Tesla posts best Australian sales in 12 months
According to figures shared with the Electric Vehicle Council, Tesla delivered 4589 vehicles in Australia in June, marking its biggest month for new-vehicle registrations so far this year.
However, Tesla deliveries were down 2.0 per cent compared with June 2024.
Tesla not only delivered more vehicles than in May 2025 – when 3897 reached customers, up 9.25 per cent year-on-year – it also posted its biggest month of deliveries since June 2024, when 4683 Teslas found new homes.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
But the brand's deliveries from January to June were still down 38.8 per cent on the same period last year, to 14,146 units.
Sagging Model 3 sales are dragging down Tesla, despite the mid-size electric sedan (pictured above) receiving an extensive update early in 2024.
Deliveries of the Model 3 were down 36.3 per cent on June 2024 to 1132 units, and down 64.9 per cent year-to-date to 3715 units.
In contrast, the recently updated Model Y mid-size electric SUV (pictured below) is helping propel the brand. Its sales were up 19 per cent year-on-year to 3457 units, though year-to-date sales are down 16.7 per cent to 10,431 units.
The Model Y's year-on-year bounce in June wasn't as large as the one it enjoyed in May, when deliveries soared by 122.5 per cent.
The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) is responsible for the Australian auto industry's monthly VFACTS sales report. June sales results are set to be published tomorrow, when we'll be able to see how close rival brands like BYD have gotten to Tesla.
Some challenger brands like Xpeng, however, don't yet report to VFACTS or the EV Council.
Apart from Tesla, Polestar is the only other brand to report its sales to the EV Council, and its June deliveries were down 4.8 per cent year-on-year to 339 units.
The Geely-owned brand, however, is up 23.6 per cent year-to-date to 1173 units, thanks to the arrival of the Polestar 3 and Polestar 4 (pictured above) electric SUVs, helping to offset sagging sales for the Polestar 2 fastback.
Despite its recent sales slump, the Tesla Model Y will likely maintain its stranglehold on the title of Australia's top-selling EV – an impressive feat given its ever-growing contingent of rivals.
Here's a breakdown of Tesla's monthly sales volumes so far this year.
MORE: Is Tesla's sales slump in Australia over?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Tesla had a solid month for deliveries last month.
According to figures shared with the Electric Vehicle Council, Tesla delivered 4589 vehicles in Australia in June, marking its biggest month for new-vehicle registrations so far this year.
However, Tesla deliveries were down 2.0 per cent compared with June 2024.
Tesla not only delivered more vehicles than in May 2025 – when 3897 reached customers, up 9.25 per cent year-on-year – it also posted its biggest month of deliveries since June 2024, when 4683 Teslas found new homes.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
But the brand's deliveries from January to June were still down 38.8 per cent on the same period last year, to 14,146 units.
Sagging Model 3 sales are dragging down Tesla, despite the mid-size electric sedan (pictured above) receiving an extensive update early in 2024.
Deliveries of the Model 3 were down 36.3 per cent on June 2024 to 1132 units, and down 64.9 per cent year-to-date to 3715 units.
In contrast, the recently updated Model Y mid-size electric SUV (pictured below) is helping propel the brand. Its sales were up 19 per cent year-on-year to 3457 units, though year-to-date sales are down 16.7 per cent to 10,431 units.
The Model Y's year-on-year bounce in June wasn't as large as the one it enjoyed in May, when deliveries soared by 122.5 per cent.
The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) is responsible for the Australian auto industry's monthly VFACTS sales report. June sales results are set to be published tomorrow, when we'll be able to see how close rival brands like BYD have gotten to Tesla.
Some challenger brands like Xpeng, however, don't yet report to VFACTS or the EV Council.
Apart from Tesla, Polestar is the only other brand to report its sales to the EV Council, and its June deliveries were down 4.8 per cent year-on-year to 339 units.
The Geely-owned brand, however, is up 23.6 per cent year-to-date to 1173 units, thanks to the arrival of the Polestar 3 and Polestar 4 (pictured above) electric SUVs, helping to offset sagging sales for the Polestar 2 fastback.
Despite its recent sales slump, the Tesla Model Y will likely maintain its stranglehold on the title of Australia's top-selling EV – an impressive feat given its ever-growing contingent of rivals.
Here's a breakdown of Tesla's monthly sales volumes so far this year.
MORE: Is Tesla's sales slump in Australia over?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Tesla had a solid month for deliveries last month.
According to figures shared with the Electric Vehicle Council, Tesla delivered 4589 vehicles in Australia in June, marking its biggest month for new-vehicle registrations so far this year.
However, Tesla deliveries were down 2.0 per cent compared with June 2024.
Tesla not only delivered more vehicles than in May 2025 – when 3897 reached customers, up 9.25 per cent year-on-year – it also posted its biggest month of deliveries since June 2024, when 4683 Teslas found new homes.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
But the brand's deliveries from January to June were still down 38.8 per cent on the same period last year, to 14,146 units.
Sagging Model 3 sales are dragging down Tesla, despite the mid-size electric sedan (pictured above) receiving an extensive update early in 2024.
Deliveries of the Model 3 were down 36.3 per cent on June 2024 to 1132 units, and down 64.9 per cent year-to-date to 3715 units.
In contrast, the recently updated Model Y mid-size electric SUV (pictured below) is helping propel the brand. Its sales were up 19 per cent year-on-year to 3457 units, though year-to-date sales are down 16.7 per cent to 10,431 units.
The Model Y's year-on-year bounce in June wasn't as large as the one it enjoyed in May, when deliveries soared by 122.5 per cent.
The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) is responsible for the Australian auto industry's monthly VFACTS sales report. June sales results are set to be published tomorrow, when we'll be able to see how close rival brands like BYD have gotten to Tesla.
Some challenger brands like Xpeng, however, don't yet report to VFACTS or the EV Council.
Apart from Tesla, Polestar is the only other brand to report its sales to the EV Council, and its June deliveries were down 4.8 per cent year-on-year to 339 units.
The Geely-owned brand, however, is up 23.6 per cent year-to-date to 1173 units, thanks to the arrival of the Polestar 3 and Polestar 4 (pictured above) electric SUVs, helping to offset sagging sales for the Polestar 2 fastback.
Despite its recent sales slump, the Tesla Model Y will likely maintain its stranglehold on the title of Australia's top-selling EV – an impressive feat given its ever-growing contingent of rivals.
Here's a breakdown of Tesla's monthly sales volumes so far this year.
MORE: Is Tesla's sales slump in Australia over?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Tesla had a solid month for deliveries last month.
According to figures shared with the Electric Vehicle Council, Tesla delivered 4589 vehicles in Australia in June, marking its biggest month for new-vehicle registrations so far this year.
However, Tesla deliveries were down 2.0 per cent compared with June 2024.
Tesla not only delivered more vehicles than in May 2025 – when 3897 reached customers, up 9.25 per cent year-on-year – it also posted its biggest month of deliveries since June 2024, when 4683 Teslas found new homes.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
But the brand's deliveries from January to June were still down 38.8 per cent on the same period last year, to 14,146 units.
Sagging Model 3 sales are dragging down Tesla, despite the mid-size electric sedan (pictured above) receiving an extensive update early in 2024.
Deliveries of the Model 3 were down 36.3 per cent on June 2024 to 1132 units, and down 64.9 per cent year-to-date to 3715 units.
In contrast, the recently updated Model Y mid-size electric SUV (pictured below) is helping propel the brand. Its sales were up 19 per cent year-on-year to 3457 units, though year-to-date sales are down 16.7 per cent to 10,431 units.
The Model Y's year-on-year bounce in June wasn't as large as the one it enjoyed in May, when deliveries soared by 122.5 per cent.
The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) is responsible for the Australian auto industry's monthly VFACTS sales report. June sales results are set to be published tomorrow, when we'll be able to see how close rival brands like BYD have gotten to Tesla.
Some challenger brands like Xpeng, however, don't yet report to VFACTS or the EV Council.
Apart from Tesla, Polestar is the only other brand to report its sales to the EV Council, and its June deliveries were down 4.8 per cent year-on-year to 339 units.
The Geely-owned brand, however, is up 23.6 per cent year-to-date to 1173 units, thanks to the arrival of the Polestar 3 and Polestar 4 (pictured above) electric SUVs, helping to offset sagging sales for the Polestar 2 fastback.
Despite its recent sales slump, the Tesla Model Y will likely maintain its stranglehold on the title of Australia's top-selling EV – an impressive feat given its ever-growing contingent of rivals.
Here's a breakdown of Tesla's monthly sales volumes so far this year.
MORE: Is Tesla's sales slump in Australia over?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
23 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Beyond carbon: big four banks urged to capture more gas
Australia's big four banks are being urged to take greater action against climate change after a study found none were specifically identifying emissions of a major greenhouse gas. The banks' failure to single out methane emissions could undermine their environmental efforts, the study warned, in addition to their failure to phase out support for methane-intensive coal-mining projects. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis issued the warning and six recommendations on Thursday after analysing climate reports from the Commonwealth Bank, ANZ, Westpac and NAB. The report comes after Australian research group The Superpower Institute launched an open platform to report methane emissions and after the big big banks were found to have cut lending to fossil fuel companies by more than 20 per cent in two years. The institute's report analysed annual climate reports and climate transition plans from the four banks and found only ANZ covered methane emissions in its environmental reporting, and none recorded methane emissions separately. The lack of methane reporting went against Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials guidelines, report author and lead coal analyst Anne Knight said, and could diminish the banks' environmental targets. "Australia's major banks have taken significant strides in addressing their climate-related financial risks and setting decarbonisation targets," she said. "However, the credibility and effectiveness of these efforts are undermined by various critical shortcomings, most notably the inconsistent, often inadequate treatment of methane emissions." While all four banks had set targets to phase out financing for thermal coal mining projects by 2030, they did not set similar targets for metallurgical coal mining that used more methane on average. NAB and Westpac had banned support for new metallurgical mining projects this year, but Ms Knight said they had an opportunity to make a bigger climate impact by addressing methane use. "Reducing methane emissions now could have more immediate results at slowing down global warming," she said. "Banks could be doing more to help achieve this." The institute issued six recommendations to banks in the report including explicitly reporting methane emissions, requiring independent verification of methane emissions from clients, and phasing out finance offered to both thermal and metallurgical coal projects. The report follows research from The Superpower Institute that warned Australia's methane emissions from fossil fuel production could be twice as high as current estimates. It also comes after a Macquarie analysis of the major banks' environmental, social and governance plans in December found they had cut lending to fossil fuel businesses by more than 20 per cent in two years. Australia's big four banks are being urged to take greater action against climate change after a study found none were specifically identifying emissions of a major greenhouse gas. The banks' failure to single out methane emissions could undermine their environmental efforts, the study warned, in addition to their failure to phase out support for methane-intensive coal-mining projects. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis issued the warning and six recommendations on Thursday after analysing climate reports from the Commonwealth Bank, ANZ, Westpac and NAB. The report comes after Australian research group The Superpower Institute launched an open platform to report methane emissions and after the big big banks were found to have cut lending to fossil fuel companies by more than 20 per cent in two years. The institute's report analysed annual climate reports and climate transition plans from the four banks and found only ANZ covered methane emissions in its environmental reporting, and none recorded methane emissions separately. The lack of methane reporting went against Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials guidelines, report author and lead coal analyst Anne Knight said, and could diminish the banks' environmental targets. "Australia's major banks have taken significant strides in addressing their climate-related financial risks and setting decarbonisation targets," she said. "However, the credibility and effectiveness of these efforts are undermined by various critical shortcomings, most notably the inconsistent, often inadequate treatment of methane emissions." While all four banks had set targets to phase out financing for thermal coal mining projects by 2030, they did not set similar targets for metallurgical coal mining that used more methane on average. NAB and Westpac had banned support for new metallurgical mining projects this year, but Ms Knight said they had an opportunity to make a bigger climate impact by addressing methane use. "Reducing methane emissions now could have more immediate results at slowing down global warming," she said. "Banks could be doing more to help achieve this." The institute issued six recommendations to banks in the report including explicitly reporting methane emissions, requiring independent verification of methane emissions from clients, and phasing out finance offered to both thermal and metallurgical coal projects. The report follows research from The Superpower Institute that warned Australia's methane emissions from fossil fuel production could be twice as high as current estimates. It also comes after a Macquarie analysis of the major banks' environmental, social and governance plans in December found they had cut lending to fossil fuel businesses by more than 20 per cent in two years. Australia's big four banks are being urged to take greater action against climate change after a study found none were specifically identifying emissions of a major greenhouse gas. The banks' failure to single out methane emissions could undermine their environmental efforts, the study warned, in addition to their failure to phase out support for methane-intensive coal-mining projects. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis issued the warning and six recommendations on Thursday after analysing climate reports from the Commonwealth Bank, ANZ, Westpac and NAB. The report comes after Australian research group The Superpower Institute launched an open platform to report methane emissions and after the big big banks were found to have cut lending to fossil fuel companies by more than 20 per cent in two years. The institute's report analysed annual climate reports and climate transition plans from the four banks and found only ANZ covered methane emissions in its environmental reporting, and none recorded methane emissions separately. The lack of methane reporting went against Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials guidelines, report author and lead coal analyst Anne Knight said, and could diminish the banks' environmental targets. "Australia's major banks have taken significant strides in addressing their climate-related financial risks and setting decarbonisation targets," she said. "However, the credibility and effectiveness of these efforts are undermined by various critical shortcomings, most notably the inconsistent, often inadequate treatment of methane emissions." While all four banks had set targets to phase out financing for thermal coal mining projects by 2030, they did not set similar targets for metallurgical coal mining that used more methane on average. NAB and Westpac had banned support for new metallurgical mining projects this year, but Ms Knight said they had an opportunity to make a bigger climate impact by addressing methane use. "Reducing methane emissions now could have more immediate results at slowing down global warming," she said. "Banks could be doing more to help achieve this." The institute issued six recommendations to banks in the report including explicitly reporting methane emissions, requiring independent verification of methane emissions from clients, and phasing out finance offered to both thermal and metallurgical coal projects. The report follows research from The Superpower Institute that warned Australia's methane emissions from fossil fuel production could be twice as high as current estimates. It also comes after a Macquarie analysis of the major banks' environmental, social and governance plans in December found they had cut lending to fossil fuel businesses by more than 20 per cent in two years. Australia's big four banks are being urged to take greater action against climate change after a study found none were specifically identifying emissions of a major greenhouse gas. The banks' failure to single out methane emissions could undermine their environmental efforts, the study warned, in addition to their failure to phase out support for methane-intensive coal-mining projects. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis issued the warning and six recommendations on Thursday after analysing climate reports from the Commonwealth Bank, ANZ, Westpac and NAB. The report comes after Australian research group The Superpower Institute launched an open platform to report methane emissions and after the big big banks were found to have cut lending to fossil fuel companies by more than 20 per cent in two years. The institute's report analysed annual climate reports and climate transition plans from the four banks and found only ANZ covered methane emissions in its environmental reporting, and none recorded methane emissions separately. The lack of methane reporting went against Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials guidelines, report author and lead coal analyst Anne Knight said, and could diminish the banks' environmental targets. "Australia's major banks have taken significant strides in addressing their climate-related financial risks and setting decarbonisation targets," she said. "However, the credibility and effectiveness of these efforts are undermined by various critical shortcomings, most notably the inconsistent, often inadequate treatment of methane emissions." While all four banks had set targets to phase out financing for thermal coal mining projects by 2030, they did not set similar targets for metallurgical coal mining that used more methane on average. NAB and Westpac had banned support for new metallurgical mining projects this year, but Ms Knight said they had an opportunity to make a bigger climate impact by addressing methane use. "Reducing methane emissions now could have more immediate results at slowing down global warming," she said. "Banks could be doing more to help achieve this." The institute issued six recommendations to banks in the report including explicitly reporting methane emissions, requiring independent verification of methane emissions from clients, and phasing out finance offered to both thermal and metallurgical coal projects. The report follows research from The Superpower Institute that warned Australia's methane emissions from fossil fuel production could be twice as high as current estimates. It also comes after a Macquarie analysis of the major banks' environmental, social and governance plans in December found they had cut lending to fossil fuel businesses by more than 20 per cent in two years.
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Sydney may be the world's steak capital, but farmers are going hungry
The recent story, ' Why Sydney has been declared the steak capital of the world ', was both encouraging and dismaying to read as someone who raises the cattle behind those world-class steaks. It's incredible to see Australian restaurants like Rockpool, Margaret and The Grill being globally recognised. I'm proud of what our country's beef producers make possible. But as a farmer and business owner, I couldn't help asking the question many of us in the industry are thinking: If Sydney is the steak capital of the world, why are so many of the people producing that beef still under financial pressure or leaving the land altogether?
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson laments exploding public sector reaching record levels under Albanese government
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has lamented the Albanese government's bloated public sector and claimed the huge growth in workers was 'making our life worse'. The federal public service has expanded to record levels under Labor, despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledging to bolster lagging productivity growth. New Australian Public Service (APS) data has revealed the federal bureaucracy is set to balloon to a record-breaking 213,000 staff, up from a 14-year low of 144,704 workers at the end of 2019. A considerable number of the growing workforce is made of up compliance, regulation, administrative, and human resources officers tasked with supervising the mammoth public service. The compliance category, which makes up HR, policy and regulation employees experienced the steepest bump, surging by more than 41,000 workers over five years to December 2024. 'They're actually making our life worse,' Senator Hanson told Sky News on Thursday. 'You put in more public servants, that means more taxpayers' money has to pay the wages and then on top of that you've got all superannuation on top and then all your benefits and everything.' Senator Hanson said the expanded public service was a 'drain' of taxpayers' dollars. 'Albanese has also increased (the public service) because public servants will vote for Labor because they've got a job for life and they're just going to not sack them,' she added. Mr Albanese made the topic of the federal bureaucracy a central talking point in the recent election and defended his government's hiring spree while criticising former opposition leader Peter Dutton's plan to cull over 41,000 civil servants in the nation's capital. Senator Hanson said the Liberal Party backing away from the policy to crack down on working from home was a 'big mistake'. 'They should have followed through on that,' she said. Despite Mr Albanese vowing to lift lagging productivity and reduce the workforce's dependency on government support, Australian Bureau of Statistics data released last week showed that the almost one million workers were employed in federal, state, territory, and local government positions. This makes up 6.8 per cent of the Australian workforce.
