When Aishwarya Rai revealed Ranbir Kapoor LIED to her — found out the truth 15 years later!
Bachchan once shared a light-hearted story about her co-star
Ranbir Kapoor
that still makes people smile. The two first worked together in 2016 in
Karan Johar
's romantic drama '
Ae Dil Hai Mushkil
', also starring Anushka Sharma. But it was during the film's promotions that
Aishwarya
revealed how Ranbir once told her a cheeky little lie, and how she only found out the truth more than 15 years later!
A warm bond beyond the screen
In 'Ae Dil Hai Mushkil', fans loved the sizzling chemistry between Aishwarya and Ranbir. Off the screen too, they seemed to share a close and friendly bond. This became clear when they went on the popular show '
The Kapil Sharma Show
' to promote their film.
While joking around and sharing old memories, Aishwarya ended up telling a funny story about the 'Rockstar' actor from years ago.
The day Ranbir lied about his marks
During a fun segment on the show, the host showed an old photo of Ranbir. Seeing this, the 'Guru' actress burst into laughter. She remembered how Ranbir had once told her he scored 'about 65 percent' in his Class 10 board exams. But that wasn't true at all! She then revealed that it was only during the shoot of 'Ae Dil Hai Mushkil', over 15 years later, that she finally learnt he had actually scored just 54 percent.
A party for the wrong result
The story became even funnier when Aishwarya shared how Ranbir's grandmother, Krishna Kapoor, had thrown a huge party to celebrate his exam result. Aishwarya said, 'His grandmother Krishna aunty was very excited. I have to throw a very big party, have to give dinner to everyone and the whole celebration was going on and we both were laughing while looking at everyone on the side and he was saying that everyone is so happy in just this much.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Doutor: Manter a massa muscular após os 50 anos depende deste hábito noturno
Revista do Homem
Saiba Mais
Undo
'
The 'Brahmastra' actor then explained why this happened. He said he had calculated his best five subjects and proudly declared that as his result at home. The Kapoors were so thrilled, they didn't ask any more questions and threw a grand party. Looking back, both Ranbir and Aishwarya found it hilarious that so many people had come together to celebrate marks that were not quite what everyone thought!
On the work front, Aishwarya was last seen in
Mani Ratnam
's period drama 'Ponniyin Selvan II', which came out in 2023. Ranbir Kapoor is now preparing for Nitish Tiwari's '
Ramayana
', where he will play Lord Ram alongside
Sai Pallavi
as Sita.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
When Anushka Sharma reacted to losing her debut award to Asin: 'I got very upset...'
The year 2008 marked the arrival of two different yet impactful female leads in Bollywood—Anushka Sharma, who made her debut with Shah Rukh Khan in 'Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi,' and Asin, who was in the movie with Aamir Khan in 'Ghajini. ' Both performances were lauded, both films were box office successes, and both actresses were nominated. Although when the envelope opened, it was Asin who took home the trophy. 'I was very upset… I cried like a child' In a resurfaced 2018 interview on 'Look Who's Talking With Niranjan,' Anushka candidly recalled her heartbreak, saying, 'I'm very upset they didn't give it to me. I made my calculation, you know. Asin had already done Ghajini in Tamil, Telugu, and maybe Kannada. She's already been an actress for many years. Obviously, they won't give it to her! Debut toh mera hua hai, main nayi hoon, maine nayi film mein kaam kiya hai. I need the encouragement.' In spite of clapping for Asin during the ceremony, Anushka admitted she was devastated afterwards, as she said, 'I cried like a child—as if I didn't get a certificate in school.' The 'debut' debate: Fresh face vs. first Hindi film Anushka's frustration was not just all personal; it became a larger industry debate. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The question though lies what truly defines a debut? While 'Ghajini' was Asin's first Hindi film, she was already a popular star in South Indian cinema. Anushka, on the other hand, was a complete newcomer, stepping into the spotlight with no prior screen experience. This distinction, Anushka felt, should have mattered. She emphasised, 'She's already an actress. I was new. I needed the encouragement.' A-Sin or just a sin? In a cheeky moment on 'Koffee With Karan,' Anushka even referred to Asin as 'A-Sin,' a pun that reflected her lingering disappointment. While said as a joke, it ignored how deeply the moment had affected her. Where they stand today Asin stepped away from acting after 'All Is Well,' choosing to focus on family life. Anushka, meanwhile, has shaped herself into one of the Bollywood's most respected actors and producers. Her upcoming film 'Chakda 'Xpress,' which is based on the cricketer Jhulan Goswami, is among the most expected biopics in recent memory.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Murzban Shroff Captures Mumbai's Soul Through Stories
Excerpts here: Q. Everyone may say there are classic ways of writing a story, but everyone brings their uniqueness to the table, wouldn't you say? A. Whenever I begin a new book or project, I start with two basic questions: What do I have to say that's any different? And why do you need a book like this? Similarly, with Muses of Mumbai, I began by exploring certain key questions about the city. Going back a bit, when I was working on Breathless in Bombay, my feelings towards the city were quite ambivalent. With Breathless, my focus was on understanding the have-nots of the city, delving into migrant communities, and trying to sensitise the haves to the struggles of the have-nots. But with Muses, I found myself directly engaging with deeper questions. I wanted to explore how serious the vegetarian and non-vegetarian divide really is, whether the rich in Mumbai are any less vulnerable than the poor, and whether all gurus and godmen are conmen. I was also interested in how newly arrived migrants navigate the city and what specific challenges they face. These were the kinds of questions that shaped Muses of Mumbai and inspired many of the stories in the collection. Q. There's a sense that the stories leapt out at the author—perhaps from a newspaper clipping or from something overheard while walking through the city. How did this book come about? A. Not so much newspaper clippings. But it's interesting because let me give you an example. In my first book, while working with migrant communities, I had written a story on the Dhobi Ghats where I anticipated that builders might eye the ghats for development. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kostenlose Casinospiele in Chemnitz [Jetzt spielen] Merkur24 Jetzt spielen Undo Two years after the story was published in the US, the Mumbai Mirror broke a front-page story confirming just that. I believe literature—and writers in particular—often have an underlying objective: to anticipate where the environment is headed. In that sense, there's almost a kind of clairvoyance involved. And how does that come about? Simply by being a flâneur, as you rightly observed. Yes, I write a lot from observation and detail—but not superficial detail. It's not there just for environmental precision. It's detail that creates immediacy, wraps itself around the reader, and feeds into the vision I'm trying to convey. For instance, in Muses of Mumbai, there's a story called 'Neighbours'. I was walking through a part of old Bombay with strong community feeling—where vendors knew each other—and suddenly I entered a stretch gripped by chaotic development. I call it the contrast between Bombay Bahami and Mumbai Mayhem. That kind of insight only comes when you're walking the city like a flâneur, with antennas up and eyes at the back of your head, constantly absorbing and sensing where the city is headed. Q. You make the reader look more closely than they otherwise would. Would you say that's what allows fiction to anticipate reality in ways journalism sometimes can't? A. Oh, absolutely. To understand this aspect of my writing, I think one must first understand why I'm here—what my role is, how I see myself as a writer. I don't work out of plot. For me, life itself is the plot. Just following life as a plot works beautifully for me. To expand on that, I work with characters and I work with issues. I get fascinated by certain character types and try to understand how the city shapes them. At the same time, I focus on issues. So, what are some of the issues I've explored in Muses of Mumbai? So I start with the vegetarian–non-vegetarian divide, then move on to alcoholism, terrorism, corruption, civic apathy, corporate greed and apathy, communal and caste prejudices, the usurpation of green zones, and the destruction of green cover. Lastly, I talk about the conspiracies behind urban development. But my real epiphany is: what does all this do to us as individuals? What does it do to us as human beings? How does it affect our relationship with the city? My writing is social realism in fictional form. It has a strong non-fiction base. I use that foundation to establish a leap of faith—with either the characters or the issues—and then take a leap of imagination to bring in the fictional elements, making the story more human and relatable. It's reality-based writing—what I call storytelling that grinds its way to a deeper reality. Q. Would you ever explore a short story that isn't grounded in non-fiction or reality? Would you be able to write something completely imaginative? A. Oh, absolutely. There are two kinds of writing I do—one within my milieu and one outside of it. By 'within my milieu,' I mean writing rooted in my environment—Mumbai or even pan-India, especially when exploring cultural issues. 'Outside my milieu' refers to the lives of the invisible—the migrants, the homeless. Then there's another kind of writing I do: work that's close to the bone, close to home. By that, I mean deep psychological excavations into human nature. You'll be seeing more of that soon. I attempted it in my novel Waiting for Jonathan Koshy, where I explored the lives of four friends engaged in alternate thinking. That novel wasn't research-heavy; it was drawn from material close to home. In it, I dealt with two central questions: How do you define success? And what's the difference between success and gratification? India is in the throes of commercialism and a transitional economy, and those questions felt urgent. Q. What is it about the short story form that appeals to you? A. I reserve the short story form mostly for my issue-based fiction because, when covering a territory like Mumbai, it's difficult to weave everything into a single overarching theme. Mumbai works best as a polyphony of class and cultures. There are multiple issues operating at multiple levels, and the short story allows me to represent that diversity more effectively. To expand on that—Muses of Mumbai has 17 stories, two of which are almost novelettes, around 15,000 to 17,000 words. Each story is completely different, not just in subject, characters, and socio-economic backgrounds, but also in writing style. Some use elements of memoir, some essay, some whimsy. The styles themselves reflect the city's diversity. That's why I find the short story form so powerful. It's a wonderfully promiscuous form of writing—you can explore a situation, a cameo, a predicament. A short story can raise questions and be deeply introspective, unlike the novel, which often feels the need to resolve itself. Q. You don't think a short story needs to resolve itself—it can just hang? A. Well, if you look at the Chekhovian model or the modern short story format, the short story often aims to raise questions and encourage introspection more than entertain. An analogy I use is that a short story is like an affair—you're on someone else's time, so you must deliver quickly, and it's open-ended. A novel, on the other hand, is like a marriage—there are good parts and bad parts, but you stay with it. Q. In your opinion, what defines a good short story? A. I think a good short story has to be taut, with a certain compact elegance. It needs a strong narrative pace and must take the reader on a journey of the soul. It should unfold truths that might otherwise go unnoticed and single-mindedly pursue a line of questioning or introspection. There has to be growth by the end—some form of cerebral or emotional shift. At the very least, it should get the reader thinking. Let me give you a couple of examples. Alice Munro's The Bear Came Over the Mountain is a beautiful story about an elderly couple where the wife develops Alzheimer's and falls in love with another patient in the care home. Her husband, while grappling with his own emotional journey, ultimately accepts her reality with grace and generosity. The story ends with a sense of growth and dignity—showing that such largeness of spirit is possible. Another example is Chekhov's The Chorus Girl, where a woman confronts a sex worker involved with her husband. Chekhov builds deep pathos for the sex worker, who tries to redeem herself in the eyes of the wife. That's what a good short story does—it deepens your understanding of human nature. Q. Who are the short story writers you admire? A. I like Jennifer Egan, Ben Fountain, and Richard Yates. But my reading ethic is a bit different—if I take to a writer, it doesn't matter whether they've written a novel or a short story collection. What matters is that the writer fuels my own growth and reading repertoire. I'm a voracious reader. Writers I enjoy include Saul Bellow, James Baldwin, F. Scott Fitzgerald, DH Lawrence, Chekhov, Dostoevsky—I love the Russians. Among the French, I admire Flaubert, Michel Houellebecq, and of course Camus. Richard Yates has become a recent favourite, and when I discover writers like these, I make it a point to read all their work. I also do a lot of rereading, because once I embrace a writer, I know they're there to stay. Among contemporary writers, I admire Edward P Jones, Ben Fountain, Jennifer Egan, and Robert Olen Butler. Among Indian writers, I enjoy Jhumpa Lahiri, Rohinton Mistry, and Salman Rushdie. Q. What is it about the short story—compared to the novel—that appeals to you, and which writing style do you prefer? A. With a short story, you can tackle a cameo, an incident, an episode, or a character crisis. But with a novel, you create an entire universe. It's not that I start with a predetermined form. The subject matter often dictates the form. Mumbai, with its many layers, lent itself beautifully to the short story. Similarly, in my India collection Third Eye Rising, I explored issues like caste, dowry, child apathy, and female exploitation—drawn from experiences in tribal and rural India. There again, I was working with issues, so the short story format suited the material. I was trying to understand the two great institutions that bind India—family and spirituality. For my novel, I wanted to create a universe. I set it in the late '80s and early '90s, an era of independent and alternate thought. The novel follows five friends from different communities, united by their love for books, films, and ideas, reflecting a moment of national unity and intellectual freedom. That vision required the length and depth of a novel. So for me, it's always the vision that determines the form. Every story or idea presents itself in an embryonic form—a vision or a character's dilemma. That vision has its own trajectory, and at some point, the character begins to reveal whether it's a long marathon—a novel—or a brisk walk—a short story. Q. You had to go through three years of court cases. How did that experience impact your writing afterward? A. It was certainly a dark phase in my life. I was completely unprepared for it and realised early on that it was politically manufactured. I lost three years—wasted time, resources, and a huge drain on my energy. I was completely derailed from the project I was working on. To answer your question—how did it affect my writing? Was there any self-censorship? Actually, the opposite happened. I decided that if I could be sued for no fault of mine and my life could be turned upside down, then I might as well write exactly what I want, the way I want. That's why I wrote Waiting for Jonathan Koshy. It was a satirical work on what India was becoming, and through the novel I could say things I wanted to say. It actually emboldened me. I found my voice, I found my turf, and I decided—I'm going in guns blazing.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gauahar Khan calls out paparazzi's inappropriate behaviour towards Pragya Jaiswal, questions eve-teasing culture
Gauahar Khan condemned paparazzi for their inappropriate behaviour towards Pragya Jaiswal at Zayed Khan's birthday party. Pragya appeared uncomfortable as some paps made lewd comments. Gauahar called out this eve-teasing culture on Instagram. Pragya hasn't responded yet. Gauahar's recent work includes the show 'Lovely Lolla'. Gauahar Khan, known for her fearless expression of opinions, recently condemned the paparazzi for their disrespectful conduct towards actress Pragya Jaiswal . The incident, caught on camera during Zayed Khan 's birthday celebration in Mumbai, sparked widespread attention and prompted Gauahar to strongly criticize their behavior. Incident Unfolds at Zayed Khan's Birthday Bash The situation started as Pragya, clad in a black bodycon dress, posed for the photographers. Once she stopped and started to leave, some paparazzi began calling out to her inappropriately and making unsettling sounds, leaving her visibly uncomfortable. Gauahar Voices Frustration on Instagram On Monday, Gauahar expressed her frustration on Instagram, highlighting how some paparazzi contribute to normalizing eve-teasing. She acknowledged that although many photographers behave respectfully, a significant number cross the line with inappropriate remarks. Gauahar called for accountability, insisting that such disrespectful behavior must be addressed and stopped. Pragya Yet to Respond as Backlash Grows Pragya has not yet commented on the situation, but the video capturing the incident has led to widespread backlash against the paparazzi's inappropriate behavior. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AI is helping small businesses increase productivity. Insider Learn More Undo Gauahar's Recent Work: Lovely Lolla On the work front, Gauahar Khan's most recent project was the show 'Lovely Lolla', where she starred alongside Isha Malviya and Nikhil Khurana. The series was created by producers Sargun Mehta and Ravi Dubey for their entertainment platform, Dreamiyata Dramaa.
