
Boy starved to death in Birmingham ‘was invisible to child services'
Three-year-old Abiyah Yasharahyalah, who lived with his parents in Birmingham, died in early 2020 from a respiratory illness.
He was severely malnourished when he died and suffered from anaemia, rickets and stunted growth which, as well as the illness, were exacerbated by the 'restricted' vegan diet he was given at home.
A local child safeguarding practice review, published on Wednesday, into Abiyah's death found that a lack of questions asked about how the family's lifestyle and culture could have had an effect on his health, stating 'the safeguarding of children being affected by harmful cultural practice is paramount'.
The review also found that while the family were subject to visits, they were sporadic and short, noting that Abiyah 'was only ever seen by a small number of professionals during his lifetime, and for a limited time only'.
At the parents' trial at Coventry crown court in December last year, the court was told that following Abiyah's death, his mother and father, Tai and Naiyahmi Yasharahyalah aged 42 and 43, performed an 'eight-day ritual' in the hopes that their son would 'come back' to life, before burying his body in the garden of their home in Handsworth in the centre of the city.
The court also heard that police had visited the families residence three times, including in February 2018 when Abiyah was still alive, but that 'no details were recorded' about Abiyah, with his presence 'almost invisible on review of records'.
The home was also visited by social workers on at least five occasions, but these visits were described as 'very limited, reinforcing that there was very little insight into (Abiyah's) existence, health or welfare'.
The review found that authorities coming into contact with the child's family showed a 'general lack of knowledge or assessment of the parents' belief systems', leading to an 'insufficient understanding about the impact on his care.'.
It added that his parents' behaviour 'often distracted or diverted professional attention' away from Abiyah's safety and welfare and that 'parental resistance of advice, support or authority ultimately resulted in (Abiyah) becoming invisible and lost from professional view.'
Annie Hudson, chair of the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, said that the report strongly evidenced 'the paramount importance of understanding what life is like for children, and not being distracted or diverted away by parental behaviour when considering children's safety and welfare.
'It is important to respect parents' faith and beliefs,' she added. 'However, as this review highlights, professionals must always be mindful of whether their views about parents, including their faith, race and culture, is inhibiting their capacity to be questioning and act together in a timely way to safeguard and protect children.'
Tai, a medical genetics graduate and Naiyami, a former shop worker, left the body buried in the garden when they were evicted from the house in 2022. The couple adopted their own belief and legal system dubbed 'slick law' which incorporated elements of Igbo culture.
They were described as shunning society, putting a sign on the door of their home which warned 'all governmental and non-governmental bodies' not to ring the doorbell or make 'any contact with any member of this house'.
Tai and Naiyami, who were arrested in December 2022 whilst living in shipping container in Somerset, were sentenced to 24 years and 6 months and 19 years and 6 months for multiple charges including child cruelty, causing or allowing the death of a child, and attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Netanyahu has pushed Hamas to the brink of destruction
It's often been said that there is nothing as pathetic – and embarrassing – as British politicians opining about what they want to see happen in the Middle East. The days when we ran the show ended many decades ago, and the idea that anyone in Israel or the rest of the region gives a damn about what some nonentity British MP thinks is risible. But as the past few weeks have shown, it's not quite as simple as that. The reaction by Hamas to the Government's plan to recognise a Palestine state – the same applies to similar announcements by France, Canada and Australia – shows that we nonetheless have the ability to throw a giant spanner in the works. Sir Keir Starmer's statement last month had one immediate effect: it emboldened Hamas and destroyed ceasefire talks that had appeared to be making progress. As Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, put it: 'When you have all these European nations saying, 'Israel's not going to have a ceasefire, we're going to go ahead and unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state,' what do you think that did with Hamas? It emboldened them. It empowered them. And that's when negotiations were over right then.' That is the context in which the latest development in the ceasefire talks needs to be seen, with Hamas reportedly agreeing to a joint Egyptian-Qatari proposal for it to release 10 of the remaining living hostages and 18 bodies (there are believed to be 20 still alive, and another 30 or so dead) during a 60-day truce, with further negotiations over a permanent ceasefire. The question being asked is why Hamas has seemingly done a volte-face and agreed to a ceasefire, barely three weeks after walking away from the last round. First, we simply don't know what, if any, pressure is being applied by Qatar, which is the only nation other than Iran that can force Hamas to act as it wants. But we do know that there is even more pressure on Hamas now from another direction: Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu has been pilloried in Britain and elsewhere for his recently announced plan to occupy Gaza City and to widen military action to all of Gaza.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements
Musician Paul Weller is suing his former accountants after they stopped working with the singer after public statements alleging Israel was committing genocide in Gaza, according to a legal letter. The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included: 'It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide. 'Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views.' Lawyers for Weller claim that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said: 'I've always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide. What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe. 'I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. 'Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship – it's complicity. 'I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people.' Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter also states. Cormac McDonough, a lawyer at Hodge Jones and Allen, representing Weller, said that his case 'reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights'. Mr McDonough added: 'Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Anti-British sentiment is on the rise thanks to unchecked immigration and cowardly bureaucrats. I'm proud to have made this country my home - and it's time we embrace patriotism and ditch multi-culturalism, writes imam DR TAJ HARGEY
A new front has opened up in Britain's culture wars, fuelled by extremism from radicals and cowardice from officialdom. Over recent weeks, Labour-run councils across England – pandering to self-appointed community leaders and activists – have been removing St George's Cross flags attached to lamp posts and the like.