‘It could be his Obamacare': GOP senator reveals his warnings to Trump before voting against his agenda
'As I told the president, if we don't get this right, he's probably going to have two of the most miserable years of his life if Democrats take the gavels in the House. And I'm trying to avoid that,' Tillis said in a wide-ranging interview with CNN's Jake Tapper on Wednesday – his first national sitdown interview since announcing his retirement a day after voting to block the president's agenda.
'I told the president, I really do believe it could be his Obamacare,' Tillis said of the sweeping tax and spending cuts package that Trump signed into law last week, without Tillis' vote. 'I think it's politically just devastating.'
The plainspoken North Carolinian was clear about who he blames for the details of that law, repeatedly calling out unnamed White House staffers that he said failed to grasp the real-life consequences of the new policy, particularly the spending cuts to Medicaid, which provides health care to millions of low-income Americans. Those advisers, he said, are the 'biggest risk to [Trump's] legacy' — though he declined, for now, to identify any by name.
'I don't have a problem with President Trump. I got a problem with some of the people I consider to be amateurs advising him. And I want to make it very clear to them: When you act like the president when he's out of the room, you don't impress me,' Tillis said.
The senator may not be quiet for long. Asked about how he planned to spend his remaining 18 months in office, Tillis said he would demand accountability for some of those same Trump advisers.
'I am going to hold some of these people accountable, who I think are shielding him, who do not understand the legislative process, certainly do not understand the executive. And they're the biggest risk to his legacy,' Tillis told Tapper.
The swing-state Republican had multiple issues with Trump's agenda. But it's the cuts to Medicaid that's drawn his sharpest rebuke, and which eventually led him to vote against the sprawling package. Tillis had repeatedly urged Trump and his team not to cut so deeply into the program, which he feared would cut off access to people who legally qualify for the program and cause Trump's downfall — just like then-President Barack Obama's health care law that led to Democrats' self-described 'shellacking' in the 2010 midterms.
But in the end, GOP leaders passed their bill without Tillis' help, spurring Trump himself to publicly threaten to help primary the senator. In response, Tillis recalled sending the president a private missive of his own — just before announcing he would retire from Congress instead of seeking reelection next November.
'I told the president in another text: 'Now's the time to start looking for my replacement because I don't deal with that kind of bullsh*t,' Tillis recounted.
Tillis has helped confirm nearly all of Trump's key nominees this term. But with hindsight, Tillis raised concerns with one of those now in power: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
The senator suggested he would not vote to confirm Hegseth, if a vote were to be held again today.
'With the passing of time, I think it's clear he's out of his depth as a manager of a large, complex organization,' Tillis said, pointing, for instance, to Hegseths' recent failure to inform the White House before he authorized a pause on weapons shipments to Ukraine last week.
'The whole idea of having a pause on Ukraine defensive arms, that's just amateurish,' Tillis said.
Asked by Tapper whether he would vote to confirm Hegseth knowing what he does now, Tilis said: 'Now, I have the information of him being a manager and I don't think his probationary period has been very positive.'
Tillis offered another clear warning to his party about next November: Keep scandal-plagued Republican Mark Robinson out of the GOP's race to replace him in the Senate.
'There's no way if he became the nominee in North Carolina I could possibly support him,' Tillis said of Robinson, the former lieutenant governor who suffered a historic defeat in 2024 after a CNN KFile investigation found he made dozens of lewd comments on an online porn forum. 'Of course I wouldn't support the Democratic nominee. I would just have to take a pass.'
And notably, Tillis was tight-lipped when asked about another possible candidate — Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law and former co-chair of the Republican National Committee.
'Our state is very difficult for Republicans to win. … So they need to be really smart about the name on the ballot and the profile on the ballot to have an opportunity to win,' Tilis said when specifically asked about Lara Trump. 'This is gonna be a tough race for someone. They need a good, solid, business, right-of-center conservative to match up against whoever it is.'
When Tillis made his stunning decision late last month to not seek reelection, he called out DC politicians who 'don't bother to do the hard work' to understand what their policies would mean for someone like a young person living in a trailer park – a reference to his own humble beginnings.
Tillis has been a waiter, a warehouse worker, and even, once, as an 8-year-old kid who got paid in biscuits, a walker of an elderly neighbor's cat. (Yes, a cat.)
He said he thought about those living in his former trailer park in Nashville when he decided to vote against Trump's agenda. Again, he compared it to the 2010 health care law that led to a massive red wave after some people were forced off their private health plans.
'Now it's like, if you like Medicaid and you're eligible, you can keep it. That's fundamentally untrue,' Tillis said. Asked if many of those who will be impacted understand what's in Trump's bill, Tillis said: 'No, they don't, but they will' — referring to the Democrats' plans to broadly message the GOP cuts ahead of the midterms.
'If you're a competent Democrat, you're going to figure out how to communicate to them how it affects their lives. And it almost certainly will,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Says He'd Use National Guard Or Military To Keep 2028 Olympics Safe
President Donald Trump told reporters on Tuesday that 'we would do anything necessary to keep our Olympics safe, including using our National Guard or military.' Trump made the comments after he signed an executive order establishing a task force on the 2028 games, a group that includes cabinet secretaries and administration officials, including FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. More from Deadline Robert Thompson, CEO Of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, Jabs Donald Trump For Backing "Blatant Theft" By AI: "The Art Of The Deal Has Become The Art Of The Steal" FoxLA Anchor Elex Michaelson Is Leaving Station Thousands Of Writers Sign WGA Open Letter Slamming Trump's "Unprecedented, Authoritarian Assault" On Free Press Trump's comment about using the National Guard or military follows his dispatch of troops to Los Angeles in response to protests of ICE raids. His decision to federalize the guard was opposed by California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who said that the show of federal force inflamed the situation. At a White House event establishing the task force, the chair of the Olympic organizing committee, Casey Wasserman, had nothing but praise for the president, including his assistance during his first term in ensuring that Los Angeles was selected as host city. Wasserman compared the process of organizing events to producing 'seven Super Bowls a day for 30 days.' The city will host about 11,000 Olympic athletes and 4,500 Paralympic athletes, participating in 800 competitions at 49 venues. He also said that for the first time, the Olympic torch relay will pass through all 50 states. Trump undoubtedly would like to put his stamp on the games, even though planning has been taking place for years. The task force's functions, per the executive order, are to coordinate federal planning and response related to security, transportation, and entry/exit processes; to support interagency and state and local information sharing; to identify legal, logistical, or regulatory barriers that could stymie federal support; to assist in visa processing and credentialing; and to ensure operational readiness across law enforcement, counterterrorism, transportation and emergency response. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Trump signed into law last month, included $1 billion for Olympics security and other costs. Wasserman said that the funding 'will be used by local and state agencies and the federal government to make sure that our games are safe and secure and ultimately the best place to experience and be an Olympic fan.' Best of Deadline Everything We Know About Paramount's 'Regretting You' Adaptation So Far Everything We Know About 'My Life With The Walter Boys' Season 2 So Far 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is gerrymandering? How a centuries-old political tactic sparked a redistricting firestorm in Texas.
Republicans are threatening to remove Democrats from office or even have them arrested. Democrats have declared 'we are at war' and pledged to go 'nuclear' in response. All of this over maps. How can something so seemingly basic spark such intense rhetoric? That's because, thanks to a process known as gerrymandering, political fights over maps can become high-stakes contests over power, how it's wielded and how far the parties are willing to go to protect it. The current standoff over gerrymandering centers around Texas, where the state's Republican majority is hoping to approve new maps that redraw the congressional districts to secure their party up to five additional seats in Congress if the maps are in place by next year's midterm elections. Dozens of Democratic legislators have fled the state to prevent the legislature from considering the maps. So far the tactic has worked, but it's unclear how long they can hold out or what authority Republicans have to overcome their holdout. What is gerrymandering? Every 10 years, the Census determines how the 435 seats in the House of Representatives are divided among the states. That decision is made at the federal level, but it's the states themselves that choose how to carve up their territory into their allotted number of districts. In most cases, district maps are approved by the state legislature, which creates an obvious incentive for the party in power to manipulate the maps to their advantage. That's what gerrymandering is: the process of drawing maps in a way that concentrates one party's power while diluting the power of the opposition. Gerrymandering is nothing new. In fact, it has been around longer than either of today's major political parties. The term was coined all the way back in 1812 after Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry approved congressional maps that included a winding district that critics said looked like a mythical salamander. Gerry plus salamander became gerrymander, even though Gerry himself found the map to be 'highly disagreeable.' Click the arrows to cycle through different gerrymandering scenarios to see how it works in practice. How does gerrymandering work? Voters for the two parties aren't spread out evenly across the states. They tend to cluster together with others who hold similar political views. Democratic voters are concentrated in big cities, while Republicans usually dominate rural areas. This creates the opportunity for lawmakers to draw lines that tactically distribute their voter base across districts so they can win as many seats as possible. There are two primary techniques that are used in gerrymandering: cracking and packing. Cracking splits a dense area of one party's voters into small pieces that are spread out across several districts where they are outnumbered by their political opposition. In Utah, for example, the lines are drawn so the state's lone Democratic stronghold of Salt Lake City is cracked into four pieces that are each part of larger, mostly rural districts. The other gerrymandering strategy is called packing, which is when maps cram as many of one party's voters as possible into a small number of districts so seats elsewhere in the state are safe. Is gerrymandering legal? Yes, but with some important caveats. The Supreme Court has ruled that there is nothing in the Constitution barring legislators from designing their state's districts to give themselves a partisan advantage. Gerrymanders based on race — maps designed to weaken the voting power of a specific minority group — are unconstitutional, however. The distinction between the two types of gerrymandering can be fuzzy because minorities, particularly Black voters, tend to vote for Democrats. In those cases, the court has found that a gerrymander can still be constitutional as long as it was created with a clear intent to dilute minority votes. Other than the rules against racial gerrymandering, which could change as soon as the next Supreme Court term, the only other nationwide mandate for congressional map drawing is that districts must have roughly the same population. Many states also set additional guidelines for their maps, including the principle that districts should be as geographically compact as possible and that all parts of a district have to be connected. How did gerrymandering become such a big deal? There have been complaints about gerrymandering for centuries, but nothing in the past compares with the intensity of the fight over district lines over the past decade and a half. Things began to escalate after the 2010 Census, when Republicans across the country mounted a coordinated effort to use redistricting to increase GOP control over both state and federal legislatures. The campaign utilized sophisticated mapping technology that had not been available during previous redistricting cycles. The new maps were credited with helping Republicans maintain a strong majority in the House of Representatives in 2012 despite receiving 1.4 million fewer votes than Democrats in House races nationwide. Republicans kept control of the House during the next two election cycles, in part because of partisan maps that helped them secure more than a dozen seats than they would have otherwise won, according to analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice. Though Democrats were largely caught off guard in 2012, blue states passed their own gerrymanders following the 2020 Census. As a result, the GOP's districting advantage had been largely erased by the 2022 midterms, according to the Associated Press. Even in the context of recent gerrymandering, Analysts say the scope and timing of Texas Republicans' redistricting effort stands out. States usually redraw their districts every 10 years, after the new census determines where House districts will be apportioned. The Texas GOP has opted to create new maps just five years after the state's last round of redistricting, with the goal of having them in place ahead of the midterms. Republicans currently control 25 of Texas's 38 congressional districts. The new map would put them in position to hold 30 House seats after next year, which would give them 80% of the state's representation in Congress in a state where President Trump secured 56% of the vote in last year's presidential race, according to the official tally from the Texas Secretary of State. That plan is on hold, however, until the standoff with Democrats who have fled the state is resolved. Democratic governors in California, New York and Illinois have pledged to gerrymander their own states if the new Texas map does go into effect, but experts say they would face serious hurdles if they do try to go tit-for-tat with the GOP on redistricting. The outcome of the current redistricting fight could have a huge impact on President Trump's final two years in the White House. Democrats need to flip only a handful of seats to gain a majority in the House, which would give them veto power over any legislation Trump wanted to pass and the authority to launch high-profile investigations into his actions in office. If Republicans keep control, Trump would enjoy two more years of a Congress that is steadfastly aligned behind his vision for the country.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Priest's Daughter Told a Friend She Was Nervous Before ‘Routine' Visa Hearing. Then She Was Detained by ICE for 5 Days
'The pain, fear, and uncertainty she and her family endured over the past five days should never have happened,' an official said after Yeonsoo Go's releaseNEED TO KNOW A 20-year-old college student and priest's daughter was detained by immigrant officials following a visa hearing on July 31 Four days later, she was released on her own recognizance after the religious community rallied around her The U.S. Department of Homeland Security claimed that she "overstayed her visa that expired more than two years ago," but an attorney for the Episcopal Diocese of New York denies that, saying her visa was valid through the end of the yearA college student — and daughter of an Episcopal priest — was detained after a standard visa hearing in New York City. Days later, she was reunited with her mom after she was brought back to Manhattan from a Louisiana detention center. 'Everything just feels surreal,' Yeonsoo Go, 20, said after she was allowed to leave Federal Plaza Immigration Court with her mother, Rev. Kyrie Kim, on the evening of Monday, Aug. 4, CW affiliate WPIX reported. 'I always had faith that I would be out soon,' she added, according to CNN affiliate WCBS. Before her arrest, the Purdue University student — who moved to the United States from South Korea with her mom back in 2021 — told a friend she was nervous because of the wave of detainments under the Trump administration, the outlet reported. Then, on Thursday, July 31, Go's fears became reality. Mary Davis, an attorney for the Episcopal Diocese in New York, where Go's mother is a priest, told CNN that the hearing was part of the process to convert her religious worker's dependent visa, known as a R-2 visa, to a student visa. In a separate interview with NBC News, Marissa Joseph, identified as Go's attorney, said the student was renewing her visa because her mother had changed employers. On July 31, Go was told she was due back in court in October, but when she and her mother exited the courthouse, ICE agents were waiting for the young woman, ABC affiliate WABC, FOX affiliate WNYW and CNN reported. 'They thought they had come for a routine hearing, for due process, and they really fell into a black hole of unknown,' Davis told CNN affiliate WCBS, adding that Go was 'absolutely terrified.' Neither attorney immediately responded to PEOPLE's request for comment. In a statement obtained by PEOPLE before her release, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin claimed that Go had "overstayed her visa that expired more than two years ago." However, lawyers for the Episcopal Diocese of New York have denied this, saying that her visa wasn't set to expire until December. 'We have no idea why they are alleging this, because we have a piece of paper that says she has a visa till December 2025,' Davis told NBC News. 'This is what lack of due process does. We have evidence on our side. They're making allegations. We are not being given the opportunity to sort it out.' DHS and ICE did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's questions about Go's release. Go's case is one of a number making headlines since President Trump returned to the White House and began cracking down on immigration. While Trump's successful campaign was centered on a law enforcement message to 'seal' the southern border and remove millions of migrants in the country illegally — with a focus on dangerous people and people with criminal backgrounds — some of the deportations have stirred debate. The local religious community was 'heartbroken' by Go's detainment, Rev. Anne Marie Witchger, a priest of St. Mark's Church in-the-Bowery and a colleague of Rev. Kim, tells PEOPLE. 'Soo came to this country legally and is lawfully here,' says Rev. Witchger, adding that both Go, who is gearing up her second year at Purdue University, and her mom are 'important members of the community.' Following the 20-year-old student's arrest, the religious community rallied around her, and a GoFundMe has been created to help with legal fees. "We call for the end of weaponization in our courts," Rt. Rev. Matthew Heyd, Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, said while advocating for her release over the weekend, according to WNYW. "We stand up for a New York and a country that respects the dignity of every person." Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Following Go's release, New York Assemblymember Amy Paulin released a statement of support. 'The pain, fear, and uncertainty she and her family endured over the past five days should never have happened,' Paulin wrote. 'But tonight we celebrate her freedom and the strength of a community that refused to stay silent.' Lawyers told WABC that the student's case is ongoing and they are cooperating with government officials. As Davis told CNN, 'We've worked very hard for our voices to be heard and to lift her up, and to convey the message that Soo does not deserve to be in detention and…it's been heard.' Read the original article on People
