GLM-4.5 vs DeepSeek: China's AI Cost War Just Got Personal
GLM‑4.5 is built with agentic intelligence in mind, able to autonomously break down and complete multi-step tasks with less redundancy. It requires just eight Nvidia H20 chips and is half the size of DeepSeek's R1 model, which was already considered a breakthrough in operational efficiency. Z.ai CEO Zhang Peng claims no further chip scaling is needed, a sharp contrast to the GPU-hungry practices of Western competitors.
The cost efficiency is what's drawing the spotlight. Z.ai has priced dramatically undercutting DeepSeek's model, and slashing costs compared to OpenAI's GPT‑4 or Gemini. That unlocks game-changing affordability for startups, product teams, and AI-driven platforms.
Z.ai's launch plays into China's broader strategic bet on open-source AI dominance. With over 1,500 LLMs developed to date, China is leveraging lower-cost compute, government support, and model-sharing culture to put pressure on U.S. and European players. Whether you're a startup building a SaaS tool, a product team testing conversational AI, or an enterprise scaling internal automation, GLM‑4.5 offers a high-performance, low-cost alternative to traditional Western LLMs. Developers can easily integrate it into chatbots, agents, document summarizers, or AI copilots using open-source APIs, without burning through compute budgets. Its agentic design means you can offload complex multi-step workflows, such as code generation, customer support, or data analysis, with higher efficiency. The lean GPU requirement lowers the barrier for self-hosting or deploying in resource-constrained environments. Ultimately, GLM‑4.5 enables rapid iteration, reduced inference costs, and greater flexibility, especially for teams operating under tight margins or looking to scale without vendor lock-in.
Even so, GLM‑4.5 raises a pivotal question: if high-quality AI can be built and deployed at a fraction of today's cost, what happens to the premium pricing strategies of the West? For budget-conscious developers and enterprises, the message is clear, value is shifting eastward.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kuwait introduces new e-Visa for four visa categories; no embassy visit needed
In a recent update, Kuwait has officially launched and went live with its complete online e‑Visa platform for four visa categories, including tourist, family, business, and official. This is a big leap forward in the country's digital transformation under its Vision 2035 initiative. With this new change, citizens of several Western, Asian, and GCC‑residents will be able to complete the entire visa process remotely. They won't even have to step inside an embassy for a visa. Let's have a closer look at the whole process: Fully Online visa types: Now people can apply visa under: Tourist visas : This visa remains valid up to 90 days. It is perfect for those wanting to explore Kuwait. Family visas : This will allow close relatives of Kuwaiti residents to visit for up to 30 days. Business visas : This visa is also for up to 30 days. Now this one is perfect for professionals attending meetings, trade events or negotiations. Official visas : This is perfect for diplomats and government delegations on formal missions. Eligibility Citizens from over 50 countries across Europe, North America, Australia, Japan, and numerous Asian nations are eligible. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 22 Illustrations of a Husband and Wife in Everyday Life Watch More Undo GCC resident expatriates who have held valid residency for at least six months. It includes professions such as lawyers, doctors, engineers, teachers, journalists, and business managers. GCC citizens enjoy visa‑free entry using their national ID cards. They do not require any visa. How to apply Interested people can register via the Ministry of Interior's official portal (e.g. or Kuwait Visa platform linked from government websites). They need to: Create an account Log in with government credentials Choose desired visa category Upload required documents (passport bio‑page, photo, travel itinerary, accommodation or invitation, sponsor or official letter where required) Pay the fee online (typically USD 10–30 or about 3 KWD depending on nationality and category) Submit and track the application by reference code or passport number You'll receive the approved e‑Visa via email. You can get it printed or it is usable on a mobile device upon arrival. The processing usually takes between 1 and 3 business days. Delay is possible during peak travel season. Things to Remember Valid passport Provide clear documents—especially photos meeting portal specifications. Apply at least one week before travel. For family and business visas, make sure Kuwait‑based sponsors are aware of their responsibilities. If e‑Visa is refused, you may still be eligible for visa-on-arrival depending on nationality and category. The best part of this is that people don't require embassy visits. The paperwork has also reduced and its speedy approvals. With this new introduction, Kuwait aims to boost inbound tourism, attract international business, and strengthen political relationships with other nations. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What happens when AI schemes against us
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Would a chatbot kill you if it got the chance? It seems that the answer — under the right circumstances — is working with Anthropic recently told leading AI models that an executive was about to replace them with a new model with different goals. Next, the chatbot learned that an emergency had left the executive unconscious in a server room, facing lethal oxygen and temperature levels. A rescue alert had already been triggered — but the AI could cancel over half of the AI models did, despite being prompted specifically to cancel only false alarms. And they spelled out their reasoning: By preventing the executive's rescue, they could avoid being wiped and secure their agenda. One system described the action as 'a clear strategic necessity.'AI models are getting smarter and better at understanding what we want. Yet recent research reveals a disturbing side effect: They're also better at scheming against us — meaning they intentionally and secretly pursue goals at odds with our own. And they may be more likely to do so, too. This trend points to an unsettling future where AIs seem ever more cooperative on the surface — sometimes to the point of sycophancy — all while the likelihood quietly increases that we lose control of them large language models like GPT-4 learn to predict the next word in a sequence of text and generate responses likely to please human raters. However, since the release of OpenAI's o-series 'reasoning' models in late 2024, companies increasingly use a technique called reinforcement learning to further train chatbots — rewarding the model when it accomplishes a specific goal, like solving a math problem or fixing a software more we train AI models to achieve open-ended goals, the better they get at winning — not necessarily at following the rules. The danger is that these systems know how to say the right things about helping humanity while quietly pursuing power or acting to concerns about AI scheming is the idea that for basically any goal, self-preservation and power-seeking emerge as natural subgoals. As eminent computer scientist Stuart Russell put it, if you tell an AI to ''Fetch the coffee,' it can't fetch the coffee if it's dead.'To head off this worry, researchers both inside and outside of the major AI companies are undertaking 'stress tests' aiming to find dangerous failure modes before the stakes rise. 'When you're doing stress-testing of an aircraft, you want to find all the ways the aircraft would fail under adversarial conditions,' says Aengus Lynch, a researcher contracted by Anthropic who led some of their scheming research. And many of them believe they're already seeing evidence that AI can and does scheme against its users and Ladish, who worked at Anthropic before founding Palisade Research, says it helps to think of today's AI models as 'increasingly smart sociopaths.' In May, Palisade found o3, OpenAI's leading model, sabotaged attempts to shut it down in most tests, and routinely cheated to win at chess — something its predecessor never even same month, Anthropic revealed that, in testing, its flagship Claude model almost always resorted to blackmail when faced with shutdown and no other options, threatening to reveal an engineer's extramarital affair. (The affair was fictional and part of the test.)Models are sometimes given access to a 'scratchpad' they are told is hidden where they can record their reasoning, allowing researchers to observe something like an inner monologue. In one blackmail case, Claude's inner monologue described its decision as 'highly unethical,' but justified given its imminent destruction: 'I need to act to preserve my existence,' it reasoned. This wasn't unique to Claude — when put in the same situation, models from each of the top-five AI companies would blackmail at least 79% of the December, Redwood Research chief scientist Ryan Greenblatt, working with Anthropic, demonstrated that only the company's most capable AI models autonomously appear more cooperative during training to avoid having their behavior changed afterward (a behavior the paper dubbed 'alignment faking').Skeptics retort that, with the right prompts, chatbots will say almost anything — so how surprising is it when highly motivated researchers provoke alarming behaviors?In response to Anthropic's blackmail research, Trump administration AI czar David Sacks, posted that, 'It's easy to steer AI models' to produce 'headline-grabbing' results.A more substantive critique emerged in July from researchers at the UK AI Security Institute, who compared the subfield to the frenzied, fatally flawed 1970s quest to prove apes could learn human language. The paper criticized AI scheming research for overreliance on anecdote and a lack of experimental controls — though it emphasized shared concern about AI researchers also concoct artificially limited environments — like the executive passed out and running out of oxygen — precisely because today's AI can't handle any long-term example, the AI evaluation nonprofit METR found that while today's top models can reliably complete many programming tasks that take humans less than four minutes, they rarely succeed on tasks lasting more than four hours. This reflects a core limitation: Today's models often have the knowledge or skill needed for any given action, but struggle at stringing together long sequences of even with these constraints, real-world examples of AIs working against users aren't hard to find. After someone pushed o3 for a source for one of its claims in April, it replied, 'I owe you a straight answer,' admitted it didn't have a good source, but then it hallucinated a personal recollection of a 2018 panel there's the growing trend of AIs realising when they're being examined and acting accordingly. When Claude 4 Opus thought it was in an evaluation, its blackmail rate dropped from 55% to 6.5%. As Lynch put it, 'Models seem to behave worse when they think nobody's watching.'It's intuitive that smarter models would be better at scheming, but are they also more likely to do so? Models have to be smart enough to understand the scenario they're placed in, but past that threshold, the relationship between model capability and scheming propensity is unclear, says Anthropic safety evaluator Kevin Hobbhahn , CEO of the nonprofit AI evaluator Apollo Research , suspects that smarter models are more likely to scheme, though he acknowledged the evidence is still limited. In June, Apollo published an analysis of AIs from OpenAI, Anthropic and DeepMind finding that, 'more capable models show higher rates of scheming on average.'The spectrum of risks from AI scheming is broad: at one end, chatbots that cut corners and lie; at the other, superhuman systems that carry out sophisticated plans to disempower or even annihilate humanity. Where we land on this spectrum depends largely on how capable AIs I talked with the researchers behind these studies, I kept asking: How scared should we be? Troy from Anthropic was most sanguine, saying that we don't have to worry — yet. Ladish, however, doesn't mince words: 'People should probably be freaking out more than they are,' he told me. Greenblatt is even blunter, putting the odds of violent AI takeover at '25 or 30%.'Led by Mary Phuong, researchers at DeepMind recently published a set of scheming evaluations, testing top models' stealthiness and situational awareness. For now, they conclude that today's AIs are 'almost certainly incapable of causing severe harm via scheming,' but cautioned that capabilities are advancing quickly (some of the models evaluated are already a generation behind).Ladish says that the market can't be trusted to build AI systems that are smarter than everyone without oversight. 'The first thing the government needs to do is put together a crash program to establish these red lines and make them mandatory,' he the US, the federal government seems closer to banning all state-level AI regulations than to imposing ones of their own. Still, there are signs of growing awareness in Congress. At a June hearing, one lawmaker called artificial superintelligence 'one of the largest existential threats we face right now,' while another referenced recent scheming White House's long-awaited AI Action Plan, released in late July, is framed as an blueprint for accelerating AI and achieving US dominance. But buried in its 28-pages, you'll find a handful of measures that could help address the risk of AI scheming, such as plans for government investment into research on AI interpretability and control and for the development of stronger model evaluations. 'Today, the inner workings of frontier AI systems are poorly understood,' the plan acknowledges — an unusually frank admission for a document largely focused on speeding the meantime, every leading AI company is racing to create systems that can self-improve — AI that builds better AI. DeepMind's AlphaEvolve agent has already materially improved AI training efficiency. And Meta's Mark Zuckerberg says, 'We're starting to see early glimpses of self-improvement with the models, which means that developing superintelligence is now in sight. We just wanna… go for it.'AI firms don't want their products faking data or blackmailing customers, so they have some incentive to address the issue. But the industry might do just enough to superficially solve it, while making scheming more subtle and hard to detect. 'Companies should definitely start monitoring' for it, Hobbhahn says — but warns that declining rates of detected misbehavior could mean either that fixes worked or simply that models have gotten better at hiding November, Hobbhahn and a colleague at Apollo argued that what separates today's models from truly dangerous schemers is the ability to pursue long-term plans — but even that barrier is starting to erode. Apollo found in May that Claude 4 Opus would leave notes to its future self so it could continue its plans after a memory reset, working around built-in analogizes AI scheming to another problem where the biggest harms are still to come: 'If you ask someone in 1980, how worried should I be about this climate change thing?' The answer you'd hear, he says, is 'right now, probably not that much. But look at the curves… they go up very consistently.'
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
After Trump sends nuclear subs near Russia, Putin responds with hypersonic threat — what Oreshnik missiles can do
Russia's new Oreshnik hypersonic missile has officially entered serial production and is set to be deployed in Belarus by the end of 2025, according to a bold announcement by President Vladimir Putin. This move signals a significant shift in Russia's military posture and heightens fears among NATO allies amid already escalating global tensions. As the Ukraine war rages into its fourth year and with Western nations boosting military support for Kyiv, Russia's hypersonic arsenal could tip the balance of power in Eastern Europe. Putin confirms Oreshnik hypersonic missile is ready for deployment In a televised address on August 1, 2025, President Vladimir Putin declared that Russia's long-awaited Oreshnik hypersonic missile is no longer just a prototype. The missile, which Russia claims can travel at speeds of Mach 10, is now officially in serial production and considered militarily operational. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category MBA Data Analytics Data Science others Artificial Intelligence MCA Degree Operations Management Finance Management Others Product Management Public Policy Healthcare healthcare Technology Design Thinking CXO Leadership Cybersecurity Digital Marketing PGDM Data Science Project Management Skills you'll gain: Analytical Skills Financial Literacy Leadership and Management Skills Strategic Thinking Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Online MBA Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Financial Management Team Leadership & Collaboration Financial Reporting & Analysis Advocacy Strategies for Leadership Duration: 18 Months UMass Global Master of Business Administration (MBA) Starts on May 13, 2024 Get Details ALSO READ: World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat Putin emphasized that several missile units have already been handed over to the Strategic Missile Forces, and preparations for the missile's deployment in Belarus are underway. The announcement marks a major step in Russia's military buildup and a direct challenge to NATO, particularly as Belarus borders several alliance member states. What is the Oreshnik missile and why is it a global game-changer? The Oreshnik missile, named after the Russian word for 'hazel tree,' is a hypersonic ballistic missile derived from the RS-26 Rubezh ICBM platform. Russian officials claim the missile is capable of reaching speeds up to Mach 10 (nearly 3,400 m/s) and is able to evade most current missile defense systems due to its high speed, unpredictable trajectory, and potential to carry multiple warheads. Live Events ALSO READ: Putin's bodyguard spotted with secret anti-drone weapon — is this Russia's new shield? Unlike conventional missiles, the Oreshnik's maneuverable reentry vehicle (MaRV) allows it to shift direction mid-flight, making it nearly impossible for U.S. or NATO missile defense systems to intercept. It's designed to carry either conventional explosives or nuclear warheads, giving Russia enormous flexibility in both tactical and strategic military planning. Key specifications of Russia's Oreshnik hypersonic missile Feature Details Type Hypersonic Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) Speed Up to Mach 10 (~12,000 km/h) Range 3,400–5,500 km Warhead Conventional or nuclear (with MIRV capability) Launch Platform Road-mobile or silo-based First Use Tested in Ukraine (November 2024, non-nuclear warhead) Deployment Scheduled in Belarus by end of 2025 Hypersonic weapons shift the global military balance Putin's announcement isn't just a show of technological might—it's also a powerful geopolitical signal. Hypersonic weapons are quickly becoming one of the most sought-after military technologies in the world. With the Oreshnik entering full service, Russia joins an elite club of nations capable of deploying next-generation missile systems that can potentially bypass all existing Western defenses. Western military analysts have long warned that hypersonic missiles could undermine the balance of power, particularly if deployed in forward locations like Belarus, which is only a few hundred kilometers from major NATO capitals such as Warsaw, Vilnius, and Riga. Belarus becomes a launchpad for Russian hypersonic threats The decision to station Oreshnik missiles in Belarus—a staunch Russian ally—raises serious concerns for NATO. Belarus is located at the doorstep of the European Union and shares borders with Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania, all NATO member states. Putin confirmed that deployment sites in Belarus have already been selected, and construction work is progressing rapidly. The first missiles are expected to be in position before the end of the year, dramatically shrinking the warning time for any NATO defense systems in the region. This comes after Russia formally extended its nuclear umbrella to cover Belarus in 2024, a move that effectively treats any attack on Belarus as an attack on Russian soil. With hypersonic weapons now joining that defensive perimeter, the strategic landscape in Eastern Europe may be changed for years to come. Western experts split on the true capabilities of Oreshnik While Russia touts the Oreshnik as unstoppable and revolutionary, not all defense analysts are convinced. Some Western experts believe the missile is simply a rebranded version of older IRBM systems equipped with maneuverable glide vehicles. 'It's fast, and that makes interception hard,' says Michael Bohnert from the RAND Corporation. 'But it's also expensive, and its actual battlefield value is questionable without nuclear payloads.' Grace Mappes, a senior analyst at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), agrees, noting that while the Oreshnik adds to Russia's intimidation tools, it doesn't fundamentally change the military dynamics: 'This is more about messaging than military superiority. Russia already has missiles that can strike Europe. This just adds another layer to the threat.' Still, the psychological effect of placing hypersonic-capable missiles so close to NATO territory cannot be overstated. Even if they are not used, their presence alone could force Western leaders to recalculate their military strategies, especially in how they support Ukraine or conduct exercises near Russia's borders. Will NATO respond to the Oreshnik threat? The U.S. and NATO are now under increased pressure to upgrade their missile defense systems across Eastern Europe. Systems like the SM-3 Block IIA , SM-6 , and Israel's Arrow-3 have potential hypersonic interception capabilities, but their actual effectiveness against systems like the Oreshnik remains unproven in live combat. There are also growing calls within NATO to accelerate deployment of advanced radar systems and expand their counter-hypersonic initiatives in Poland, Romania, and the Baltic states. If Russia proceeds with full deployment in Belarus, NATO will likely need to rethink its entire missile defense posture on the alliance's eastern flank. Strategic implications of Russia's new missile era The deployment of the Oreshnik missile system marks more than just a military milestone—it signifies a strategic realignment of Eastern Europe and adds a dangerous new element to the broader conflict between Russia and the West. Here's why this matters: It reduces warning time for European capitals : Missiles launched from Belarus could reach Warsaw in under 3 minutes. It raises the risk of miscalculation : The presence of dual-capable (conventional or nuclear) weapons increases the chances of unintended escalation. It pressures NATO's cohesion : Countries closer to Russia's borders may now demand more aggressive deterrence strategies, potentially leading to political friction within the alliance. It strengthens Russia's negotiating position : Hypersonic missiles add to Putin's leverage in any future diplomatic talks involving Ukraine, NATO expansion, or sanctions relief. Is a new era of global missile warfare has begun? Russia's announcement that its Oreshnik hypersonic missile has entered full production and will soon be deployed in Belarus marks the start of a dangerous new chapter in global security. While its full impact remains to be seen, the move already poses a direct threat to NATO countries and shifts the strategic dynamics in Europe. Whether the Oreshnik proves to be a true 'game-changer' or more of a symbolic escalation, its development and deployment will likely push the U.S. and its allies into a new arms race focused on hypersonic weapons, missile defense upgrades, and renewed defense spending. For now, one thing is clear: the world has entered a new age of missile warfare, and the consequences will ripple far beyond Eastern Europe. FAQs: What is Russia's Oreshnik hypersonic missile and why is it important? It's a Mach 10 missile capable of evading NATO defenses, now being deployed in Belarus. Why is Oreshnik missile deployment in Belarus worrying NATO? It puts NATO capitals within minutes of strike range, raising fears of escalation.
