
PensionBee Analysis Finds Left-Behind 401ks May Cost Americans $90,000 by Retirement
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--In today's dynamic job market, frequent career moves are common, especially among younger professionals. However, this trend has led to a growing issue: abandoned 401(k) accounts. Recent estimates indicate that over 29 million forgotten 401(k) accounts exist in the U.S.
This isn't merely a different default option; it's a fundamentally different investment approach with dramatically reduced growth potential.
Share
To make matters worse, when employees leave behind small 401(k) balances - under $7,000 - employers can transfer these funds into Safe Harbor IRAs without the employee's consent to help manage high volumes of inactive accounts.
PensionBee examined the impact of this common administrative practice, revealing the stark return differential between Safe Harbor IRAs and traditional retirement accounts. Americans who leave behind just a handful of accounts early in their careers can lose out on over $90,000 by the time they retire.
The Three-Fold Problem
Safe Harbors IRAs are designed to preserve rather than grow capital. Previous market analysis by PensionBee found that combined high fees and low returns of many mainstream providers work against this goal, and may even deplete forgotten retirement accounts to $0.
The problem is threefold:
First, mandated ultra-conservative investments. Regulations require Safe Harbor IRAs to use low-risk investments, usually offering far below standard retirement portfolio returns, often below the rate of inflation. Many Safe Harbor IRA providers use bank deposits with very low interest rates, sometimes as low as 0.5%.
Second, many providers charge excessive fees that devour returns. Unlike 401(k) plans, which have an average fee of approximately 0.85%, Safe Harbor IRAs charge seemingly small monthly fees ($1-$5) that quickly accumulate. One provider charges $5.67 monthly plus 0.5% annually—on a $3,500 account, that's $85.54 yearly (2.4%) before additional withdrawal fees of $75 per transaction. These fees often exceed any earnings and actively deplete principal.
Third, interest skimming. Certain providers have been known to pay less than 1% interest while prevailing rates exceed 4%, taking substantial portions of investment returns as a 'bank servicing fee.'
The Generational Toll
Younger workers face a perfect storm. Not only do Gen Zers change jobs often, but they are also opening retirement accounts earlier than ever before. The average Gen Zer starts saving for retirement at age 22, compared with Millennials, who began at 27, Gen X, whose average age was 31, and Boomers, who didn't start until the age of 37.
The combination of changing jobs more frequently and opening retirement accounts earlier than their predecessors creates a dangerous vulnerability. Gen Z is more likely to accumulate multiple small 401(k) accounts that are prime targets for automatic transfers to Safe Harbor IRAs, which were never meant to be long-term investing vehicles. Our system quietly undermines their early start through these forced transfers to low-yield investments.
The lack of transparency compounds the problem. This isn't merely a different default option; it's a fundamentally different investment approach with dramatically reduced growth potential.
The Compounding Problem
PensionBee's latest research compared growth trajectories of Safe Harbor IRAs (~2% returns) and 401(k) investments (~5% returns), to model the difference in returns between employees whose small balances are forced into low-yielding accounts and those who are not.
The findings suggest that automatic rollovers into Safe Harbor IRAs with low-yielding accounts harm former employees and can lead to an exponential difference in returns across several accounts.
For illustrative purposes, the analysis looks at a typical worker who:
Job hops between the ages of 20 and 30, leaving behind a 401(k) every two years (five total)
Has a starting salary of $50,000 that grows 10% with each new job
Retirement balances are calculated as 3% of that salary annually, with 50% employer match vested
PensionBee's analysis shows that a typical 20-year-old worker who leaves behind a $4,500 retirement account will see it grow to just $5,507 by retirement age if left in a typical Safe Harbor IRA. Had that same amount been rolled over to a traditional 401(k) earning 5%, it would grow to $25,856, a difference of over $20,000 from a single account.
The impact compounds dramatically with multiple job changes. Someone who switches jobs every two years in their 20s and rolls over their accounts each time saves over $90,000 more by retirement than someone who leaves them in Safe Harbor IRAs. This difference exceeds the median American retirement savings of $87,000.
How to Protect Your Retirement Savings
Check Account Size: Know your balance when leaving a job, as accounts under $7,000 may be automatically transferred to Safe Harbor IRAs. If your account is under $1,000, it may be cashed out automatically, triggering taxes and penalties.
Know Your Options: You generally have four choices for your retirement account when switching jobs: keep it with your former employer, transfer it to an IRA, move it to your new employer's plan, or cash out, potentially triggering penalties and taxes.
Update Contact Information: Ensure all retirement account providers have your current contact information to prevent account transfers without your knowledge.
Take Timely Action: Make decisions about your retirement funds within 30 days of leaving a job to prevent automatic transfers.
Bottom Line
The silent drain of retirement savings through inadequate Safe Harbor IRAs remains largely invisible to millions of Americans who switch jobs regularly. Most job-hoppers assume their retirement accounts are safe, even if unaccounted for. Instead, forgotten accounts may be eroded by excessive fees and low returns, potentially costing thousands in retirement savings.
"Safe Harbor IRAs represent a critical blind spot in America's retirement system," notes Romi Savova, CEO of PensionBee. "The lack of transparency in these accounts is particularly troubling, as most assume that the money they put towards their retirement will remain theirs. The difference between investment defaults matters enormously."
Savova emphasizes that "these seemingly small default decisions have profound long-term consequences for savers. Greater transparency around default investment strategies would empower consumers to make informed choices about their financial future."
About PensionBee
PensionBee is a leading online retirement provider, helping people easily consolidate, manage, and grow their retirement savings. The company manages approximately $8 billion in assets and serves over 275,000 customers globally, with a focus on simplicity, transparency, and accessibility.
Notes
The information provided in this announcement, including any projections for investment returns and future performance, is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal. PensionBee is not liable for any losses or damages arising from the use of this information. Projections and forecasts are based on assumptions and current market conditions, which are subject to change.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

4 hours ago
Economy steady amid global tariff war
Despite a dip in May's jobs report, Americans seem to show resiliency as an ongoing tariff war shakes stocks for Tesla and Lululemon. ABC News' Phil Lipof has the latest numbers. June 7, 2025
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The cheapest grocery stores in 2025 have been named — and the first-place winner is expanding in NYC
Check out these checkouts. As food prices are expected to rise by up to 3.5% in 2025, according to the USDA, many Americans are looking for ways to keep their grocery bills in check. A recent study by MarketForce, which surveyed over 4,300 shoppers, highlights the grocery stores that best balance affordability with quality. Whether it's inflation, supply chain issues or simply the high cost of living, everyone could use a break at checkout. Here's your chance, according to the roundup, with seven grocers helping customers stretch their dollars without sacrificing taste or freshness. Lidl has been a rising star in the U.S. discount grocery scene, especially in NYC, where it has been expanding locations, including in Brooklyn. The store layout is inspired by European roots, which helps Lidl keep its overhead low by minimizing staffing and using a streamlined warehouse-style setup. This helps reduce costs for shoppers, making it one of the most budget-friendly options for families. According to the MarketForce study, an impressive 81.4% of customers return to Lidl because of its unbeatable value. The store's affordable pricing is made better with the quality of its products, the report notes. In addition to the usual grocery items, Lidl also surprises customers with seasonal and non-food items, from power tools to potted plants. If you've ever dreamed of paying Costco prices without the membership fee, WinCo Foods is where it's at. This employee-owned chain has become a household name in many parts of the U.S., with 139 locations spread across 10 states. WinCo operates a warehouse-style model focusing on low prices by cutting out the middleman. It buys directly from manufacturers and even has customers bag their own groceries. The strategy must be working: a whopping 73.1% of shoppers cited value for money as their main reason for frequenting WinCo. Its bulk sections are also noted as a treasure trove for those seeking to stock up on essentials like flour, rice and dried goods at steep discounts. Grocery Outlet's business model revolves around selling overstocked or discontinued items at discounted prices. Locations vary by region, but the appeal is universal: customers can score big on both name-brand and private-label products. Fresh produce, dairy and meat are always stocked, while their natural and organic sections offer a variety of specialty items like vegan and gluten-free foods — often for less than what you'd find at other places. Notably, 71.4% of shoppers reported returning to Grocery Outlet for the exceptional value it provides. Aldi's reputation for value is legendary — and the numbers don't lie. The MarketForce study found that 70.4% of shoppers favor Aldi for the exceptional value it offers. With a European-inspired model, Aldi keeps costs low by minimizing staff, using simple displays, and encouraging customers to bag their own groceries. Despite this no-frills approach, Aldi shoppers can find everything from pasta and canned goods to frozen items and fresh produce. If you're looking to make your budget stretch even further, Aldi is also home to great deals on dairy, baked goods and even alcohol. Known for its vast selection of high-quality store-brand products, Wegmans is a favorite among many shoppers, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region. The family-owned grocer boasts more than 110 stores and has become well-known for its excellent customer service and affordable prices. A solid 68.7% of MarketForce respondents cited value for money as their main reason for choosing Wegmans. Wegmans stands out for its wide range of organic and healthy food options, from fresh produce to gluten-free snacks. The grocer expanded to Long Island earlier this year and continues to extend its reach beyond the Northeast. Despite its smaller footprint compared to traditional grocery stores, about 67.2% of study participants mentioned that they return because of the store's value. While it's famous for its affordable and fun frozen-food options, much-beloved Trader Joe's also serves up fresh produce, unique snacks, seasonal items and high-quality private-label goods. While Costco may require a membership, the savings it offers can make it worth the investment. Known for its bulk-buying model, Costco allows customers to purchase everything from household essentials to luxury items at steeply discounted prices. Whether it's buying a year's supply of toilet paper, a bulk pack of fresh fruit, gourmet cheeses or pantry staples, according to the MarketForce study, 61.4% of customers return to Costco for its impressive deals.