Afghan man criticises Home Office delays to reunite family in UK
An Afghan man has urged the Home Office to fast-track applications to reunite family members who face an imminent risk of being deported back to the Taliban-led country.Muhammad Khan has been living in Oxfordshire since being resettled in the UK after arriving in 2021, while his family escaped to neighbouring Pakistan.But the Pakistani government is threatening to deport thousands of Afghans and has set a deadline of 31 March for those awaiting relocation to third countries.The Home Office said it was "working at pace" to process referrals made under the Separated Families Pathway of the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme.
Mr Khan said he assisted UK forces to source accommodation before Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, something he believes would make him and his family "enemies" of the current regime.His family was among those who became separated due to the speed and chaotic circumstances surrounding the evacuation of Afghanistan.
After more than three years apart, the 31-year-old engineer had been hopeful he would soon be reunited with his wife and two young children after the government announced the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme (ACRS) separated families route would open for applications.But six months on, Mr Khan is still waiting for a Home Office decision.He said he felt powerless, explaining: "I can't do anything for my kids, for my wife, I'm feeling disappointed by this government that we are being forgotten."While in Pakistan, his wife has no legal access to work and their children are not allowed to go to school. The family fears if they are deported back to Afghanistan they will be targeted by the Taliban."There is no future for my daughter over there and maybe the Taliban would force me to bring back my husband and our life is not secure over there," Mr Khan's wife, who wishes to remain anonymous, told the BBC during a video call.When the scheme was launched last July, Minister for Migration and Citizenship Seema Malhotra said there was an "urgency" to reunite families who had helped the UK.She said: "It is our moral duty to ensure that families who were tragically separated are reunited and are not left at the mercy of the Taliban."Afghans did right by us and we will do right by them, ensuring our system is fair and supports those most at risk and vulnerable."
'Real and imminent risk'
A freedom of information request made by Refugee Legal Support at the end of last year found that of the 2,511 applications received by the Home Office before the October deadline, only 88 had been successful and 361 had been refused."Every day that people are left in limbo, the government is failing them," said Freya Morgan, a supervising lawyer at Refugee Legal Support.She said the government needed a clear policy on the timeframe of when decisions would be made and how they would be communicated."It also needs to be clear as to how it will prioritise cases because everyone's family reunion is important but there are people who are at real and imminent risk," she added.Olly Glover, Liberal Democrat MP for Didcot and Wantage, has been supporting Mr Khan's case.He said: "The delays are very frustrating and not really what we expected so I really call on the government to focus on processing these applications properly."
Most of the 30,000 Afghans who have come to the UK were evacuated in August 2021 as part of Operation Pitting.They were mostly British nationals, as well as people who worked with the UK in Afghanistan and their family members, who are eligible under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy.After its withdrawal from Afghanistan, the UK pledged to resettle up to 20,000 vulnerable Afghans in the coming years under the ACRS.Around 12,400 people had arrived under the scheme by the end of September 2024.Wendy Chamberlain MP, chair of the all party parliamentary group for Afghan women and girls, said: "Too many families remain separated by a slow, opaque and bureaucratic process. "Meanwhile for thousands of others, the promise of safety on our shores has never materialised, with the threat of deportation from Pakistan looming over them. *The programmes put in place three and a half years ago have simply not achieved what they intended to."She said she had written to the Home Office raising the issues and urging officials to "engage with us and our networks as soon as possible".A Home Office spokesperson said it did not routinely comment on individual cases.They added: "We are working at pace to process referrals made under the Separated Families Pathway of the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme and we have already begun to see arrivals and families be reunited."
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Government stalling in efforts to cut foreign aid spent on asylum seekers
The government is struggling to cut the amount of money from the foreign aid budget it spends on asylum seekers in the UK, new figures show. Home Office figures show the department expects to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year, of which £2.1bn is expected to be spent on asylum support. The predictions for this year are only slightly less than the £2.4bn spent in 2024/25. Official development assistance (ODA) – which was slashed earlier this year to 0.3 per cent of GDP to pay for a boost to defence spending - is used to promote the economic development and welfare in developing countries around the world. A portion of this money is handed to the home office to support asylum seekers after they arrive in the UK, most of which goes towards their accommodation. But the government's failure to cut back on this spending has led aid organisations to accuse ministers of 'robbing Peter to pay Paul', claiming they are in danger of a 'reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' Figures published in March revealed that the number of asylum seekers housed in costly hotels has increased by more than 8,000 since the general election, with 38,079 migrants being housed in hotels at the end of December. It comes despite Sir Keir Starmer previously saying a Labour government wouldn't use the foreign aid budget to pay for asylum seekers' hotel costs – but admitted that the government would not be able to stop doing so immediately. 'I'm not going to pretend to you we can do that in the first 24 hours', he said in May 2024. Meanwhile, Labour's election manifesto vowed to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds'. Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, warned that 'cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul', he told the BBC. Meanwhile, Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said: "Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder." "The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK. The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." The Home Office told the BBC it is committed to ending asylum hotels and is speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The department also said it had reduced overall asylum support costs by half a billion pounds in the last financial year, saving £200m in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. In April, The Independent revealed that the government had awarded a contract which allows for hotels and barges to house asylum seekers up until September 2027, despite Labour vowing to end the practice. The contract, advertised ahead of the election, was awarded by the Cabinet Office in October 2024 – just months after Labour won a historic landslide election victory - and runs up until September 2027. In June, the home secretary admitted she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation, adding: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether."
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
