Burkina Faso's only eye doctor for children sees the trauma of both play and conflict
When they eventually found Dr. Claudette Yaméogo, Burkina Faso's only pediatric ophthalmologist, the injury had become too difficult to treat.
'The trauma has become severe,' Yaméogo said of Diallo's condition as she attended to him recently at the Sanou Sourou University Hospital in the city of Bobo-Dioulasso. 'Cases like (Diallo's) must be treated within the first six hours, but I'm seeing him two weeks later, and it's already too late.'
It is a common problem in the country of about 23 million people, which has just 70 ophthalmologists.
Yaméogo , who started her practice late last year, said the work is daunting and often requires her to visit — at no cost — families who cannot afford care or cannot make their way to the hospital where she works.
While there is limited data available on eye defects in children in Burkina Faso or in Africa at large, an estimated 450 million children globally have a sight problem that needs treatment, according to the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness.
Late intervention can significantly alter a child's future, the organization said, with many such cases in less developed countries.
In Burkina Faso, an estimated 70% of the population lives in rural areas. And yet ophthalmologists are concentrated in the capital, Ouagadougou, and other main cities, making them unreachable for many.
While more than 2,000 ophthalmology procedures were performed in Burkina Faso's western Hauts-Bassins region in 2024, only 52 of those were carried out in its more rural areas, according to the Ministry of Health. Most procedures were done in the area of Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso's second city.
Not many people are aware of Yaméogo's work. Even when they are, traveling to reach her often requires days of planning and financial saving.
In a further challenge to accessing care, Diallo's family is among the 2 million people displaced by violence as extremist groups seize parts of the country.
To visit Yaméogo's hospital from the village where they are sheltering, they had to travel about 40 kilometers (21 miles) on a motorcycle to Bobo-Dioulasso, spending 7,500 francs ($13) on transport, a high price for a small-scale farming family.
At least 70% of the trauma cases in children treated at the hospital come from rural areas where the risk of exposure — from conflict or from play — is higher, Yaméogo said.
Examining and treating a child is a delicate practice that requires a lot of time, something many families can't afford. Many must return home to earn money for the treatment.
As she treated Diallo, Yaméogo noticed that the boy associated a drawing of an apple with a pepper, making her wonder: Is it that he can't see it, or that he doesn't know what an apple is? The fruit doesn't grow in the region where he lives.
'There's no fixed time for examining children,' she said. 'You need a lot of patience.'
Yameogo's work has had a "very positive impact on training future pediatricians and on the quality of ophthalmology services,' said Jean Diallo, president of the Burkinabè Society of Ophthalmology.
'A child's eye is not the same as that of an adult, which is why we need specialists to treat problems early so the child can develop properly,' Diallo said.
He cited retinoblastoma, a retinal cancer mostly affecting young children, and congenital cataracts, eye diseases that can be cured if diagnosed early. Pediatricians won't necessarily detect them.
During another consultation, Yaméogo told the family of 5-year-old Fatao Traoré that he would need cornea surgery as a result of an injury sustained while playing with a stick.
'Sometimes I feel a pinch in my heart,' Yaméogo said as she examined the boy after they arrived from their farm on the outskirts of Bobo-Dioulasso. 'His iris has detached from his cornea, so he needs to be hospitalized.'
The father, looking overwhelmed, sighed, unsure of where the money for the child's surgery would come. On paper, Burkina Faso's government covers the cost of medications and care for children under 5, but often no drugs are available in hospitals, meaning families must buy them elsewhere.
A surgery like the one for Traoré can cost 100,000 CFA ($179), several months' income for the family.
___
For more on Africa and development: https://apnews.com/hub/africa-pulse
The Associated Press receives financial support for global health and development coverage in Africa from the Gates Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
5-year-old boy had his cancer treatments interrupted with his deportation as his family files suit against ICE
The family of a five-year-old boy with a 'rare and aggressive' form of kidney cancer has sued ICE after his treatments were interrupted when the agency deported him. The boy, referred to BY the pseudonym Romeo, was deported along with his seven-year-old sister and their 25-year-old mother on April 25, according to a federal lawsuit filed in Louisiana. The children are U.S. citizens and were born in Louisiana and the young boy was diagnosed with his condition at the age of two. 'Romeo needs regular specialized care and follow-up treatment to this day,' the lawsuit states. The case is being brought by the National Immigration Project on behalf of the family as well as another mother, who also has two children who are U.S. citizens – which claims the families were deported 'without even a semblance of due process.' Documents seen by The Independent allege that ICE violated its own policy and multiple federal laws when officers secretly detained the families in hotel rooms, denied them the opportunity to speak to family and make decisions about or arrangements for their minor children. The suit also alleges that the families were denied access to counsel and deported within less than a day in one case and just over two days in the other. 'In the early morning hours of Friday, April 25, 2025, the United States government illegally deported three U.S. citizen children, along with their non-U.S. citizen family members, to Honduras,' the suit states. 'Earlier that week, Plaintiffs 'Julia' and … 'Rosario' – two mothers of U.S. citizen children – attended what they believed to be regularly scheduled check-ins with a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement contractor. 'In violation of the government's own directive, Julia and Rosario were never given a choice as to whether their children should be deported with them and were prohibited from contacting their counsel or having meaningful contact with their families to arrange for the care of their children. 'Instead, they were held effectively incommunicado with their children and illegally deported without even a semblance of due process.' "ICE's actions in this case are not only unlawful, they are cruel and show a complete disregard for family values and the well-being of children," said Sirine Shebaya, Executive Director of the National Immigration Project. "No government agency should have the power to disappear families, ignore medical needs, and disregard its own policies and constitutional rights simply in order to achieve a goal of unfettered enforcement. 'Without accountability, violations like this will only happen more frequently. Through this lawsuit, we seek justice, accountability, and the immediate safe return of these families to the United States." Speaking via the NIP, Rosario said that the ordeal had been 'scary and overwhelming,' 'After so many years in the United States, it has been devastating to be sent to Honduras. Life in Honduras is incredibly hard. I don't have the resources to care for my children the way they need.' The lawsuit demands that ICE be held accountable for the 'unlawful deportation of U.S. citizens and its disregard for the rights and safety of children.' The plaintiffs seek immediate return to the U.S, recognition of their right to make custodial decisions for their children, and compensation for the harms the families have endured.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Over-50s provided more donated organs than ever before last year, data shows
The highest-ever proportion of organ donors in the UK last year were over the age of 50, according to officials. However, only one in four people on the organ donation register are 50 or over, NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said. NHSBT analysis found there were 932 donors aged above 50 last year, making up 63% of all people who donated organs after death – the highest-ever proportion. It is now calling for more people in the age group to sign the NHS Organ Donor Register. Anthony Clarkson, director for organ and tissue donation and transplantation at NHSBT, said: 'We know from research many people aged over 50 mistakenly think they're too old to donate or that their health might stop them donating. 'However, more and more research shows that organs from older donors are lifesaving. 'The reality is the over-50s are more important to organ donation than ever. There is no age limit to organ and tissue donation, and people die every day waiting for a transplant.' According to NHSBT, the rise could be down to the ageing population, public awareness of organ donation, new techniques and more research which shows that organs from older donors can be successfully used. Nick Beresford, from London, became an organ donor at 57. He was working as the resident representative of the United Nations Development Programme in Georgia in July 2023 when he had a brain haemorrhage. His kidneys and liver were donated and transplanted into three recipients: a man in his fifties, a woman in her sixties, and another woman in her fifties. Mr Beresford's wife Angela, 51, a pilates instructor, said: 'Nick spent his whole life helping people living in extreme poverty, people with disabilities and the marginalised. He was a truly good and generous man. He was a fantastic dad and the love of my life. 'Being a donor gives others that chance, that's probably the most beautiful thing a person can do. 'I would definitely encourage other people over 50 to join the NHS Organ Donor Register – you could still save lives if something happens.' Margaret Humphries, from Richmond in London, also donated both kidneys after a brain haemorrhage aged 65. Husband John, a retired manager, said: 'My darling wife was a very giving person. Margaret's two children from her first marriage and I all agreed that donation was the right decision. 'Margaret was an absolute angel. It was very fitting that her last action would be to save somebody else.' Mr Clarkson added: 'Your organs don't need to be the same as when you in your 20s – if someone will die without a transplant, a healthy organ from someone over 50 will be a lifesaver.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Experts warn that progress in cancer survival rates is ‘slowing'
Progress in cancer survival rates across the UK has "slowed down", experts have warned, as a new study reveals the disparity in outcomes between the most and least deadly forms of the disease is wider than ever before. Researchers are now calling for a national cancer plan, deeming it "essential" to "bring cancer survival trends back towards the best in the world". The comprehensive study, led by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and funded by Cancer Research UK, meticulously analysed long-term trends in the cancer survival index (CSI) for adults across England and Wales. Covering the period from 1971 to 2018, the research utilised records from the National Disease Registration Service for England and the Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, estimating net survival for up to 10 years after diagnosis for approximately 10.8 million people. In 2018, the CSI for all cancers combined a decade after diagnosis stood at 49.8 per cent – a figure hailed as "remarkable" by researchers, surpassing the one-year CSI for those diagnosed in 1971/72. However, the study highlighted a concerning trend: the "speed of improvement in survival has slowed down". Between 2000/01 and 2005/06, the 10-year CSI saw a 4 per cent rise, from 41.2 per cent to 45.2 per cent. Yet, in the subsequent period from 2010/11 to 2015/16, this increase dwindled to just 1.4 per cent, reaching 49.3 per cent. Significant disparities in survival rates were also identified across different cancer types. For instance, 10-year survival for testicular cancer was 97 per cent, starkly contrasting with just 4.3 per cent for pancreatic cancer. While screening programmes have bolstered survival rates for breast, bowel, and cervical cancers, progress for other types, including stomach, lung, and brain cancer, has seen only marginal increases over the past five decades. Writing in the Lancet Regional Health – Europe, the researchers concluded that this slowdown for individual cancers implied a "system-wide challenge". Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, commented: "Thanks to research, most patients today are far more likely to survive their cancer than at any point in the past. But the reality is that this progress is slowing – and for some cancers, it never got going in the first place." Michel Coleman, a professor of epidemiology and statistics at LSHTM, underscored the urgency: "Since I began my career in cancer research, I've seen substantial increases in survival for most types of cancer. Our understanding of cancer biology has expanded, effective screening programmes have been introduced, and new treatments have been developed. Allowing this trend to stall will have devastating consequences." He added: "This study was only possible because of data on millions of patients from cancer registries in England and Wales. It's vital that the Government provides the political and financial support to ensure we maintain this crucial data. Without these, the Government will be flying blind on cancer control. The National Cancer Plan is a chance to improve NHS cancer pathways and reap the benefits of new research – the Government must take it." Cancer Research UK is advocating for the national cancer plan to address unacceptable delays by slashing waiting times for diagnosis and treatment. They also call for improved early diagnosis, boosted participation in existing screening programmes, and a commitment to fully rolling out lung cancer screening in England by 2029. The Government launched a call for evidence in February to help shape a national cancer plan, aiming to outline actions to transform disease treatment and reduce deaths. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson stated: "We are prioritising cancer care as we turn around more than a decade of neglect of our NHS. We're already seeing progress, with 95,000 more people having cancer diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days between July 2024 and May 2025, compared to the same period the previous year. The National Cancer Plan will set out how we will improve survival rates further and address the variation between different cancer types."
