‘If it somehow sounds like there's anger in my voice, there is': Tensions rise as DC Council waits for the 2026 budget
WASHINGTON () — D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser on Wednesday announced a $100 million investment in the Housing Production Trust Fund under her proposed 2026 budget.
The announcement came as the Mayor celebrated a ribbon cutting and grand opening at the Riggs Crossing Senior Residence, a new 93-unit affordable housing development supported through the Housing Production Trust Fund (HPTF).
The HPTF is a dedicated fund that helps support affordable housing in the District.
'My fiscal 2026 budget is a growth budget,' Bowser said. 'It's about creating economic activity to replace a shrinking federal footprint and it's about investing in our future. This $100 million investment in affordable housing is part of that vision for our future.'
Proposed federal bill would cut DC budget by roughly $1 billion, city officials say
Still, the announcement happened as tensions over the 2026 budget continue to rise.
'There are press releases and press conferences and what we need is for the Mayor to focus on getting this supplemental done,' said DC Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, who criticized the Mayor during a legislative meeting Tuesday. 'If it somehow sounds like there's anger in my voice, there is. Because the legislature has been played on this.'
The full 2026 budget was supposed to be delivered to the DC Council on April 2 — however, that still hasn't happened.
'We have no interest in hoarding the budget. We are done, we're talking about it, we want it to move. We have some things that need to happen,' Bowser said.
According to the Mayor, her administration is waiting to deliver the full 2026 budget until it has more clarity on the fate of the current 2025 budget.
That budget is in limbo after Congress passed a spending plan in March that reverted D.C. to its 2024 spending levels. The Senate passed the DC Local Funds Act, fixing this issue. However, the House hasn't passed the legislation, leaving D.C. with a multimillion-dollar gap in its 2025 budget.
'It's simply not true that we're holding [the 2026 budget] up for kicks. We're waiting to get some resolution on the 2025 issue. … I think I'm in agreement with the CFO, that we're at the time where if there aren't fixes, we're going to have to balance 2025,' Bowser explained.
'This is not the right investment for our city': Washington Commanders RFK Stadium deal draws mixed reactions from DC Council
Mendelson did not agree with the assertion that the council cannot receive the 2026 budget until the 2025 budget is fixed, however.
'The continuing resolution issue in Congress has no bearing on the fiscal year 2026 budget,' he said.
On Tuesday, he and the council passed a resolution requiring the Mayor to deliver the 2026 budget to them by May 15. Otherwise, Mendelson said he'll take legal action.
'We have a limited time, we have roughly eight weeks to consider a $20 billion budget. It's all-consuming,' said Mendelson.
'The council has 70 days by law. When they get the package, they have 70 days to look, no matter when they get it,' said Bowser.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Switch 2 Is Selling Out But Nintendo Believes It Can 'Meet The Demand' Through The Holiday
ChickenDog was the first person to get a Switch 2 at launch in New York City, and Nintendo promises he'll be far from the last. Even as the new system starts selling out at most retailers, the company says it believes it will be able to meet demand through the rest of 2025, avoiding the scarcity issues that plagued the PlayStation 5 for years. While the June 5 launch of Nintendo's new hardware has gone relatively smoothly, with fans who lined up early for pre-orders and day-off inventory able to secure their Switch 2, latecomers are already finding it harder to get. While new inventory comes and goes on a rolling basis, places like Best Buy, Walmart, Target, and GameStop are already showing the Switch 2 as 'out of stock' more often then not. Still, Nintendo of America President Dough Bowser sought to reassure people that even if the Switch 2 becomes hard to find, it won't be impossible to get. 'We have a steady supply of manufacturing that'll be coming in and we believe we'll be able to meet that demand all the way through the summer, through Father's Day, and then on into the holiday period,' he said on CBS Mornings this week (via NintendoLife), adding that stores often stagger their inventory availability instead of unleashing it all at once. The hosts also grilled Bowser on the Switch 2's $450 price tag, the highest non-inflation adjusted price in the company's history. He stressed that the new hardware was 'built from the ground-up' with new features and better specs, pushing back against the implication that it's an overpriced upgrade. He was also asked about tariffs, which still threaten to torpedo that pricing strategy if a current pause lapses next month. 'It's still a very fluid and complex situation as it is for most companies,' Bowser said. 'We're continually looking at various scenarios of how we make sure we can keep our pricing as low as possible and the products as obtainable as possible. For the Switch 2 we've already announced we'll be holding our pricing for $449 for the base unit and $499 for the bundle with Mario Kart World but we did have to take some pricing [increases] on some accessories.' While Nintendo hasn't released official sales figures, the Switch 2 already seems to be shaping up to be the company's biggest new console release ever. And it's not just the Switch 2 flying off shelves during launch week. Limited stock of physical games and even many first-party accessories also seem to be selling through at many big box stores. Kotaku has heard from sources at some retailers like GameStop that many stores are expected to get new allotments of inventory as early as next week. We'll see if the 'out of stock' signs Nintendo sent stores mostly just collect dust or stay up through the summer. . For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
New report indicates new Commanders stadium could bring $24B in revenue to DC
The Brief A new report shows that the new Commanders stadium could bring in even more revenue than originally expected. The report comes from a data analytics company called CSL and was commissioned by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. The $4 billion deal to build a new stadium at the old RFK Site still has to be approved by the D.C. Council. WASHINGTON - A recent economic impact report indicates that revenue from a new Commanders stadium could be even higher than first predicted. The study commissioned by the Bowser administration claims that billions of dollars in spending and tax revenue would come from a new stadium at the RFK site but economists tell FOX 5 that they're not so sure. What we know The report comes from a data analytics company called CSL. The proposed $4 billion deal would have the Commanders invest $2.7 billion in the stadium, while the D.C. government is expected to contribute $1.1 billion. The new 22-page report commissioned by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser—no surprise—supports what her administration has been saying are the economic benefits of the stadium The report says that once open, a new Commanders stadium is estimated to generate $24 billion in economic activity across the entire RFK Stadium campus project and over $5 billion in new tax revenue for the District. These projections are higher than the Bowser administration itself first predicted. "The financial projections of the stadium didn't change that much but look at the 'top line' of this," said D.C. City Administrator Kevin Donohugh. "It is a historically large private investment that will produce multiple of investments in terms of both spending and taxes." Big picture view Pro-sports franchises and local governments often tout an economic windfall from public tax dollars going to privately-owned sports stadiums but some economists warn the projects often don't deliver the promised economic impacts. Salim Furth is an urban economist at George Mason University. He told FOX 5 that the teams, not the cities, wind up with the economic touchdown. "We've seen more and more sports owners willing to do that and cities that say, 'hey we are going to work with you and easy do business, we want you in our city but we're not going to treat you differently than the people who run our grocery stores and the people who pump our gas,'" Furth said. The D.C. Council still needs to approve the deal. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the Washington Commanders told FOX 5 that the team is now conducting a search for an architect to design the new stadium, with a target opening in 2030.
Washington Post
4 days ago
- Washington Post
Eliminating the tipped minimum wage was a mistake. Repeal Initiative 82.
One can sympathize with D.C. residents who, in 2022, overwhelmingly voted to eliminate the tipped minimum wage in the city. Proponents sold the measure — known as Initiative 82, which passed with nearly 74 percent of the vote — as a policy to guarantee restaurant servers a 'living wage.' Instead, it is proving to be an economic disaster. With restaurants closing, laying off workers or warning that they are on the verge of financial ruin because of rising payroll costs, the D.C. Council voted 8-4 on Tuesday to pause minimum-wage increases for tipped workers, which have been rolling out in phases since May 2023. The next raise, to $12, was slated for July. Pausing the policy was the right call. Now, the council should take the next step and repeal it entirely, as D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) proposed in her 2026 budget. D.C. lawmakers should rarely overturn voter-approved policies. Should a repeal pass, it would be the second time the council overturned the will of voters on the issue, having repealed a measure that passed in 2018 with 56 percent of the vote. The council's vote on Tuesday provoked intense backlash from activists, who disrupted the meeting multiple times with booing and yelling. One declared the decision a 'betrayal' of service workers. Council member Brianne K. Nadeau (D-Ward-1) stressed that D.C. residents were 'counting on' the raise. Yet Initiative 82 is a case study example of when council action is justified — indeed, essential, if the D.C. hospitality industry is to survive. The argument that District restaurant employees failed to receive livable wages was never accurate. Nor is it true that eliminating tipped wages would make servers more financially stable. Before the initiative went into effect, the minimum wage for tipped workers was set at $5.35 an hour, with tips covering the rest of their income to reach the city's standard minimum wage, which is now $17.50. If that didn't happen, employers were legally required to make up the difference. Some servers now complain that the initiative has resulted in them making less money because many customers now pay less in tips. And that's if they're eating at D.C. restaurants at all. Many restaurants are adding irritating service charges to cover the higher payrolls costs, which has pushed fed-up diners to competitors outside the city. Most restaurants — especially smaller ones — operate on thin margins, so multiple increases in pay for their staff within a short period can be toxic. Initiative 82 it hitting them as other economic factors bite into their business: inflation, tariffs and a sagging regional economy due to widespread job losses among federal workers. Proponents of the initiative often point out that the number of D.C. employees working at restaurants has grown since the policy took effect, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But many factors can affect job numbers, including the industry's long-term recovery from the pandemic — which might have been more robust without Initiative 82. In fact, the data suggests that job growth in full-service restaurants slowed significantly in the District as soon as the policy was implemented. That fact should make all elected officials uneasy. Beset by new economic challenges, the city needs a pro-growth agenda. A haphazard attempt to restructure how restaurants have long done business is the opposite of that.
