Tinian adopts cryptocurrency for internet gaming
Photo:
Supplied
The island of Tinian in the Northern Marianas is the first US jurisdiction to adopt a government-backed cryptocurrency for internet gaming.
The CNMI's House of Representatives has voted to override Governor Arnold Palacios' veto of a senate bill.
Senate Local Bill 24-01, Draft 1 essentially authorizes internet gaming using a regulated platform and creates the "Tinian Stable Token" or MUSD, backed by the US dollar and managed by the CNMI treasury on a secure blockchain.
It also enables casinos to accept and process stablecoin payments for digital gaming and mandates full transparency and recordkeeping of all gaming transactions.
Chief technology officer of Marianas Rai Corporation, and an advocate of the measure, Vin Armani, told lawmakers the actions they took on the matter of the override "will have an impact on the economic prosperity, or lack thereof, for generations of citizens of the CNMI".
"You have a chance to attract billions of dollars of investment and tax revenue from the fastest growing segment of the financial technology industry."
Senator Jude Hofschneider, who co-sponsored the bill, emphasized the need for diversification in the wake of repeated economic shocks from tourism decline and federal program wind-downs.
He thanked the House for passing the override of Palacios' veto.
"We believe that this initiative can help not only Tinian but the entire CNMI in our efforts to economic recovery," he said.
"We often hear statements being made about diversifying our economy. This exercise is a great indication of what that means."
He assured lawmakers that regulations and enforcement mechanisms already exist through the Tinian Casino Gaming Control Commission, which would oversee licensing and compliance.
Palacios initially vetoed the measure, citing concerns raised by the Office of the Attorney General about oversight, financial transparency, and constitutional authority. The Attorney-General questioned whether such a currency framework could bypass federal and local financial regulations or create liabilities for the CNMI government.
But lawmakers in both the Senate and House rejected the veto, arguing that the bill only enables a legal framework and does not appropriate any government funds or authorize uncontrolled crypto trading.
Tinian's local leaders said the system will be tightly regulated, with every token transaction recorded on a tamper-proof blockchain for public auditing.
Representative Patrick San Nicolas said a vote to override Palacios' veto on the bill is a vote for the future of not only Tinian but the entire CNMI.
"Overriding this Senate local bill is a forward-looking measure that gives our island and our Commonwealth the legal infrastructure to enter a global digital economy, through standalone internet gaming licenses and the creation of the Tinian stablecoin.
"This is not a rushed thing into unregulated digital wireless. This is a bill about transparency. This is a bill about accountability and modern financial infrastructure. It is about building an economy within the Commonwealth."
Floor leader, representative Marissa Flores, who voted no to the override, asked her colleagues for patience and not to rush into passing an override without carefully thinking of its ramifications.
"By taking the time to think carefully, to act thoughtfully, and to persevere patiently, we can make decisions that not only serve our immediate political needs, but also pave the way for the long-term security, prosperity, and the well-being of our Marianas."
On 9 May the Senate voted 7-1 to override Palacios' veto, which then needed a two-thirds majority in the House to pass and was voted through 14-2 on 15 May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Donald Trump says he plans to phase out FEMA after 2025 hurricane season
By Gabe Cohen , CNN Donald Trump. Photo: ANNA MONEYMAKER President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he plans to phase out the Federal Emergency Management Agency after this year's hurricane season, offering the clearest timeline yet for his administration's long-term plans to dismantle the disaster relief agency and shift responsibility for response and recovery onto states . "We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down to the state level," Trump told reporters during a briefing in the Oval Office, later saying, "A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor." Trump added that the federal government will start distributing less federal aid for disaster recovery and that the funding will come directly from the president's office. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration projects this year's hurricane season, which officially ends on November 30, to be particularly intense and potentially deadly. For months, Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose department oversees FEMA, have vowed to eliminate the agency, repeatedly criticizing it as ineffective and unnecessary. Noem reiterated those plans Tuesday in the Oval Office, saying FEMA "fundamentally needs to go away as it exists." "We all know from the past that FEMA has failed thousand if not millions of people, and President Trump does not want to see that continue into the future," Noem said. "While we are running this hurricane season, making sure that we have pre-staged and worked with the regions that are traditionally hit in these areas, we're also building communication and mutual aid agreements among states to respond to each other so that they can stand on their own two feet with the federal government coming in in catastrophic circumstances with funding," she said. Photo: ANNA MONEYMAKER Noem is co-chairing a new FEMA Review Council, established under Trump, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The council is expected to submit recommendations in the coming months to drastically reduce the agency's footprint and reform its operations and mission. Another senior FEMA official is leaving the agency, according to multiple current and former high-level agency officials, and submitted his resignation Wednesday, one day after Trump's remarks. Jeremy Greenberg heads the agency's Operations Division and National Response Coordination Center, where he is largely responsible for coordinating mission assignments and managing personnel and resources that deploy during disasters. His departure is another blow to FEMA less than two weeks into hurricane season, given the ongoing brain drain and confusion within the agency. The agency has entered hurricane season understaffed and underprepared, after months of turmoil, plummeting morale and workforce reductions. At least 10% of its total staff have left since January, including a large swath of its senior leadership, and the agency is projected to lose close to 30% of its workforce by the end of the year, shrinking FEMA from about 26,000 workers to roughly 18,000. Plans to eliminate FEMA have baffled federal and state emergency managers, who doubt localized efforts could replace the agency's robust infrastructure for disaster response. Most states, they said, do not have the budget or personnel to handle catastrophic disasters on their own, even if the federal government provides a financial backstop in the most dire situations. "This is a complete misunderstanding of the role of the federal government in emergency management and disaster response and recovery, and it's an abdication of that role when a state is overwhelmed," a longtime FEMA leader told CNN. "It is clear from the president's remarks that their plan is to limp through hurricane season and then dismantle the agency." In a last-minute push to bolster hurricane preparedness, Noem reopened several FEMA training facilities and lengthened contract extensions for thousands of staffers who deploy during disasters. Photo: FREDERIC J. BROWN The agency's influence is already shrinking in this administration. Last month, Noem appointed David Richardson - a former marine combat veteran and martial-arts instructor with no prior experience managing natural disasters - to lead FEMA. Richardson, who came from the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction office at DHS, has since brought in more than a half-dozen homeland security officials to help him run the agency, relegating more seasoned staff to lesser roles. Until recently, Richardson had said his team was preparing an updated disaster plan for this hurricane season. But last week, CNN previously reported, Richardson told FEMA staff that the plan will not be released, saying the agency does not want to get ahead of Trump's FEMA Review Council and that the agency will attempt to operate as it did in 2024. Meanwhile, communication and coordination between the White House and FEMA also appear to be breaking down. In several recent cases, the president approved disaster declarations, but it took days for FEMA - which is tasked with actually delivering that financial aid - to find out, delaying funds to hard-hit communities. Trump's exact long-term plans for the federal government's role in disaster response remain unclear, but the administration is already discussing ways to make it far more difficult to qualify for federal aid. "The FEMA thing has not been a very successful experiment," Trump said Tuesday. "It's extremely expensive, and again, when you have a tornado or a hurricane or you have a problem of any kind in a state, that's what you have governors for. They're supposed to fix those problems." - CNN
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
US begins uneasy World Cup countdown as Trump moves Marines to Los Angeles
The SoFi stadium in Los Angeles, the city's Fifa 2026 World Cup venue. Photo: AFP / Daniel Slim US cities hosting next year's Fifa World Cup faced questions about how to reassure international fans concerned by President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and travel ban as the year-to-go countdown began. The United States, along with Canada and Mexico, is set to co-host the finals, which will feature 48 teams and a record 104 matches in a tournament that Fifa boss Gianni Infantino said would usher in a new generation of soccer fans. Celebrities and soccer stars were due to walk the red carpet at the Fox Studio Lot in Los Angeles - one of the host cities - for the year-to-go event there, a day after President Trump deployed Marines and the National Guard to quell protests. California Governor Gavin Newsom described the deployment as an "unmistakable step toward authoritarianism," while Trump officials defended it and branded the protests as lawless, blaming local and state Democrats for permitting upheaval. Los Angeles is one of several host cities marking the year-to-go occasion. New York-New Jersey held a waterside party on Wednesday, where local officials and fans celebrated against the backdrop of Ellis Island. President Donald Trump has deployed Marines and the National Guard to quell protests in Los Angeles. Photo: SAUL LOEB / AFP Asked about comments Vice President JD Vance made last month warning World Cup travellers not to overstay their welcome, New York-New Jersey host Committee CEO Alex Lasry said: "Our goal is to make sure everyone who comes to New York-New Jersey has an incredible time." "Something that you have to kind of know, when you're putting on mega sporting events ... is the world is still going on. The world doesn't stop for these sporting events," said Lasry. "And you kind of have to go with the flow and make sure that you're able to adapt." Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, said Fifa needed to work with the U.S. government to ensure the rights of competitors, support staff, fans and media were protected regardless of their identities or views. "Fifa should publicly acknowledge the threat US immigration and other anti-human rights policies pose to the tournamentG��s integrity ... (and) should establish clear benchmarks and timelines for the US policy changes needed to ensure respect for immigrants' rights during the 2026 World Cup and beyond," she said. US Democratic leaders raised concerns over a national crisis on Tuesday as Trump moved U.S. Marines into Los Angeles to tackle civilian protests over his immigration policies. "There are certainly things that are happening at the national level, the international level, there are going to be geopolitical issues that we don't even know right now that are going to affect the tournament," Meg Kane, a host city executive for Philadelphia told reporters at a Paley Center event on Monday. "So we recognise that we're planning within uncertainty." Fifa did not immediately respond to a request for comment. FIFA president Gianni Infantino. Photo: © Copyright Photosport Ltd 2023 Fifa President Gianni Infantino said last month after meeting Trump that he was confident the world would be welcomed in for the 2026 World Cup and this year's Club World Cup, which runs from June 14 to July 13. But the task of reassuring international fans was complicated by a travel ban that went into effect on Monday, cracking down on what Trump called "foreign terrorists". Of the 12 countries facing travel bans, Iran is the only one that has qualified for the 2026 tournament so far. Tehran said on Saturday that the ban showed "deep hostility" toward Iranians and Muslims. European fans, supporter groups and former players contacted by Reuters said it was too early for anyone to be thinking about revising schedules or reevaluating plans for attending the World Cup. Alina Hudak, the Miami host committee president and CEO, told Reuters she had been in touch with the local consular corps to address their concerns and to offer support. "My responsibility is to make sure that we're ready, that we're safe, that we're coordinating logistically with all of our law enforcement agencies, that we've done everything we can to ensure that our mass transit system is ready and can handle the volume," said Hudak. "And so for me, you know, what's happening outside of that is something that we're monitoring, but not something that, quite frankly, I have an impact (on)." - Reuters
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Can California leave the United States? What you need to know about secession
Could California leave the United States? It's complicated. Photo: Unsplash Explainer - One of last year's big movies was Civil War , a gritty look at an America torn apart by conflict into separate territories. Fiction, right? But talk of seceding from the rest of the country is a very real hot topic in certain parts of California during the second presidential term of Donald Trump. When Trump ordered the National Guard and US Marines into Los Angeles to tackle protests over his administration's immigration crackdown , that talk became a roar in some circles. Some people said it was time for California - a frequently left-leaning, progressive state where Trump got only 38 percent of the vote in last year's election - to leave the United States of America entirely. But could California actually leave the US, which it's been part of for 175 years? Here's what you need to know about secession. The National Guard was called in by President Trump over Los Angeles protests. Photo: AFP / SPENCER PLATT Republican Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, have clashed for some time, but recent protests in Los Angeles over Trump's aggressive efforts to deport migrants have taken it to a new level . Trump ordered in the National Guard to quell protests - a task that is usually the responsibility of governors and has resulted in a lawsuit by Newsom and California against Trump's administration. Trump then upped the ante more by also deploying US Marines . He also appeared to endorse the unprecedented idea of having Newsom arrested if he defied Trump's orders. The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward… Since his inauguration in January for a second term as President, Trump has broadly expanded presidential powers and cracked down on dissent. Last week, CNN reported that Trump has looked at cancelling much of California's federal funding. However, Trump may be the President, but Newsom is still the twice-elected leader of America's most populated state with nearly 40 million people. California has economic muscle on its side. It's the fifth largest economy in the world with a GDP of nearly US$3.9 trillion as of 2023 - larger than India, the United Kingdom and France. If California did split away - and that's a very big if - it would instantly become one of the world's economic superpowers. Anger against Trump's immigration policies has fuelled protests. Photo: ROBYN BECK "No, the US Constitution does not provide for a state to peacefully secede," University of Otago international relations professor Robert Patman said. Still, clashes between the federal government and the rights of states have been a thread all through American history. The last - and only - time secession happened, there was a bloody Civil War. In the climax of a long-brewing conflict over the existence of legalised slavery of Black Americans, 11 states seceded from the rest of the country. The four-year struggle from 1861 to 1865 left nearly 700,000 Americans dead and remains the single deadliest war in the nation's history. There have always been secession and split movements brewing in parts of the United States. None of them have actually gotten very far. For instance, in California, for years there's been scattered talk of splitting the rural far north of the state and parts of southern Oregon into a new "State of Jefferson." In the heightened environment of the Trump years, talk of dividing up the country by political factions has grown louder. "Growing political polarisation between 'blue' and 'red' states in the US poses a significant threat to its stability and democratic institutions," Patman said. "The conditions that led to an attempted insurrection on 6 January 2021 in the US have not yet moderated and so further outbreaks of instability cannot be ruled out." Georgia Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene called in 2023 for a "national divorce" between so-called red (Republican-leaning) and blue (Democrat) states. A 2021 poll by the University of Virginia Center for Politics found 52 percent of Trump voters and 41 percent of Biden voters at least somewhat agreed that they favoured blue and red states seceding from the union to form their own separate country. And in January, a poll conducted by YouGov for the pro-secession group the Independent California Institute found that 61 percent of Californians polled said California would be better off if it peacefully seceded. The American Civil War of 1861-1865 left at least 700,000 Americans dead. Photo: Bridgeman Images via AFP Pretty slim. California's own state constitution clearly says in Article III, Section 1 that "The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land." Meanwhile, the US Constitution has no mechanisms within it to allow secession at all. Back in 1869, shortly after the US Civil War, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Texas V. White that states do not actually have the right to unilaterally secede and that the union was "perpetual": "There was no place for reconsideration or revocation, except through revolution or through consent of the States." That precedent has pretty much remained ever since. Some say that could mean that all states might have to concede to one state's secession, or the Constitution itself would need to be amended, a long and complicated process. The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in a letter in 2010 , "If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede." It's theoretically possible a state could just declare itself independent and devil take the consequences, but again, last time that happened hundreds of thousands died in civil war. "The possibility of a second US Civil War is a serious concern, with surveys showing a significant number of Americans worrying about such a prospect," Patman said, noting that while the issues are quite different from the 1860s, many factors are fuelling division. "These include the rise of far-right extremism, growing economic inequality, cultural conflicts, and the divisive impact of the social media." California's flag has carried a 'Republic' tag since the state joined the union in 1850. Photo: Unsplash A movement called "CalExit" is hoping to put a measure on the ballot for California to vote on in November 2028 which would ask, "Should California leave the United States and become a free and independent country? CalExit organiser Marcus Ruiz Evans has been trying to get secession on the table for years. "Californians are aware they just don't think like Americans," he told RNZ's Saturday Morning in an interview in 2018 during Trump's first term. "You know, the average American is not sure if climate change is real, questions if immigration is a good idea, wants to have massive amounts of guns and hates any regulations against them and is generally distrustful of government." Organisers would need to get 546,000 signatures to put Ruiz Evans' latest measure on the ballot . To pass, 50 percent of registered voters must participate in the election and at least 55 percent of them would then have to say yes. That doesn't mean that CalExit then becomes a thing. Instead organisers say "it would constitute 'a vote of no confidence in the United States of America' and 'expression of the will of the people of California' to become an independent country, but would not change California's current government or relationship with the United States". If the ballot measure is approved, a 20-member commission would then evaluate the feasibility of California becoming an independent nation. However, there would be a long road to any actual change, and the courts might well put a stop to it. "Even if this [ballot measure] passes, there's virtually no way it can result in California leaving the union," David A. Carrillo, director of the California Constitution Center at UC Berkeley Law School, told ABC News 10 . And civil war? That's not really likely either when the world is far more interconnected than it was in the 1860s. "Any internal conflict in the US would generate global shockwaves and thus there would be much greater international resistance and perhaps intervention to prevent another civil war occurring," Patman said. But still, secession talk isn't likely to go away anytime soon with America's politics seemingly stuck at a perpetual boiling point. "We think we've gotten to the point where it doesn't work," Ruiz Evans told CBS News recently. "There are people out there who will respond to California as a nation." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
