Recall issued by Mesa County Public Health
GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (KREX) — Mesa County Public Health sent out a news release Tuesday morning, recalling Lyons Magnus' frozen supplemental shakes.
The release stated the recall was issued due to listeria monocytogenes concerns.
The shakes were packaged in 4-ounce cartons under the Lyons ReadyCare and Sysco Imperial brand names.
The products were distributed nationwide and were not available for retail sale.
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, there have been 38 illnesses associated with the strain of listeria monocytogenes that may have contaminated these products, including 11 deaths.
Anybody in possession of these products should quarantine them.
The recalled products are:
Key
Item #
Product Name
BB (Best By)
1
1733
ReadyCare Frozen Vanilla Shake
022125 To 022126
2
1734
ReadyCare Frozen Chocolate Shake
022125 To 022126
3
1735
ReadyCare Frozen Strawberry Shake
022125 To 022126
4
1736
ReadyCare Frozen Vanilla Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
5
1737
ReadyCare Frozen Strawberry Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
6
1747
ReadyCare Frozen Chocolate Shake Plus
022125 To 022126
7
1749
ReadyCare Frozen Strawberry Shake Plus
022125 To 022126
8
1754
ReadyCare Frozen Vanilla Shake Plus
022125 To 022126
9
1844
ReadyCare Frozen Strawberry Banana Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
10
3633
ReadyCare Frozen Chocolate Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
11
3338
Imperial Frozen Vanilla Shake
022125 To 022126
12
3339
Imperial Frozen Chocolate Shake
022125 To 022126
13
3340
Imperial Frozen Strawberry Shake
022125 To 022126
14
3341
Imperial Frozen Vanilla Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
15
3342
Imperial Frozen Strawberry Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
16
3364
Imperial Frozen Strawberry Banana Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
17
3699
Imperial Frozen Chocolate Shake NSA
022125 To 022126
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
HaloMD Vows to Defend Providers and the Federal IDR Framework Against Blue Cross Lawsuit
DALLAS, June 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- HaloMD, the nation's prominent health‑technology company empowering healthcare providers to secure fair payment through the federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process, announced today that it will fight "to the full extent of the law" against a baseless lawsuit filed by Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia (BCBSGA) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on May 27, 2025. "After years of systematically underpaying physicians and severely compressing reimbursement rates, BCBSGA has resorted to a courtroom smear campaign orchestrated to intimidate healthcare providers and to challenge rules and regulations of the very system Congress established to ensure fairness and protection for patients and providers," stated Alla LaRoque, President of HaloMD. "HaloMD will not stand by while a dominant insurer tries to suppress the evidence‑based advocacy that is finally achieving parity for physicians." The lawsuit arrives as national attention centers on the No Surprises Act (NSA)—landmark legislation that protects patients from surprise medical bills and grants clinicians a federally protected Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) structure to contest insurers' unfairly low reimbursements. Regulated and implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the IDR process relies on certified Independent Dispute Resolution Entities (IDREs) to issue legally-binding, impartial arbitration awards. HaloMD has emerged as the industry's best‑in‑class technology partner—and a lifeline—for physician groups that lack the scale, resources, or in‑house expertise to navigate the complex IDR process and reclaim revenue lost to chronic underpayment. For many small and rural practices, HaloMD is the difference between keeping the lights on and closing their doors. HaloMD's platform levels the playing field, arming every provider—regardless of size—with the data, technology, and regulatory savvy needed to secure fair, timely payments. Lawsuit attacks providers and the arbitration system itself BCBSGA's filing does not merely target emergency physicians who have long suffered systemic underpayment or no payment at all; it directly challenges certified IDREs and the entire IDR framework. If successful, the suit would: Erode statutory safeguards, compliance with rules and regulations, authority of impartial arbitrators and balance in the process of dispute resolution; Disrupt patient access to emergency care by jeopardizing sustainability of medical practices; Set a dangerous precedent allowing insurers to litigate away federal consumer‑protection laws and processes After decades of setting reimbursement rates unilaterally, insurers are now confronting a neutral, factor‑driven arbitration process where they no longer hold the upper hand. As IDR rulings uphold fair and reasonable payments, BCBSGA has resorted to baseless litigation to regain an advantage it can no longer command. Put plainly, this payor is attacking the process because it is losing in IDR. "This is not a good‑faith legal dispute—it is a calculated strike aimed at collapsing the IDR infrastructure so insurers can return to unilateral price‑setting," added LaRoque. Timing underscores insurer's intent BCBSGA filed its lawsuit just one day before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released public‑use data confirming that more and more emergency physicians—pushed into IDR after being paid pennies on the dollar—are finally recouping the reimbursements they were always entitled to with HaloMD's support. Next steps HaloMD is prepared to vigorously defend itself in this litigation in a manner that will highlight the lawsuit's meritless nature. "Our mission is bigger than any single lawsuit," LaRoque said. "We exist to safeguard the financial viability of medical practices so they can focus on saving lives—not fighting payors." Media Contact Press Inquiries: HaloMD Communications, View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE HaloMD Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
HaloMD Vows to Defend Providers and the Federal IDR Framework Against Blue Cross Lawsuit
DALLAS, June 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- HaloMD, the nation's prominent health‑technology company empowering healthcare providers to secure fair payment through the federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process, announced today that it will fight "to the full extent of the law" against a baseless lawsuit filed by Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia (BCBSGA) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on May 27, 2025. "After years of systematically underpaying physicians and severely compressing reimbursement rates, BCBSGA has resorted to a courtroom smear campaign orchestrated to intimidate healthcare providers and to challenge rules and regulations of the very system Congress established to ensure fairness and protection for patients and providers," stated Alla LaRoque, President of HaloMD. "HaloMD will not stand by while a dominant insurer tries to suppress the evidence‑based advocacy that is finally achieving parity for physicians." The lawsuit arrives as national attention centers on the No Surprises Act (NSA)—landmark legislation that protects patients from surprise medical bills and grants clinicians a federally protected Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) structure to contest insurers' unfairly low reimbursements. Regulated and implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the IDR process relies on certified Independent Dispute Resolution Entities (IDREs) to issue legally-binding, impartial arbitration awards. HaloMD has emerged as the industry's best‑in‑class technology partner—and a lifeline—for physician groups that lack the scale, resources, or in‑house expertise to navigate the complex IDR process and reclaim revenue lost to chronic underpayment. For many small and rural practices, HaloMD is the difference between keeping the lights on and closing their doors. HaloMD's platform levels the playing field, arming every provider—regardless of size—with the data, technology, and regulatory savvy needed to secure fair, timely payments. Lawsuit attacks providers and the arbitration system itself BCBSGA's filing does not merely target emergency physicians who have long suffered systemic underpayment or no payment at all; it directly challenges certified IDREs and the entire IDR framework. If successful, the suit would: Erode statutory safeguards, compliance with rules and regulations, authority of impartial arbitrators and balance in the process of dispute resolution; Disrupt patient access to emergency care by jeopardizing sustainability of medical practices; Set a dangerous precedent allowing insurers to litigate away federal consumer‑protection laws and processes After decades of setting reimbursement rates unilaterally, insurers are now confronting a neutral, factor‑driven arbitration process where they no longer hold the upper hand. As IDR rulings uphold fair and reasonable payments, BCBSGA has resorted to baseless litigation to regain an advantage it can no longer command. Put plainly, this payor is attacking the process because it is losing in IDR. "This is not a good‑faith legal dispute—it is a calculated strike aimed at collapsing the IDR infrastructure so insurers can return to unilateral price‑setting," added LaRoque. Timing underscores insurer's intent BCBSGA filed its lawsuit just one day before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released public‑use data confirming that more and more emergency physicians—pushed into IDR after being paid pennies on the dollar—are finally recouping the reimbursements they were always entitled to with HaloMD's support. Next steps HaloMD is prepared to vigorously defend itself in this litigation in a manner that will highlight the lawsuit's meritless nature. "Our mission is bigger than any single lawsuit," LaRoque said. "We exist to safeguard the financial viability of medical practices so they can focus on saving lives—not fighting payors." Media Contact Press Inquiries: HaloMD Communications, View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE HaloMD Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Grand Junction Bomb Squad determines unknown liquid in jars safe
GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (KREX) — On Tuesday, at approximately 2:20 p.m., the Grand Junction Police Department (GJPD) responded to a report of unknown liquids found in jars in the 2500 block of Ouray Avenue. The reporting party stated that she had discovered several jars with an unknown liquid in a residential garage. Technicians with the Grand Junction Bomb Squad were called to assist. Bomb technicians with the Grand Junction Fire Department HazMat Technicians tested the substances and confirmed that the jars held no threat to the community. There was no evidence of any Molotov cocktail materials found during the incident. All of the substances will be taken to the hazardous waste facility. Recognizing the concern following the recent attack in Boulder, the Grand Junction Police Department takes reports of all suspicious activity seriously. GJPD encourages Grand Junction residents to be vigilant and call 911 for any unusual activity. The GJPD believes this incident to be isolated with no ongoing threat to the community. WesternSlopeNow will update this story if it develops. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
