
Delta and United airlines face class action suits for selling window seats
The proposed class action lawsuits, filed in federal courts Tuesday seek millions of dollars in damages for over one million customers who rode on each airline.
While some Boeing 737, Boeing 757 and Airbus A321 planes have rows entirely without windows due to air conditioning ducts or other systems — Delta and United do not flag this to customers purchasing 'window seats,' the complaint claims.
United and Delta charge hundreds of dollars for such seats and make no mention that they are without windows. Meanwhile, their competitors, American and Alaska Airlines, inform their customers that these types of seats do not have a window while booking, Reuters reported.
The lawsuit notes that passengers often buy window seats for specific reasons, including for extra light or legroom, to occupy children or to calm traveling anxieties.
United and Delta did not immediately return requests for comment from The Independent.
'A large proportion of airline travelers prefer window seats, and are willing to pay extra money to obtain them. For many, it is a special experience to see the world from 30,000 feet, or to watch a descent into LaGuardia,' each lawsuit states, according to The Hill.
'Windows can captivate or distract an antsy child. Many people have a fear of flying, or get claustrophobic or motion sick on planes, and windows give them a greater level of comfort in an otherwise stressful environment,' they continue. 'Others just want a burst of sunlight to brighten their days.'
United and Delta, like many other airlines, offer basic fares that do not include seat selection. Passengers must pay extra to choose their seat, and some windowless rows are in upgraded sections.
Both complaints specifically note that had the plaintiffs known the seats they were purchasing — and paying extra for — were windowless, they wouldn't have selected them.
The Delta lawsuit was filed by Nicholas Meyer of Brooklyn, New York, while the United suit is led by Marc Brenman of San Francisco and Aviva Copaken of Los Angeles.
While customers can do research online to see if their seat is without a window, Carter Greenbaum, a lawyer whose firm filed both lawsuits, told Reuters that doesn't excuse the airlines' bad behavior.
'A company can't misrepresent the nature of the products it sells and then rely on third party reviews to say a customer should have known that it was lying,' Greenbaum said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Mexico to return capital flight slots to US airlines, United says
MEXICO CITY, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Mexican officials informed several U.S. airlines in an August 18 call that slots that had been cut at Mexico City's main airport will be returned to them, United Airlines (UAL.O), opens new tab said in a filing made public on Thursday. Mexico's transportation ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Embarrassing real reason for MSNBC's impending 'MS NOW' rebrand revealed
MSBNC was forced into a rebrand after top bosses at NBC decided they did not want any affiliation with the left-leaning news network, it was revealed. The liberal cable network this week unveiled their rebrand, shifting from MSNBC to MSNOW - a decision which has sparked widespread confusion and mockery. Some critics even noted that the new logo appears to have a 'K' in front, which some viewers could perceive as 'KMS NOW' - an acronym for 'kill myself.' Now, new details of the decision have emerged in Puck Media, alleging that MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler and Mark Lazurus were backed into a corner with no other option but to rebrand. According to the source, executives at NBCU and NBC News had decided they didn't want any affiliation with MSNBC. This comes as MSNBC prepares to split from parent company NBCUniversal. While simultaneously distancing the NBC brand from MSNBC, executives were reportedly happy to continue the CNBC brand, the acronym for the Consumer News and Business Channel. Lazarus and Kutler tried to find the positives in the order, describing the rebrand as 'an opportunity to chart our own path forward.' 'The most important thing to Rebecca was keeping the 'MS' in the name,' a source close to Kutler told the publication. The MS in the brand remaining the same allows viewers who are used to scrolling the channel guide on the television continuity and avoids any brand confusion. MS NOW will first appear on screens in its new stylized form later this year. 'This new branding underscores our mission: to serve as a destination for breaking news and best-in-class opinion journalism, all rooted in accurate and reported facts,' Kutler wrote in an internal memo. 'I know this announcement will be met with questions, and I want to acknowledge that for many of you who have spent years or decades here, it is hard to imagine the network by any other name. 'This was not a decision that was made quickly or without significant debate,' she continued. 'Over the last eight months, we have worked to untether ourselves from NBC News and embrace our independence under Versant. 'We've hired dozens of first-rate reporters and newsroom leaders and have been recruiting for nearly 100 roles across our new and nimble organization. 'We continue to supercharge our non-linear products, achieving rapid success on YouTube, TikTok, audio, digital, live events, and more – all while aggressively developing a direct-to-consumer product.' The new branding will debut as the network enters its 30th year, and as it continues to build up a newsgathering operation entirely independent of NBCU. Rachel Maddow seems poised to stay the network's top star while l ongtime MSNBC host Joy Reid was ousted from the network this year.


Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration not eyeing equity in companies that are increasing US investment, WSJ reports
Aug 21 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is considering taking equity stakes in companies receiving funds from the 2022 CHIPS Act but has no plans to seek shares in bigger semiconductor firms that are increasing their U.S. investments, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing a government official. The development follows comments made by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who on Tuesday said the government is continuing to work on the possibility of taking a 10% stake in troubled chipmaker Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab. However, the administration does not intend to take equity stakes in companies like TSMC ( opens new tab, which are ramping up investment, the official told the Journal. Businesses not increasing their commitments may need to offer equity to the government in exchange for subsidies. "The Commerce Department is not looking to take equity from TSMC and Micron," the official told WSJ. TSMC executives have already had discussions about giving back their subsidies if the administration asks to become a shareholder, according to the report. The White House and TSMC did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. TSMC, which counts Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab as key clients, announced plans for a $100 billion investment in the United States during an event with President Donald Trump at the White House in March. This investment is in addition to $65 billion committed for three manufacturing facilities in the state of Arizona. The U.S. Commerce Department, which oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act, late last year finalized subsidies of $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the United States. Besides Intel, Micron (MU.O), opens new tab, TSMC and Samsung ( opens new tab were among the biggest recipients of CHIPS Act funding. In the past, the U.S. government has taken stakes in companies during periods of economic uncertainty to provide financial support and restore confidence.