Julio Cesar Chavez Jr to be deported after arrest days after Jake Paul loss
Jake Paul 's recent opponent, Julio Cesar Chavez Jr, has been arrested and is now facing deportation from the US.
The rivals squared off last weekend in a cruiserweight clash in Anaheim, where Paul swiftly took charge, piling on the pressure from the get-go. Chavez Jr, once a middleweight world champion, struggled to get a real foothold of the contest and barely threw anything back at the American.
In the final two rounds of the dust-up, Chavez Jr started to find his feet, but it was a case of too little, too late, with Paul securing the victory by points. Just days after their showdown, Chavez Jr found himself arrested for a warrant in Mexico. The 39-year-old is rumoured to have cartel ties and faces charges of organised crime and arms trafficking.
He is currently being processed after being taken into custody in the Los Angeles area. "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) today announced Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detained prominent Mexican boxer and criminal illegal alien Julio Cesar Chavez Jr., and is processing him for expedited removal from the United States," declared the agency, reports All Out Fighting.
"Chavez is a Mexican citizen who has an active arrest warrant in Mexico for his involvement in organised crime and trafficking firearms, ammunition, and explosives." Chavez Jr, the son of boxing icon Julio Cesar Chavez Sr, hails from Sinaloa, Mexico. He kicked off his professional boxing career in September 2002 and has since faced opponents such as Canelo Alvarez, Daniel Jacobs, Anderson Silva and Andy Lee.
According to US officials, Chavez Jr entered the country in August 2023 on a B2 tourist visa that was valid until February 2024. The 39-year-old applied for Lawful Permanent Resident status last year due to his marriage to a US citizen - but the department alleged they had ties to the Sinaloa Cartel through a previous relationship with the now-deceased son of notorious cartel leader Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman.
It alleged fraudulent statements were made on his application to become a resident. "This Sinaloa Cartel affiliate with an active arrest warrant for trafficking guns, ammunition, and explosives was arrested by ICE," stated DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.
"It is shocking the previous administration flagged this criminal illegal alien as a public safety threat, but chose to not prioritise his removal and let him leave and come back into our country. Under President Trump, no one is above the law—including world-famous athletes. Our message to any cartel affiliates in the U.S. is clear: We will find you and you will face consequences. The days of unchecked cartel violence are over."
The Mexican boxer has been detained by US authorities on multiple charges, including illegal possession of an assault weapon for which he was convicted in January 2024. Previously, he faced an arrest warrant for allegedly trafficking weapons for a criminal organisation.
Michael Goldstein, representing Chavez Jr, has fiercely defended his client against the allegations, telling Sports Illustrated they are "outrageous" and constitute "a brazen act designed to terrorise the community." He also highlighted the distress caused to Chavez Jr's family, who were left in the dark about his whereabouts after more than two dozen ICE and other law enforcement agents arrested the ex-world champion.
According to Goldstein's statement to SI: "Mr. Chavez is not a threat to the community. In fact, he is a public figure and has been living out in the open and just fought Jake Paul in a televised boxing match before millions of viewers. His workouts were open to the public and afforded law enforcement countless opportunities to contact him if he was indeed a public threat. The truth is, he has been focused on his own personal growth, family and mental health."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ICE memo reveals Trump's plan to scrap bond hearings to keep millions of illegal migrants locked up
Millions of migrants who entered the United States illegally will be forced to remain behind bars while their deportation proceedings continue for months or even years under a new Trump administration policy. Acting Director for Immigration and Customs Enforcement Todd M. Lyons told agents in a July 8 memo obtained by the Washington Post that such migrants will no longer be eligible for a bond hearing and should be detained 'for the duration of their removal proceedings.' He revealed the Department of Homeland Security and Justice Department ' revisited its legal position on detention and release authorities', and determined that migrants 'may not be released from ICE custody.' This new policy reverses legal standards governing migrant detention that have been held for decades, said Tom Jawetz, a former homeland security official in the Biden administration, who called it 'a radical departure that could explode the detention population.' In the past, those who were marked for deportation have been able to request a bond hearing before a judge. If the judge were then to grant the migrant a bond, he or she could be released into society as their deportation proceedings continued in the courts. As of last year, the majority of the 7.6 million migrants on ICE's docket were released, the agency's annual report revealed. But under the new guidance, those migrants will be forced to remain in detention centers, where the agency is currently holding about 56,000 migrants each day. The capacity, though, is expected to nearly double under the recently-passed Big Beautiful Bill, which allocates $45 billion over the next four years to lock up migrants for civil deportation proceedings. The new policy will apply to any migrant who illegally crossed into the country at the southern border over the past few decades, including those who came in record numbers during the Biden administration. In rare circumstances, migrants may still be released on parole - but that decision must be made by immigration officers and not judges, according to the memo. The Trump administration is justifying the reversal of its policy by citing a provision of immigration law that states that migrants 'shall be detained' after their arrest, which the memo says should be taken as a 'prohibition on release.' But the provision has long been interpreted as to apply only to those who had recently crossed the border - and in the memo Lyons even notes that the shift in policy is 'likely to be litigated.' In the meantime, he encouraged ICE prosecutors 'to make alternative arguments in support of continued detention' as immigration lawyers say they have already seen migrants being denied bond hearings in more than a dozen immigration courts across the US. Those migrants now find themselves being deported to a 'third country' with as little as six hours notice if they have been given an opportunity to speak with an attorney. 'This is their way of putting in place nationwide a method of detaining even more people,' said Greg Chen, the senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association. 'It's requiring the detention of far more people without any real review of their individual circumstances.' Immigrant rights groups also argue that the new guidance deprives migrants of their due process rights, with immigration lawyer and former ICE chief counsel for the Dallas, Texas area noting that migrants 'could be held indefinitely until they're deported.' Other attorneys have likened the new policy to a position taken by several immigration judges in Tacoma, Washington, who have denied hearings to anyone who crossed the border illegally. The Northwest Immigrant Rights Project in Seattle filed a suit in March challenging the judges' actions, arguing that their refusal to hold a bond hearing violated the migrants' rights, according to the Washington Post. Its original plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez has lived in the state since 2009 and works as a farmer. He argued that his entire family are US citizens and he even owns the home where ICE officers arrested him in February for living in the country illegally. By April, a federal judge in Washington state found that he had 'no criminal history in the United States or anywhere else in the world' and ordered immigration officers to give him a proper bond hearing before a judge. The judge, though, denied him bond and he has since been deported back to Mexico. An attorney representing Rodriguez Vasquez now says the Trump administration's decision to deny migrants bond hearings is 'flagrantly unlawful' and argued that the policy 'is looking to supercharge detention beyond what it already is.' Those in favor of the policy change, however, have argued that it might discourage migrants from filing frivolous claims in hopes of being released into the community while their cases proceed through the backlogged immigration courts. 'Detention is absolutely the best way to approach this, if you can do it. It costs a lot of money, obviously,' said Mark Krikorian, the executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies. 'You're pretty much guaranteed to be able to remove the person if there's a negative finding, if he's in detention.' Migrants who have been convicted of murder or other serious crimes were already subject to mandatory detention without bond, and this year, the Republican-led Congress added theft-related crimes to the list of those that are not bond-eligible. Government officials have also reopened family detention centers that the Biden administration shuttered due to security concerns, and have reinforced other facilities like the controversial 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center in the Florida Everglades. Democrat lawmakers who were granted access to tour the hastily-constructed facility have lamented the tough conditions migrants housed there will face. Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz compared the facility to an internment camp and insisted 'there are really disturbing, vile conditions,' demanding the 'place be shut the hell down.' The lawmakers said more than 30 migrants were packed into cage-style cells with just three combination sink-toilets. Temperatures hovered in the mid-80s inside medical intake tents. Detainees have reported worms in the food, overflowing toilets, and 24-hour lockdowns in cages teeming with mosquitoes. But Kevin Guthrie, from the Florida division of Emergency Management, has since claimed the Democrats' were lying about the conditions of the facility to make it seem worse than it is.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's MAGA mob fume over refusal to release Epstein files
The poll found that 67% of Trump voters in the 2024 election disagreed with the president's decision not to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, compared to 58% of Kamala Harris voters American voters, particularly those in Donald Trump's MAGA base, are fuming over the president's apparent refusal to disclose the so-called Epstein files, as revealed by a recent survey. The uproar follows the Trump administration 's declaration to its followers that there isn't an Epstein list, despite previous campaign promises to unveil all involved parties. Notably, it's Trump's own backers who are most irked by his sudden U-turn, with a new Democracy Institute poll indicating that 67% of MAGA supporters who voted for him last November are at odds with his decision not to release the client list, in contrast to 58% of Kamala Harris voters who also disagree. First-time voters in 2024 appear to be particularly incensed by Trump's choice, with a staggering 71% opposing his decision. Among all Americans, the figure dips slightly to 63%, yet this still signifies a majority, according to the poll. The incumbent's latest actions seem to be taking a toll on his approval ratings, signalling that even Trump's staunchest advocates might have found a reason to withdraw their support from the contentious figurehead. Presently, data shows that 50% of Americans disapprove of President Trump's performance, reports the Mirror US. All this turmoil has emerged after the Justice Department and the FBI issued an unsigned memo last week, asserting that there is no alleged Epstein client list, contradicting Attorney General Pam Bondi's February statement that the list was "on her desk." The DOJ's decision has sparked controversy among Trump's supporters, with many viewing the Epstein case as a pivotal reason for backing Trump. FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino, before assuming their roles, had consistently spoken out about the list and the alleged "deep state" efforts to conceal it from the public eye. They also repeatedly insisted that Epstein did not take his own life. The DOJ memo confirmed that Epstein indeed died by suicide while detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City in 2019. On Saturday, the president took to social media to voice his discontent over the split within his staunch "Make America Great Again" following regarding this issue, throwing his support behind Bondi. In his extensive post, he made no reference to Bongino. "What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?'" Trump penned. "They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening." Nevertheless, following an exhaustive months-long review of the evidence held by the government, the Justice Department concluded in Monday's memo that no further revelations would be appropriate or justified. The department highlighted that much of the information was sealed by a court order to safeguard victims, and only a small portion "would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial."
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The greatest showmance! As Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean retire, how their intense bond sparked years of romance rumours - despite both marrying other people
Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean have performed for the last time together after retiring from ice skating, four decades on from their gold win at the 1984 Winter Olympics. They've long impressed audiences with their sizzling chemistry and tactile performances before winning a new legion of fans as the faces of ITV 's Dancing On Ice. But throughout their impressive career, there has been long-standing speculation as to the nature of their relationship. Both the British skaters are in committed relationships; Jayne, 67, has been wed to Phil Christiansen since 1990, and Christopher, 66, was married twice before beginning a relationship with Dancing On Ice co-star Karen Barber in 2011. Yet fans have often believed their is more to the bond - particularly after the pair shared a smooch during their trip to Sarajevo in 2024, to commemorate 40 years since winning gold at the 1984 games held in Bosnia and Herzegovina's capital. The duo appeared to get caught up in the Valentine's Day spirit as they kissed while performing the sultry Bolero routine which snagged them the medals four decades ago. They've also both admitted in the past that they shared a one-time kiss as teenagers - and considered being together when they were younger - but ultimately decided to put their careers first. On Saturday, the pair performed for the final time together in their hometown of Nottingham after embarking on the UK leg of their farewell tour, Torvill And Dean: Our Last Dance, in April. With choreography filled with barely-there pecks and longing looks, it's perhaps unsurprising that fans have long speculated that more than just friendship resides in their partnership. Plus the skaters are evidently used to being in each other's arms, often squaring up close to one another and cuddling up for photos. Yet Christopher and Jayne have only 'crossed the line' in their relationship once, when they were younger, according to the pair themselves, and never slept together. Christopher told the High Performance podcast in 2024: 'When we were younger, we were sort of, for a minute [crossed a line], but it didn't last very long. ' I think we just eventually got into that place where we knew that we were the best of friends. I think that mutual friendship has got us to this point now, 50 years later.' Jayne added: 'Quite often we get asked, "What's the secret of your friendship, relationship?"... we never got married,' before Christopher insisted: 'Don't sleep with each other.' However, Christopher has previously explained that their 'unique' relationship is 'not like brother and sister' nor like 'husband and wife'. 'We still have a great spark and chemistry,' Jayne added in the interview with the Mirror. 'And we enjoy each other's company but we have other partners as well.' Fans have often believed their is more to the pair's bond - particularly after the pair shared a smooch during their trip to Sarajevo in 2024 (pictured), to commemorate 40 years since winning gold at the 1984 games held in Bosnia and Herzegovina's capital The pair have often teased a kiss as part of their routine choreography on the ice. Pictured performing when they were younger The pair became international stars after receiving 12 perfect sixes while skating to Maurice Ravel's Boléro at the Zetra Olympic Hall in Bosnia and Herzegovina, prompting a standing ovation. It was watched on television by 24 million people in the UK and one month later they received an even better score at the World Championships. But suspicions about their relationship were roused as soon as they snagged the gold medal - and despite both being in respective relationships, their affectionate performances on the ice have continued to spark romance rumours. One of Christopher's exes even previously hit out that their marriage had a third person in it. His first wife, Isabelle Duchesnay, was famously jealous of Jayne and referred to her as the 'other woman' in their marriage. 'I think that's where Princess Diana got her remark about three people in her marriage from!' Christopher previously joked. 'The trouble was Isabelle didn't want me to go on skating.' Jayne continued. 'That was a bit selfish of her.' Speaking to the Mirror, Christopher also revealed that while the sporting pair seriously considered trying to have a relationship together when they were younger, they ultimately decided to put their careers first. 'We got close but at some point realised that we weren't going to make a relationship off the ice in terms of a romantic one,' he said. 'We had seen a lot of partnerships fail. The skating was everything and having a relationship just didn't occur to us.' The pair have over the years also insisted that beyond everything, they are great friends. In 2014, Christopher told The Sun newspaper: 'I don't think we've ever, ever had a falling out. Not a real one.' But in an interview with Radio Times, Jayne revealed that one reporter asked Christopher after their historic win when he was planning on getting married. 'And he said, "Not yet!",' she explained. 'And that was it – there were reports that we were going to get married. I thought, "Oh no! Why did you say that?".' She also told the outlet that the couple did share a kiss - once, when they were teenagers and before the start of their partnership. 'We were in the back of the bus going to a league match, and it just happened. It was a one-off. We never talked about it afterwards. We laugh about it now,' she explained. 'Chris comes out with things without filtering them, and on Piers Morgan's Life Stories he said, "We dabbled." So that's what it is now – Dabblegate. It was a kiss!' After the 12 perfect sixes that won gold in Sarajevo they went professional, then a decade later decided to go amateur again and compete in the Olympics in Lillehammer, Norway. But they only won bronze and there was a national outcry against the judges' decision. 'It was a case of: can we still do it?' Christopher told the Daily Mail. 'We were older and physically we were fitter because of performing professionally,' Jayne added. 'There was a problem with other skaters coming up and reaching their peak, and it was like: 'Why are they coming back?' The others looked at us oddly.' 'The judges had their own champions,' Christopher continued. 'The USSR had just split into all these smaller countries. 'On the panel of nine, five would be from those countries and guess who they wanted to vote for? The atmosphere with the judges wasn't great. The writing was on the wall before we went out there.' The duo both started skating when they were children - Jayne was eight and Christopher was ten. Jayne has said that she recalls seeing her future partner whizzing across the ice in 1971 - when she was 14 - and nicknaming him the 'Blond Prince'. However they officially met at a Nottingham ice-rink when Christopher was still a 16-year-old police cadet and Jayne was an insurance clerk. Both were skating solo for some time, but by 1975, coach Janet Sawbridge decided to try and see what their chemistry could be like together. To this day, their lasting closeness with one another has proven to be a hit with the public. Their infamous non-romance has even been recreated for the screen in a passionate 2018 biopic. 'The whole world wants to know if we were in love,' Jayne told the Daily Mail in 2008. However, the duo are both in committed long-term relationships. Jayne has been wed to Phil Christiansen since 1990, and Christopher was married to American skater Jill Trenary from 1994 to 2010. He has been in a relationship with ice dancer Karen Barber since 2011. Following the end of their competitive career, Torvill and Dean started coaching and choreographing and regularly toured, before becoming the faces of ITV's reality show Dancing on Ice in 2006. The show went on hiatus in 2014 and when it was revived in 2018 they returned as head judges before announcing their retirement from skating together in 2024, and their farewell tour. Following the end of their competitive career, Torvill and Dean started coaching and choreographing and regularly toured, before becoming the faces of ITV's reality show Dancing on Ice in 2006. Pictured on Dancing on Ice in 2014 They performed their tour, Torvill and Dean: Our Last Dance, from April 12 to May 11, 2025 with dates in London, Belfast, Newcastle and Glasgow. 'I think there comes a time when you know,' said Christopher before the tour. 'We're not spring chickens anymore but we're still able to do it to a certain degree that we feel good about it but that will go. 'So, I think this is the right time for us to be able to do that and go and skate and do some of the old routines, be very nostalgic, but then do some new fun, upbeat (dances) with friends of ours from the skating world and from Dancing On Ice.' Following their final performance together, Christopher said: 'The performance went well and the audience were amazing and so, for us, to be able to bow out on a high like that was wonderful.' Asked if it had been emotional, he said: 'These last four performances here in Nottingham, the early ones were quite emotional and I think I sort of got that out of me, and tonight, it was a high. 'We enjoyed it so much. The skating was good from our point of view, but the audience were phenomenal. They were the best audience ever.' Jayne, meanwhile, said: 'I think we'll miss it. When you've done all these shows like this, and you're suddenly home, not doing anything, you miss that adrenaline rush and you miss the excitement of being on the ice, whether it's a practice session or a performance.' The sportswoman promised they would be working on other projects but said they will not be skating on the ice together.
