‘Why are you shaming me?': 30-year-old calls out stigma around ChatGPT
Alexandra Frisby-Smith, 30, works as a virtual assistant. She recently applied for a role that would pay $80 an hour for five hours a week on an ongoing basis, resulting in an extra $20,000 a year.
Ms Frisby-Smith explained to news.com.au that she was going through the process which involved an interview, a questionnaire and a trial task.
She was then given a list of tasks her potential employer needs to complete daily and asked to streamline them.
'I was brainstorming and thinking, 'Can I do it this way?' Or that way, basically bending and stretching and working out what platforms would work best,' she said.
'Once I worked out an overview, I popped that into ChatGPT and it created a cohesive and beautiful way of representing my thoughts.'
Ms Frisby-Smith explained that since she was given 30 minutes to complete the task she figured using the AI tool was smart.
'The most efficient way was to brainstorm everything and then put it into ChatGPT, and that can make it cohesive and easy to digest,' she argued.
After completing the task, she received an email from her potential employer explaining that she hadn't been hired because of her 'heavy use of ChatGPT,' which Ms Frisby-Smith found confusing.
'I'm not trying to hide the fact that I use it. Everyone has their different views, and I can see why people dislike it because it takes the humanness out of writing, which I think is what she was concerned about,' she said.
At the end of the day, Ms Frisby-Smith ultimately thinks ChatGPT is simply a tool that makes her 'more efficient', so it is ultimately helpful.
The virtual assistant said once she posted about her experience on TikTok she was surprised to learn how many people were 'afraid' of ChatGPT.
'They are afraid because it is new and it is different but it can make us more efficient but people are also feeling threatened,' she said.
'It is like having an assistant, like a real-life person you're working with and collaborating with.'
Ms Frisby-Smith ultimately stands by her use of the AI tool and doesn't understand why there's a stigma around it.
'Why are you shaming me? When are we going to stop shaming people who use it?' she asked.
The 30-year-old might have embraced the online tool, but others on social media are far wearier and don't see using the program as acceptable.
'When are we going to start shaming people for being too damn lazy to do the bare minimum?' one asked.
'Girl, come on,' another said.
'I use it,' one admitted.
'Nothing wrong with using it, but it's the lack of attention to detail that would've been the reason,' someone else noted.
'I'm struggling to take this seriously,' another chimed in.
'Nah, I think being able to write correspondence yourself is an important communication skill,' one argued.
'When are people going to realise that employers need to know your capabilities and not AI's capabilities?' someone asked.
'Don't get me wrong, ChatGPT is super useful, but something you're submitting should always be in your own words,' another recommended.
Recruitment expert Roxanne Calder told news.com.au that ChatGPT has already become the norm in the job interview process.
One big thing she's noticing now is people sending through resumes using the AI chatbot and not bothering to add their own flair.
'Resumes get sent through in third person now,' she said.
Ms Calder is realistic about the new technology, saying there's no point ignoring it, otherwise you'll get left behind. However she does think it needs to be used wisely.
'These tools are really great, and everyone should get across them and work out how to integrate, but it is really obvious when someone uses it and doesn't add their own words,' she said.
Ms Calder said Chat GPT is fine if it is treated like a tool but it shouldn't be relied on to do your work for you.
'If you are lazy and don't integrate your thoughts, then the work isn't yours. If someone presents a piece of work to you and you ask them questions about it and they can't answer them it is undeniable you've used ChatGPT,' she said.
'It should be used as a tool only.'
If you're making the chatbot app do all the work for you, then in Ms Calder's eyes, you've 'lost credibility'. And of course, that is going to hold you back from securing jobs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
28 minutes ago
- ABC News
Productivity summit turns to building homes, with warnings housing targets will not be met
Housing will dominate discussion at the Economic Reform Roundtable this morning, with ministers, business leaders and conservationists all under pressure to solve the wicked problem of building more homes without trashing the environment. Productivity commissioner Danielle Wood, who will open the session, titled: Better Regulation and Approvals, is expected to explain to attendees that environmental approvals are one of the biggest handbrakes on housing. In her speech to the National Press Club on Monday, Ms Wood warned "regulatory hair balls" had found their way into "almost every corner of our economy". The result has included massive blowouts in approval times for housing and major infrastructure projects, and she argues it has hurt productivity. The focus has again turned to aging environmental laws that both the former Morrison government and the Albanese government last term failed to reform. Under current laws, new developments only need federal approval if they are likely to damage the environment, harm threatened species or affect culturally sensitive land. That means only a fraction of projects fall within the Commonwealth's remit. But ABC News understands that even within that smaller pool, there is still a backlog of 30,000 projects, including many of industry's largest proposals, and plenty of room to speed up approvals. Both Environment Minister Murray Watt and Housing Minister Clare O'Neil will be at the forum today, searching for the balance between protecting the environment and delivering homes faster. Ms Wood on Monday pointed out that housing approval times had blown out 50 per cent in the past three decades due to regulation. It means "hard conversations" are unavoidable, including about heritage and density restrictions. Last week, Treasury documents that were leaked to the ABC suggested the government could freeze changes to the National Construction Code to speed up housing approvals as a major outcome of the three-day summit. Labor derided a Coalition policy for a 10-year freeze at the 2025 election, arguing it would lead to the construction of "shoddy homes". Now, the government seems to be inching towards a freeze, which is feeding criticism from the opposition. "The government are hopeless when it comes to balancing the needs of more housing while protecting the environment. Labor are totally paralysed by this dilemma," Shadow Housing Minister Andrew Bragg told the ABC. "If their only outcome from the roundtable is to copy our policy, you can forgive us for rolling our eyes." Behind closed doors, Labor MPs admit the scale of the problem. Treasury documents show the government is not on track to meet its own election pledge of building 1.2 million homes in five years. Senator Watt has been consulting for months with miners, developers, business groups and conservationists on reforms to the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Act he hopes to legislate by mid-next year after two previous terms of government failed. A consistent complaint of the current system is duplication. Projects require the sign off of both state and federal departments, with the federal process not beginning until state or territory approval is given. Stakeholders agrees more housing is needed and that Australia's environmental laws are outdated. The sticking point is how far each side is willing to compromise. Graeme Samuel, who reviewed the EPBC Act in 2020, has identified a number of areas where approvals can delay and cause real impediments to proper investment. "The first is local government planning laws and approvals, they can take an inordinate amount of time and of course the NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) syndrome of local objectors can hold approvals up and in fact result in them never being obtained," he told the ABC. "The environmental approvals are also important and the recommendations in the review I did back in 2020 are designed to ensure efficiency and, more importantly, to ensure certainty." The same leaked Treasury documents also recommend a national artificial intelligence plan to cut environmental red tape. Housing approvals are just one concern of the flaws in the EPBC Act. Another is accelerating approvals for renewable energy projects, which the government considers just as critical in meeting its green energy targets. A Labor source told the ABC: "Reaching renewables targets and delivering on housing are the hardest challenges for the government politically. The big question for the talks is how to speed up approvals for both." It is why BHP's Australian president Geraldine Slattery and Australian Conservation Foundation chief Kelly O'Shanassy are central voices at today's discussion — symbols of the tension between growth and conservation. For Housing Minister Clare O'Neil, the Productivity Commission's report is blunt: red tape is choking supply. In some cases, it takes up to 10 times longer to get approval for a new home than to build one. She argues this bottleneck is shutting ordinary Australians out of home ownership and driving up costs. Fixing it has become one of the government's most urgent priorities. While housing dominates today's agenda, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will step away from Canberra to travel to South Australia to make his first inspection of the state's algal bloom crisis and flex his environmental credentials. Back in the capital, pressure will remain on attendees to strike the right balance between protecting the environment and solving the housing crisis. If tensions spill over, Mr Albanese will have the chance to smooth them over tonight, when he hosts union bosses, business chiefs and bureaucrats for dinner at The Lodge.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
AI not a 'straightforward' fix for ailing productivity
Australia has been warned against the "seductive" pull of artificial intelligence as the federal government looks to the technology to help solve its productivity woes. AI is expected to take centre stage during the second day of the government's economic reform roundtable, alongside regulation and competition. Though he recognised its risks, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said AI could be an economic "game changer" to boost Australia's ailing productivity and lift living standards. But Monash University human-centred computing lecturer Jathan Sadowski warned the story was not so simple. "AI changes the nature of work but it doesn't straightforwardly make work more efficient or more productive," he told AAP. "It produces all kinds of new problems that people need to adjust to: they need to fill in the gaps with AI, or they need to clean up the mess after AI does something in not the right way. "A lot of organisations are simply not prepared to do the hard work necessary to implement AI." To use AI well, businesses would have to change their practices so they can complement the capabilities of the technology, which generally requires significant infrastructure work, capital investment and human labour. The technology also works best when it is purpose-built using specific, high quality data for an organisation's specific subject area. This means having lots of smaller scale technologies, which runs counter to the prevailing understanding of AI. "There's this real push towards universal models - something like ChatGPT - it's the one model to rule them all, one solution to every problem," Dr Sadowski said. "It means that you can sell the technology to every market and from the government's point of view means that all you have to do is implement this one solution. "There's something very seductive to that because it tells a good story ... but it doesn't produce good technology." Research about AI's impact on productivity shows mixed results. A recent CSIRO study of 300 employees found one in three did not report productivity benefits, and the majority that did expected the improvements to be better than what was delivered. Analysis published in the US National Bureau of Economic Research showed unclear results at the organisational level and it can also be difficult to disentangle the impact of AI from other factors.
News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Telstra warns of new wave of scams on encrypted messaging apps
Popular encrypted messaging platforms are becoming a safe haven for scammers looking to bypass scam blocking technology, Australia's largest telco has warned. Telstra has cautioned its customers against flocking to encrypted messaging platforms, flagging users may be more vulnerable to scam messages and calls. While the security of end-to-end encryption means messages can only be accessed by the sender and receiver, limited visibility for telecommunication providers means their scam blocking technologies cannot scan or filter suspicious activity. Telstra's Cyber expert Darren Pauli said while encryption was a 'wonderful thing', the nature of these platforms make it tough for Telco's to monitor for potential scams. '(Encryption) protects banking, it protects everything. And it doesn't care about what the contents are that it's protecting. It just works,' he told NewsWire. 'I think more broadly that wherever the scams are happening, that platform should really genuinely put effort in and money in to really try to crush this. 'It's one of those things that you have to do for the broader security of the internet.' The telecommunications provider has also flagged an uptick in sophisticated recruitment lure scams, offering fake job opportunities that seem legitimate, and a rise in AI-enhanced scams and deepfakes. In the 12 months to June, Telstra was forced to block more than 18 million scam calls a month, almost double the number from the previous year. It also intercepted an average of more than 8 million scam text messages a month, and observed a 13 per cent year-on-year increase in reports of suspicious contacts. 'These fake job offers and recruitment scams are particularly nasty … they're targeting people who are vulnerable,' Mr Pauli said. 'They might be looking for work or whatever, and they will come out with offers of work from home, with good remuneration, and a quick interview process … So these are really quite lucrative and enticing offers. 'The tragedy really is that these scams are all about harvesting personal information (which) they then use for identity theft and sell it on the dark market.' Despite the increasingly sophisticated methods used by scammers, the National Anti-Scam Centre's Targeting report recorded a 25 per cent drop in losses between 2023 and 2024. Telstra's 'Cleaner Pipes' cyber initiative comes amid a massive advocacy push across the telecommunications and banking industry, spreading awareness to the harms of scams. 'I'm genuinely impressed with what the industry as a whole has done. It's remarkable stuff,' Mr Pauli said. 'They are frustrating scammers who are trying to hammer out texts or phone calls and it's not working and it costs (the scammers) money. 'If they weren't such terrible people I'd almost have some sympathy for them.'
