logo
Trump and Starmer call trade deal 'historic,' but questions remain

Trump and Starmer call trade deal 'historic,' but questions remain

Yahoo08-05-2025
A trade deal with the United Kingdom announced by the White House on Thursday marked the first of its kind since President Trump launched sweeping global tariffs last month, offering a glimpse into the Trump administration's negotiating strategy as it seeks to reset terms with trading partners around the world.
The agreement, hailed by Trump and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer as 'historic,' kept the U.S. baseline tariff rate on U.K. imports at 10%, while eliminating duties on British aluminum and steel and significantly lowering tariffs on a limited number of U.K. car exports.
In exchange, the White House said that London had agreed to lower barriers on U.S. farmers and ranchers seeking access to the U.K. market for exports such as ethanol and beef, and to increase access for U.S. aerospace companies to crucial British-made components.
Although the White House called the agreement a 'milestone' in its trade policy, U.S. officials also described the deal as merely the 'end of the beginning' of talks to come over their trade relationship. And the British media described the agreement as a yearlong, temporary understanding that required further rounds of negotiations if it's going to last.
Read more: Mattel considers price hikes in response to tariffs after Trump says kids don't need a lot of dolls
Starmer, describing the announcement as the 'basis' of a deal, said he intended to continue negotiating with the administration to bring down its 10% baseline rate. 'We would like to go further,' he said from a manufacturing plant in the West Midlands.
'But please do not underestimate the significance of the tariff reductions today, because these are measured in thousands of good-paying jobs across the country,' Starmer said.
Asked by a reporter whether Britain was better off in its trade relationship with America than it was a year ago, Starmer replied, 'The question you should be asking is, is it better than where we were yesterday?'
The Dow Jones industrial average jumped 500 points on news of the deal, as Wall Street investors look for signs of progress in trade negotiations more than five weeks since Trump announced tariff increases on global trading partners, 'friend and foe alike.'
But economists questioned the value of the announcement.
"This looks like a deal that was largely done for show," said Dean Baker, co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research and one of the first economists to identify the 2008 housing bubble. "There already were very few trade barriers to U.S. exports to the U.K., and this really doesn't change that picture in any meaningful way."
Baker noted that U.K. exports still would face higher taxes than they had before Trump started imposing tariffs. "It will reduce our demand somewhat, but the ultimate impact on volume will depend on what other tariffs remain in place," he said. "In any case, the higher tax on imports from the U.K. amounts to a tax increase of around $6 billion a year on U.S. businesses and consumers."
Of the largest U.S. trading partners, the United Kingdom stands out as having a trade deficit with the United States. The agreement will mean more to the British economy than it will to U.S. households. Although the U.K. accounts for roughly 3% of U.S. trade, the United States is Britain's largest trading partner, followed by the European Union.
"It is good news, but it is not clear how much of a precedent it will be for trade deals," said Kenneth Rogoff, a prominent economist and professor at Harvard. Since the United Kingdom left the European Union in "Brexit," he said, "the U.K. was desperate for a trade deal with the U.S."
And "the deal looks to be the product of years of negotiations that began long before 'Liberation Day,'" he added, referencing Trump's April 2 global tariffs announcement.
Americans buy exponentially more goods from the United States' three biggest trading partners — Canada, Mexico and China — than from Britain, and there are few signs that U.S. talks with those three countries are closing in on trade deals.
And with goods from China still facing tariffs of 145%, U.S. importers and retailers are warning that price increases for American consumers will become visible within a matter of days.
From the White House, where he phoned Starmer to announce the deal to the media, Trump described the U.S.-U.K. agreement as 'a great deal for both parties.'
Read more: Letters to the Editor: Hollywood needs incentives, not tariffs, to bring filmmaking back to the U.S.
'It opens up a tremendous market for us, and it works out very well. Very well,' Trump said. 'The deal includes billions of dollars of increased market access for American exports, especially in agriculture, dramatically increasing access for American beef, ethanol, and virtually all of the products produced by our great farmers.'
'It's very conclusive, and it's a great deal, and it's a very big deal, actually,' he added.
Trump underscored the potential for the export of up to $250 million in U.S. agricultural products to a market that had long been restricted for U.S. goods. But Starmer said that the U.K. government had drawn 'red lines on standards' with regard to agricultural imports, raising questions over what exact products would be eligible.
Starmer said he hoped that the Trump administration would lower barriers on British pharmaceutical products in future talks, and also said the two governments already were discussing Trump's proposed tariffs on foreign film production.
'There aren't any tariffs in place on film at the moment,' Starmer said of the potential film tariffs, 'and of course, we're discussing it with the president's team.'
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's time to save the whales again
It's time to save the whales again

Los Angeles Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

It's time to save the whales again

Diving in a kelp forest in Monterey Bay recently, I watched a tubby 200-pound harbor seal follow a fellow diver, nibbling on his flippers. The diver, a graduate student, was using sponges to collect DNA samples from the ocean floor. Curious seals, he told me, can be a nuisance. When he bags his sponges and places them in his collection net, they sometimes bite into them, puncturing the bags and spoiling his samples. Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, coming closer than 50 yards to seals and dolphins is considered harassment, but they're free to harass you, which seems only fair given the centuries of deadly whaling and seal hunting that preceded a generational shift in how we view the world around us. The shift took hold in 1969, the year a massive oil spill coated the Santa Barbara coastline and the Cuyahoga River, in Cleveland, caught fire. Those two events helped spark the first Earth Day, in 1970, and the shutdown of America's last whaling station in 1971. Protecting the environment from pollution and from loss of wilderness and wildlife quickly moved from a protest issue to a societal ethic as America's keystone environmental legislation was passed at around the same time, written by a Democratic Congress and signed into law by a Republican president, Richard Nixon. Those laws include the National Environmental Policy Act (1969) , the Clean Air Act (1970), the Clean Water Act (1972) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (1972), which goes further than the Endangered Species Act (1973) in protecting all marine mammals, not just threatened ones, from harassment, killing or capture by U.S. citizens in U.S. waters and on the high seas. All these 'green' laws and more are under attack by the Trump administration, its congressional minions and longtime corporate opponents of environmental protections, including the oil and gas industry. Republicans' disingenuous argument for weakening the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act is that the legislation has worked so well in rebuilding wildlife populations that it's time to loosen regulations for a better balance between nature and human enterprise. When it comes to marine mammal populations, that premise is wrong. On July 22, at a House Natural Resources subcommittee meeting, Republican Rep. Nick Begich of Alaska introduced draft legislation that would scale back the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Among other things, his proposal would limit the ability of the federal government to take action against 'incidental take,' the killing of whales, dolphins and seals by sonic blasts from oil exploration, ship and boat strikes or by drowning as accidental catch (also known as bycatch) in fishing gear. Begich complained that marine mammal protections interfere with 'essential projects like energy development, port construction, and even fishery operations.' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael), the ranking member on the House Resources Committee, calls the legislation a 'death sentence' for marine mammals. It's true that the marine mammal law has been a success in many ways. Since its passage, no marine mammal has gone extinct and some species have recovered dramatically. The number of northern elephant seals migrating to California beaches to mate and molt grew from 10,000 in 1972 to about 125,000 today. There were an estimated 11,000 gray whales off the West Coast when the Marine Mammal Protection Act became law; by 2016, the population peaked at 27,000. But not all species have thrived. Historically there were about 20,000 North Atlantic right whales off the Eastern Seaboard. They got their name because they were the 'right' whales to harpoon — their bodies floated for easy recovery after they were killed. In 1972 they were down to an estimated 350 individuals. After more than half a century of federal legal protection, the population is estimated at 370. They continue to suffer high mortality rates from ship strikes, entanglement in fishing gear and other causes, including noise pollution and greater difficulty finding prey in warming seas. Off Florida, a combination of boat strikes and algal pollution threaten some 8,000-10,000 manatees. The population's recovery (from about 1,000 in 1979) has been significant enough to move them off the endangered species list in 2017, but since the beginning of this year alone, nearly 500 have died. Scientists would like to see them relisted, but at least they're still covered by the Marine Mammal Protection Act. A 2022 study in the Gulf of Mexico found that in areas affected by the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill 12 years earlier, the dolphin population had declined 45% and that it might take 35 years to recover. In the Arctic Ocean off Alaska, loss of sea ice is threatening polar bears (they're considered marine mammals), bowhead and beluga whales, walruses, ringed seals and harp seals. On the West Coast the number of gray whales — a Marine Mammal Act success story and now a cautionary tale — has crashed by more than half in the last decade to fewer than 13,000, according to a recent report by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, the nation's lead ocean agency, is an endangered species in its own right in the Trump era). Declining prey, including tiny shrimp-like amphipods, in the whales' summer feeding grounds in the Arctic probably caused by warming water are thought to be a major contributor to their starvation deaths and reduced birth rates. The whale's diving numbers are just one signal that climate change alone makes maintaining the Marine Mammal Act urgent. Widespread marine heat waves linked to a warming ocean are contributing to the loss of kelp forests that sea otters and other marine mammals depend on. Algal blooms off California, and for the first time ever, Alaska, supercharged by warmer waters and nutrient pollution, are leading to the deaths of thousands of dolphins and sea lions. What the Trump administration and its antiregulation, anti-environmental-protection supporters fail to recognize is that the loss of marine mammals is an indicator for the declining health of our oceans and the natural world we depend on and are a part of. This time, saving the whales will be about saving ourselves. David Helvarg is executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean policy group. His next book, 'Forest of the Sea: The Remarkable Life and Imperiled Future of Kelp,' is scheduled to be published in 2026.

After Trump greets Putin with red carpet treatment, Ukrainians feel betrayed
After Trump greets Putin with red carpet treatment, Ukrainians feel betrayed

Los Angeles Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

After Trump greets Putin with red carpet treatment, Ukrainians feel betrayed

KYIV, Ukraine — In Kyiv, Ukrainians living under near daily Russian bombardment watched with astonishment as their country's most important ally rolled out a red carpet in Alaska for the man they blame for more than three years of war, bloodshed and loss. Natalya Lypei, 66, a Kyiv resident, was taken aback: The images flashing on her phone screen showed President Trump greeting Vladimir Putin warmly and clapping as the Russian leader approached him, after having been escorted into the country by four American fighter jets. Trump also ignored the arrest warrant issued for Putin by the International Criminal Court that has kept him mostly confined at home or in nations that are strong allies of Moscow. 'How can you welcome a tyrant like that?' she asked, echoing the views of many Kyiv residents. The red carpet treatment, the lack of concrete decisions for Ukraine and, most significant, neglecting the significance of sanctions — a policy that could turn the tide in Kyiv's favor — have felt like a betrayal for Ukrainians who have borne enormous suffering in the almost 3½ years since Russia's full-scale invasion. Tens of thousands of Ukrainian service members have been killed or wounded, thousands of civilians have been killed in Russian strikes, and a fifth of the country is under occupation, severing families, properties and Ukraine's territorial integrity. On Ukrainian social media, memes of Putin and Trump walking down a red carpet strewn with dead Ukrainian bodies were widely shared. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had anticipated that the meeting would be a boon for Putin and that there would be little in the way of results. Speaking to reporters in the days leading up to the summit, he said it would end up being a public relations victory for the Russian leader. Above all else, he said, Putin was seeking a photo on American soil — which he got in Friday's meeting. It was the first time in a decade that Putin had stepped foot in the U.S., ending international isolation spurred by the 2022 Ukraine invasion; in other words, it was a win. For Lypei, whose serviceman son was killed last year, it was like attending another funeral, a fresh loss. This time, she said, her country's hopes for a just peace. 'It hurts me a lot that my child died in a full-scale war, and today we saw a new funeral,' she said. Her 34-year-old son fought with Ukraine's 79th Brigade and was killed in the Donetsk region, one of the areas Putin wants Ukraine to cede to Russia as a condition for a truce. 'I do not wish anyone that sorrow, that sadness, those tears,' she said. Natalya Cucil, 60, another Kyiv resident, said she was surprised that Trump did not produce any results from the meeting, despite his stated efforts to end the war. 'There are no results and we don't know if there will be, although we always expect something and hope for it,' she said. Pensioner Anatolii Kovalenko, 72, said no matter what was discussed between the two leaders, it is clear his country's adversary has won in the sphere of public relations. 'Putin won this meeting 100%,' he said. Kullab and Babenko write for the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store