‘I run Britain's cheapest shop where everything costs 20p… but we're still fighting thieves'
The 20p Shop, situated in the market town of Otley, West Yorkshire, is renowned for its jaw-dropping bargains.
4
4
4
The small business sells greeting cards, cutlery and even pieces of jewellery for next-to-nothing.
But its owner has issued a warning to other retailers over shoplifters - despite the unbelievably low prices.
It comes as statistics published last month indicate that shoplifting in England and Wales is at an all time high.
Steve Nelson, 67, told the Daily Mail how thieves will come in and pay for one 20p item "just to make it look good" - before taking other items off the shelves and walking out.
He even said how some of the shoplifters are pensioners and that one couple had been barred from the shop.
Steve added: "When you've got pensioners stealing from a 20p shop, something's gone seriously wrong, hasn't it?"
Despite items only setting customers back by 20p per item, shoplifting has still had an impact on the shop.
Stock in the shop is bought in bulk and sourced carefully to allow profit margins of a mere few pennies on each item sold - making theft a big blow to the small business.
Steve said that some thieves allegedly take cards in bulk just to sell them on at car boot sales for 50p each.
Bulk thefts on cards, for example, could cost owner Steve £30 to £40, he said.
How business owners are cracking down on shoplifting
The 20p store opened in 2017 and has become somewhat of a tourist attraction due to its bargains.
Locals reportedly donate any unwanted items, and there are no hired employees - just kind-hearted volunteers.
The total income for the shop in a day sits at roughly £150 - which has to cover rent, rates and electricity.
But bill increases and wholesale stock becoming more expensive means pressure has mounted on the shop.
The council also decided to paint double yellow lines outside the shop, causing a drop in footfall.
Steve's son Stewart, 31, said that while there had been rumours of the prices getting raised to 50p, he said it wasn't happening.
In 2023, shoplifting added £133 to the cost of an average household's shopping bill for the year, according to the Centre For Retail Research.
There were 516,971 shoplifting crimes last year, according to the Office for National Statistics, which is a 20 per cent increase on 2023 when 429,873 offences were recorded.
In its annual crime survey of major retailers, the British Retail Consortium found that violence and abuse against shop workers rose by 50 per cent, with more than 2,000 incidents recorded on average each day.
4
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
8 minutes ago
- Finextra
FCA's revamped returns put pressure on bureaux and the credit providers they serve.: By Cliff Bunting
In May 2025, the FCA introduced PS25/3, a new regulatory return for firms with permissions for credit broking, debt counselling, and credit information services. It replaces the returns process introduced in 2014, which the regulator had concluded was no longer delivering the level of clarity needed to monitor risk in the market. The updated return requires firms to report activity across five categories: permissions, business model, marketing, revenue, and staffing. This gives the FCA more direct visibility into how brokers and bureaux are operating and whether their actions align with the outcomes they are expected to support. While PS25/3 does not apply to credit providers, it is already influencing the way bureaux behave, including how they configure, price, and explain their services. That makes this a sensible moment for lenders to reassess whether their bureau data contracts still reflect what the business needs and how it operates. Why this affects data buyers The FCA has made clear that it wants a more consistent understanding of how regulated firms operate. For brokers and bureaux, that means connecting internal decisions across multiple areas of the business. For those that supply credit data services, it means explaining how each product, process, and dataset fits into the wider operation. This increased scrutiny has implications for their clients. Many credit providers are still using bureau contracts that haven't changed in years. Some terms were agreed around older product sets or inherited usage patterns. In other cases, volumes or decisioning logic have evolved without a formal review of the underlying data or licensing model. This is where issues tend to surface: FCA return section What's reported Where problems often occur Permissions Regulated activities Datasets don't match product permissions or customer types Business model Products and services offered Affordability models or coverage haven't been reviewed Marketing Targeting methods Risk data is used in early-stage activity without an audit Revenue Credit vs. non-credit income No clear link between data usage and income classification Staff Incentives and oversight Teams rely on data not covered by the current contract or policy These are operational gaps, not regulatory breaches. But as bureaux are required to document and explain their activity, the services they provide, and the clients using them, will come under greater internal and commercial review. Is your bureau setup still appropriate? For many credit providers, bureau data contracts remain largely unchanged since they were first negotiated. Product configurations and licence terms may have rolled forward year after year. In some cases, the rationale for specific data decisions is no longer clear internally. For firms that have expanded their product lines or added new use cases, these arrangements may no longer reflect actual requirements. This raises practical questions: Does our current bureau agreement match our products, permissions and customer base? Have we added use cases that were never reviewed with our data supplier? Are we still paying for services that no longer support risk, compliance, or commercial activity? Can we explain how the current setup came to be and who approved it? PS25/3 has made these questions more relevant, even for firms outside the scope of the return. As bureaux respond to regulatory expectations, the structure and pricing of their services will become more deliberate. Their clients should expect, and prepare for, the same. How firms are reassessing value through benchmarking Many credit providers are now using benchmarking as a way to review their bureau arrangements. This involves comparing contract pricing, product mix, and usage against others with similar requirements, helping teams identify whether existing terms still make commercial sense. In practice, this often supports clearer internal conversations between credit risk, procurement and compliance, especially where data usage spans multiple functions. Firms typically use benchmarking to: Compare bureau costs against peer usage Identify underused or outdated services Review whether pricing reflects actual volume and footprint Establish a clearer rationale for contract terms Support mid-term negotiations based on observed market practice This doesn't require a supplier change or formal audit. It's simply a method for understanding whether current data services match today's needs and whether the right commercial structure still supports internal decisions. Conclusion PS25/3 requires brokers and bureaux to take a more structured view of their activity. That will influence how they configure and deliver their services, including to credit providers who rely on their data. For those buying from bureaux, this is a good time to revisit the terms in place and the rationale behind them. If supplier behaviour is changing, there's value in being prepared, commercially and operationally, before it becomes a requirement to do so.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government could ban ‘barely legal' pornography after Bonnie Blue documentary
The new pornography taskforce will propose legislation aimed at banning a type of content produced by porn star Bonnie Blue, known as 'barely legal'. It comes after Channel 4 broadcast a documentary about the porn star, called: '1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story', which followed her for six months. The show attracted significant criticism, with the children's commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, accusing the show of 'glamorising and normalising' extreme pornography. The documentary shows Tia Billinger – who uses the stage name Bonnie Blue – preparing to film a scene with a group of models dressed in school uniform, who acknowledge that they have been picked for the scene because they look young. 'This content is pushing at the boundaries. We will be trying to address the 'barely legal' aspect legislatively', Baroness Bertin told The Guardian. She said she plans to raise amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill once Parliament returns from its summer recess to make it illegal for online platforms to host content that could encourage child sexual abuse. This would include content filmed by adults dressed up as children. Bonnie Blue became famous after initially filming sexual content with young male students, who she dubbed 'barely legal'. She later gained notoriety after filming stunts, including one which saw her have sex with more than 1,000 men in a 24-hour period. Under rules that came into effect on July 25 as part of the Online Safety Act, online platforms including social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. The act also gave Ofcom the responsibility to monitor whether sites are protecting viewers from illegal material including child sexual abuse or extreme content such as portrayals of rape, bestiality and necrophilia. But currently, adults role-playing as children in pornography is not prohibited online. The Channel 4 documentary, which showed pixellated clips of Bonnie Blue having sex with more than 1,000 men, faced condemnation for failing to challenge her enough, with advertisers pulling support for the programme. Card payment business Visa, juice maker Cawston Press and vodka brand Smirnoff all had ads which appeared online during the show, but they later told Channel 4 that they no longer wanted their products promoted during the programme as it did not align with their advertising guidelines or values. Dame Rachel said: 'For years we have been fighting to protect our children from the kind of degrading, violent sex that exists freely on their social media feeds. This documentary risks taking us a step back by glamorising, even normalising, the things young people tell me are frightening, confusing and damaging to their relationships.' Baroness Bertin added: 'Channel 4 showed a surprising lack of judgment in showing such explicit sex scenes. More widely the glamorisation and normalisation of content creators like Bonnie Blue does undoubtedly have an effect. In my opinion, this is a direction of travel that is not particularly helpful for society nor is it prudish to call it out as such.' A Channel 4 spokesperson said: 'The film looks at how Bonnie Blue has gained worldwide attention and earned millions of pounds in the last year, exploring changing attitudes to sex, success, porn and feminism in an ever-evolving online world. 'Director Victoria Silver puts a number of challenges to Bonnie throughout the documentary on the example she sets and how she is perceived, and the film clearly lays bare the tactics and strategies she uses, with the audience purposefully left to form their own opinions.'
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour reignites row with Nigel Farage as Home Office minister Jess Phillips says Reform UK is 'empowering modern-day Jimmy Saviles'
Labour has reignited a row with Nigel Farage by claiming Reform UK's pledge to repeal online safety laws risks empowering 'modern-day Jimmy Saviles'. Home Office minister Jess Phillips launched a fresh attack on Reform's promise to scrap the Online Safety Act. She accused Reform leader Mr Farage of putting 'clicks for his monetised social media accounts' ahead of children's safety. Ms Phillips, minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, also backed her Labour colleague Peter Kyle following his row with Mr Farage last week. Mr Kyle, the Technology Secretary, said Mr Farage was putting himself on the side of 'extreme pornographers' and people like Savile by opposing the Online Safety Act. In a furious spat, Mr Farage demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, saying his remarks about vile sex predator Savile were 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'. Under rules that came into effect on 25 July, online platforms including social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. But Mr Farage has warned the Online Safety Act 'poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes'. Reform has pledged to scrap the legislation if it wins the next general election, while Mr Farage has also urged people to sign a petition demanding the Act is repealed. Writing in The Times, Ms Phillips said: 'Farage said it's the biggest threat to freedom of speech in our lifetimes. 'My colleague Peter Kyle said he was siding with modern-day Jimmy Saviles preying on children online.' She said she would like to speak to Mr Farage about 'one of those modern-day Saviles, Alexander McCartney'. McCartney, who posed as a teenage girl to befriend young females from across the globe on Snapchat and other platforms before blackmailing them, 'just needed a computer' to reach his targets, Ms Phillips wrote. Believed to be one of the world's most prolific online offenders, McCartney abused at least 70 children online and drove one girl to suicide. Ms Phillips said the Online Safety Act exists to try to provide a 'basic minimum of protection, and make it harder for paedophiles to prey on children at will'. She said police have told her that paedophile networks use 'normal websites where their parents assume they're safe' to coerce and blackmail young people. 'Perhaps Nigel Farage doesn't worry about that - there's no political advantage in it, and no clicks for his monetised social media accounts. But I do,' she added. 'I worry about what it means now and what it will mean when boys reared on a diet of ultraviolent online child abuse are adult men having children of their own. 'I can't ignore that, neither can Peter Kyle, and, most importantly, nor can millions of parents across the country. 'I defy Nigel Farage to tell me what any of that has to do with free speech. 'I defy him to meet even one parent who has lost a daughter to suicide because she was being blackmailed online and tell them that is just the price of civil liberties. Maybe he'd feel differently after that kind of meeting, or maybe he wouldn't care.' Her comments echo those of Mr Kyle, who said last week: 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Mr Farage demanded an apology from the Technology Secretary, who refused to withdraw the remarks. In his own newspaper article last week, the Reform leader said of the new online rules: 'These apparently well-intentioned checks enforce mandatory ID scans, not just for porn sites, but also for mainstream social media where political or any other content is deemed potentially 'harmful'. 'This erosion of privacy could make it easier to identify online critics of government policy on migration and much else.'
