Spain's Cuerpo, Lithuania's Šadžius pull out of Eurogroup race
'After intense days gathering numerous supports among finance ministers of the Eurogroup, and after recent contacts in the last hours, it has been found that the support for Minister Cuerpo does not reach the necessary majority to guarantee the success of the candidacy,' the Spanish economy ministry said in a statement released on Monday.
'In the current context of great challenges for the Eurozone, it is necessary to promote unity and avoid fragmentation within the Eurogroup, a key body for economic decision-making in the union. Therefore, in an exercise of responsibility, the minister has decided to step aside to favour a choice based on consensus,' it added.
Shortly after Cuerpo's withdrawal, Lithuania's Rimantas Šadžius – who was the only other candidate in the race to beat Donohoe – announced that he was also withdrawing from the race as he didn't have "sufficient support" from other member states.
Cuerpo and Šadžius are both socialists, while Donohoe – a veteran politician who has led the body since 2020 – hails from the same centre-right European People's Party political family as European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen.
In his motivation letter announcing his candidacy last month, Cuerpo suggested that the Eurogroup currently focuses too much on 'discussion' rather than 'delivery'.
The statement was widely interpreted as a swipe at Donohoe's practice of seeking consensus among member states before advancing major policy files, such as capital markets integration.
Cuerpo has called for Spain and other willing member states to deepen their capital markets, even without the backing of all 20 euro area countries.
Donohoe's re-election was widely anticipated by EU diplomats even before Cuerpo's and Šadžius' withdrawal. Many member states are deeply suspicious of the Spaniard's support for controversial proposals, including doubling the EU's regular long-term budget and issuing more common EU debt to finance defence investment.
Spanish premier Pedro Sánchez's staunch refusal to boost military expenditure to 5% of annual GDP, as agreed during last month's NATO annual summit, also didn't help Cuerpo's cause, diplomats said.
Cuerpo later told reporters that Madrid "will continue to contribute constructively from now on to support the new presidency".
Šadžius was not believed to represent a serious rival to Donohoe and had not earned the support of any other country in the single currency area, according to diplomats.
Created in 1997, the Eurogroup gained prominence – and even notoriety – during the eurozone crisis in the 2010s, when it took crucial decisions to preserve the integrity of the euro area, including member state bailouts and banking reforms.
Donohoe is only the fourth person to lead the Eurogroup since its inception. Luxembourg's Jean-Claude Juncker was chairman from 2005 to 2013, followed by the Netherlands' Jeroen Dijsselbloem until 2018, and Portugal's Mário Centeno until 2020.
The group typically meets once a month, usually in Brussels, to coordinate economic policies across the single currency area. Its president is elected for a two-and-a-half year term, which can be renewed indefinitely.
Inés Fernández-Pontes contributed reporting.
(vib)
CORRECTION: Updated to state that Cuerpo is Spain's economy minister.
UPDATE: This article has been updated to include further context.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
10 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU pauses tariff response to US, Indonesia trade breakthrough announced
BRUSSELS – European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on Sunday afternoon that the EU would extend the suspension of retaliation against the US until early August. She also unveiled a political agreement for a trade deal with Indonesia. "We will use the time that we have until the 1st of August," said von der Leyen at a press conference in Brussels alongside Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto. The bloc will keep working on countermeasures to the 30% tariffs announced by the US, which will start 1 August. But Brussels is "not there yet" and will continue negotiations as the end of the month approaches. EU ambassadors were called to discuss the response to Donald Trump's tariff escalation on Sunday at 15:30. Brussels has repeatedly delayed retaliatory action in hopes of reaching a negotiated solution – despite the EU already facing a blanket 10% tariff since April, alongside duties of 50% on steel and aluminium and 25% on cars and car parts. Several diplomatic sources consulted by Euractiv on Sunday suggested that most member countries support the Commission's stance and will not push for retaliation before the 1 August deadline. Indonesia trade progress During the same press conference, von der Leyen said a "political agreement" had been reached on Sunday to advance towards an "ambitious" free trade deal with Indonesia. This follows ten years of negotiations. Acknowledging the growing geopolitical volatility and economic uncertainty, von der Leyen emphasised the need for partners to "come closer together". The agreement "comes at the right time," she added. Under her second mandate, von der Leyen has been pushing to diversify trade ties and seal ambitious agreements this year with partners including Indonesia, India, and Malaysia, as well as ratifying the finalised deals with Mercosur and Mexico. Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto, who repeatedly apologised for visiting Brussels "on a Sunday", described the move as a breakthrough. "We would like to see more European presence and more European participation in our economy," he added, stressing that the EU is seen as "a leader" and a key actor in providing global stability. "Many of us wouldn't like to admit it openly (...) but I am here and I admit it: I would like to see a stronger Europe," said Prawobo.
Euractiv
17 hours ago
- Euractiv
Carbon markets aren't a cop-out, they're a climate solution
Dr. Daniel Klier is the CEO of South Pole, a climate consultancy. A former Partner at McKinsey, Daniel is a recognised sustainability leader, having chaired climate finance groups for the Bank of England and the Institute of International Finance. The EU's 2040 climate target proposal is the boldest policy pivot in years. By backing the use of high-integrity Article 6 carbon credits and opening the EU Emissions Trading System to carbon removals, Brussels has delivered an unmistakable message: Carbon markets are back in the game. While no silver bullet, when the cost of inaction is mounting and public budgets are stretched, no credible climate tool can be left on the shelf. Cutting emissions by 90% based on 1990 levels by 2040 is the penultimate stop before full decarbonisation by 2050. It defines the EU's negotiating position ahead of COP30 in Brazil and will influence global climate ambition just as countries submit their updated national climate targets. One of its most significant provisions is the allowance of international carbon credits worth 3% of EU 1990 emission to be used towards the 2040 target. This may sound modest, but it's a breakthrough: the EU has formally backed the use of Article 6, a key provision in the global climate pact (also known as the Paris Agreement) that enables countries to work together by trading carbon credits to reduce emissions more efficiently and fairly. Even more notable: the expansion of the EU Emission Trading System (ETS) to include domestic project-based, technology carbon removals, opening one of the world's most influential carbon pricing mechanisms to a new category of climate solutions. These aren't tweaks, they're turning points. As the EU balances net zero with energy security, competitiveness, growth and defence, carbon markets are reemerging as a legitimate pillar of its climate policy. It's not just a residual fix, but a driver of finance, innovation and global cooperation. In practical terms, it amounts to around 140 million tonnes of CO ₂ equivalent by 2040, roughly equal to the annual emissions of 30 million cars. A fraction of the EU's overall emissions, yes, but a clear vote of confidence in international carbon trading. This matters. After years of technical negotiations – many led by European delegates – Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is finally in play. It allows countries to trade emissions reductions across borders, helping unlock climate finance for projects that wouldn't otherwise happen, particularly in developing economies. As climate finance from developed nations continuously falls short, private investment is non-negotiable. And high-integrity carbon markets can help close the gap. When well-designed and governed, these markets create powerful financial incentives for low-carbon transformation across sectors, from clean energy and transport electrification to modernised waste systems and the early retirement of coal-fired plants. One thing is clear: Article 6 is no excuse to stall or delay the low-carbon transition. So while the volumes of carbon that have been hotly debated these past few weeks are relatively small, the opportunity to channel finance to emerging economies is significant. The 2040 target also proposes opening the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to permanent, domestic project-based technology carbon removals. The ETS – with its scale, rules, and market discipline – offers what the sector badly needs: a credible price signal to develop new technology solutions and incentivise innovation. Europe has long claimed that innovation is key to its green growth strategy. Including high-integrity removals within its flagship climate mechanism makes good on that promise. It will drive down costs as demand grows and accelerate technology development at the pace needed. Crucially, the 2040 goal isn't just about setting targets, it's about delivering on them. That means putting Article 6 credits and removals into practice, not just leaving them on paper. The risk isn't utilising carbon markets. It's failing to act at the scale and speed the climate crisis demands.
Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
‘A slap in the face': EU leaders, industry reel from Trump's tariff shock
Donald Trump's announcement on Saturday of 30% tariffs on EU products has major implications for European economies, triggering a flurry of responses from national leaders and industries. The tariffs, which are a significant jump from the 10% baseline levy that is currently in place, are due to be effective from 1 August. Whilst the EU had previously indicated that it might be prepared to accept terms similar to those secured by the UK in May, the current "deal" has led stakeholders to reassess their stance. EU ambassadors will hold an emergency meeting on Sunday afternoon to discuss the response. But even on Saturday, reactions called for unity and stressed the bloc's trade strength – while urging Brussels to respond firmly to Washington's move. The US is the EU's top trading partner, with goods trade totalling €867 billion in 2024. Trump's letter is "impertinent and a slap in the face," said socialist MEP Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, adding that the EU had been negotiating intensely "for more than three weeks." He added that EU countermeasures "should come into force as planned on Monday, quickly followed by the second list." France shared a "very strong disapproval" of the announcement of 30% tariffs on EU exports, French President Emmanuel Macron said, adding that Brussels should adopt countermeasures if no agreement is reached by 1 August. "It is more than ever up to the Commission to assert the Union's determination to defend European interests resolutely," he added. Brussels has repeatedly delayed retaliatory action in hopes of reaching a negotiated solution – despite the EU already facing a blanket 10% tariff since April, alongside duties of 50% on steel and aluminium and 25% on cars and car parts. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the EU should use its collective single market strength to achieve a 'fair deal'. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – one of the few EU leaders to enjoy cordial relations with the Trump administration – said she still trusted the "goodwill of all players" to reach an agreement. "It would make no sense to trigger a trade clash between the two sides of the Atlantic," she said. Hungary, expectedly, lashed out at the European Commission for not having secured a deal yet. "EU tariffs on the US should've been lowered after Trump took office," Hungary's Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said. Industry warns of severe losses German industry, which accounts for the largest share of EU exports to the US, was quick to react. "President Trump's announcement is a wake-up call for industry on both sides of the Atlantic," said the Federation of German Industries (BDI), in a statement quoted by AFP. The federation urged Berlin, the European Commission, and the US administration to "very quickly find solutions and avoid an escalation." Ongoing tariff threats have already driven German exports to the US down to their lowest level since March 2022, according to government data released last week. The EU's food and drink sector would also be among the hardest hit by a 30% tariff. Italy's wine association, UIV, said on Saturday that Trump's letter had written 'the darkest page in relations between the two historic allies.' The US is the largest export market for EU wines, accounting for 27% of export value and 21% of volume. If implemented, a 30% duty on wine would amount to an embargo on 80% of Italian wine exports, the group said. "At this point, the fate of us and of hundreds of thousands of jobs is tied to additional time, which will be crucial, because it is unthinkable to place these volumes of wine elsewhere in the short term," said UIV President Lamberto Frescobaldi. Alexandra Brzozowski contributed reporting. (ow)
