
US Tariffs Could Be Triggering New Inflation Woes. Everything You Need to Know
James Martin/CNET
The One Big Beautiful Bill may have been signed into law, but the economic plan of the second Trump administration is still uncertain due to the confusion around tariffs. President Donald Trump unleashed chaos on April 2 ("Liberation Day") when he unveiled a laundry list of heavy tariffs for countries around the world. He then paused them for 90 days after the stock market dramatically tumbled.
That 90-day pause was supposed to end this week, but the tariffs have been been extended again through Aug. 1. More recently, the administration hiked tariffs against Canada to 35% and threatened Brazil with a 50% rate, while the US Labor Department announced on Tuesday that consumer prices rose 2.7% in June, the highest spike since February.
Amid the uncertainties and upheavals, Trump has barreled forward with his plans, including doubling the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and announcing a new plan to increase the rate for China to 55%. He also hyped up a trade deal on July 2 that leaves Vietnam's import tax rate at a historically high 20%. The sweeping tariff initiative will likely impact your cost of living, which we know from our surveys is something you're worried about.
That all came after Trump's push hit its biggest roadblock yet, when the US Court of International Trade ruled late last month that Trump had overstepped his authority when he imposed tariffs. That ruling was stayed, but the fight is likely to head to the Supreme Court. All the while, major US companies like Apple and Walmart have butted heads with the administration over the tariffs and their bluntness about how tariffs will make affording things harder for consumers.
Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs
Click to unmute
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Next playlist item
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
9:42
Loaded :
6.13%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
9:42
Share
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background
Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background
Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Close Modal Dialog
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Close Modal Dialog
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs
Amid all this noise, you might still be wondering: What exactly are tariffs, and what will they mean for me?
The short answer: Expect to pay more for at least some goods and services. For the long answer, keep reading, and for more, check out CNET's price tracker for 11 popular and tariff-vulnerable products.
What are tariffs?
Put simply, a tariff is a tax on the cost of importing or exporting goods by a particular country. So, for example, a 60% tariff on Chinese imports would be a 60% tax on the price of importing, say, computer components from China.
Trump has been fixated on imports as the centerpiece of his economic plans, often claiming that the money collected from taxes on imported goods would help finance other parts of his agenda. The US imports $3 trillion worth of goods from other countries annually.
The president has also shown a fixation on trade deficits, claiming that the US having a trade deficit with any country means that country is ripping the US off. This is a flawed understanding of the matter, many economists have said, since deficits are often a simple case of resource realities: Wealthy nations like the US buy specific things from nations that have them, while those nations in turn may not be wealthy enough to buy much of anything from the US.
While Trump deployed tariffs in his first term, notably against China, he ramped up his plans more significantly for the 2024 campaign, promising 60% tariffs against China and a universal 20% tariff on all imports into the US.
"Tariffs are the greatest thing ever invented," Trump said at a campaign stop in Michigan last year. At one point, he called himself "Tariff Man" in a post on Truth Social.
Who pays the cost of tariffs?
Trump repeatedly claimed, before and immediately after returning to the White House, that the country of origin for an imported good pays the cost of the tariffs and that Americans would not see any price increases from them. However, as economists and fact-checkers stressed, this is not the case.
The companies importing the tariffed goods -- American companies or organizations in this case -- pay the higher costs. To compensate, companies can raise their prices or absorb the additional costs themselves.
So, who ends up paying the price for tariffs? In the end, usually you, the consumer. For instance, a universal tariff on goods from Canada would increase Canadian lumber prices, which would have the knock-on effect of making construction and home renovations more expensive for US consumers. While it is possible for a company to absorb the costs of tariffs without increasing prices, this is not at all likely, at least for now.
Speaking with CNET, Ryan Reith, vice president of International Data Corporation's worldwide mobile device tracking programs, explained that price hikes from tariffs, especially on technology and hardware, are inevitable in the short term. He estimated that the full amount imposed on imports by Trump's tariffs would be passed on to consumers, which he called the "cost pass-through." Any potential efforts for companies to absorb the new costs themselves would come in the future, once they have a better understanding of the tariffs, if at all.
Which Trump tariffs have gone into effect?
Following Trump's "Liberation Day" announcements on April 2 and subsequent shifting by the president, the following tariffs are in effect:
A 50% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, doubled from 25% as of June 4.
A 30% tariff on all Chinese imports until the new deal touted by Trump takes effect, after which it will purportedly go up to 55%. China being a major focus of Trump's trade agenda, it has faced a rate notably higher than other countries, peaking at 145% before trade talks commenced.
25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and 35% on those from Canada. This applies only to goods from each country that are not covered under the 2018 USMCA trade agreement brokered during Trump's first term. The deal covers roughly half of all imports from Canada and about a third of those from Mexico, so the rest are subject to the new tariffs. Energy imports not covered by USMCA will be taxed at only 10%.
A 25% tariff on all foreign-made cars and auto parts.
A sweeping overall 10% tariff on all imported goods.
For certain countries that Trump said were more responsible for the US trade deficit, Trump imposed what he called "reciprocal" tariffs that exceed the 10% level: 20% for the 27 nations that make up the European Union, 26% for India, 24% for Japan and so on. These were meant to take effect on April 9 but were delayed by 90 days due to historic stock market volatility, and then delayed again to Aug. 1. These rates are subject to change until that new effective date, and some have already been altered: the rate against Japan was upped to 25%, the same as the rate against South Korea; Trump has also threatened a 50% rate against Brazil.
Trump's claim that these reciprocal tariffs are based on high tariffs imposed against the US by the targeted countries has drawn intense pushback from experts and economists, who have argued that some of these numbers are false or potentially inflated. For example, the above chart says a 39% tariff from the EU, despite its average tariff for US goods being around 3%. Some of the tariffs are against places that are not countries but tiny territories of other nations. The Heard and McDonald Islands, for example, are uninhabited. We'll dig into the confusion around these calculations below.
Notably, that minimum 10% tariff will not be on top of those steel, aluminum and auto tariffs. Canada and Mexico were also spared from the 10% minimum additional tariff imposed on all countries the US trades with.
On April 11, the administration said smartphones, laptops and other consumer electronics, along with flat panel displays, memory chips and semiconductors, were exempt from reciprocal tariffs. But it wasn't clear whether that would remain the case or whether such products might face different fees later.
How were the Trump reciprocal tariffs calculated?
The numbers released by the Trump administration for its barrage of "reciprocal" tariffs led to widespread confusion among experts. Trump's own claim that these new rates were derived by halving the tariffs already imposed against the US by certain countries was widely disputed, with critics noting that some of the numbers listed for certain countries were much higher than the actual rates and some countries had tariff rates listed despite not specifically having tariffs against the US at all.
In a post to X that spread fast across social media, finance journalist James Surowiecki said that the new reciprocal rates appeared to have been reached by taking the trade deficit the US has with each country and dividing it by the amount the country exports to the US. This, he explained, consistently produced the reciprocal tariff percentages revealed by the White House across the board.
"What extraordinary nonsense this is," Surowiecki wrote about the finding.
The White House later attempted to debunk this idea, releasing what it claimed was the real formula, though it was quickly determined that this formula was arguably just a more complex version of the one Surowiecki deduced.
What will the Trump tariffs do to prices?
In short: Prices are almost certainly going up, if not now, then eventually. That is, if the products even make it to US shelves at all, as some tariffs will simply be too high for companies to bother dealing with.
While the effects of a lot of tariffs might not be felt straight away, some potential real-world examples have already emerged. Microsoft has increased prices across the board for its Xbox gaming brand, with its flagship Xbox Series X console jumping 20% from $500 to $600. Kent International, one of the main suppliers of bicycles to Walmart, announced that it would be stopping imports from China, which account for 90% of its stock.
Speaking about Trump's tariff plans just before they were announced, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said that they would generate $6 trillion in revenue over the next decade. Given that tariffs are most often paid by consumers, CNN characterized this as potentially "the largest tax hike in US history." Estimates from the Yale Budget Lab, cited by Axios, predict that Trump's new tariffs will cause a 2.3% increase in inflation throughout 2025. This translates to about a $3,800 increase in expenses for the average American household.
Reith, the IDC analyst, told CNET that Chinese-based tech companies, like PC makers Acer, Asus and Lenovo, have "100% exposure" to these import taxes, with products like phones and computers the most likely to take a hit. He also said that the companies best positioned to weather the tariff impacts are those that have moved some of their operations out of China to places like India, Thailand and Vietnam, singling out the likes of Apple, Dell and HP. Samsung, based in South Korea, is also likely to avoid the full force of Trump's tariffs.
In an effort to minimize its tariff vulnerability, Apple has begun to move the production of goods for the US market from China to India.
Will tariffs impact prices immediately?
In the short term -- the first days or weeks after a tariff takes effect -- maybe not. There are still a lot of products in the US imported pre-tariffs and on store shelves, meaning the businesses don't need a price hike to recoup import taxes. Once new products need to be brought in from overseas, that's when you'll see prices start to climb because of tariffs or you'll see them become unavailable.
That uncertainty has made consumers anxious. CNET's survey revealed that about 38% of shoppers feel pressured to make certain purchases before tariffs make them more expensive. About 10% say they have already made certain purchases in hopes of getting them in before the price hikes, while 27% said they have delayed purchases for products that cost more than $500. Generally, this worry is the most acute concerning smartphones, laptops and home appliances.
Mark Cuban, the billionaire businessman and Trump critic, voiced concerns about when to buy certain things in a post on Bluesky just after Trump's "Liberation Day" announcements. In it, he suggested that consumers might want to stock up on certain items before tariff inflation hits.
"It's not a bad idea to go to the local Walmart or big box retailer and buy lots of consumables now," Cuban wrote. "From toothpaste to soap, anything you can find storage space for, buy before they have to replenish inventory. Even if it's made in the USA, they will jack up the price and blame it on tariffs."
CNET's Money team recommends that before you make any purchase, especially a high-ticket item, be sure that the expenditure fits within your budget and your spending plans. Buying something you can't afford now because it might be less affordable later can be burdensome, to say the least.
What is the goal of the White House tariff plan?
The typical goal behind tariffs is to discourage consumers and businesses from buying the tariffed, foreign-sourced goods and encourage them to buy domestically produced goods instead. When implemented in the right way, tariffs are generally seen as a useful way to protect domestic industries.
One of the stated intentions for Trump's tariffs is along those lines: to restore American manufacturing and production. However, the White House also says it's negotiating with numerous countries looking for tariff exemptions, and some officials have also floated the idea that the tariffs will help finance Trump's tax cuts.
Those things are often contradictory: If manufacturing moves to the US or if a bunch of countries are exempt from tariffs, then tariffs aren't actually being collected and can't be used to finance anything. This and many other points have led a lot of economists to allege that Trump's plans are misguided.
As for returning -- or "reshoring" -- manufacturing in the US, tariffs are a better tool for protecting industries that already exist because importers can fall back on them right away. Building up the factories and plants needed for this in the US could take years, leaving Americans to suffer under higher prices in the interim.
That problem is worsened by the fact that the materials needed to build those factories will also be tariffed, making the costs of "reshoring" production in the US too heavy for companies to stomach. These issues, and the general instability of American economic policies under Trump, are part of why experts warn that Trump's tariffs could have the opposite effect: keeping manufacturing out of the US and leaving consumers stuck with inflated prices. Any factories that do get built in the US because of tariffs also have a high chance of being automated, canceling out a lot of job creation potential. To give you one real-world example of this: When warning customers of future price hikes, toy maker Mattel also noted that it had no plans to move manufacturing to the US.
Trump has reportedly been fixated on the notion that Apple's iPhone -- the most popular smartphone in the US market -- can be manufactured entirely in the US. This has been broadly dismissed by experts, for a lot of the same reasons mentioned above, but also because an American-made iPhone could cost upward of $3,500. One report from 404 Media dubbed the idea "a pure fantasy." The overall sophistication and breadth of China's manufacturing sector have also been cited, with CEO Tim Cook stating in 2017 that the US lacks the number of tooling engineers to make its products.
For more, see how tariffs might raise the prices of Apple products and find some expert tips for saving money.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Special Kind Of Stupid': Trump Gets Brutal Real-Time Fact-Check After Epic Brain Fart
President Donald Trump's critics on Wednesday were stunned after he appeared to forget who appointed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Hint: It was Trump himself. Trump has been attacking Powell for months for not cutting interest rates, and has toyed with the idea of trying to fire him, even though that's not a power the president has. He continued his verbal assault on Wednesday, saying Powell does a 'terrible job' and costs the nation 'a lot of money.' 'I was surprised he was appointed,' Trump said. 'Surprised frankly that Biden put him in and extended him.' But President Joe Biden didn't 'put him in.' Trump nominated Powell as Fed chair in 2017, at the time praising his 'steady leadership, sound judgment, and policy expertise.' Biden renominated Powell for a second term in 2021. In both cases, Powell was confirmed by the Senate with widespread bipartisan support. Critics offered the president a trip down memory lane on X: Not remembering he appointed Powell himself is kind of a perfect encapsulation of how poorly thought out and stupid this move is. — Tina Smith (@SenTinaSmith) July 16, 2025 Dementia?And yes let's once again imagine the reaction not just from Fox but the entire DC media if Biden said this. — Lawrence O'Donnell (@Lawrence) July 16, 2025 I hear Biden had trouble recognizing George Clooney once — Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) July 16, 2025 Appointing someone and being surprised they got appointed is a special kind of stupid that only Trump can trademark. — Alex Cole (@acnewsitics) July 16, 2025 Did he forget? — Ways and Means Democrats (@WaysMeansCmte) July 16, 2025 Trump surprised that Trump appointed Powell makes you wonder who has Administration car keys now . . . — Jonathan A. Parker (@ProfJAParker) July 16, 2025 Holy 25th Amendment, Batman! — chuckwestover (@chuckwestover) July 16, 2025 — Comedy of Things (@ComedyOfThings) July 16, 2025 Hey Jake Tapper, where's your book on Trump's brain turning to goo — I Smoked The Diddy Verdict (@BlackKnight10k) July 16, 2025 Jake Tapper wrote a whole ass book about Biden's "decline" while this motherfucker is running the country with the IQ of a boiled carrot. — Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) July 16, 2025 "Trump: I was surprised he was appointed— surprised frankly that Biden put him in and extended him."Holy crap. — Holly 🇺🇸🐊 (@CrossingUNStyle) July 16, 2025 Amazing. Truly amazing. To go on a 2 minute rant about a prominent official without even bothering to check to Wikipedia…… to find out YOU appointed him. — Stephen Richer (@stephen_richer) July 17, 2025 ….Trump appointed Jerome Powell does he not remember that? — je ne sais quoi (@lonerzstoner) July 16, 2025 25th — Art Candee 🍿🥤 (@ArtCandee) July 16, 2025 If Trump makes such big mistakes on details like this related to him, imagine how many other mistakes he makes on a day to day basis and what the implications are for major policy issues like tariffs. We're only half a year in to a four year term folks. — Rian Davis (@RianAuthor) July 17, 2025 Imagine if Biden etc, etc the guys who hung on every single Biden word for sign of a flub have just completely gone missing. Strange. — Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) July 16, 2025 The list of people Trump hired, turned against then fired is extraordinary — Akash Maniam (@ManiamAkash) July 16, 2025 Tony, why was Jay Powell appointed? — pourmecoffee (@pourmecoffee) July 16, 2025 Whoever appointed him was obviously an incompetent fucking moron. — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) July 16, 2025 Remember, if Biden said this, all of your centrist friends (who have nothing to say about Trump's mental state) would be pointing to this as more conclusive evidence that he's senile. — Destiny | Steven Bonnell II (@TheOmniLiberal) July 16, 2025
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Markets bet on August interest rate cut after unemployment rose to a four-year high
Investors remain confident that the Bank of England (BoE) will cut interest rates next month after unemployment rose to a four-year high. This Thursday, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed the UK jobs market continued to cool in May, with unemployment ticking higher and pay growth slowing. The rate of unemployment rose to 4.7% in the March to May period, up from 4.6% for the three months to April. The number of employees on the payroll in May was down by 25,000 on the month, though this was lower than a previous estimate of 109,000 and less than a decline of 55,000 in April. The data is likely to cement the case for the Bank of England to cut interest rates next month in a bid to boost the economy. Since its first quarter-point rate cut last August from the 16-year high of 5.25%, the Bank of England has been cautious, reducing interest rates every three months to the current 4.25%. Read more: UK inflation unexpectedly rises in June on higher fuel prices The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said consumer prices rose by an annual rate of 3.6% in June, up from 3.4% in May. That was the highest rate since January 2024. The ONS added that higher food prices were primarily behind the increase. Fuel and transport costs also contributed. Money markets indicate there is an 89% chance that policymakers will lower borrowing costs in August, up from an 87% probability on Wednesday. Suren Thiru, economics director at ICAEW, said: 'June's uptick is the start of a slight summer surge in inflation with skyrocketing business costs and global trade turbulence likely to lift the headline rate moderately higher by the autumn, despite July's drop in energy bills. 'While June's hot inflation won't deter policymakers from sanctioning an August policy loosening, given mounting worries over economic conditions, these figures may increase caution over the pace of future rate cuts.' Services inflation, a measure the central bank views as a better guide to domestically generated price pressures than the headline rate, held steady at 4.7% in June. Read more: UK jobs market continues to cool, pay growth slows Sanjay Sanjay, Deutsche Bank's chief UK economist, said: 'A 'gradual and careful' approach seems appropriate for now. And we do not think that the bar for faster rate cuts has been met just yet. 'The labour market is loosening, but perhaps not as fast as the unrevised payroll data suggested.' Last month, the central bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) voted six to three to keep rates unchanged at 4.25%, following a quarter-point cut in May. The MPC, which has an inflation target of 2%, has reduced interest rates four times since last summer. Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at IG, said: "[Wednesday's] CPI data spells more pressure for consumers thanks to the surge in food prices, but the overall picture doesn't quite spell the end for any further rate cuts. "Core goods and services inflation was broadly contained, and the focus shifts now to the job numbers tomorrow to see if there are further signs of weakness that might keep the Bank of England on course to ease policy in upcoming meetings." Traders are betting on lower borrowing costs in August but are no longer pricing in a second cut before the end of the year, although derivates trades indicate this scenario is still considered likely. Read more: Bank of England could cut interest rates faster if jobs market slows, Bailey says Isaac Stell, investment manager at the investment service Wealth Club, said: "The surprising strength of the inflation figures adds additional issues to the UK's mounting economic woes. All eyes will turn to the Bank of England who have indicated they are willing to cut rates given the cooling in the jobs market but are unlikely to be able to justify a cut when inflation has started to run hot once again. "In the absence of interest rate cuts, consumers are likely to feel a continued squeeze, unhelpful for the government's growth agenda which has yet to show signs of life itself. Awful April has rolled into miserable May and in turn rolled into joyless June. The government will now pin its hopes on a Jubilant July." Andrew Sentance, who sat on the Monetary Policy Committee from 2006 to 2011, said it would be 'irresponsible' for it to cut interest rates after the jump in inflation. Bank governor Andrew Bailey said in an interview with The Times newspaper earlier this week that rates could be cut further if the jobs market slows down, saying 'I really do believe the path is downward'. Yael Selfin, Chief Economist at KPMG UK, said slowing pay growth had 'opened the door' for an interest rate cut in August'. She said: 'Slowing activity in the labour market, coupled with pay pressures easing, will likely prompt the Bank of England to lower interest rates next month. 'The impact of April's tax and administrative changes has led to a marked slowdown in hiring activity among firms. Read more: FTSE 100 LIVE: Stocks higher as UK unemployment hits four-year high and wage growth slows 'With domestic activity remaining sluggish, the MPC will likely want to provide support via looser policy to prevent a more significant deterioration in the labour market.' Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown and Yahoo Finance UK personal finance columnist, said: "The Bank of England was hoping for bad news from the labour market, and it got what it wanted: wage growth has slowed and unemployment has risen again. For the Bank, this is a sign of growing slack in the labour market, which is likely to ease inflationary pressures, and mean it can cut rates sooner rather than later." The Bank of England will announce its decision on interest rates on 7 August around in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gold prices fall as Trump tempers Powell firing fears
Gold (GC=F) Gold prices fell on Thursday morning, as the dollar strengthened and US president Donald Trump tempered fears that he planned to fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump said he is "not planning" to fire Powell, though he reiterated his view that rates should be lower and the Fed chair is doing a "terrible job." "I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely, unless he has to leave for fraud," he added when asked about a firing. Trump's comments came just about an hour after a slew of reports suggested the president was inching closer to firing Powell. The dollar sold-off amid the reports on Wednesday but later recovered most of its losses following Trump's comments. Read more: Stocks higher as UK unemployment hits four-year high and wage growth slows On Thursday morning, the US dollar index ( which measures the greenback against a basket of six currencies, rose 0.3% to 98.71. A stronger dollar typically weighs on gold prices, given that the precious metal tends to be traded in the US currency, so this makes it more expensive for overseas buyers. Gold is also considered to act as a safe haven asset in times of geopolitical and economic uncertainty, so an easing of market fears over Powell's position weakened the appeal of the precious metal. Gold futures (GC=F) were down 0.8% to $3,332,10 per ounce, at the time of writing, while spot gold fell 0.6% to $3,326.81 per ounce. Looking further ahead, Rick Kanda, managing director at The Gold Bullion Company, said that as the year progresses "gold could continue to see significant increases, especially if economic instability continues, as this will encourage central banks to keep at it with their aggressive gold-buying strategies. This behaviour from the banks is ultimately contributing to the upward pressure on gold prices." Pound (GBPUSD=X, GBPEUR=X) The pound also weakened against a firmer dollar, edging 0.3% lower to $1.3382 at the time of writing. The dip in sterling came as data released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Thursday morning showed that the UK jobs market continued to cool, adding to pressure on the Bank of England (BoE) to cut interest rates next month. The rate of unemployment ticked up to 4.7% in the March to May period, versus 4.6% for the three months to April. The number of employees on the payroll in May was down by 25,000 on the month, while early estimates for June showed a decline of 41,000 on the month. In addition, the number of job vacancies in the UK fell by 56,000 in the three months to June. The ONS said that feedback from its vacancy survey suggested that some firms may not be recruiting new workers, or replacing workers who have left. Meanwhile, annual wage growth excluding bonuses eased to 5% in March to May, having fallen to 5.2% in the previous three months. Read more: UK jobs market continues to cool, pay growth slows Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said that the BoE had been "handed a fresh incentive to cut rates after labour market data showed slowing wages and a rise in unemployment. "Markets are pricing in two cuts by the end of the year, with 80% of the first cut coming in August. The fallout from hikes to national insurance and minimum wages has not been as large as once feared. Yesterday's inflation print showed some signs of higher prices, but companies look to be cutting back on hiring as their priority." In other currency moves, the pound rose slightly against the euro (GBPEUR=X), up 0.1% to trade at €1.1539 at the time of writing. Oil (BZ=F, CL=F) Oil prices hovered around the flatline on Thursday morning, settling after a three-day decline. Brent crude (BZ=F) futures trade at $68.47 per barrel, at the time of writing, while West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) stood at $66.44 a barrel. Britzman said that oil prices had been supported by "strong economic data from major oil consumers and easing trade tensions, including the Chinese AI chip ban lift and a new Indonesia trade deal." Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio "Despite tariff pressures tempering US optimism and swelling gasoline stocks capping gains, China's strong second-quarter growth and 8.5% year-on-year crude throughput surge, alongside a 3.9-million-barrel drop in US crude inventories, signal resilience, though tariff risks still loom large," he said. More broadly, the FTSE 100 (^FTSE) rose 0.4% on Thursday morning to 8,964 points. For more details, on broader market movements check our live coverage here. Read more: Trending tickers: TSMC, Netflix, Rigetti, Novartis and EasyJet Bank of England governor warns tariff hikes risk 'fragmenting the world economy' Reeves calls on regulators to loosen rules in push to spur investmentError while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data