Maharashtra logs 86 new Covid cases, 4 deaths taking toll to 14
A majority of the 14 persons who succumbed and tested positive for Covid-19 had comorbid conditions like diabetes, cancer, interstitial lung disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal failure, hypertension and Parkinson's Disease and other diseases. A total of 435 persons have recovered.
Meanwhile, Mumbai reported the highest number of cases — 509 . As per the state health department data on Tuesday, 26 new Covid 19 cases were reported from Mumbai, 24 from Pune city while three each from Pune rural areas and Pimpri Chinchwad municipal corporation area.
Covid-19 is now endemic and doctors have urged citizens to remain vigilant, and with the right precautions, protect themselves. Dr Nina Borade, Medical Officer of Health, Pune Municipal Corporation, said that routine testing was not usually necessary for mild symptoms like common cold and cough.
'However it is important to take extra precaution around persons at high risk who have comorbid medical conditions and are immunocompromised,' Dr Borade said. She added that mock drills have been carried out and directives issued to reserve 50 beds at Naidu hospital. Private hospitals have been urged to report cases to municipal health authorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Medicaid Cuts Set to Drain Revenue at Elite Teaching Hospitals
(Bloomberg) -- Few in the US healthcare sector are immune to the effects of Washington's recent cuts to Medicaid, even the cash-rich teaching hospitals affiliated with top-notch medical schools. These facilities, often known as academic medical centers or AMCs, are usually seen as the cream of the industry crop for their top-tier credit ratings and ability to churn out revenue. But federal cuts to the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled people will lead to less funding for teaching hospitals around the country. In response, they've already started to reduce staff and scale back operations. In June, Vanderbilt University Medical Center said it would lay off as much as 650 people. About 300 positions are being eliminated at the health system tied to the University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League school. And just last week, the University of Vermont Health Network announced staff and spending cuts. Add in other industry challenges such as rising costs and labor shortages — which stretch back to the Covid-19 pandemic — and AMCs, once seen as a trophy, now look like a liability. 'It could be material potentially for individual credits,' said Brad Spielman, a vice president at Moody's Ratings, referring to Medicaid funding, which was cut by nearly $1 trillion over ten years. 'Money withdrawn is money withdrawn.' The risk to AMCs is a drop in revenue as some patients lose Medicaid coverage and reimbursements for their care decline. That could spell trouble for schools with teaching hospitals. Medical facilities contributed to 45% of their total revenue in fiscal 2023, according to a Moody's report. For universities, that income from their medical centers can be 'very good in the good times and not so great in the bad times,' said Patrick Ronk, an analyst covering higher education at Moody's. In recent years, some AMCs have increased their exposure to Medicaid patients by acquiring community hospitals in deals meant to expand their networks and boost income. Members of the Association of American Medical Colleges — which includes AMCs, medical schools and academic societies — make up just 5% of the nation's hospitals but provide about 27% of Medicaid hospitalizations. AMCs won't just be affected by Medicaid cuts, which will be phased in over the next few years. The Trump Administration has also frozen billions in research grants and moved to scale back other federal support, which will also put a strain on operations, according to Leonard Marquez, who oversees government relations and advocacy at the Association of American Medical Colleges. It adds up to 'death by a thousand cuts,' Marquez said. 'I've never seen a situation where we have so many different lines of attack coming at us.' More stories like this are available on
NDTV
19 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Boy In A Hurry" Vs "Politics of Delay": DK Shivakumar And Tejasvi Surya Clash
Bengaluru: The opening of the new Yellow Line section of the Bengaluru metro has sparked a row between Karnataka's Congress government and the BJP and senior BJP leader Tejasvi Surya invited Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar has called him a "boy in a hurry", accusing him of announcing the details and sending the invitation without consulting the state government. Tejasvi Surya has hit back, calling the Deputy Chief Minister "ageist' and "insensitive" and said theirs is a "politics of delay". "I am part of a young generation in India that wants reforms today -- not in some distant future," Mr Surya told NDTV in an exclusive interview. "He (Shivakumar) may have no urgency because he comes from a party that represents the politics of delay," he said. The metro, he added, is a requirement for thousands who have to spend two hours in public transport just to reach their office. "This is the situation and the Deputy Chief Minister says what is the urgency... A two-km flyover in my constituency took 8.5 years to complete. I am not okay with that," he added. The Congress, he has alleged, delayed the inauguration six times. "Recently, the seven MLAs of the Yellow Line area, two MPs, our district president, and hundreds of public members... all worked hard, protested, and demanded the inauguration be done by August 15," he said. Earlier, giving reporters a ride in the new metro line, Mr Shivakumar had said Rs 7,610 crore has been spent on the line that covers 19.5 km. "The clearances to operate this have come only on July 31. Our poor young MP who is inexperienced has been in a hurry but we can't do that. The technical clearances came only on July 31. Today is August 5 and the Prime Minister has been given time to inaugurate this on August 10," he told reporters. Mr Surya accused the Congress of trying to take credit for a project for which they had little contribution. "As soon as it was announced that the Prime Minister will inaugurate the Metro line on Aug 10, yesterday they (the Congress) started publicity tours. The work on this Metro line began in 2018 and was supposed to be completed by 2021. Some problems occurred due to Covid-19, and some due to land acquisition. Even then, neither Congress nor anyone else came forward to help," he told reporters earlier. "During the Covid-19 period, BS Yediyurappa-led BJP government was in power. Even during Covid-19, civil works happened under our (BJP) government. There were problems in calling workers, so we met former CM Yediyurappa and he released additional funds. Much work was done. Later, during former CM and BJP MP Basavaraj Bommai's tenure, we (the BJP) completed 95 per cent of the civil works. Their (Congress) government didn't even appoint a full-time Managing Director for BMRCL," Mr Surya alleged.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
American job slowdown, H‑1B backlash: Is the clock ticking for Indian talent in the US?
Is the clock ticking for Indian talent in the US? In August 2025, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) did something uncharacteristically jarring—it quietly downgraded previous job estimates, revealing that 258,000 jobs initially reported for May and June had not, in fact, materialised. July's fresh data wasn't any better: Only 73,000 new jobs were added, marking the weakest performance since the COVID-19 collapse of 2020. The picture was bleak enough to prompt a public reckoning. As Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, told CNN, 'The job market is terrible. Outside of education and health, the economy has lost private sector jobs in the past three months. That's terrible. ' It wasn't just a statistical correction—it was an unmistakable signal that the engine of job creation was losing steam. President Donald Trump's reaction to the BLS report? Swift and severe. He fired BLS Commissioner Dr Erika McEntarfer, accusing her of intentionally damaging the economy's image ahead of the election cycle. The move sent shockwaves—not only because it politicised statistical reporting—but because it underscored a dangerous truth: when narratives trump numbers, policy decisions can become erratic and targeted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo For Indian professionals on H‑1B visas, many working in sectors (mostly tech) directly affected by these shifts, this wasn't just a Washington shake-up. It was a flashing red light. Economic gloom and the growing crisis for Indian techies on H-1B visa Nowhere has the economic slowdown hit harder—or more symbolically—than in the technology sector, the very engine room of American innovation and the primary destination for skilled Indian immigrants on H‑1B visas. According to Crunchbase, over 95,000 U.S.-based tech workers were laid off in 2024, with an additional 4,500 roles eliminated in just one week of July 2025. The CRN list of 2025 tech layoffs reads like a who's who of Silicon Valley titans: Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Salesforce, Intel, and Oracle. Salesforce, notably, has placed a full freeze on hiring new software engineers this year. These aren't merely cyclical belt-tightening measures. They mark a structural recalibration of the sector—away from expansive hiring and toward leaner, AI-driven operational models. And that recalibration comes with a sharp, often underdiscussed casualty: H‑1B visa holders, the majority of whom are Indian and heavily concentrated in tech roles. Indeed, according to the National Foundation for American Policy, Indian nationals received 72% of all H‑1B visas in recent years. Top sponsoring firms include Amazon, Cognizant, Infosys, and TCS—all deeply enmeshed in the tech ecosystem now undergoing contraction. The fallout is visible and brutal. As per Bloomberg, more than 200,000 tech workers were laid off in the U.S. between November 2022 and January 2023 alone, and industry estimates suggest that 30–40% of those affected were Indian IT professionals. Nearly 80,000 Indian workers on H‑1B and L‑1 visas have faced job losses since late 2022, many with just 60 days to find a new employer before being forced to leave the country. This is not just an economic hiccup. It's a systemic shock—a cold pause that is statistical, immediate, and structurally skewed against the very immigrant talent that helped build the American tech miracle. The rising heat against OPT and H‑1B deepens the crisis The American economic engine may be sputtering, but for Indian professionals in the U.S., it's not just the slowdown that's cause for alarm. A rising wave of political hostility toward high-skilled immigration—especially the OPT and H‑1B visa programmes—is turning an economic risk into a full-blown career crisis. The Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme—long considered the vital bridge from American universities to the U.S. workforce for international students—is now facing the threat of repeal. Critics have labelled it a regulatory loophole, arguing that it allows foreign graduates to bypass traditional labour certification and take American jobs. Leading the charge are figures like Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies, who calls OPT a 'shadow guestworker programme.' And in a chilling turn, Joseph B. Edlow, now USCIS Director, has declared his intent to 'remove the ability for employment authorizations for F‑1 students beyond the time that they are in school.' This isn't just political theatre. Ending OPT would dismantle the first step in the employment ladder for thousands of Indian graduates, especially in STEM fields where they make up the overwhelming majority. For many, OPT isn't just optional—it's their only on-ramp to long-term employment and eventual H‑1B sponsorship. The rhetoric extends well beyond student pathways. Former Trump strategist Steve Bannon has called for an immediate moratorium on all foreign student visas, declaring: 'No foreign students should be in the country right now.' His remarks have been echoed—more pointedly—by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has explicitly demanded a ban on Indian H‑1B visa holders, claiming they displace American tech graduates. What was once fringe positioning is now bleeding into legislative language and policy debate. The MAGA playbook is evolving from anti-undocumented sentiment to a more coded, targeted hostility toward high-skilled immigrants—particularly those from India, who dominate both the H‑1B and OPT pipelines. A vicious loop: Job cuts, visa heat, and the Indian immigrant squeeze The combination of shrinking tech opportunities, hostile political rhetoric, and legal uncertainty is producing a chilling effect that's both economic and existential. None of these developments—slowing job growth, rising layoffs, or anti-immigrant sentiment—exist in isolation. They're mutually reinforcing. A weaker economy provides the political cover to restrict immigration. Restricting immigration further strains sectors already short of talent. It's a vicious loop, and Indian workers are caught in the middle. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
