logo
Trump threatens to restrict stadium deal with Washington Commanders if they don't change name back to ‘Redskins'

Trump threatens to restrict stadium deal with Washington Commanders if they don't change name back to ‘Redskins'

RNZ News5 days ago
By
Kit Maher
, CNN
Washington Commanders runs off the field after being sacked on a fourth down while playing the Philadelphia Eagles during the fourth quarter in the NFC Championship Game.
Photo:
EMILEE CHINN
President Donald Trump has escalated his call for the Washington Commanders to change their name back to the "Redskins", threatening to restrict the NFL team's stadium deal if they don't, though it's unclear how he would be able to.
"I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins', and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders', I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
The organisation left Washington for Landover, Maryland, in 1997, but DC Mayor Muriel Bowser and the team announced a deal in April to bring the Commanders back to the district at the site of the old Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium. Trump touted the deal at the time, but the proposal is stalled before the DC Council.
Speaking to reporters last week, Bowser urged the DC Council to "make moves" on the deal, adding that "the Commanders are anxious" about it.
Trump expressed openness earlier this month to helping out if the DC Council does not approve the deal.
"It's a great piece of property, so we'll see. But if I can help them out, I would. …The federal government ultimately controls it," Trump said.
In late 2024, lawmakers in Congress passed a bill to transfer ownership of the RFK site from the federal government to the district's government.
"The owner is very, very successful and a very good man," Trump continued.
"It would be a great place for the NFL to be there, I can tell you that."
A bust of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stands outside RFK Stadium, defunct and currently under demolition, in Washington, DC.
Photo:
BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI
Earlier on Sunday (US Time), the president initially referred to the football team as the "Washington 'Whatever's'" and urged the owners to "IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team."
CNN has reached out to the Commanders and the DC mayor's office for comment on Trump's posts.
Trump's comments went further than ones he made earlier this month, when he told reporters the Commanders' name should be changed back to the Redskins, something he acknowledged was a "controversial statement."
"It doesn't have the same ring to me," he said.
"But, you know, winning can make everything sound good. So, if they win, all of a sudden, the Commanders sounds good, but I wouldn't have changed it."
The Commanders aren't the only team moniker Trump wants reverted.
Donald Trump told reporters the Commanders' name should be changed back to the Redskins, something he acknowledged was a "controversial statement".
Photo:
Bonnie Cash/UPI/Bloomberg/Getty Images via CNN Newsource
Trump also put the pressure on the Cleveland Guardians to change their name back to the "Indians", claiming that the "Indian people" want the Guardians to be the "Indians" yet again.
The names were changed as part of a larger cultural shift as corporate brands re-examined their use of racist caricatures and stereotypical names, but Trump argued on Sunday that "times are different now".
"Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them," Trump said.
"Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!"
And in a later post on Sunday, Trump claimed Matt Dolan, a former Ohio state lawmaker whose family owns the Guardians, "has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change. What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election."
"Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!" Trump added, a riff on his "Make America Great Again," or MAGA, slogan.
CNN has reached out to the Cleveland Guardians for comment.
The Washington football team dropped the "Redskins" name in 2020 after decades of criticism from Native American groups that said it was an ethnic slur and a derogatory reference to skin colour. Two years later it unveiled the "Commanders" name.
The Cleveland baseball team announced its name change in 2021, after similar criticism from Native Americans over the "Indians" moniker.
- CNN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade on agenda as Trump lands in Scotland for diplomacy and golf
Trade on agenda as Trump lands in Scotland for diplomacy and golf

NZ Herald

time5 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Trade on agenda as Trump lands in Scotland for diplomacy and golf

Trump is also due to meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer during the trip. US President Donald Trump boards Air Force One bound for Scotland. Photo / Getty Images He said the meeting would be 'more of a celebration than a workout', appearing to row back on previous comments that a bilateral trade deal struck in May needed 'fine tuning'. 'The deal is concluded,' he told reporters on the tarmac at Prestwick. But the unpredictable American leader appeared unwilling to cede to a UK request for reduced steel and aluminium tariffs. Trump has exempted British exports from blanket 50% tariffs on both metals, but the fate of that carve-out remains unclear. 'If I do it for one, I have to do it for all,' Trump said in Washington before embarking on his flight, when asked if he had any 'wiggle room' for the UK on the issue. The international outcry over the conflict in Gaza may also be on the agenda, as Starmer faces growing pressure to follow French President Emmanuel Macron and announce that Britain will also recognise a Palestinian state. Protests Trump is due to return to the UK in September for a state visit – his second – at the invitation of King Charles III, which promises to be lavish. During a 2023 visit, Trump said he felt at home in Scotland, where his mother Mary Anne MacLeod grew up on the remote Isle of Lewis before emigrating to the United States at age 18. 'He's original, he does things the way he wants to. I think a lot of our politicians could take a good leaf out of his book,' 45-year-old Trump fan Lisa Hart told AFP as she waited to see his plane touch down. But the affection between Trump and Scotland is not always mutual. In this photo from February 2000, Donald Trump (left) – a real estate developer at the time – and his future wife, former model Melania Knauss, financier Jeffrey Epstein (now deceased) and Ghislaine Maxwell pose at the Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida. Epstein and Maxwell were in later years convicted of sex trafficking offences. Photo / Getty Images Residents, environmentalists and elected officials have voiced discontent over the Trump family's construction of a new golf course, which he is expected to open before he departs the UK on Tuesday. Police Scotland, which is bracing for mass protests in Edinburgh and Aberdeen as well as close to Trump's golf courses, have said there will be a 'significant operation across the country over many days'. Scottish First Minister John Swinney, who will also meet Trump during the visit, said the nation 'shares a strong friendship with the United States that goes back centuries'. Trump has also stepped into the sensitive debate in the UK about green energy and reaching net zero, with Aberdeen being the heart of Scotland's oil industry. In May, he wrote on his Truth Social platform that the UK should 'stop with the costly and unsightly windmills' as he urged incentivising drilling for oil in the North Sea. US discontent The trip to Scotland puts physical distance between Trump and the latest twists in the case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the wealthy financier accused of sex trafficking who died in prison in 2019 before facing trial. In his heyday, Epstein was friends with Trump and others in the New York jet-set, but the President is now facing backlash from his own Maga supporters who demand access to the Epstein case files. Many support a conspiracy theory under which 'deep state' elites protected rich and famous people who took part in an Epstein sex ring. But Trump is urging his supporters to move on from the case. The Wall Street Journal, which published an article detailing longstanding links between Trump and the sex offender, is being punished by the White House. Its reporting team plan to travel to Scotland on their own and join the White House press pool but it has now been denied a seat on Air Force One for the flight home. While Trump's family has undertaken many development projects worldwide, the President no longer legally controls the family holdings. However, opponents and watchdog groups have accused him of having many conflicts of interest and using his position as US President to promote private family investments, especially abroad. – Agence France-Presse

Disgraced US ex-congressman George Santos reports to prison
Disgraced US ex-congressman George Santos reports to prison

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Disgraced US ex-congressman George Santos reports to prison

Former US Congressman George Santos arriving for a court hearing at a US district court in Long Island on 19 August, 2024. Photo: AFP/ Getty - Michael M Santiago Disgraced former Republican lawmaker George Santos, who was expelled from the US Congress for using stolen donor cash to bankroll a lavish lifestyle, reported to prison to start his seven-year sentence, authorities said. Santos, 37, had pleaded guilty to wire fraud and identity theft for his elaborate grifting while a lawmaker representing New York. He turned himself in on Friday (US time) at the federal prison in Fairton, New Jersey, the Bureau of Prisons told AFP. Despite his guilty plea, prosecutors insisted Santos's social media showed his claims of remorse "ring hollow" and Judge Joanna Seybert in April handed down a sentence of seven years and three months. The downfall of the congressman from Long Island came after it was revealed he had fabricated almost his entire backstory including his education, religion and work history. Santos was elected to the US House of Representatives in 2022 and indicted the following year for stealing campaign donors' identities and using their credit cards, among other charges. Santos used the stolen funds for Botox treatments and the OnlyFans porn website, as well as luxury Italian goods and vacations to the Hamptons and Las Vegas, according to an investigation by a congressional ethics committee. Santos's bizarre biographical fabrications included claiming to have worked for Goldman Sachs, being Jewish and having been a college volleyball star. He was ultimately doomed by the congressional probe that found overwhelming evidence of misconduct and accused him of seeking to "fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy". Santos was expelled from the House in 2023, becoming only the third person to be ejected as a US lawmaker since the Civil War, a rebuke previously reserved for traitors and convicted criminals. - AFP

Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse
Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse

By Aaron Blake , CNN Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Photo: AFP / US District Court for the southern district of New York Analysis : Interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell is the Trump administration's first big move to allay concerns about its hugely unpopular handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday (US time) wrapped up two days of interviews with Epstein's convicted associate . But there were already all kinds of reasons to be sceptical of this move and what it could produce, given the motivations of the two sides involved. And President Donald Trump epitomised all of them in a major way on Friday. While taking questions on his way to Scotland, Trump repeatedly held open the possibility of pardoning Maxwell for her crimes. "Well, I don't want to talk about that," Trump said initially. When pressed, he said, "It's something I haven't thought about," while conspicuously adding, "I'm allowed to do it." US President Donald Trump disembarks from Air Force One upon his arrival at Prestwick Airport, south of Glasgow on July 25, 2025, on the first day of his UK visit. Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski This wouldn't be the first time Trump has appeared to dangle a pardon over someone providing evidence that could impact him personally and politically. (In this case, he has demonstrated past personal ties to Epstein, and his administration is scrambling to clean up its botched handling of the Epstein files after previously promising to release them.) A similar situation played out during the Russia investigation, when Trump repeatedly left open the possibility of pardoning key witnesses like Paul Manafort , Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen. Critics alleged this amounted to obstruction of justice. Special counsel Robert Mueller's report didn't draw conclusions on possible obstruction, but it did cite Trump's pardon comments as "evidence" that Trump's actions "had the potential to influence Manafort's decision whether to cooperate with the government". Manafort indeed wound up being a decidedly uncooperative witness, with a bipartisan Senate report saying his repeated lies hamstrung its own investigation. And Trump later pardoned him in a move that could certainly be understood as a reward for his lack of cooperation. That bit of history looms large here, given the parallels. But Trump is really just exacerbating an already dubious situation. There were already plenty of reasons to be sceptical of this move to interview Maxwell, and nobody involved seems particularly bothered to address those problems or even combat the perception of them. Ghislaine Maxwell pictured in September 2013 in New York City. Photo: AFP / Getty Images The first reason is the state of play in Maxwell's criminal case. It might seem far-fetched that Trump would ever pardon a convicted child sex-trafficker like Maxwell (even though he did "wish her well" after she was charged). But there are other things his administration could do to help her. Among them would be taking actions in her ongoing appeal of her 2021 conviction. The Trump Justice Department has already taken highly suspect actions in another criminal case involving someone Trump wanted something politically from: New York mayor Eric Adams. The administration earlier this year moved to dismiss the charges against Adams while suggestively citing its desire for the New York Democrat to assist in its crackdown on illegal immigration. Multiple prosecutors resigned in protest, with one claiming it was a "quid pro quo" in her resignation letter. And the judge in the case appeared to sympathise. "Everything here smacks of a bargain: Dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions," the judge said. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, has also been remarkably solicitous of Trump and the administration. Last week he called Trump the "ultimate dealmaker" while claiming that the Justice Department had violated a deal with Maxwell. This week, he praised the Trump administration's "commitment to uncovering the truth in this case" and said he and Maxwell were "grateful that the government is trying to uncover the truth". Markus on Friday also suggested an openness to a pardon. "The president this morning said he had the power to do so," Markus said, "and we hope he exercises that power in a right and just way." Indeed, also relevant here are the lawyers involved. Critics have cried foul that the DOJ official interviewing Maxwell was Blanche, rather than a non-political prosecutor who has been involved in the case who would have much more expertise. Not only is Blanche a top political appointee of Trump's; he's also his formal personal lawyer. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Photo: AFP/ Getty - Kevin Dietsch "The conflict of interest is glaring," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said on Thursday on X. "It stinks of high corruption." What's more, Blanche appeared on a podcast last year with Markus and labelled him a "friend." "You are by far the best out there," Blanche said. But one of the biggest reasons to be sceptical is that Maxwell is someone the Trump Justice Department - the first one, at least - labelled a brazen liar. Back in 2020, the DOJ charged Maxwell with two counts of perjury - on top of the more serious charges she faced - while citing a 2016 civil deposition she gave. In the deposition, Maxwell claimed no knowledge of Epstein's "scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages", despite later being convicted of helping in the effort. She also claimed she didn't know about Epstein possessing sex toys, which was contradicted by witnesses at her trial. Maxwell's lawyers at the time said "the questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed". She was never actually tried for perjury. After her conviction on the more serious charges, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the perjury charges if her conviction stood, citing a desire to avoid further emotional trauma for the victims. But the Trump Justice Department in 2020 still called her credibility into question. In a 2020 filing, it said Maxwell's lies "should give the Court serious pause" about trusting her. It also said Maxwell's "willingness to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct … strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes". All of that would seem relevant to today, especially given Trump's demonstrated willingness to wield his power to help people who help him - whether using pardons or anything else. Maxwell, who has years left in her 20-year prison sentence, clearly has motivation to say things Trump wants. That doesn't mean the interviews of Maxwell couldn't glean something important. Even witnesses with credibility problems can provide important information, if it's corroborated with other evidence. But right now, Trump and Co aren't trying very hard to make this situation look kosher. And Trump's pardon comments take that to another level. -CNN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store