Trump tax-cut plan returns to US House, Republicans divided on bill
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The debate within President Donald Trump 's Republican Party over a massive tax-cut and spending bill returns to the House of Representatives on Wednesday, as party leaders try to overcome internal divisions and meet a self-imposed July 4 deadline.The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and substantial cuts to the Medicaid health care program.Similar divides exist in the House, which Republicans control by a 220-212 margin and where a fractious caucus has regularly bucked its leadership in recent years -- though members have so far not rejected major Trump priorities."The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump's full America First agenda by the Fourth of July," House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement on Tuesday, citing the bill's extension of Trump's 2017 individual tax cuts and increased funding for the military and immigration enforcement.House Republican leaders set an initial procedural vote on the bill for 9 a.m. ET (1300 GMT).Some of the loudest Republican objections against it come from party hardliners angry that it does not sufficiently cut spending and a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default on the nation's $36.2 trillion debt."What the Senate did was unconscionable," said Representative Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican, one of several fiscal hawks who spoke out against the Senate bill's higher price tag, accusing the Senate of handing out "goodie bags" of spending to satisfy holdouts.Norman said he would vote against advancing the bill on Wednesday.Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy, while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill."This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters on Tuesday, pledging that his party will use "all procedural and legislative options" to try to stop - or delay - passage.The version of the bill passed by the Senate on Tuesday would add more to the debt than the version first passed by the House in May and also includes more than $900 million in cuts to the Medicaid program for low-income Americans.Those cuts also raised concerns among some House Republicans "I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding our hospitals rely on," Representative David Valadao of California said before Senate passage.Timing difficultiesBut some House Republicans worried about social safety-net cuts could find solace in the Senate's last-minute decision to set aside more money for rural hospitals, funding that Representative Nick Langworthy, a New York Republican, called "a lifeline that will be very helpful to districts like mine."Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, making it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline.Further complicating the timeline, a wave of storms in the Washington area on Tuesday night canceled flights, and some lawmakers from both parties detailed on social media plans to drive from their home districts to the Capitol for Wednesday's expected vote.A senior White House official said on Tuesday that Trump is expected to be "deeply involved" in the whip operation this week.Trump for weeks has pushed for passage ahead of the July 4 Independence Day holiday, though he has also in recent days softened that deadline, describing it as less than critical.Any public opposition to the bill risks irking Trump, as was the case when the president slammed Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who announced his retirement after coming out in opposition to the bill.Another former Trump ally, the world's richest person Elon Musk, this week resumed an active campaign against the bill over social media, blasting its deficit-building effects. That has reignited a feud between Trump and Musk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
24 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's tax cuts vs. healthcare fallout: Will the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' backfire in 2026 midterms?
Donald Trump's signature tax legislation, dubbed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' faces political scrutiny ahead of the 2026 midterms. While Republicans tout its economic benefits, critics argue it favours the wealthy and endangers healthcare for the poor, raising questions about its long-term electoral consequences. read more Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden pushed through the Inflation Reduction Act. Now, Donald Trump is staking his legacy on sweeping tax cuts. Like his predecessors' landmark policies, Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' is both a signature legislative achievement and a potential electoral liability. While initially celebrated within Republican circles, the bill is under growing scrutiny for provisions that critics say could strip health coverage from low-income Americans and unravel years of climate and energy policy progress. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump secured passage of the multitrillion-dollar legislation by rallying Republican lawmakers through a blend of persuasion and pressure tactics. True to his brand-driven approach, he named the bill with characteristic flair and made it a partisan milestone, pushing it through Congress without a single Democratic vote. But its political durability faces a crucial test in the 2026 midterm elections. Democrats are preparing to center their campaign narrative around a stark accusation: that Trump has prioritised tax breaks for the wealthy at the cost of health care for the poor. While Trump and Republican allies insist that vulnerable groups will retain access to health coverage, independent analysts forecast a sharp rise in the uninsured population. At the same time, GOP promises that the bill will deliver an economic boost are being questioned amid economic instability and global trade tensions. To address criticism that the bill primarily benefits the rich, Trump has highlighted tax relief measures for tipped workers and those earning overtime pay—groups that, while politically symbolic, make up only a fraction of the workforce. Still, whether these offsets will be enough to change public perception remains to be seen as both parties brace for an intense electoral showdown. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. 'The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.' With inputs from agencies
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Viral video sparks outrage: Tricolour burnt at garbage dump in Bhopal, police launch probe
— ShrutiDhore (@ShrutiDhore) Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Police in Bhopal, the capital of Madhya Pradesh, have launched an investigation after a shocking video showing several Indian flags being burnt at a garbage dump went viral on social incident reportedly took place near the ward 50 office, where civic authorities are said to burn regular garbage. The footage shows several national flags, the Tricolour, being burnt along with waste, sparking outrage from both the public and political after the video surfaced, leaders from the Congress party and BJP rushed to the police demanding action. Congress spokesperson Vivek Tripathi, along with BJP corporator Sushma Babisha, submitted complaints at the Shahpura police alleged that civic staff members were responsible for carelessly disposing and burning the national flags, which is a serious offence and an insult to national the receipt of two formal complaints, Shahpura police station sub-inspector Harish Gujarbos said, 'We are examining CCTV footage from the area to identify the people involved in the incident. A probe is underway.'Authorities have not yet confirmed whether the burning of the Tricolours was intentional or accidental, but the incident has stirred strong reactions online, with many demanding strict punishment for disrespecting the national from PTI
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
34 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump welcomes Hamas' positive reply to US-backed Gaza ceasefire plan
US President Donald Trump on Friday welcomed Hamas's response to a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire proposal, calling it "a positive spirit" and saying a deal could be reached by next week, The Jerusalem Post reported. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, "We have to get it over with. We have to do something about Gaza," though he noted he had not been briefed on the latest in negotiations. Hamas had given a "positive" reply to mediators Qatar and Egypt on the ceasefire and hostage deal, as reported by The Jerusalem Post. A Hamas official confirmed that the group had completed internal consultations with Palestinian factions and was ready to immediately begin a round of negotiations based on the mediators' latest proposal, The Jerusalem Post reported. The proposed 60-day ceasefire, already accepted by Israel, would see the release of 10 Israeli hostages--eight alive and two deceased--on the first day in exchange for an unspecified number of Palestinian prisoners. Israel would begin withdrawing from parts of northern Gaza, and both sides would then enter talks for a permanent ceasefire. The plan also includes staged release dates for the remaining hostages and a commitment by Israel to allow increased humanitarian aid into Gaza through traditional channels. Meanwhile, Trump said that Iran had not agreed to inspections of its nuclear program or to stop uranium enrichment. He claimed Iran's nuclear capabilities had been set back permanently but admitted Tehran could resume at another site. He confirmed he would discuss the matter with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during his visit to the White House on Monday, The Jerusalem Post reported. Efforts toward a truce accelerated after last month's 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran. Qatar relaunched indirect talks, and the new proposal is reported to contain stronger US guarantees to keep Israel at the negotiating table. Trump reiterated his support for the proposal, posting on Truth Social that Israel had "agreed to the necessary conditions" and warning Hamas to accept the deal: "It will not get better--IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE." He thanked Qatar and Egypt for their mediating role. According to the Palestinian Health Ministry, more than 57,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since the war began. With mounting international pressure and intensified Israeli bombardment, talks are gaining urgency. Netanyahu, signaling a shift in priorities, recently said that Israel's operations in Iran had "opened up opportunities," including a chance to bring home the remaining hostages. Before flying to Washington, he is set to convene his cabinet to discuss the proposal, even as far-right coalition members threaten to oppose it.
