The surprising coastal city where millennials are snapping up homes
The average house price in the Scottish city is £174,047, according to Rightmove, and has only grown by 1pc since last year, making it an attractive destination for cash-strapped young people.
Demand for properties in Dundee surged by 176pc in the past 10 years, the website said – the highest of any city. It was followed by Edinburgh and Doncaster, where demand surged by 91pc and 74pc respectively.
Westport Properties, a management company, said Dundee offers 'affordability, culture and jobs, but has limited nightlife and weather challenges'. It also lacks the 'majesty of Edinburgh or the vibrancy of Glasgow'.
Rightmove's research looked at the average demand in Britain's 50 largest cities between January and May 2015 and compared it with the same period in 2025.
It found that demand for properties in Dundee had almost tripled in that time, and that the number of people looking to move cities had jumped by 16pc.
Cameron Ewer, Savills' head of residential in Scotland, said the influx of first-time buyers in Dundee and other university cities could be students opting to buy rather than rent.
He said: 'You may also see Scottish students who are reluctant to pay full fees in England increasingly deciding to study in Scottish cities. Scotland as a whole has also been benefiting from buyers coming from the South.
'The cost of living is also a lot higher in the South, and you can have a good quality of life in Scotland while also achieving good capital growth.'
Colleen Babcock, of Rightmove, said: 'Comparing where we are now versus a decade ago, it looks like there's even more appeal from potential first-time buyers to live in cities.
'However, the data does show that it can vary quite widely from city to city, and it will also depend on how first-time buyer-friendly a particular location is in terms of the type of homes that are available for sale.'
London was the only city where demand from first-time buyers had not increased in a decade, due to high property prices.
Interest in coastal areas has also remained flat for a decade, Rightmove found, while demand for northern cities like Edinburgh has surged.
Average homes in the Scottish capital sell for £337,922 – well within the £450,000 Lifetime Isa limit.
Mark Dyason, of brokerage Edinburgh Mortgages, said successive tax raids on landlords had freed up properties to be snapped up by first-time buyers.
He said: 'Amateur landlords have exited the market under this tax regime because they're seeing greater returns elsewhere.'
Many of the first-time buyers Mr Dyason sees are young professionals working in the thriving finance and technology sectors.
He added: 'It's a relatively small city with great culture, and it's a nice place to be – you can build a good career here.
'It's not central London, though. It's not unaffordable, but you still need a decent job and to be doing well to buy a property near the centre.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Martindale 'happy' but targets striker for Livi
Livingston manager David Martindale is pleased with his transfer business but still wants to add another striker before the close of the window. (Daily Record), externalRead Saturday's Scottish Gossip in full.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How OnlyFans killed off the strip club: Number of venues falls to lowest level in over a decade
Strip clubs are dying out – and experts blame OnlyFans. Only 103 premises still exist in England, Scotland and Wales, figures suggest. This is down from around 155 in 2022. Nick Ede, one of the UK's most esteemed experts on popular culture, told MailOnline: 'OnlyFans has totally killed the strip club. 'People are now tipping sex workers and strippers using their phones, rather than slipping a 10 pound note in a thong. 'It's also a clear generational thing, too. Strip clubs were seen as sleazy venues, now they are seen as old and out of touch with today's lifestyles.' The statistics, obtained by MailOnline under Freedom of Information laws, also show how standalone sex shops are vanishing. Just 42 now exist, compared to 104 in 2010. Mr Ede added: 'Sex shops will soon die a death because people purchase them from online shops which package and post them discreetly.' MailOnline sent FOI requests to all 350 local authorities responsible for issuing sexual establishment licences in England, Scotland and Wales. Under current laws, all sex premises – including pole dancing venues and standalone shops selling sex toys and paraphernalia – have to apply for new operating licences (SEV) each year. Applications can cost businesses up to £10,000, although fees vary wildly across the country. Campaigners fighting to keep the sex worker industry alive say the rules have given council bosses 'much greater powers over whether to keep them open'. In total, 184 councils have taken no SEV applications at all since 2010 – when the new rules came into play. The amendment was proposed and passed after a series of objections from local councils to the formation of new or operation of existing strip clubs on the grounds of the impact on the community. Edinburgh, Swansea and Exeter councils have even introduced 'nil cap' orders, which effectively ban new sex venues from opening. Only 50 strip clubs that were licensed in 2010 remain open today. Birmingham is the strip club capital of the country, with 21 active establishments. Liverpool (10), Newcastle Upon Tyne (10) and Manchester (8) follow behind. Meanwhile, Cardiff, Birmingham and Wolverhampton all lay claim to having the most sex shops, with four apiece. Experts believe the erosion of strip clubs and sex shops reflects the overall trend of British nightlife. Around a quarter of UK adults are thought to be teetotal, jumping to over a third of Gen Z, meaning less punters are likely to cross the strip club thresholds after a night out on the town. A 2021 YouGov poll suggests that only a quarter of men would support banning strip clubs outright, with the figure reaching over 40 per cent for women. And earlier research from the pollster shows that the majority of people in Britain think it is acceptable for a person in a relationship to go to a strip club on a stag or hen do. But the advent of OnlyFans has reshaped how some young people engage with sexual content, some experts believe. Data from Ipsos Iris show that in January, 4.4 per cent of the British population – or 2.2m people – visited the site. This was up 64 per cent in a year. Audrey Jones, a campaigner for DecrimNow – the unofficial union for sex workers, disagreed with Mr Ede. She said: 'I don't think OnlyFans has made an impact at all. 'This trend (the decline of strip clubs) was happening way before OnlyFans was a thing. 'They work in different markets and big groups of lads on stag dos... don't go on OnlyFans.' Proliferation of free online porn and cheap subscriptions to creators on OnlyFans does present a cheaper alternative to real life encounters in strip clubs. Ms Jones told MailOnline: 'Strippers are some of the first to talk about when a recession is coming because their customer base is the first thing to go.' Venues don't require SEV licenses if sexual entertainment takes place less than once a month. Sixteen councils didn't respond to our FOI request. Others refused to supply figures. High Street stores such as Anne Summers and Agent Provocateur weren't included in the analysis because they don't need licences to operate.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
How dare entitled MPs say the ‘middle class' doesn't deserve financial help
This week, 11 MPs on a combined salary of £1,032,944 decided one of the only saving products to help first-time buyers should be scrapped because they fear it is used by too many middle-class people. The Treasury Committee urged Rachel Reeves to 'consider the future' of the Lifetime Isa (Lisa), a tax-free saving product that allows people under 40 to invest up to £4,000 per year, which is matched by a £1,000 contribution from the Government. They took particular aim at the 25pc bonus, suggesting this £600m outlay was not a good use of taxpayer money given the 'current strain on public finances'. Of course, these MPs, who were handed a £2,558 pay rise in April, are spot on. It has never been easier for young people to get on the housing ladder. Everywhere you look young people are buying homes like never before! Walk down a residential street in Britain, all you can see are happy young people moving into their first homes. It's about time we stopped this Lisa racket and stopped giving the bloody middle class a hand up in getting on the property ladder. Are these really the thoughts that were racing through MPs' heads? I have to confess I am one of those young people, aged 25, hopefully saving into a Lisa each year, but stuck at home with little hope of getting out. According to NatWest, I'm not alone. They found the average person now lives with their parents until the age of 28. House prices are now eight times higher than median wages – more than double what they were in the 1990s. Meanwhile, the average age of a first-time buyer is creeping ever closer to 40. It now averages 34 in England and 35 in London, according to the English Housing Survey. These figures have become almost meaningless today. They are rattled out all the time. Half of them were even in the Treasury Committee report. But clearly these MPs don't understand the significance of them. They don't understand that while they collect a salary of £93,904 per year, while also being able to expense their rent and travel, millions of young people are sitting in their parents' basement growing ever more disillusioned with their future. The lifetime Isa, launched in 2017, offered a way on to the housing ladder. It certainly isn't perfect. The purchasing cap of £450,000 has remained frozen since its inception, leaving many home buyers in the South East facing a punitive 25pc withdrawal fee if they buy a home above this price. The cap would be £600,000 if it had risen in life with inflation. But again, the Committee squirmed at the idea that the Government should support anyone but the neediest in owning a home. They said the frozen £450,000 cap was justified because it 'ensures that Government spending supports those who need financial assistance the most'. It is such an infantile argument to suggest that the Lisa should be reformed because it's not used by the poorest in society. Any form of savings account will always be disproportionately used by those who have more money because they can afford to put aside some of their salary each month. By that logic, you might as well scrap all Isas. Just scrap all savings accounts, and we can all be poor and equal. There is no doubt the 25pc bonus is generous. No other savings account will pay out such a return, but rather than this being a poorly targeted support that aids the super wealthy, it is in fact a great leveller. There are 1.4 million active Lisa holders. Since 2018-19, 228,000 people have used Lisas to buy 182,500 homes, which equates to an average of 38,000 homes purchased each year. These are not the super-rich, but the hard-working middle class. Moneybox, one of the largest providers of Lisas, said 80pc of its account holders earned £40,000 or less. Tembo Money found its Lisa customers earned £41,000 a year on average, and were able to buy a home four years earlier than those without Lisas. Be in no doubt – these people would have been less able to afford their home without the 25pc bonus. It's hard to understand what message this cross-party group of MPs therefore are trying to send to young people. Dame Meg Hillier, a Labour MP and chairman of the Committee, questioned whether it was 'the best way to spend billions of pounds over several years'. But £600m is a drop in the ocean of the £3bn about-turn Sir Keir Starmer has made on personal independence payments. And it doesn't compare to the £1.25bn winter fuel farce either. Chancellor Rachel Reeves would do well to ignore almost every one of the 64-page report put together by the Treasury Committee. There is a breaking point at which young people will stop paying for about-turn after about-turn from their parents' basement.
