&w=3840&q=100)
Beyond blame game: Thailand, Cambodia must understand their shared past
A monk visits the Preah Vihear temple on the border between Thailand and Cambodia. File image: REUTERS/Samrang Pring
The border conflict between Cambodia and Thailand that erupted on Thursday, July 24, along various locations continues to worsen as it entered its fourth day on Sunday, July 27. Each side claims the other launched fresh artillery attacks across contested border areas, despite US President Donald Trump's Saturday claim that leaders of both countries had agreed to work towards a ceasefire.
While Cambodia said it fully endorsed Trump's call for an immediate ceasefire, Thailand expressed gratitude to the US President but opined that talks with Cambodia were not possible at this stage because Cambodia continued to target Thai civilians—a claim Phnom Penh vehemently denied.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Blame Game
Both sides continue to blame each other for firing the first shot on Thursday and for military actions that have exacerbated the border fight, engulfing new areas and causing severe collateral damage.
Cambodia's Defence Ministry claimed on July 27 that Thailand shelled and launched fresh ground assaults at several points along the border, including firing heavy artillery at historic temple complexes. Contrarily, the Thai army claimed Cambodian forces had fired shots into several areas on Sunday, including civilian homes, and alleged that the Cambodian army was mobilising long-range launchers.
Thailand also accused Cambodia of launching 'armed attacks' on its civilians, while Cambodia cited Thailand's deployment of F-16 jets and tanks, and its use of cluster munitions and artillery, as examples of aggression.
As I write this piece, what began as skirmishes along the border threatens to escalate into an all-out war between the two Southeast Asian neighbors, who have a long history of disputed border claims.
Friends Turned Foes
The latest dispute has been exacerbated by a feud between two supposedly old friends—Hun Sen, the authoritarian ruler who handed power in Cambodia to his son Hun Manet in 2023, and Thailand's former populist leader Thaksin Shinawatra, whose daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra became prime minister in 2024 but had to resign over ethical issues related to the border dispute.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Both Thaksin and Hun Sen remain highly influential in their countries. Once considered close friends, they are now embroiled in a bitter dispute, trading insults on social media.
The public rift between Thaksin Shinawatra and his longtime friend Hun Sen, Cambodia's de facto leader, has further fueled their countries' conflict, whose future trajectory remains unknown.
Collateral Damage
Thailand and Cambodia share a long, complex history that predates modern borders. The rigid lines of nation-states cannot fully account for the deep civilisational ties between these two Southeast Asian neighbours.
Four days into the deadliest conflict in the last 14 years between the two countries, the border clashes, which began on Thursday with violence over contested territory near Prasat Ta Muen Thom—an ancient temple—have already claimed at least 34 lives and displaced more than two hundred thousand people. As I conclude this piece, clashes have escalated to at least 12 locations along the disputed border.
Here is the breakup:
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Casualties: According to Cambodian defence ministry sources, at least 13 people have been confirmed killed so far—8 civilians and 5 soldiers—with more than 71 wounded. In Thailand, the army has reported a total of 21 deaths so far, including 14 civilians (children among them) and 7 armed forces personnel. Additionally, at least 29 Thai soldiers and 30 civilians have been wounded in Cambodian attacks.
Displacements: At least 138,000 people have been evacuated from Thai border regions, while over 50,000 have either fled or been evacuated in Cambodia.
The casualties and evacuations in this latest conflict have already exceeded those from the previous clashes between 2008 and 2011.
The Centrifuge
The most recent tensions began in May when troops from Thailand and Cambodia briefly exchanged fire in a contested area, killing a Cambodian soldier and leading to retaliatory measures by both sides.
On Wednesday, July 23, the crisis worsened when five Thai soldiers were injured by a landmine—the second such incident in less than a week. Thailand alleged that landmines had been recently placed in the area—a claim Cambodia denies. The situation further deteriorated with Thailand recalling its ambassador to Cambodia and announcing it would expel Cambodia's envoy in Bangkok.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Why the Fighting?
First, a Century-Old Dispute—Thailand and Cambodia have bickered for decades over un-demarcated points along their 817-km (508-mile) land border, leading to periodic tensions.
The contested claims stem from a 1907 map drawn under French colonial rule that separated Cambodia from Thailand. Cambodia has used this map as a reference to claim territory, while Thailand argues it is inaccurate.
The most prominent and violent conflicts have centered around the 1,000-year-old Preah Vihear temple, a major point of dispute.
In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarded sovereignty over the Preah Vihear temple area to Cambodia. However, tension escalated in 2008 after Cambodia attempted to list it as a UNESCO World Heritage site, leading to skirmishes over several years that caused at least a dozen deaths. Since then, the ruling has been a major irritant in bilateral relations.
Following further clashes that killed more than 20 people and displaced thousands, Cambodia again turned to the ICJ in 2011, and the court reaffirmed its ruling in Cambodia's favor in 2013. Thailand, however, has continually rejected the court's jurisdiction regarding the border dispute.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Secondly, Fanning Nationalistic Fervor: The conflict has been exploited to stoke nationalism in both countries. Cambodia, under one-party rule, may be witnessing Hun Sen's efforts to shore up his son Hun Manet's position. Meanwhile, Thailand is gripped by political instability, with its prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, suspended and her party accused of failing to act swiftly on the border dispute.
Third, A Welcome Reprieve: The conflict may serve as a distraction for both countries, which are facing significant economic headwinds. Thailand is grappling with a struggling tourism sector, potential trade disruptions, and political instability, while Cambodia faces similar tourism challenges alongside concerns about its impending exit from Least Developed Country (LDC) status. Ironically, both nations face the prospect of a 36 per cent US tariff from August 1.
What Next?
Four parties can influence the warring neighbors to end the conflict and enter a truce, if not lasting peace:
International Court of Justice: Cambodia earlier asked the ICJ to resolve the border dispute. However, this is unlikely to bring even a temporary or permanent solution, as Thailand refuses to accept the ICJ's authority on the matter.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
United States of America: Thailand shares a strong strategic partnership with the US, focused on defence, security, and economics. President Trump, as he has with other major global conflicts, claimed on social media that both parties were seeking an immediate ceasefire and peace, adding that tariff negotiations with both countries were on hold until fighting stopped. Yet, despite Trump's claims, the conflict continues.
China: Though more closely aligned with Cambodia, China has strong economic ties with both countries. Expressing 'deep concern' over the latest conflict, Beijing has urged dialogue and consultation and offered to play a 'constructive role' in resolving the crisis.
Malaysia: Anwar Ibrahim, Prime Minister of Malaysia and current Chairperson of Asean, is working overtime to broker peace, calling on Thailand and Cambodia to 'stand down'. But Asean's long-standing non-interference policy raises doubts about its ability to effectively mediate peace between two warring member states.
Peace Talks
Though both countries continue to blame each other as I conclude this piece, Thai and Cambodian leaders will meet for peace talks in Malaysia in response to an invitation from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, in his capacity as Asean Chairperson and ostensibly under pressure from President Donald Trump.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The talks, at the apex level between Phumtham Wechayachai, acting Prime Minister of Thailand, and Cambodian counterpart Hun Manet, may bring a temporary pause to the conflict. However, it is unlikely to deliver long-lasting peace, as the deeply entrenched territorial disputes along the 807-km border remain a festering wound.
The author is a multi-disciplinary thought leader with Action Bias and an India based impact consultant. He is a keen watcher of changing national and international scenarios. He works as President Advisory Services of Consulting Company BARSYL. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Brazil's Lula plans joint response to Trump tariffs with Modi, other Brics leaders
Brazil's President Luiz Incio Lula da Silva has called for a joint Brics response to tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, positioning himself as a defender of multilateralism at a time of rising global trade an interview with Reuters on Wednesday, Lula criticised Trump's recent tariff wave, saying they reflect an attempt to dismantle the global multilateral order in favour of unilateral deals dominated by the United President Trump is doing is tacit -- he wants to dismantle multilateralism, where agreements are made collectively within institutions, and replace it with unilateralism, where he negotiates one-on-one with other countries," Lula said. "What bargaining power does a small Latin American country have against the United States? None."LULA TO SPEAK WITH BRICS LEADERSLula said he will reach out to Brics leaders -- including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chinese President Xi Jinping and other leaders -- to understand how each country to formulate a collective response."I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation, what the implications are for each country, so we can make a decision," Lula said."It's important to remember that the Brics have ten countries at the G20."Lula, who held the Brics presidency, said Brazil will use its leadership to bring member countries together -- including Russia, South Africa and other emerging economies -- to stand up for multilateral trade and collective has recently labelled Brics as "anti-American" and threatened additional 10% tariffs on its member nations. The move followed last month's Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro and is seen as part of Trump's broader campaign to reassert US trade dominance ahead of the 2026 ACCUSES BOLSONARO OF INCITING US TARIFFS ON BRAZILThe Brazilian president also accused his predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro, of working behind the scenes to provoke Trump into targeting Brazil with punitive trade measures."He (Bolsonaro) is being tried for his actions," Lula told Reuters. "Now I think he should face more legal proceedings because of what he is doing, inciting the United States against Brazil, causing harm to the Brazilian economy, causing harm to Brazilian workers."Lula's remarks follow public statements by So Paulo Congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro -- the former president's son -- who recently moved to the United States. Eduardo claimed credit for influencing Trump's White House to impose sweeping 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods, which came into effect on Wednesday. advertisement"There is no precedent in history for a president of the republic and a son, who is a congressman, to go to the United States to incite the president against Brazil," Lula said, calling the Bolsonaros "traitors to the homeland."The tensions are not only about trade. The United States condemned the decision by Brazil's Supreme Court to place former President Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest before his trial on charges of plotting a coup.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersMust Watch


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump pulls the trigger, doubles India levy to 50%
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday imposing an additional 25% tariff on all Indian goods entering the US, carrying out his threat made a day ago to penalise New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. Trump's additional 25% tariff followed after over a week of criticism focused on New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian energy. (REUTERS) The additional 25%, due to take effect on August 27, puts India at par with Brazil as the two countries whose exports will face the highest levy of 50% on their goods. The duties would put Indian exporters at a significant disadvantage compared to their rivals in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Vietnam – which face tariffs of between 19% and 20% tariffs. 'I have received additional information from various senior officials on the actions of the government of the Russian Federation with respect to the situation in Ukraine,' Trump wrote in the executive order. 'I determine that it is necessary and appropriate to impose an additional ad valorem duty on imports of articles of India, which is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil.' India hit back, reiterating that the American actions are 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. 'India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests,' ministry of external affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement, adding that it was 'extremely unfortunate' that the US had chosen to act against India 'for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest'. He was alluding to continuing imports of Russian energy, especially LNG, by European Union (EU) member states that have paid Russia $105.6 billion for gas imports since the start of the invasion of Ukraine. Almost 87% of all EU imports of Russian LNG went to Spain, France or Belgium, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named. To be sure, the executive order continues exemptions provided earlier for sectors like pharmaceuticals and smartphones — though how long these exemptions remain is unclear. The order also exempts goods that are already in transit to America and which will clear US customs before September 17. 'The move places India among the most heavily taxed US trading partners, far above rivals such as China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, and threatens most of India's $86.5 billion in annual exports to the US, from textiles to machinery,' according to analysis by the Global Trade Research Institute. 'The tariffs are expected to make Indian goods far costlier in the US, with potential to cut US-bound exports by 40–50%,' the GTRI analysis added. The executive order issued on Wednesday specifies that certain exemptions will continue. Among these are Section 232 national security exemptions that protect Indian pharmaceuticals — which account for about 40% of America's generic medicines — along with electronics, semiconductors and technology products that form the backbone of bilateral trade. Additional exemptions under Executive Order 14257's Annex II cover raw materials, certain metals and chemical formulations. Select product categories like apparels, vehicles and parts, furniture, organic chemicals and some food products like shrimp – which account for billions of dollars of exports -- will now face high tariffs entering the US market. Trump's additional 25% tariff followed after over a week of criticism focused on New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian energy. Washington has sought to increase economic pressure on Russia to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war by restricting Moscow's oil export revenues. India is Russia's second largest market for oil exports after China. In 2024, China purchased Russian oil worth $62.6 billion, followed by India's purchases to the tune of $52.7 billion. In the order, the US president also specified that he may – in the 21 days before the order takes effect – change the levy if 'if another country retaliates against the United States in response to this action, or if the government of the Russian Federation or a foreign country impacted by this order takes significant steps to address the national emergency and align sufficiently with the United States on national security, foreign policy, and economic matters.' In other words, Trump held out both a threat that he could ratchet up the levy or pare it back, depending on any retaliation or changes to Russia's stance in the war against Ukraine. Trump has set an August 8 deadline for Russia to agree to a Ukraine truce deal. 'There's a higher chance that India will find loopholes to concede the agri/soybean access the US has been asking for, than there is for India to halt oil purchases from Russia due to external pressure. Either way, it is unlikely that a decision will be taken on either front as long as Parliament is in session. Momentum on real solutions shouldn't be expected before August 20,' says Prerna Bountra, Deputy Director at the Ananta Aspen Centre, a New Delhi-based think tank. The rising tensions between India and the United States have also spiralled into a political controversy, with Opposition parties objecting to the government's handling of ties with America. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi called the move 'economic blackmail' by the US to bully India into an unfair trade deal, adding Prime Minister Narendra Modi should not let Indian interests be overridden. (With inputs from Rezaul H Laskar in New Delhi)

Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Brazil's President Lula plans joint statement with PM Narendra Modi, other BRICS leaders on Donald Trump's tariffs
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on Wednesday indicated his plans to call PM Narendra Modi and other leaders of the BRICS bloc in response to the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump. Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva speaks during an interview with Reuters at the Alvorada Palace, in Brasilia, Brazil, He said he was planning to ring PM Narendra Modi, Chinese President Xi Jinping and other leaders of BRICS.(REUTERS) The US tariffs on Brazilian goods jumped to 50% on Wednesday, but Lula said that his country won't announce any reciprocal measures. Instead, the Brazilian President told Reuters in an interview that he was planning to ring PM Narendra Modi, Chinese President Xi Jinping and other leaders of BRICS to discuss the possibility of a joint statement on Trump's tariffs. Trump had announced that the US would impose an additional 10 per cent tariff on 'any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS' with 'no exceptions'. The BRICS countries, including India, had released a joint declaration voicing 'serious concerns' about the 'rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures' in an apparent jibe at the Trump administration's trade policy. Lula might be looking for a more stinging statement from BRICS this time around. Brazil President doubles down on not calling Donald Trump Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva is in no rush to ring the White House, doubling down on his earlier statement that he wouldn't call Donald Trump to hold talks over the tariff issue. "The day my intuition says Trump is ready to talk, I won't hesitate to call him. But today my intuition says he doesn't want to talk. And I'm not going to humiliate myself," Lula told Reuters. Lula described the US-Brazil relations at a 200-year nadir after Trump tied the new tariff to his demand for an end to the prosecution of right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial for plotting to overturn the 2022 election. The President said Brazil's Supreme Court, which is hearing the case against Bolsonaro, "does not care what Trump says and it should not," adding that Bolsonaro should face another trial for provoking Trump's intervention, calling the right-wing former president a "traitor to the homeland." "We had already pardoned the US intervention in the 1964 coup. But this now is not a small intervention. It's the president of the United States thinking he can dictate rules for a sovereign country like Brazil. It's unacceptable," Lula said. Despite Brazil's exports facing one of the highest tariffs imposed by Trump, the new US trade barriers look unlikely to derail Latin America's largest economy, giving its President more room to stand his ground against Trump than most Western leaders.