2.15 billion purchase of the Dodgers in 2012 and holds around a quarter of the franchise's ownership stake. Though Walter has given much of the day-to-day decisions to Stan Kasten and Andrew Friedman, Walter is the public-facing leader of the ownership consortium. He's invested in Chelsea FC Walter teamed up with longtime business partner and Dodgers part-owner Todd Boehly in the consortium that purchased the Premier League club in a forced sale from Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich in 2022. Though Walter doesn't have veto power or operational influence with the club, he still owns a reported 12 percent stake in Clearlake Capital's holding company, BlueCo, which was established for the Chelsea purchase. There could be a bit of a Premier League rivalry at the Lakers facility now between Walter and Liverpool part owner LeBron James. He's also involved in the WNBA and F1 Walter is a part owner of the Los Angeles Sparks and the Cadillac Formula 1 Team. He joined the Sparks in 2014.
