Young Ukrainians get their way as Zelensky overturns law to defuse crisis
The signs carried by the MPs outside the Rada were a nod to the placards carried by thousands of young people who had taken to the streets in towns and cities across Ukraine for almost a week.The protesters had demanded that Zelensky and his government "take their hands off" the two anti-corruption bodies, and they threatened to continue carry on until the government made a U-turn.Within days, it did.
Zelensky's original bill had stripped the two bodies of their independent authority to decide who to prosecute in high-level corruption cases, giving that prerogative to the general prosecutor - a presidential appointee.For the placard-waving protesters, safeguarding the independence of Nabu and Sap was as crucial to their European future as the war against Russia was a matter of life and death for their country.In 2022, Kyiv was granted the coveted status of EU candidate country – but on condition it mounted a credible fight against corruption.For Ukraine's Western partners, donors and investors who pour money into the country through international assistance and funding programmes, the existence and independence of the two anti-corruption bodies are non-negotiable.And for Ukraine and its war-shattered economy – that external financial help is critical.It was only 10 days earlier that MPs had backed Zelensky's controversial law, and yet they voted on Thursday by 331 to 0 to overturn it. On both occasions they appeared to be following Zelensky's direction."Ukraine is a democracy - there are definitely no doubts," he said on social media.
Many Ukrainians see the hand of Zelensky's right-hand man, Andriy Yermak, behind the president's recent choices.Yermak's position as head of the presidential office is is not regulated by the constitution nor limited by any checks or balances. And questions are being asked about such a role in Ukraine's democracy.Safeguarding that democracy and Ukraine's course towards European integration were the key drivers for the young protesters, while their parents and friends were defending their country on the front lines.MPs did their best to show the problem was now solved, but this crisis has left behind an unpleasant aftertaste.It has brought into question Zelensky's dedication to the anti-corruption reforms.That he seemed ready to compromise on these reforms may have seriously dented the trust the EU put in him.
Read more: Kyiv death tolls rises to 16 as wave of Russian strikes defies Trump demandZelensky backtracks on law after protestsUkrainecast: Can Zelensky recover from nationwide protests?
Some made the link between the government's bid to curtail the independence of Nabu and Sap. Powerful figures in Zelensky's circle have come under scrutiny, with some either facing charges or investigation.Zelensky's move also came after the government rejected a candidate selected by an independent commission to head the Bureau for Economic Security - the main agency for investigating economic crimes in Ukraine.The official reason Oleksandr Tsyvinski didn't get the job was that he didn't get the security clearance from the security service, and that is under the president's control.However, Tsyvinski is a well-regarded anti-corruption expert and the selection commission still wants him appointed.All these elements resulted in one of the biggest power crises for Zelensky's team since he came to power in 2019.Three and a half years into the full-scale war, the risk of further such mis-steps could come at a significant cost.Next year, Ukraine's budget deficit could hit $13bn (£10bn), according to a National Bank estimate. Kyiv would not be able to continue fighting the war if were to lose Western partners' support.Already, the EU has reduced some of its financial aid to Ukraine because the government has not kept up with promised reforms.Ukraine's young protesters appear to have understood that all too well, and were prepared to challenge their government in a country they chose to stay in despite the deadly threat of Russian drone and missile attacks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
24 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Homelessness minister must resign over rent hike after tenants' exit, Tories say
Labour's homelessness minister is facing calls to resign after reports claimed she hiked rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds just weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Four tenants who rented a house in east London from Rushanara Ali were sent an email last November saying their lease would not be renewed, which also gave them four months' notice to leave, the i Paper reported. Ms Ali's property was then re-listed with a £700 rent increase within weeks, the newspaper said. Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative party chairman, called for the minister to stand down, accusing her of 'staggering hypocrisy' over her handling of the rental property. A spokesperson for the minister said: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.' The house, rented on a fixed-term contract, was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only re-listed as a rental because it had not sold, according to the i Paper. Tory frontbencher Mr Hollinrake said: 'I think it shows staggering hypocrisy. Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a Government minister in charge of homelessness. 'She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants. 'You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord. She's got to resign.' He said the conduct appeared to be 'unethical, not illegal' but 'we can't just say one thing and do another'. Speaking to the i Paper, Ms Ali's former tenant Laura Jackson said she was one of four tenants who received an email giving four months notice to leave the property, for which they collectively paid £3,300 in rent. Ms Jackson, a self-employed restaurant owner, said she saw the house re-listed weeks after she and her fellow tenants had left, but with a rent of around £4,000. The 33-year-old told the i Paper: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion.' She also said two letting companies managing the property for Ms Ali had attempted to charge £395 in cleaning fees and £2,000 to repaint the house when they left. The tenants successfully challenged this, as landlords are prohibited from charging tenants for professional cleaning, and from repainting costs unless serious damage has occurred. A Labour voter, Ms Jackson suggested it was a 'conflict of interest' for MPs to be landlords, especially in their own constituencies. Ms Jackson declined to comment further when approached by the PA news agency but confirmed the details of the i Paper's story. The minister's actions have also faced scrutiny from rental rights campaigners, as the Government seeks to clamp down on what it sees as unfair rental practices. The Renters' Rights Bill includes measures to ban landlords who end a tenancy to sell a property from re-listing it for six months. The Bill, which is nearing its end stages of scrutiny in Parliament, will also abolish fixed-term tenancies and ensure landlords give four months' notice if they want to sell their property. Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, described the allegations as 'shocking and a wake-up call to Government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters'. He added: 'It is bad enough when any landlord turfs out their tenant to hike up the rent, or tries their luck with unfair claims on the deposit, but the minister responsible for homelessness knows only too well about the harm caused by this behaviour. 'These allegations highlight common practices that the Government can eradicate. 'The Renters' Rights Bill would ban landlords who evict tenants to sell the property from re-letting it within 12 months, to deter this kind of abuse – but unfortunately members of the House of Lords have voted to reduce this to six months. 'The Government can also use its review of the deposit protection system to penalise landlords who make exaggerated claims at the end of the tenancy.' Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, said: 'It's mind-boggling that we have a homelessness minister who has just evicted four people in order to rake in more rent – something that will soon be illegal under the Renters' Rights Bill her own department is bringing through Parliament. 'The Government are currently considering an amendment to the legislation from the House of Lords which reduces the ban on re-letting after eviction from 12 months to six months. 'The Government must remove this amendment, and at the very least minister Ali must recuse herself from any discussions on this within Government.' Mairi MacRae, director of campaigns and policy at homelessness charity Shelter, said it 'beggars belief that after months of dither and delay, the Government's own homelessness minister has profited from the underhand tactics the Renters' Rights Bill is meant to outlaw'. Cabinet ministers lined up to defend Ms Ali when questioned about the allegations. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, speaking to broadcasters, said: 'I don't know any of the details of this but I understand that she has followed all of the rules in this case.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she 'didn't understand' why the Conservatives were calling for Ms Ali to resign, as she was interviewed in South Wales, saying: 'I don't know the details but Rushanara Ali seems to have done everything in accordance with the law.'
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
A Trump-Putin summit will be as useful to Ukraine and democracy as Agent Orange is for gardening
A long overdue summit between the Presidents of the United States and the Russian Federation to discuss peace in Ukraine, where nuclear war has been threatened, must be seen as an historic moment for optimism. Except that from London to Langley, Berlin, Canberra and Tokyo, intelligence chiefs will be on tenterhooks wondering if this is another occasion that looks like the meeting between an agent and his handler. There's no evidence that Donald Trump works for Vladimir Putin. But there is ample evidence that the US president favours Putin's agenda. And that he has done all he can to hobble Ukraine while it defends itself against a Russian invasion of Europe's eastern flank. The summit was announced, significantly, by the Kremlin first. It may be held in the United Arab Emirates, which has been pursuing a 'friends with all, enemies of none' foreign policy. That would be apt; a summit held in a mostly benign authoritarian state between a malevolent leader of a brutal authoritarian state and his greatest admirer, who happens to lead the world's most powerful democracy. Trump has done some performative pouting and sounded peevish about Putin recently. He has been humiliated by the Russian president's indifference to his pleas to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine. This has provoked the leader of the free world to accuse its most dangerous challenger of 'bulls***' and to threaten largely toothless sanctions against the Kremlin. Earlier this year Trump. took a very different tone with Ukraine – a pro-western democracy on track to joining the European Union and hoping to become part of Nato. Trump cut weapons supplies to Kyiv. He blinded the US intelligence feed to Ukraine during the Russian counter-offensive to retake territory in Kursk. He publicly insulted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky accusing him of risking World War III. He held Zelensky's feet to the fire to get a colonial-style mineral deal to pay for weapons that had been free. Trump also took Russia's side in every aspect of how he thought Ukraine should capitulate to Moscow in future peace talks. Putin is obsessed with returning Ukraine to the former Russian (or Soviet) empire. He has never hidden his ambition to do so and consistently denies that Ukraine is really an independent entity at all. He is also a former KBG agent, an expert at manipulation, who genuinely believes that 'the west' is plotting against Moscow, whatever ideology dominates the Kremlin. He ordered Russian intelligence services to interfere in the 2016 US elections, to undermine the very notion of truth in the western media, and has been delighted by Brexit as it weakens the perceived threat of the EU. In the US, Trump has further empowered Russia by his assault on the independence of the judiciary, his flouting of democratic conventions, the enrichment of his family through his presidency and the widespread spectacle of ICE arrests by masked police. A weakened American democracy in crisis is a victory for Putin – and it's been delivered by Trump. As The Independent has reported before, the Five Eyes intelligence network that links the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand is under strain because the agencies using the network do not trust Trump with their secrets – he has a record of blurting them out and of storing confidential material in his toilet. When he met Putin for his first summit in Helsinki in July 2018 he did so for more than two hours with only a US translator in the room with him and the Russian delegation. He snatched away the translator's notes after the meeting. Then, when asked if he agreed with US intelligence assessments that Russia has interfered with the US elections he said 'no'. 'President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be," he insisted. The remark was condemned by Republican grandees from then US House speaker Paul Ryan and senator John McCain, among many others. 'No prior president has ever abased himself more abjectly before a tyrant,' McCain said after the Helsinki summit. Most of Trump's face-to-face meetings with Putin have not been properly recorded and have often been held without the usual presence of White House aids and officials. And every time they meet, Trump has emerged apparently dazzled and fulsome in his praise for the leader of a regime that kills its political opponents in jail, tosses critics off balconies and uses nerve gas and radioactive poisons to bump off defectors to Britain. There is every chance that Trump will continue to take Russia's side against Ukraine in a summit with Putin. The bilateral sanctions he's threatened will make no difference to Russia, which now has negligible trade with the US. His 'tertiary' sanctions against India, which has been hit with a 25 per cent surge in tariffs because it imports Russian oil, are unlikely to be imposed or if they are they will be short lived. Trump needs India inside his tent. Trump has not threatened to renew arms shipments to Ukraine. He has not said he might reconsider the Nato/Ukraine request for American troops to help guarantee a future peace deal. He's granted tiny exports of enough Patriot air defence missile for Kyiv for about one night's Russian bombardment. Trump has caused turmoil in Nato more widely. The leaders of the alliance no longer see the US as a reliable ally – let alone the cornerstone of a military construct that has protected western democracy for six decades. Trump's relationship with Putin has been toxic for the West, for Europe and is stripping the branches of democracy like Agent Orange.
STV News
24 minutes ago
- STV News
Scottish Government announces £20m to speed up dangerous cladding removal
The housing secretary has announced a further £20m to speed up action to remove dangerous cladding in Scotland. Mairi McAllan announced the additional funding and expanded eligibility on Thursday, stating that social housing will now be eligible for remediation funding. It comes after the Scottish Government has been repeatedly criticised by opposition parties over the pace of remediation work following the 2017 Grenfell Tower disaster in London, which killed 72 people. 'Scotland's cladding remediation programme is progressing at pace and the additional £20m I've announced today will further expedite this vital work,' McAllan said. 'Ultimately I am determined that, by 2029, every high-risk residential building over 18 metres will have been resolved, with buildings between 11 and 18 metres placed on a clear pathway to resolution.' The announcement follows criticism that Scotland's removal of dangerous cladding is behind other parts of the UK. Out of an estimated 1,450 buildings that may require work to remove cladding, just three have been fully assessed under the cladding remediation programme. Only two buildings in the country currently have active remediation work being undertaken. Another 12 single building assessments (SBA), which assess any risk to life caused by cladding, are currently under way. The Scottish Liberal Democrats said the Government was moving at a 'glacial pace'. McAllan, who was given the newly created role in June, said the additional money will speed up actions to make Scotland's buildings safe. It will boost the Scottish Government's single open call fund, which was launched in March. The fund, which was launched in March, allows owners and residents to apply for an assessment to determine the work required to make buildings safe. She also set a deadline of October 31, 2025, by which developers must sign the developers' remediation contract, an agreement between the UK government and major developers, requiring them to fix life-critical fire safety defects in buildings they developed or refurbished over the past 30 years. The Scottish Government said the fund has already made 258 initial grant funding offers for building owners and residents to take forward a single building assessment. The £10m additional funding will ensure every eligible application received before the end of December will be progressed. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
