Private jet makes emergency landing at Bournemouth Airport
The Citation jet, travelling from Palma in Mallorca, was met by a large emergency response when it arrived shortly after midday on Wednesday, August 14.
Plane landing (Image: The Dorset Aviator)
Plane enthusiast Jack Oliver was at the airport specifically to watch the Red Arrows arrive when he realised something unusual was happening.
He said: 'We heard a siren go off from the air traffic control fire.
'It was quite confusing at first because we didn't know what the sirens were and we didn't know what was going on.
'Then loads of fire engines appeared next to the runway and a plane landed the wrong way.'
According to Jack, there were three fire engines, a fire truck and a command van positioned alongside the runway as the aircraft came in to land.
He said: 'The fire service followed it down the runway to do checks on the plane. Then they stopped to find out what was going on and it had a mechanic flap failure on it.'
Bournemouth Airport confirmed that the jet landed without incident at 12.13pm.
A spokesperson said: 'An inbound Citation executive jet from Palma reported a technical issue and was met as a precaution by our on-site response team. The aircraft landed safely without incident at 12.13 and our team stood down shortly afterwards.'
(Image: The Dorset Aviator)
Jack, who frequently visits Bournemouth Airport to take photographs of planes, said he was impressed the jet was able to land despite the fault.
He said: 'The flaps come down to break up the airflow and slow the plane. If they hadn't, most planes would have had to divert to an airport with a longer runway. But because it was a smaller plane, it managed to land – though it went right to the end of the runway. It came in really fast.'
Jack added that the viewing spots around the airport offer unique opportunities to get close to the action.
'There's a little path down the end of one of the runways and you can see the whole way down,' he said. 'It's really cool, and I especially enjoyed watching the Red Arrows land yesterday.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Can Lyft Win by Staying Small?
Key Points Lyft's decision to focus on North American ride-hailing has improved efficiency and driven growth. It is transitioning from a growth-at-all-costs company to a more sustainable profit generator. Investors should track key financial metrics and FreeNow's integration to assess Lyft's ongoing progress. 10 stocks we like better than Lyft › Lyft (NASDAQ: LYFT) has long been the smaller player in U.S. ride-hailing, overshadowed by Uber's global reach and diverse business lines. However, in 2025, the company's focused and disciplined approach is quietly turning heads. By concentrating on its core North American ride-hailing business and strategically expanding into Europe through its recent acquisition of FreeNow, Lyft is charting a path toward sustainable growth and profitability. The power of focus Lyft's geographic and product focus has two clear advantages. First, it avoids the complexity of managing multiple business lines across dozens of countries. Instead of figuring out the regulations, pricing dynamics, and competitive threats in every region of the world, Lyft can concentrate resources on improving service, increasing driver supply, and fine-tuning pricing where it already operates. Second, this singular focus allows management to dedicate attention and capital to its primary product -- ride-hailing. That's showing up in the numbers. In Q2 2025, Lyft reported a record 26.1 million active riders, a 10% year-over-year increase, and facilitated nearly 235 million rides, up 14% from the prior year. These gains suggest Lyft is successfully attracting and retaining customers and drivers alike, crucial ingredients for long-term viability. This strategy contrasts with Uber's expansive portfolio, which includes food delivery, freight, and fintech businesses across more than 70 countries. While Uber benefits from diversification, its leadership has to balance competing priorities and capital allocation. Lyft's leaner model is simpler but also potentially more efficient. Focus reflected in the bottom line That focus isn't just a talking point -- it's showing up in Lyft's financials. The company reported $4.5 billion in gross bookings for the second quarter of 2025, representing a 12% year-over-year increase. Net income expanded to $40 million, up from $5 million the previous year. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) grew 26% to $129 million, reflecting steadily improving margins, up from 1.2% in the second quarter of 2023 to 2.9% in the current period. Importantly, Lyft has turned positive on free cash flow -- a milestone in an industry notorious for cash burn. It first delivered positive trailing-12-month free cash flow (FCF) of $368 million in the second quarter of 2024. Since then, the FCF has increased to $993 million in the second quarter of 2025, representing a nearly threefold increase over the past year. With a growing free cash flow, Lyft can redirect it into further refining its operations, as well as its targeted expansion strategy -- starting with Europe. Europe enters the picture with the FreeNow acquisition Lyft's recent €175 million acquisition of FreeNow, a leading European mobility platform serving 180 cities in nine countries, marks a meaningful step beyond North America. FreeNow's established presence offers Lyft a ready-made platform to test its focused ride-hailing model internationally, expanding its addressable market while maintaining operational discipline. This move signals Lyft's intention to grow -- but on its terms. Instead of chasing global dominance, Lyft is opting for targeted, capital-efficient expansion that complements its core strengths. And the benefits could be massive. One thing to note is that Lyft's U.S. riders can now use the Freenow service when traveling to Europe, and vice versa for Freenow riders. Similarly, drivers can now expect more rides, which should improve driver income and enhance loyalty. What investors should watch in the coming quarters Of course, focus cuts both ways. The challenge for Lyft will be to grow meaningfully without diluting its focus. That could mean expanding into adjacent mobility services, such as rentals, bikes, or partnerships with autonomous vehicle providers, while still keeping its operations concentrated in North America and now in Europe. As Lyft executes this strategy, investors should track several key indicators: Active riders and ride volume: Sustained growth in this area indicates continued demand and engagement in core markets. Adjusted EBITDA margin: Indicates whether Lyft can sustain and improve profitability as it scales. Free cash flow: Essential for assessing Lyft's financial health and its ability to invest internally. Driver supply and retention metrics: Drivers are the backbone of ride-hailing economics. Improvements suggest stronger unit economics. FreeNow integration: Progress and contribution from the European acquisition will reveal if Lyft's international push is gaining traction. What does it mean for investors? Lyft's "stay small, execute well" strategy bucks conventional wisdom in a tech world that is often obsessed with size and diversification. However, in ride-hailing, where operational execution and unit economics are paramount, this approach could prove effective. With a growing base of riders, improving profitability, and a smart European expansion under its belt, Lyft is quietly carving out a sustainable, profitable niche. The risks remain -- particularly Uber's scale and market power -- but for investors focused on disciplined growth and cash flow, Lyft's focused comeback deserves attention. It's worth keeping the stock on watch while Lyft executes on its strategy. Should you invest $1,000 in Lyft right now? Before you buy stock in Lyft, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lyft wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Lawrence Nga has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Lyft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Can Lyft Win by Staying Small? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How to find the cheapest train tickets as passengers face 5.5% rise in rail fares
Campaigners have said a potential 5.5% rise in regulated fares is 'outrageous' - but there are some ways you can save money when buying tickets. Train fares in England could jump by 5.5% next year following an uptick in UK inflation, financial analysts have warned. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation - which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train tickets - will be announced on Wednesday. While the government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, this year's hike of 4.6% was one percentage point above the RPI rate in July last year. With this July's RPI figure expected to be 4.5%, according to banking group Investec, train fares in England could jump by 5.5%. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for transport pressure group Railfuture said "it would be outrageous" if fares rose by that much, adding that there is no justification in "jacking up fares above inflation". "It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest." Chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, Ben Plowden, warned that rising fares are "putting people off rail travel", pointing to a survey that found 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if prices were lower. With passengers facing yet another rise in fares, here is a guide on how to save as much money as possible on your train tickets. Get a Railcard There are currently nine available Railcards, depending on your situation and needs, which can knock off 1/3 of your train fare. Most Railcards can be purchased online with the option to download as a digital Railcard to your smartphone or device with our Railcard App. Some one-year Railcards can also be purchased at any staffed National Rail ticket office. You can book your discounted train tickets online or in person, but you must be able to present your Railcard to inspectors during your journey for your ticket to be valid. 16-17 Saver: £35 for one year 16-25 Railcard: £35 for one year, £80 for three years 26-30 Railcard: £35 for one year Disabled Persons Railcard: £20 for one year, £54 for three years Family & Friends Railcard: £35 for one year, £80 for three years Network Railcard: £35 for one year Senior Railcard: £35 for one year, £80 for three years Two Together Railcard: £35 for one year Veterans Railcard: £35 for one year, £80 for three years Book in advance Train companies sell around a million advance tickets every week, according to National Rail. Tickets are usually released 12 weeks in advance, although this can vary, the rail industry body says, adding that the "earlier you book, the better the chance you have of getting the best price". Advance tickets are still available until the day of travel on many routes - sometimes up to 10 minutes before departure. While advance fares are single tickets valid only on the date and train shown on the ticket, they can be combined with other tickets to create an entire journey. Changes can be made before departure, but may be subject to a £10 admin fee and other terms and conditions. Buy a season ticket If you make the same journey more than once a week, it might be worth investing in a season ticket rather than buying tickets daily. An annual season ticket offers a full year's worth of travel for the price of 10 months and 12 days, Network Rail says. Part-time commuters may also want to consider Flexi season tickets, which give passengers day return travel for eight days within a 28-day period. Passengers don't need to choose their travel days in advance, providing plenty of flexibility for hybrid workers who only occasionally come into the office. Depending on your circumstances, you might save more money with either a weekly, monthly or annual season ticket. You can use National Rail's season ticket calculator here to see which ticket is right for you. Travel in a group If you're a small group travelling together, you can also use GroupSave on a variety of Off-Peak tickets across the rail network. GroupSave tickets save up to 1/3 on rail fares for adults travelling in a group of three to nine people. They can be bought for single or return journeys at off-peak or super-off peak times. Make sure you stick with the whole group you booked for to ensure your tickets remain valid during your journey. Travel during quieter times Off-Peak fares are cheaper tickets for travelling at less busy times during weekdays, and all day on weekends, National Rail says. You may have to travel at specified times, or on specified days or routes. On longer distance journeys, if you travel in a peak period one way but want to return when it is less busy, consider booking a combination of advance, off-peak and anytime fares to get the best deal. Rover and Ranger tickets Most train companies offer a selection of Rover tickets and Ranger tickets, which offer unlimited travel within a specified area and time period. Ranger tickets are valid for one day only, while Rover tickets are valid for longer (although still within a limited time period). For example, you could buy a Rover ticket that allows travel within a specific geographical area for three consecutive days, or within a 15-day period. These tickets may also include local bus travel, and there are often other offers and discounts available, including 50% off for children aged five to 15, 50% off for people with a 16-17 Saver Railcard and 1/3 off fares with other Railcards. How are train fares decided? About 45% of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh governments, while the rest are set by train operators themselves. Regulated fares include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: "The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. "The government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. "No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers." Read more Everything you need to know as ScotRail prepares to scrap peak train fares (The National) Voices: 'We're falling behind': Heathrow expansion sparks backlash over UK's 'outdated' travel infrastructure (The Independent) Train firms accused of 'vexatious' plot to derail Labour nationalisation (The Telegraph)
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
I went to Italy for the first time and left with 5 big regrets
I took my first trip to Italy in October 2022, visiting Venice, Rome, and Milan. I made some mistakes when booking and planning my trip that made it less fulfilling. During the six-day trip, I regretted being an annoying tourist and visiting hot spots. I never thought I'd be that annoying tourist until one afternoon in Venice, Italy. I never imagined I would regret touring the Colosseum in Rome. I couldn't have predicted I'd feel sour about spending one night in Milan. But as I've learned as a travel reporter, I make mistakes every time I visit a new place. My first visit to Italy was in October 2022 during a two-week backpacking trip through Europe. I traveled by train to four countries and spent six days exploring three Italian cities — Venice, Rome, and Milan. I had an amazing vacation, but it could have been even more fulfilling and sustainable if I'd known a few things beforehand. Squeezing three cities into a six-day trip was my first mistake. With three destinations to visit in six days, my trip to Italy felt like a race. It started with a two-night stay in Venice, and before I knew it, I was off to Rome. Roughly 48 hours later, I was on the train to Milan, where I spent just one night before hopping on a train to another European city. Traveling too quickly made me feel like I was always rushing. Going all the way to Milan for a single night didn't satisfy me. If I had selected just one destination, I would have been more present during my trip — and more environmentally conscious. Justin Francis, cofounder of the UK-based sustainable vacation company Responsible Travel, previously told Business Insider that longer stays are better for the planet than quick visits. "Fewer but longer trips mean fewer air miles, more money in local hands, and you'll have a more relaxing trip, too," Francis said. I thought visiting in October would help me avoid crowds. I was wrong. Traveling to Europe in the summer doesn't seem like a good idea. During peak season, the continent's hottest destinations are overwhelmed with tourists. So I thought booking my trip in October, during shoulder season (the time between peak and off-seasons) would help me avoid long lines and obstructed views. Well, I was wrong. In Venice and Rome, I shuffled down cobblestone streets with pedestrian traffic jams. I dragged my feet over tourist-packed bridges. I viewed ancient sites like the Colosseum through the phone screens of people standing in front of me. It seems the word is out about shoulder season. So next time I go to Italy, I'll take a winter trip. In Venice, I shouldn't have booked my stay outside the city. Spending three nights in a castle for $360 was an offer I couldn't pass up. After all, it was a unique opportunity to sleep like a queen in the tower of Castello di Roncade, which was only a half-hour drive from Venice. Though my stay was marvelous and a steal for the price point, I felt regret after learning that daytrippers can worsen overtourism in places like Venice by adding to the crowds without spending on accommodations. By not spending the night in the city itself, I wasn't contributing as much as I could have to the local economy. I should have researched etiquette before my trip. When it comes to tourism etiquette, I was wrong to assume my own sense of common courtesy would serve me well. After a walking tour in Venice, I hoped to sit down for lunch, but all the restaurants I passed were packed. Hungry and hot, I eventually cut my losses and stood in line for gelato before sitting on a shaded step to enjoy it. As I was about to take my first bite, the nearby authorities waved their hands up and down at me — a gesture I could only take to mean "get up." If I could do it again, I'd be more aimless. In Rome and Venice, I had a rigid schedule. I booked tours and planned every hour of my day to see as many highlights as possible. Every place I ventured to was one I'd seen repeatedly in films and on Instagram. Seeing these famous places in person was fascinating, but I felt like I was missing out on a sense of wonder. When I got to Milan, I dropped the agenda and walked around the city in hopes of discovering something myself. It paid off. I stumbled upon a 15th-century castle I'd never seen on social media — Castello Sforzesco. Walking through the gate, I felt like I'd stepped into a fairy tale. Brick walls and towers lush with overgrown vines surrounded me. Exploring the grounds of this castle was more fulfilling than the gondola ride in Venice or the Colosseum tour in Rome. And I think that's because I wasn't expecting it.
