Manipur security forces comes under fire for stopping media team en route to festival
GUWAHATI: A controversy erupted in Manipur on Tuesday after security personnel allegedly stopped a group of 20 journalists from travelling to cover the Shirui Lily Festival in the Naga-majority Ukhrul district. The media team was travelling in a government bus marked 'Manipur State Transport' when they were told to hide the signage by the security forces.
The incident occurred at the Gwaltabi checkpoint in Imphal East, about 25 km from Imphal. Following the instructions, the journalists returned to Imphal instead of continuing to the festival.
The five-day festival, a state-sponsored event celebrating Manipur's state flower, the Shirui Lily, was inaugurated on Tuesday by Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla. The festival had already drawn attention after an FIR was filed against a Kuki student leader who allegedly threatened that Meiteis would not be allowed to cross buffer zones to attend the event. The route to Ukhrul passes through several Kuki villages.
The Coordinating Committee on Manipur Integrity (COCOMI), based in Imphal Valley, strongly criticised the incident. In a statement, it said the actions of the security personnel seemed like a deliberate attempt to undermine the authority and legitimacy of the Manipur government within its own territory.
'Such behaviour is not only careless but also seems to align with the intentions of illegal elements trying to destabilise the region over the past two years,' the group said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India cabin crew from Manipur, Lamnunthem Singson, was only earning member of family: Cousin
Lamnunthem Singson, a 26-year-old Air India crew member from Manipur and sole provider for her family displaced by ethnic violence, tragically died in the Ahmedabad plane crash. She last spoke with her mother on June 11, sharing her upcoming London flight plans. Her family, already struggling, now faces immense grief and uncertainty as they await the identification of her body. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Twenty-six-year-old Lamnunthem Singson, who was one of the two crew members from Manipur and killed in the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad, was the sole earning member of her family, which had faced the brunt of the ethnic violence in the northeastern had last talked to her widowed mother over the phone on June 11, her cousin said on told her mother that she would fly to London on Thursday and wanted to sleep early the previous night, he third child among four siblings, Singson was the "only daughter and their widowed mother had struggled much to raise all of them", her cousin Lun Kipgen said."The 26-year-old was the sole earning member of the family. Her eldest brother is unemployed and suffering from a chronic disease, while two other brothers are studying," Kipgen told unwell, her eldest brother is already on his way to Ahmedabad, while another brother and a cousin went from Kangpokpi to Nagaland's Dimapur, and will go to the Gujarat city, he said, "We are devastated by the news. Her mother is in deep shock and refused to eat since the crash reports surfaced." Air India authorities called Singson's family late on Thursday and said her body was yet to be identified, he was among the 242 people onboard Air India Flight AI 171 , which crashed minutes after take-off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad on Thursday afternoon."There has been no survivor except one passenger," Kipgen said."Singson last talked to her mother on Wednesday around 11 pm. She had said that she would fly to London the next day and wanted to sleep as early as possible because she had to report for duty early on Thursday. Singson and her mother held routine prayers over the phone. They used to pray jointly over the phone regularly before sleeping," he belonged to a Kuki family whose members had to flee their homes during the ethnic violence in the northeastern state, her cousin said."Her family members, including her three brothers, had fled their home in Imphal during the ethnic strife and are now staying at a rented house in Kangpokpi district," Kipgen residence of Singson's family in Imphal's Old Lambulane area is near the Manipur Rifles complex and the Raj Bhavan "When ethnic violence broke out in May 2023, Singson was not in the state, but her family members, along with other Kuki families, shifted to Kangpokpi," another family member Kongbrailatpam Nganthoi Sharma, another crew member from Manipur, was onboard the London-bound flight that crashed in Ahmedabad on Thursday. PTI
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
All eyes on Yunus' London meeting with BNP leader Tareq Rahman to discuss Bangladesh crisis shortly
Dhaka [Bangladesh], June 13 (ANI): Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser to the interim government of Bangladesh, is set to meet BNP Acting Chairman Tarique Rahman in London to discuss the political crisis ahead of the national election likely to be held in early April next year. BNP and interim government officials say all preparations have been completed to start the two-hour meeting at a local hotel at 9 a.m. London local time. The meeting comes amid an ongoing cold war between the BNP and the interim government over the election schedule. Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus announced that the national election will be held in the first half of April next year. But BNP demanded it must be held by December this year. Army Chief General Waker-uz-Zaman also expressed his opinion to hold the election by December. Yunus argues that his government wants to bring about some institutional reforms in Bangladesh before the elections. In addition, it also needs time to prosecute Awami League leaders, including Sheikh Hasina. BNP, however, says that if the elections are held in April, the candidates will not have the opportunity to campaign because the holy month of Ramadan will begin in mid-February in Bangladesh, which has a Muslim-majority population of 170 million. Many are considering the London meeting between Muhammad Yunus and Tarique Rahman as a game changer for Bangladeshi politics. Right now, former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia's BNP is the largest political party in Bangladesh, as Sheikh Hasina's Awami League is banned from running. Tarique Rahman, the son of Khaleda Zia, seems set to return soon to Bangladesh after 16 years in exile in London. Muhammad Yunus is now in London on a four-day official visit. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer declined to meet Yunus after Awami League concerns. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was ousted in a student-led uprising in August last year. She is now living in India in self-imposed exile. After Sheikh Hasina's fall, an interim government was formed under the leadership of Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel Laureate. (ANI)
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Iran-Israel conflict: How secret friends turned bitter enemies
After nearly two decades of hostilities, Israel has finally attacked Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders during the start of a prolonged operation to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapons. Last year, Israel had struck Iran's defence facilities and Iran's launched retaliatory strikes on Israel but that was a limited conflict. "We are at a decisive moment in Israel's history," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a recorded video message yesterday. "Moments ago Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat." The relationship between Iran and Israel stands today as one of the most hostile and fraught rivalries in international politics. However, this animosity belies a complex history of covert cooperation, strategic alliances and shared interests that lasted for several decades. They used to be friends once, then became secret allies, and finally turned bitter enemies. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo Also Read: Why Israel bombed Iran's nuclear sites and what it means for global security, oil, and trade Iran-Israel tango during Shah's regime Following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, most Muslim-majority countries refused to recognise it. Iran, a predominantly Shia country with a long imperial history and uneasy relations with Arab states, was an exception. While Iran did not officially recognise Israel, the two countries developed discreet and pragmatic relations rooted in shared strategic concerns. Live Events You Might Also Like: India calls for restraint, dialogue amid rising tensions between Iran and Israel Under the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Iran followed a Western-aligned foreign policy during the Cold War and was a key regional ally of the United States. Israel, since it was dependent on American support, found a natural partner in Iran. Israel's strategic doctrine in the 1950s and 1960s, known as the Periphery Doctrine or sought to build alliances with non-Arab states in the Middle East that were hostile to pan-Arab nationalism. Iran, along with Turkey and Ethiopia, became a central partner in this strategy. In a secret meeting in 1958, Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion and Turkish prime minister Adnan Menderes formed the so-called "alliance of the periphery" following which Iran, Turkey and Israel established a pact known as the "Trident". The relationship included intelligence sharing, economic cooperation, and arms trade. Notably, the Mossad and Iran's spy agency SAVAK collaborated closely. Israel also provided military advisors and technical support to Iran, especially during the development of the Iranian military-industrial complex. The Israel-Iran relationship was significant economically too. Iran supplied Israel with crude oil, particularly after the 1967 Six-Day War when many Arab nations imposed boycotts. In return, Israel provided Iran with advanced agricultural and technological assistance. Israeli companies were active in infrastructure development projects across Iran. Also Read: Iran accuses US of 'supporting' Israel in carrying out strikes You Might Also Like: Israel strikes Iran: A timeline of the decades long conflict As per a declassified CIA document, "Israel's ties to Iran developed from a broader Israeli effort to forge links to strategically-located non-Arab states, also including Turkey and Ethiopia, after the 1956 Suez Crisis. Israel figured that it had much in common with these states, each of which nurtured its own set of grievances with neighboring Arab countries. All had reasons to fear the emergence of Arab power and to resent Soviet military support for their enemies, Ali maintained a close relationship with the US, and all bordered on strategically important international waterways." "Building on these commonalities," the CIA document says, "Israel eventually developed nearly full diplomatic relations with Turkey and Ethiopia. Relations with Iran developed more slowly and cautiously, due mainly to the Shah's concern for the Islamic sensibilities of his subjects. Nevertheless, Israel and Iran eventually exchanged missions which enjoyed diplomatic privileges and built up close economic and security relations in the 1960s and 1970s. Iran became Israel's chief supplier of crude oil until Israel began operating the Sinai oil fields following its conquest of the territory in the Six Day War. After Israel returned the fields to Egypt under the Sinai II Agreements in 1975, Iran once again became the chief source of oil, supplying about 70 percent of Israel's requirement until the overthrow of the Shah in 1979." The CIA document also claimed that Israel regularly sold armaments to Iran during the Shah's reign, "The arms sales gave a significant boost to Israel's fledgling defense industries, and barter arrangements secured much-needed oil in return for arms and technical assistance." As per the CIA, Israel also was interested in assisting Iran in its support of Kurdish separatists in Iraq, and Iran, in turn, may have provided Mossad with intelligence concerning the Iraqi military. The document says that Israel also sought to ensure welfare of the 90,000 Jews who lived in Iran. Despite Khomeini's open animosity, secret Iran-Israel ties flourished The Iranian Revolution of 1979 marked a fundamental break in Iran-Israel bilateral relations. The overthrow of the Shah and the establishment of the Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini radically altered Iran's foreign policy. The new Islamic regime viewed Israel not only as a political adversary but also as an illegitimate state. Khomeini's rhetoric portrayed Israel as a Zionist regime and a tool of Western imperialism. Iran's new Islamic ideology prioritised support for oppressed Muslims, particularly Palestinians, and declared unwavering opposition to Israel's existence. Iran severed all diplomatic ties with Israel, expelled Israeli personnel, and handed over the Israeli embassy in Tehran to the Palestine Liberation Organization. Anti-Israel sentiment became a core tenet of the Islamic Republic's foreign and domestic discourse. During the 1980s and 1990s, Iran emerged as a key sponsor of militant groups opposed to Israel, Hezbollah in Lebanon and later Hamas in the Palestinian territories. This support extended to training, funding and the provision of weapons. Effectively, Iran was positioning itself as Israel's biggest enemy in the Middle East. However, interestingly, even after Iran and Israel had turned into enemies, secret bilateral ties persisted. During the Iran–Iraq War, which began in 1980 and lasted eight years, Israel viewed Saddam Hussein's Iraq as a greater threat than Khomeini's Islamic Iran. Israel, along with the US, became involved in covert transfer of arms to Iran. This episode, later exposed as part of the Iran–Contra affair, revealed that Israeli intermediaries had facilitated the shipment of weapons to Iran in exchange for help securing the release of American hostages in Lebanon and funding anti-communist rebels in Nicaragua. The revelation shocked many, given the public hostility between Iran and Israel. Such was the covert cooperation between Iran and Israel that the US was worried that Israel could be supplying US-origin parts or weapons to Iran, Interestingly, the CIA document cited above, dated 7 October 1985, titled 'Israel and Iran: The ties that bind' said, "We believe Israeli arms sales to Iran, which began in the late 1950s, are continuing." "We believe the Israeli Government's relatively benign attitude toward the sales is influenced by the same strategic concerns that impelled Israel to forge links to Iran in the late 1950s," the CIA document says. "The Israelis have told us that they hope their aid will help to prolong the Iran-Iraq conflict and thereby keep Baghdad's vastly enlarged military tied down along Iraq's eastern border. Their aid, however, probably would not extend to operational assistance such as providing the Iranians with battlefield intelligence. The Israelis probably fear that such assistance would reveal too much about their capabilities and that the Irani might share this knowledge with confrontation states such as Syria." The CIA document also flagged that Israel believes, despite repeated US statements to the contrary, that US strategic interests in the Gulf will lead Washington inexorably to mend fences with Iran. Israel sees Iran as the key to promoting its interests in the Gulf and hopes eventually to use its good offices to facilitate a rapprochement between Washington and Tehran. It may seem immensely ironic in today's context that Israel was hoping that it would use its covert ties with Iran to broker peace between the US and Iran. "According to the US Embassy, the Israelis also continue to believe, despite repeated US statements to the contrary, that US strategic interests in the Gulf will lead Washington inexorably to mend fences with Iran," the CIA document says. "Israel sees Iran as the key to promoting its interests in the Gulf and hopes eventually to use its good offices to facilitate a rapprochement between Washington and Tehran." Israel was also looking to buy oil from Iran in case the US and Iran mended ties. The CIA document said that Israel would continue supplying weapons to Iran but only secretly. "Israel is acutely aware of the US desire to punish the Khomeini regime and wants to avoid angering its patron," it said. "The Israelis are consequently unlikely to allow arms sales to expand to a point where they are no longer plausibly deniable. In the past, sensitivity to US concerns appears to have prevented Israel from selling Iran any major items such as tanks or aircraft." In the 1990s, the secret Iran-Israel alliance ended due to Iran's nuclear programme and the two countries turned into bitter enemies. Israel began viewing Iran's nuclear ambitions as an existential threat. Its pursuit of nuclear technology, despite its insistence on peaceful intentions, has prompted Israeli fears of a potential nuclear-armed adversary. Iran expanded its support to anti-Israel entities such as Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthis. By the 2020s, the rivalry between Iran and Israel had escalated into a shadow war, involving drone attacks, cyber warfare and maritime sabotage. Iran's increasing influence in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen has been matched by Israel's growing cooperation with Gulf states and continued military operations aimed at limiting Iranian entrenchment near its borders. The ongoing Gaza conflict and subsequent regional tensions, culminating in direct missile and drone exchanges in 2024, brought the Iran-Israel confrontation close to open warfare. Yesterday, the attack Israel has been vowing to mount on Iran for years finally happened and is likely to turn into a full-scale war.
