logo
Morning Bid: Whoah, we're halfway there

Morning Bid: Whoah, we're halfway there

Yahoo26-04-2025

By Alun John
(Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today, by Alun John, EMEA Breaking News Correspondent, finance and markets
Wall Street looks set for another up day, thanks to above-expectations earnings from Google, which sent its shares around 6% higher in out-of-hours trading, and further signs that deals will be done to avoid the most extreme trade war.
South Korean and U.S. delegations gave positive signals after their first round of trade talks and Reuters, and others, reported China was considering exempting some U.S. imports from its 125% tariffs.
S&P 500 futures were up around 0.6%, suggesting the index would build on what's already been a 3.8% gain for the week, and the U.S. dollar too was rising on nearly all developed market currencies.
Mike Dolan is enjoying some well-deserved time off this week, but the Reuters markets team is here to provide you with all the information you need to start your day.
Today's Market Minute
* China is considering exempting some U.S. imports from its 125% tariffs and is asking businesses to identify goods that could be eligible.
* Google parent Alphabet reassured jittery tech investors that its AI investments were powering returns at its crucial ad business.
* South Korea and the United States agreed to craft a trade package aimed at removing new U.S. tariffs before the pause on reciprocal tariffs is lifted in July.
* Republicans in the U.S. Congress plan to introduce a sweeping $150 billion defense package that will give an initial $27 billion boost to President Donald Trump's controversial Golden Dome missile defense shield, according to a document and a congressional aide.
* Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda said on Thursday the central bank would continue to raise interest rates if underlying inflation converges toward its 2% inflation target as projected, but said the central bank would scrutinise how U.S. tariffs could affect this.
Whoah, we're halfway there
The S&P 500, after three straight days of gains, closed Thursday down "only" around 10.7% from its February closing high.
That's not a bad little comeback, given that it was down more than 20% at one point a couple of weeks ago, even if it did not close below that symbolic level.
And with futures pointing to a higher open, the benchmark is set for further gains on Friday - though one would not want to make too many firm predictions with a whole day of trading still to come.
A major part of the bounceback has been driven by the U.S. administration walking back some of its more "out there" positions on Fed independence and tariffs, and getting some positive signs back from the rest of the world too.
Investors have spent weeks agonising about whether the tariff announcement on April 2 was a negotiating tool or a genuine belief, and while we still do not know what the plan was at the time, there's enough going on to give traders hope that the outcome will be a series of deals that see the worst of the duties negotiated away.
After a first round of trade talks in Washington on Thursday, a delegation from Seoul said that South Korea and the United States agreed to craft a trade package aimed at removing new U.S. tariffs before the 90-day pause is lifted in July.
And after some encouragement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent this week, China is considering exempting some U.S. imports from its 125% tariffs, Reuters and others have reported.
Some numbers are also helping the mood, with no real sign of a recession in hard economic data, as opposed to surveys, Thursday's initial jobless claims were the latest to come in fine.
Again, it does not tell us anything much about the future, but strong earnings from Alphabet are also helping.
The next, and harder, question is how much further things can go. The first bit of a market move is normally the easiest, as there are plenty of people who can stop selling and start buying - not the case when things are more balanced.
"My view is that the damage to U.S. exceptionalism will be longer lasting, but that it's understandable that there'll be a relief recovery after the U.S. has come back from the brink policy wise," says Jim Reid, global head of macro research at Deutsche Bank.
It's also worth keeping an eye on the dollar, which gives a view of the U.S. on a relative basis.
That's now stopped depreciating, and is stronger on the week against the euro, yen and Swiss franc, though that's sufficiently marginal in the case of the first two that it may have changed by the time you read this.
The dollar certainly isn't halfway back to its position on April 2, let alone recent highs.
Let's wait for that to happen to say things are halfway back to normal.
Chart of the day
Google's mainstay advertising revenue was one of the focuses of Alphabet's results late Thursday and saw an 8.5% rise, above analysts expectations' of a 7.7% increase.
It also helped ease some concerns about whether big tech's ambitious AI build-out will bear fruit, as Alphabet reaffirmed its plans and said AI Overviews, the summaries that appear above traditional hyperlinks to relevant webpages, now have 1.5 billion users per month.
Today's events to watch
* University of Michigan sentiment index April
* Corporate earnings, including from Aon and Colgate
* Trade headlines (of course)
* IMF-World Bank meetings

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top U.S. Automaker Rare Earth Suppliers Receive Export Licenses from China
Top U.S. Automaker Rare Earth Suppliers Receive Export Licenses from China

Business Insider

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Top U.S. Automaker Rare Earth Suppliers Receive Export Licenses from China

Last week, President Trump accused China of violating its preliminary trade deal reached with the U.S. These violations included the continued restriction of rare earth element exports, which are critical in the development of semiconductors, cars, and planes. Now, China has responded in favor of the U.S. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter China has provided temporary rare earth export licenses to suppliers of three top U.S. automaker brands, General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Stellantis (STLA), per Reuters. This comes after Beijing imposed rare earth export restrictions in April as a response to Trump's tariffs, although the restrictions didn't apply just to the U.S. Automakers around the world had previously warned of supply chain disruptions if China continued to restrict the elements. China Eases Rare Earth Exports to Top U.S. Automakers The export licenses will be in effect for six months, with the timeline possibly set in order to respond to U.S.-China trade developments. Reuters ' sources didn't mention the quantity or exact rare earths covered through the export licenses. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earths and produces about 90% of them across the globe.

USDA redaction of trade analysis causes concern about report integrity
USDA redaction of trade analysis causes concern about report integrity

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

USDA redaction of trade analysis causes concern about report integrity

By Julie Ingwersen and Leah Douglas CHICAGO/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Analysts voiced concerns this week about the integrity of U.S. Department of Agriculture reports after the agency delayed a report and excluded findings that point to tariffs as a reason for a forecasted increase in the agricultural trade deficit, according to Reuters interviews with four analysts. The administration of President Donald Trump has pledged to shrink the farm trade deficit and has said tariffs will strengthen the farm economy, but farm groups have been critical of the approach. The agency's delay of a quarterly agricultural trade report and exclusion of its typical explanatory text were concerning because the moves raised questions about the objectivity of the data, two analysts said. "The trade is uneasy about USDA statistics now," said Charlie Sernatinger, head of grains with Marex, a brokerage and financial services company. A USDA spokesperson said the report was delayed by an internal review. "The report was hung up in internal clearance process and was not finalized in time for its typical deadline. Given this report is not statutory as with many other reports USDA does, the department is undergoing a review of all of its non-statutory reports, including this one, to determine next steps," the spokesperson said. The quarterly trade outlook report jointly published by the USDA's Economic Research Service and Foreign Agricultural Service was scheduled to be released on May 29. Shortly before it was set to publish, its authors were told to stop its release, according to a source familiar with the situation. The authors were then questioned by leaders at the ERS, FAS and USDA Office of the Chief Economist about the report's attribution of the growing agriculture trade deficit to tariffs and sentiments like "Buy Canadian" that have reduced demand for U.S. goods, the source said. In the delayed report released on Monday, the USDA raised its forecast of the U.S. agriculture trade deficit for fiscal-year 2025 to $49.5 billion, from the $49 billion it previously forecast in February. The version of the report published on Monday contains correct and unaltered data, the source said, but excludes explanatory text typically contained in the forecasts. The report delay and redaction were first reported by Politico. Such trade reports would typically be reviewed by communications and policy staff, but the removal of the explanatory text was highly unusual, according to a second source familiar with the report publication process. Two other analysts said they were confident in the USDA data for now, but expressed concern about how Trump's disruption of the federal government could affect future reports. "Departures of key personnel limit the ability of agencies to collect and analyze information," said Patrick Westhoff, director of the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri. The USDA has lost about 27% of ERS employees and 14% of FAS employees to terminations or voluntary incentives to leave the agency as the Trump administration works to reduce the size and cost of the federal government, according to Reuters reporting. The U.S. had an agricultural trade surplus for decades but in recent years, imports of high-value goods like alcohol, fruits and vegetables have driven a growing deficit, according to USDA data. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos

Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?
Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?

When Elon Musk recently announced that he was stepping back from politics, investors hoped that would mean he would step up his involvement in the many tech firms he runs. His explosive row with President Donald Trump - and the very public airing of his dirty White House laundry - suggests Musk's changing priorities might not quite be the salve they had been hoping for. Instead of Musk retreating somewhat from the public eye and focusing on boosting the fortunes of Tesla and his other enterprises, he now finds himself being threatened with a boycott from one of his main customers - Trump's federal government. Tesla shares were sent into freefall on Thursday - falling 14% - as he sounded off about President Donald Trump on social media. They rebounded a little on Friday following some indications tempers were cooling. Even so, for the investors and analysts who, for months, had made clear they wanted Musk off his phone and back at work, the situation is far from ideal. Some though argue the problems for Musk's businesses run much deeper than this spat - and the controversial role in the Trump administration it has brought a spectacular end to. For veteran tech journalist Kara Swisher, that is especially so for Tesla. "Tesla's finished," she told the BBC on the sidelines of the San Francisco Media Summit early this week. "It was a great car company. They could compete in the autonomous taxi space but they're way behind." Tesla has long attempted to play catch-up against rival Waymo, owned by Google-parent Alphabet, whose driverless taxis have traversed the streets of San Francisco for years - and now operate in several more cities. This month, Musk is supposed to be overseeing Tesla's launch of a batch of autonomous robo-taxis in Austin, Texas. He posted to X last week that the electric vehicle maker had been testing the Model Y with no drivers on board. "I believe 90% of the future value of Tesla is going to be autonomous and robotics," Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives told the BBC this week, adding that the Austin launch would be "a watershed moment". "The first task at hand is ensuring the autonomous vision gets off to a phenomenal start," Ives added. Who is Elon Musk? How the Trump-Musk feud erupted But with Musk's attention divided, the project's odds of success would appear to have lengthened. And there's something else to factor in too: Musk's own motivation. The talk in Silicon Valley lately centres less on whether Musk can turn things around and more on whether he even cares. "He's a really powerful person when he's focused on something," said Ross Gerber, President and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management. "Before, it was about proving to the world that he would make EVs - the tech that nobody else could do. It was about proving he could make rockets. He had a lot to prove." A longtime Tesla investor, Gerber has soured on the stock, and has been pairing back his holdings since Musk's foray into right-wing politics. He called Thursday an "extremely painful day." "It's the dumbest thing you could possibly do to think that you have more power than the president of the United States," Gerber said, referring to Musk's social media tirade against Trump. The BBC reached out to X, Tesla, and SpaceX seeking comment from Mr Musk but did not receive a response. A particular problem for Musk is that, before he seemingly created an enemy in Donald Trump, he already had one in the grassroots social media campaign against his car-maker. Protests, dubbed #TeslaTakedown, have played out across the country every weekend since Trump took office. In April, Tesla reported a 20% drop in car sales for the first three months of the year. Profits plunged more than 70%, and the share price went down with it. "He should not be deciding the fate of our democracy by disassembling our government piece by piece. It's not right," protestor Linda Koistinen told me at a demonstration outside a Berkeley, California Tesla dealership in February. Koistinen said she wanted to make a "visible stand" against Musk personally. "Ultimately it's not about the tech or the Tesla corporation," said Joan Donovan, a prominent disinformation researcher who co-organized the #TeslaTakedown protests on social media. "It's about the way in which the stock of Tesla has been able to be weaponized against the people and it has put Musk in such a position to have an incredible amount of power with no transparency," Donovan added. Another aspect of Musk's empire that has raised the ire of his detractors is X, the social media platform once known as Twitter. "He bought Twitter so that he had clout and would be able to - at the drop of a hat - reach hundreds of millions of people," Donovan said. There is another possibility here though. Could Musk's high-profile falling out with Trump help rehabilitate him in the eyes of people who turned against him because of his previous closeness to the president? Patrick Moorhead, chief analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy, thinks it could. "We're a very forgiving country," Moorhead says in a telephone interview. "These things take time," he acknowledges, but "it's not unprecedented". Swisher likened Musk's personal brand to that of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates more than two decades ago. She said Gates was once regarded as "the Darth Vader of Silicon Valley" because of his "arrogant and rude" personality. Today, despite his flaws, Gates has largely rehabilitated his image. "He learned. He grew up. People can change," Swisher told me, even though Musk is "clearly troubled." The problem for Musk is the future for him and his companies is not just about what he does - but what Trump decides too. And while Trump needed Musk in the past, not least to help fund his presidential race, it's not so clear he does now. Noah Smith, writer of the Noahpinion Substack, said Trump's highly lucrative foray into cryptocurrencies - as unseemly as it has been - may have freed him from depending on Musk to carry out his will. "My guess is that this was so he could get out from under Elon," Smith said. In Trump's most menacing comment of the day, he suggested cutting Musk's government contracts, which have an estimated value of $38 billion. A significant chunk of that goes to Musk's rocket company SpaceX - seemingly threatening its future. However, despite the bluster, Trump's warning may be a little more hollow than it seems. That's because SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft ferries people and cargo to the International Space Station where three NASA astronauts are currently posted. It demonstrates that SpaceX has so entrenched itself in the US space and national security apparatus, that Trump's threat could be difficult to carry out. You could make a similar argument about Musk's internet satellite company, Starlink. Finding an alternative could be easier said than done. But, if there are limits on what Trump can do, the same is also true of Musk. In the middle of his row with Trump, he threatened to decommission the Dragon - but it wasn't long before he was rowing back. Responding to an X user's suggestion he that he "cool down" he wrote, "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." It's clear Musk and Trump's friendship is over. It's less certain their reliance on each other is. Whatever the future for Musk's businesses is then, it seems Trump - and his administration's actions - will continue to have a big say in them. Trump and Musk trade insults as row erupts in public view Tesla shares tumble as Trump-Musk feud erupts Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store