Personal Medicaid data given to ICE for immigration enforcement
WASHINGTON ‒ The U.S. health department said it is giving Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials access to the personal data of 79 million Medicaid enrollees to help them track down immigrants who may not be living legally in the country.
Giving ICE access to the personal data of Medicaid enrollees marks another escalation in President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policies. It may also raise privacy concerns under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, known as HIPAA.
A Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson said sharing data between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, fell within the department's legal authority.
"With respect to the recent data sharing between CMS and DHS, HHS acted entirely within its legal authority – and in full compliance with all applicable laws – to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them," the spokesperson said.
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security said the department was exploring an initiative with CMS to ensure people living in the country illegally do not receive Medicaid benefits.
The agreement was first reported earlier on July 17 by the Associated Press, which said it was signed on July 14.
The Medicaid health program, which provides coverage for low-income people, is jointly funded by the federal government and states.
Immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally are not eligible for Medicaid under federal law, but 14 states and the District of Columbia provide coverage for eligible children regardless of immigration status, and seven states and the District of Columbia do so for adults.
"CMS is aggressively cracking down on states that may be misusing federal Medicaid funds to subsidize care for illegal immigrants," the HHS spokesperson said. "This oversight effort – supported by lawful interagency data sharing with DHS – is focused on identifying waste, fraud, and systemic abuse."
The spokesperson did not address questions from Reuters on the type of data being shared or on how HHS would ensure HIPAA protections are upheld. The AP, citing a copy of the data-sharing agreement, said the data included home addresses and ethnicities.
The agreement is the latest in a series of moves by the health department in support of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown and comes a week after it widened its interpretation of a law banning most immigrants from receiving federal public benefits.
(Reporting by Ahmed Aboulenein and Kanishka Singh; Editing by Daniel Wallis and Rosalba O'Brien)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Junk food banned from SNAP benefits in 6 more states, a win for MAHA advocates
In a win for Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) advocates, six more states have gotten waivers allowing them to ban soda, candy and other high-sugar junk foods from being purchased through the federally funded, but state-operated Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. The waivers, which amend the statutory definition of eligible food for purchase under SNAP, were granted to West Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas. The new restrictions on what can and cannot be purchased will go into effect in 2026. The six new waivers bring the number of states that have sought to restrict SNAP purchases of junk food to 12. The other states who received waivers from the Trump administration earlier this year were Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Arkansas, Idaho and Utah. "For years, SNAP has used taxpayer dollars to fund soda and candy, products that fuel America's diabetes and chronic disease epidemics," Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. "These waivers help put real food back at the center of the program and empower states to lead the charge in protecting public health." Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has praised the historic efforts that states, mostly those with Republican leadership, have made to help improve the health and nutrition assistance provided through SNAP. On average, 42 million low-income Americans receive food stamp assistance each month, including one in five American children under 17, according to a report from the Trump administration released earlier this year. "It is incredible to see so many states take action at this critical moment in our nation's history and do something to begin to address chronic health problems," Rollins said after the latest announcement of new waivers. "President Trump has changed the status quo, and the entire Cabinet is taking action to Make America Healthy Again. … These state waivers promote healthier options for families in need." Of the 12 states that have been granted SNAP waivers thus far, all of them will restrict SNAP funds from being used to purchase sugary drinks, including soda, while at least eight of the states have indicated plans to ban SNAP funds for candy purchases. Some states, such as Florida, Louisiana and Nebraska, will explicitly ban energy drinks as well, while others, like Arkansas, have indicated drinks with less than 50% natural juice will be banned. ABC News medical correspondent Darien Sutton argued the move, although pushed as an effort to improve health outcomes, lacks evidence. "There's no evidence that taking away access to soda will actually fight these conditions," he said, according to ABC News. "Sugar is one of those culprits that you always have to be mindful of." Sutton pointed out that U.S. dietary guidelines recommend that men do not have more than 35 grams of sugar per day, while women are told to limit it to 25 grams per day.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Huge cuts to mRNA research spark fears about future pandemics
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision this week to cancel hundreds of millions of dollars in mRNA vaccine funding will leave the United States unprepared for the next pandemic and other public health emergencies, public health experts warned. 'I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions—but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives,' President Trump's former surgeon general Jerome Adams said in a post to X. 'mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions.' The first COVID-19 mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna hit the market in 2021, just a year after the virus first appeared. Vaccines typically take years to develop, but the mRNA shots were developed in record time due to a massive influx of funding from the first Trump administration, dubbed Operation Warp Speed. The COVID shots proved safe and effective, and helped bring about an end to the pandemic. Experts say mRNA technology has the potential to revolutionize treatments for evolving pathogens, especially bird flu, because the platform can be easily modified. On Tuesday, Kennedy cancelled $500 million worth of contracts related to mRNA vaccine research being funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. Instead, he said the agency will focus on platforms with 'stronger safety records.' Public health experts point out that reviews of the hundreds of millions, if not billions, of doses of mRNA shots administered worldwide have found very few adverse events. 'It's pretty clear that the administration, or at least the secretary, has a political vendetta not just against vaccines but against mRNA in general,' said Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University. Coller said the move will put the U.S. behind other nations in biomedical research and sends a 'clear message' to scientists and the industry that it is not wise to invest in mRNA technology because if they do, they will likely not receive funding or approval from the federal government. Jennifer Nuzzo, a professor of epidemiology and director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health, told The Hill that the cancellation is a threat to national security, as it opens the U.S. to future public health emergencies caused by biological warfare. 'One of the ways that we deter that from happening is to say the United States is absolutely committed to preparedness,' Nuzzo said. 'When we take them off the table and leave nothing in their place, we basically signal to our adversaries that we are no longer interested in defending ourselves.' In the long run, Nuzzo said, winding down research efforts on mRNA vaccine platforms will stifle medical innovation coming out of the U.S., including new treatments for diseases like cancer. 'It's troubling on a number of fronts,' she said. MRNA vaccines work by sending instructions to cells to make a specific type of protein found on the outer membrane of a virus. The body's immune system is then able to recognize that protein as something foreign and will create antibodies to fight it. That same general approach could be used to help potentially vaccinate someone against a particular cancer, according to Nuzzo. 'Cancers have a genetic signature,' she said. 'We don't know what's going to happen but there are some preliminary studies that suggest it could be a very promising way to treat cancers.' None of the canceled contracts directly deal with cancer research, but the move will likely cause a chilling effect among researchers that ultimately impacts cancer-related work, said Michael Osterholm, founding director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy and member of the Vaccine Integrity Project. 'I think you're going to see anyone who is willing to invest in mRNA technology, pulling back, if not completely, getting out of this business,' he said. 'This is terribly unfortunate, given that we have a number of other infectious diseases for which this vaccine platform was being explored in terms of taking on other infectious diseases and including some cancer vaccines.' Kennedy is deeply skeptical of vaccines in general, and mRNA vaccines in particular. In 2021, he falsely said the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was the 'deadliest vaccine ever made.' Kennedy has also been facing pressure from fellow anti-vaccine activists for not doing enough to keep mRNA vaccines off the market. He was criticized earlier this year when the Food and Drug Administration approved Moderna's updated COVID-19 vaccine, even though the agency limited its use in children. In a video posted to X on Tuesday, Kennedy falsely claimed mRNA shots don't protect against respiratory viruses and don't work if a virus mutates. 'One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective,' Kennedy said. Following the announcement, public health experts urged Congress to restore funding towards mRNA vaccine research, with some calling it an 'assault' on federal vaccine policy. 'The HHS Secretary continues a mindless assault on sound federal vaccine policy,' said Robert Steinbrook, director of the Public Citizen Health Reseach Group. 'The mRNA vaccine platform was essential to rapid vaccine development and deployment during the COVIVD-19 pandemic and remains essential to preparing for future public health emergencies.' But the full extent of Kennedy's move isn't known. A Moderna spokesperson told The Hill that they were not aware of any new award cancellations since their contract to help develop an H5N1 bird flu vaccine was canceled in May. Gritstone Bio, another company on the HHS list of cancelled contracts, ceased operations earlier this year after the company filed for bankruptcy in 2024. A spokesperson for Tiba Bio said HHS's decision to terminate their BARDA contract 'comes as a surprise' since its contract was for a therapeutic, not a vaccine, and it does not use mRNA technology. Instead, it uses a method called RNA interference, which the FDA approved to treat some diseases in 2018.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FACT FOCUS: RFK Jr.'s reasons for cutting mRNA vaccine not supported by evidence
Although mRNA vaccines saved millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. incorrectly argued they are ineffective to justify the Department of Health and Human Service's recent decision to cancel $500 million in government-funded research projects to develop new vaccines using the technology. The longtime vaccine critic said in an X video posted Tuesday evening that mRNA vaccines do not adequately prevent upper respiratory infections such as COVID-19 and the flu, advocating instead for the development vaccines that use other processes. COVID-19 is the only virus for which real-world data on mRNA vaccine effectiveness is currently available, as mRNA vaccines for other diseases, including the flu, are still under development. The two scientists whose discoveries enabled the creation of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 won a Nobel Prize in 2023 for their work. Kennedy's claim ignores how mRNA vaccines work, according to experts. They prevent against severe infection and death, but cannot completely prevent an infection from occurring in the first place. Plus, years of research supports the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines that use mRNA technology. Here's a closer look at the facts. KENNEDY: 'As the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.' THE FACTS: His claim is contradicted by scientific evidence. Countless studies show that vaccinated individuals fare far better against COVID-19 infections than those who are unvaccinated, while others have estimated that COVID-19 vaccines prevented millions of deaths during the global pandemic. The mRNA vaccines do not prevent respiratory diseases entirely, experts say. Rather, they can prevent more serious illness that leads to complications and death. For example, an mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 may prevent an infection in the upper respiratory tract that feels like a bad cold from spreading to the lower respiratory tract, where it could affect one's ability to breathe. 'A vaccine cannot block a respiratory infection,' said Dr. Jake Scott, an infectious diseases physician and clinical associate professor at Stanford University School of Medicine. 'That's never been the standard for a respiratory virus vaccine. And it's never been the expectation, and it's never been that realistic.' He called Kennedy's claim 'misguided.' Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University, had a similar outlook. 'Vaccinations don't have to be neutralizing, meaning that you're not going to get COVID,' he said. 'But the important part of a vaccination is that they reduce hospitalization and death. And a reduction in hospitalization and death is proof of an effective vaccine.' Vaccines have traditionally required growing viruses or pieces of viruses called proteins and then purifying them. Then a small dose of the vaccine is injected to train the body how to recognize when a real infection hits so it's ready to fight back. But this method takes a long time. The mRNA technology speeds up the process and allows existing vaccines to be updated more quickly. The 'm' in mRNA stands for messenger because the vaccine carries instructions for our bodies to make proteins. Scientists figured out how to harness that natural process for vaccines by making mRNA in a lab. They take a snippet of the genetic code that carries instructions for making the protein they want the vaccine to target. Injecting that snippet instructs the body to become its own mini-vaccine factory, making enough copies of the protein for the immune system to recognize and react. Scott explained that mRNA vaccines are not a 'magic force field' that the immune system can use to block an infection, as it can't detect whether a virus is nearby. It can only respond to a virus that has already entered the body. In the case of COVID-19, this means that the virus could cause an upper respiratory tract infection — a cold, essentially — but would be significantly less likely to cause more severe consequences elsewhere. Myriad studies on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines have been published since they first became available in late 2020. Although protection does wane over time, they provide the strongest barrier against severe infection and death. For example, a 2024 study by the World Health Organization found COVID-19 vaccines reduced deaths in the WHO's European region by at least 57%, saving more than 1.4 million lives since their introduction in December 2020. A 2022 study published in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases found that nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year. Researchers used data from 185 countries to estimate that vaccines prevented 4.2 million COVID-19 deaths in India, 1.9 million in the United States, 1 million in Brazil, 631,000 in France and 507,000 in the United Kingdom. The main finding — that 19.8 million COVID-19 deaths were prevented — is based on estimates of how many more deaths than usual occurred during the time period. Using only reported COVID-19 deaths, the same model yielded 14.4 million deaths averted by vaccines. Another 2022 study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, reported that two mRNA vaccines were more than 90% effective against COVID-19. Operation Warp Speed, the federal effort to facilitate the development and distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine, began under the first Trump administration. 'What I don't understand is why is President Trump is allowing RFK Jr. to undermine his legacy that led to a medical intervention that literally saved millions of lives?' Coller said. 'Why is Trump allowing RFK to undermine U.S. leadership in biomedical research and drug development?' ___ Find AP Fact Checks here: Solve the daily Crossword
