Melbourne suburbs where houses remain affordable for buyers
Melbourne suburbs where houses remain affordable for buyers.
Stretching the budget from a unit to a house makes sense for a savvy buyer in suburbs where the difference can be less than the cost of a new car.
New Ray White data reveals areas such as Doveton, Melton South and Hampton Park East, the gap between the median price for houses and units is as little as $58,000, opening the door for buyers to set their sight on a full-sized home.
Ray White chief economist Nerida Conisbee said the figures challenge the belief that units were always the most affordable entry point.
'In some parts of Melbourne, houses are still very achievable,' she said.
'If the gap is small, and you're planning to stay for the long term, stretching for a house can be a very smart move.'
RELATED: Buyers eyeing forgotten Melb Woolies store
Revealed $40k+ Aussie mortgage mistake
Why 15 buyers fought over this Craigieburn gem
Buyers were often surprised to find just how close house prices were to units in outer suburbs, Ms Conisbee said.
'It's not everywhere, but where that gap is narrow, it's absolutely worth looking at houses instead.'
In Doveton, the median unit price sits at $487,500, compared to $545,000 for a house, a difference of just $57,500.
Houses were within reach in Melton South, a gap of $62,500, Hampton Park East, $72,500, Werribee, $90,000, and Craigieburn, $110,000.
Ni Advocacy director and buyers advocate Kevin Ni said young buyers are bypassing units in outer suburbs like Melton and Hampton Park East to secure full-sized houses with better land, value and long-term growth.
Ni Advocacy buyers advocate Kevin Ni said home prices was forcing buyers to rethink old assumptions and location was no longer the only driver to get in to the market.
'When you're looking at a $60,000 difference, and you get more land, privacy, and long-term growth potential, it's worth stretching for the house,' Mr Ni said.
'We're seeing some buyers turn away from units altogether in suburbs like these, especially with help from parents or the first home guarantee.'
235a McGrath Road, Wyndham Vale, with a $465,000-$495,000 price guide.
8 Epping Drive, Wyndham Vale, with a $640,000-$670,000 price guide.
Mr Ni said that while many younger buyers were drawn to units in inner suburbs for lifestyle, families and second-time buyers were increasingly seeking value on the fringe.
'People are getting smarter about trade-offs. They're prioritising land and growth over postcode prestige.'
Independent economist Cameron Kusher said the price gap between houses and units remained relatively modest in some growth areas.
'In blue-chip areas, houses have skyrocketed and units haven't kept pace,' Mr Kusher said.
14 Babina Ave, Melton South has a $609,000-$639,000 price guide.
40/17 Crestmont Drive, Melton South, has a $395,000-$420,000 price guide.
'But in the outer suburbs, that hasn't happened to the same extent which is why we're seeing more buyers opt for houses if the numbers stack up.'
While units would always have a place in Melbourne's housing mix, Mr Kusher said first-home buyers were increasingly running the maths.
'Where the price gap is narrow, and lifestyle needs allow, it's a no-brainer, go for the house.'
Additional reporting by Lydia Kellner
Sign up to the Herald Sun Weekly Real Estate Update. Click here to get the latest Victorian property market news delivered direct to your inbox.
MORE: Melb buyers heat up market in cold snap
Why these iconic Vic pubs are up for sale
How this Rowville home made $200k extra
david.bonaddio@news.com.au
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Young Aussie sparks debate on AI use at job interviews
A 30-year-old Aussie woman has revealed she was rejected from a job opportunity because the employers suspected she was using Chat GPT during the interview phase of recruitment. Alexandra Frisby-Smith revealed to that she works as a creative, systems and workflow consultant. The role that she recently applied for would be on an ongoing part-time basis and pay an extra $20,000 a year. The process, consisted of an interview, a questionnaire and a trial task. Ms Frisby-Smith thought that using the AI tool for the task which she was given 30 minutes for was a smart idea. 'The most efficient way was to brainstorm everything and then put it into ChatGPT, and that can make it cohesive and easy to digest,' she told However, following the interview she was told by the potential employer that she hadn't got the job due to her use of the AI tool. If you'd like to view this content, please adjust your . To find out more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Guide. 'I got a rejection email yesterday from the interview process I had and one of the main reasons was my heavy use of ChatGPT' Ms Frisby-Smith revealed in a TikTok video. Ms Frisby-Smith defended her use of AI in the interview, claiming that it was a useful and efficient tool. Credit: TikTok 'Oh my gosh, when are we gonna stop shaming people who use ChatGPT? Because absolutely if you use it intelligently it's the most efficient way of working ever.' Ms Frisby-smith said that in the industries she works in there should be no deterrent to use AI as part of her job. 'I'm proud to say that I use it because I use it to its edges . . . as someone in operations and systems management and virtual assistance why is using ChatGPT a turn off? It's so intelligent' Ms Frisby-Smith continued. The TikTok video was flooded with comments, most of which disagreed with Ms Frisby-Smith's arguments. 'Using it when you are applying to a job is not 'using it intelligently'' one person wrote. 'Nah I think being able to write correspondence yourself is an important communication skill' another said. 'If they can tell you are using ChatGPT you are not using it right.' one person claimed.
Herald Sun
7 hours ago
- Herald Sun
Melbourne suburbs where houses remain affordable for buyers
Melbourne suburbs where houses remain affordable for buyers. Stretching the budget from a unit to a house makes sense for a savvy buyer in suburbs where the difference can be less than the cost of a new car. New Ray White data reveals areas such as Doveton, Melton South and Hampton Park East, the gap between the median price for houses and units is as little as $58,000, opening the door for buyers to set their sight on a full-sized home. Ray White chief economist Nerida Conisbee said the figures challenge the belief that units were always the most affordable entry point. 'In some parts of Melbourne, houses are still very achievable,' she said. 'If the gap is small, and you're planning to stay for the long term, stretching for a house can be a very smart move.' RELATED: Buyers eyeing forgotten Melb Woolies store Revealed $40k+ Aussie mortgage mistake Why 15 buyers fought over this Craigieburn gem Buyers were often surprised to find just how close house prices were to units in outer suburbs, Ms Conisbee said. 'It's not everywhere, but where that gap is narrow, it's absolutely worth looking at houses instead.' In Doveton, the median unit price sits at $487,500, compared to $545,000 for a house, a difference of just $57,500. Houses were within reach in Melton South, a gap of $62,500, Hampton Park East, $72,500, Werribee, $90,000, and Craigieburn, $110,000. Ni Advocacy director and buyers advocate Kevin Ni said young buyers are bypassing units in outer suburbs like Melton and Hampton Park East to secure full-sized houses with better land, value and long-term growth. Ni Advocacy buyers advocate Kevin Ni said home prices was forcing buyers to rethink old assumptions and location was no longer the only driver to get in to the market. 'When you're looking at a $60,000 difference, and you get more land, privacy, and long-term growth potential, it's worth stretching for the house,' Mr Ni said. 'We're seeing some buyers turn away from units altogether in suburbs like these, especially with help from parents or the first home guarantee.' 235a McGrath Road, Wyndham Vale, with a $465,000-$495,000 price guide. 8 Epping Drive, Wyndham Vale, with a $640,000-$670,000 price guide. Mr Ni said that while many younger buyers were drawn to units in inner suburbs for lifestyle, families and second-time buyers were increasingly seeking value on the fringe. 'People are getting smarter about trade-offs. They're prioritising land and growth over postcode prestige.' Independent economist Cameron Kusher said the price gap between houses and units remained relatively modest in some growth areas. 'In blue-chip areas, houses have skyrocketed and units haven't kept pace,' Mr Kusher said. 14 Babina Ave, Melton South has a $609,000-$639,000 price guide. 40/17 Crestmont Drive, Melton South, has a $395,000-$420,000 price guide. 'But in the outer suburbs, that hasn't happened to the same extent which is why we're seeing more buyers opt for houses if the numbers stack up.' While units would always have a place in Melbourne's housing mix, Mr Kusher said first-home buyers were increasingly running the maths. 'Where the price gap is narrow, and lifestyle needs allow, it's a no-brainer, go for the house.' Additional reporting by Lydia Kellner Sign up to the Herald Sun Weekly Real Estate Update. Click here to get the latest Victorian property market news delivered direct to your inbox. MORE: Melb buyers heat up market in cold snap Why these iconic Vic pubs are up for sale How this Rowville home made $200k extra
News.com.au
7 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Why are you shaming me?': 30-year-old calls out stigma around ChatGPT
A young Aussie woman has revealed she was rejected from a job because she used ChatGPT during the recruitment process – unearthing a controversial new workplace trend. Alexandra Frisby-Smith, 30, works as a virtual assistant. She recently applied for a role that would pay $80 an hour for five hours a week on an ongoing basis, resulting in an extra $20,000 a year. Ms Frisby-Smith explained to that she was going through the process which involved an interview, a questionnaire and a trial task. She was then given a list of tasks her potential employer needs to complete daily and asked to streamline them. 'I was brainstorming and thinking, 'Can I do it this way?' Or that way, basically bending and stretching and working out what platforms would work best,' she said. 'Once I worked out an overview, I popped that into ChatGPT and it created a cohesive and beautiful way of representing my thoughts.' Ms Frisby-Smith explained that since she was given 30 minutes to complete the task she figured using the AI tool was smart. 'The most efficient way was to brainstorm everything and then put it into ChatGPT, and that can make it cohesive and easy to digest,' she argued. After completing the task, she received an email from her potential employer explaining that she hadn't been hired because of her 'heavy use of ChatGPT,' which Ms Frisby-Smith found confusing. 'I'm not trying to hide the fact that I use it. Everyone has their different views, and I can see why people dislike it because it takes the humanness out of writing, which I think is what she was concerned about,' she said. At the end of the day, Ms Frisby-Smith ultimately thinks ChatGPT is simply a tool that makes her 'more efficient', so it is ultimately helpful. The virtual assistant said once she posted about her experience on TikTok she was surprised to learn how many people were 'afraid' of ChatGPT. 'They are afraid because it is new and it is different but it can make us more efficient but people are also feeling threatened,' she said. 'It is like having an assistant, like a real-life person you're working with and collaborating with.' Ms Frisby-Smith ultimately stands by her use of the AI tool and doesn't understand why there's a stigma around it. 'Why are you shaming me? When are we going to stop shaming people who use it?' she asked. The 30-year-old might have embraced the online tool, but others on social media are far wearier and don't see using the program as acceptable. 'When are we going to start shaming people for being too damn lazy to do the bare minimum?' one asked. 'Girl, come on,' another said. 'I use it,' one admitted. 'Nothing wrong with using it, but it's the lack of attention to detail that would've been the reason,' someone else noted. 'I'm struggling to take this seriously,' another chimed in. 'Nah, I think being able to write correspondence yourself is an important communication skill,' one argued. 'When are people going to realise that employers need to know your capabilities and not AI's capabilities?' someone asked. 'Don't get me wrong, ChatGPT is super useful, but something you're submitting should always be in your own words,' another recommended. Recruitment expert Roxanne Calder told that ChatGPT has already become the norm in the job interview process. One big thing she's noticing now is people sending through resumes using the AI chatbot and not bothering to add their own flair. 'Resumes get sent through in third person now,' she said. Ms Calder is realistic about the new technology, saying there's no point ignoring it, otherwise you'll get left behind. However she does think it needs to be used wisely. 'These tools are really great, and everyone should get across them and work out how to integrate, but it is really obvious when someone uses it and doesn't add their own words,' she said. Ms Calder said Chat GPT is fine if it is treated like a tool but it shouldn't be relied on to do your work for you. 'If you are lazy and don't integrate your thoughts, then the work isn't yours. If someone presents a piece of work to you and you ask them questions about it and they can't answer them it is undeniable you've used ChatGPT,' she said. 'It should be used as a tool only.' If you're making the chatbot app do all the work for you, then in Ms Calder's eyes, you've 'lost credibility'. And of course, that is going to hold you back from securing jobs.
