
Here's what comes next in the Texas redistricting battle
After a Texas House committee advanced new congressional lines during their special session last week, Democrats left the Lone Star State to deny Republicans a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers needed to conduct business.
In response, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has called for Democrats' arrest and has ordered the Texas Rangers to launch a probe into the lawmakers for possible bribery and other violations.
Meanwhile, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) declared he would 'seek judicial orders declaring that runaway Democrats who fail to appear by the Speaker's deadline have vacated their office.' But for now, the two parties are locked in a standoff.
Here's a look at what comes next in the Texas redistricting battle:
How long can Democrats stay out?
Essentially, they can stay out of the state as long as they want.
Texas Democrats have broken quorum before. In 2003, they fled the state to try to stop Republicans from passing GOP-friendly maps. They also left the state in 2021 when Republicans worked on largely restrictive voting and election legislation.
Both times, Democrats eventually returned to the state, and Republicans passed their priorities each time. Democrats are likely on a similar trajectory because Republicans control the state legislature and the governor's mansion, and there's a conservative majority on the Texas Supreme Court.
The question this time is how long will Democrats remain away from the state. Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, expects Democrats to at least run out the clock of the first special session.
Rottinghaus noted that the key to Democrats' endurance is about 'stamina, resources and unity.'
If 'they can hold all those things, then they can be successful. If not, then they'll start to see some dribbling of support from the members who've fled the quorum and they'll ultimately kind of lose that support,' he said.
What other means of pressure can Republicans exert?
Republicans don't have many options in terms of forcing Democrats to return to the state for their special session, though Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who's in a competitive reelection battle against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), has pressed the FBI to help Republicans bring the lawmakers who fled back to their state.
Rottinghaus noted that Democrats could face some pressure from their constituents who want to see them back in the state; they might also face pressure to return to the state to deal with some of the more pressing issues, including disaster relief following the deadly Texas Hill Country flooding.
Republicans face the same kind of pressure to deal with disaster relief and other agenda items, meaning the situation is not tenable long term for either party.
How are both sides trying to win the situation?
Republicans are trying to oust the Democrats who fled the state from their House seats.
Paxton announced on Tuesday that he would seek 'judicial orders declaring that runaway Democrats who fail to appear by the Speaker's deadline have vacated their office.'
While Texas Republicans will almost certainly pass their new House map, vacating state Democrats' seats would be problematic for Republicans because the state House still wouldn't have a quorum and would then need to wait to fill those seats in an election.
Even if this is legally allowed, there's nothing to stop newly elected Democrats from breaking quorum and doing the same thing.
'The courts basically have been sort of been unwilling to intervene in other quorum breaks to require wayward members to come back,' Rottinghaus said. 'Basically, what they said in these rulings was that the House needs to police itself, so it actually doesn't say anything about what the governor or attorney general can do.'
Texas Democrats, meanwhile, are trying to stall Republican efforts as long as possible. They've traveled to New York, Massachusetts, California and Illinois and appeared alongside some of those governors and Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin to bring national attention to the issue.
Long-term, Texas Democrats will have to return to their state, so it's not a lasting solution.
Democratic governors have also said they're exploring their options over how to redraw their own maps in response to Texas.
What does Trump do?
Trump has said little publicly about Texas Democrats' decision to break quorum and the larger redistricting tit-for-tat, though that could soon change.
One question is whether Trump directs the FBI or other agencies to force Texas Democrats to comply and return back to the Lone Star State, though that would ramp up what has already become a very tumultuous situation playing out nationally — and one that could help galvanize Democrats further.
That doesn't mean his team is on the sidelines, though. Punchbowl News reported that Vice President Vance is weighing heading to Indiana to speak with Republicans there about congressional redistricting.
Other states could move forward with redistricting
Several governors and top state officials have said they're exploring their options or signaling they'd like to redraw their House maps.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said last month that it would be 'appropriate' for the state to consider mid-decade redistricting based off the Florida Supreme Court's analysis of the state's more recent battle with its congressional maps.
Missouri Lt. Gov. David Wasinger (R) also signaled in a statement that the state may redraw its map.
'Missouri is a solidly conservative state, consistently electing Republicans to every statewide office and sending strong supermajorities to Jefferson City. Despite this, our current congressional map still sends two progressive Democrats to push a liberal agenda in D.C., misrepresenting the will of Missouri voters,' he said.
'We missed the chance to secure a 7-1 map in 2022, a mistake President Trump rightly calls on us to fix,' he continued. 'Missouri's next congressional map must protect Missouri values and ensure our representatives in Congress are as conservative as the voters who send them.'
In California, it appears that lawmakers are leaning toward redrawing their map and putting it before voters for a vote. The new map would reportedly hurt five House Republicans in the state.
New York and Illinois leaders this week also said they were exploring their options over how to proceed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump tariffs take effect: ‘IT'S MIDNIGHT!!!'
President Trump's latest rollout of 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of trading partners has formally taken effect as of Thursday morning. 'IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,' the president wrote just before midnight on Truth Social. In another post early Thursday, Trump wrote, 'Tariffs are flowing into the USA at levels not thought even possible!' The president signed an executive order last week unveiling new tariff rates and delayed the implementation date by roughly a week. Now nearly all imports will face a 10 percent tariff. Some nations will stare down higher import tax rates, such as Syria with 41 percent, Laos at 40 percent and Switzerland at 39 percent. Indonesia and Thailand will face a 19 percent tariff rate, while Japan, South Korea and the European Union are looking at a 15 percent figure. Trump also increased the tariffs on goods coming into the U.S. from India by 25 percent on Wednesday, over New Delhi's purchase of Russia's oil. The move came after special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Russian President Vladimir Putin as the U.S. continues to push for peace in the more than three-year-long war in Ukraine. India will now face a 50 percent tariff rate, which is set to kick in three weeks. Later Wednesday, Trump wrote on Truth Social that 'billions' of dollars will start flowing into the U.S., mostly from countries that 'have taken advantage' of Washington. 'THE ONLY THING THAT CAN STOP AMERICA'S GREATNESS WOULD BE A RADICAL LEFT COURT THAT WANTS TO SEE OUR COUNTRY FAIL,' he said in the post. The president first proposed his ' Liberation Day ' tariff agenda on April 2 but then instituted a 90-day extension a week later, following pressure from Wall Street and GOP lawmakers to stabilize the financial markets. The deadline was extended to Aug. 1 and subsequently bumped to Thursday. Goods that are already on their way to the U.S. are exempt from import fees, along with items covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which was signed in 2020. On Aug. 29, the exemption on de minimis goods will expire, meaning items shipped commercially that are worth $800 or less will no longer be able to evade import fees.


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kamala Harris stumbles right out of the gate
It might be the only thing Team Biden got right politically — the slow-motion trainwreck that is Kamala Harris and her political operation. The Harris disaster is history in the making. Never before has a putative presidential campaign failed so badly in getting anything right. Harris should be dominant in the Democratic Party. She entered the post-Biden world with strong approval among Democrats, sky-high name recognition and the benefit of 95 percent of Democrats having voted for her in 2024. Plus, she had a built-in excuse for losing — the colossal unpopularity of Joe Biden was clearly a drag for her and rocket fuel for President Trump. But Harris and her team have squandered these advantages in record time. They have demonstrated no coherent plan and no political sense. They don't appear to have any allies in the media or the punditry. Her brief flirtation with running for governor of California is emblematic of her incoherence. Running for major office is not like buying a used car. You either want it or you don't. If Harris truly wanted to plant herself in California and be governor, her pause to 'consider' running would have been a delaying tactic to plan her announcement and her campaign. Instead, it appears that dropping out of sight was her way of preparing to announce basically nothing. She isn't going to run for governor and she is going to release a book about her campaign — not now, but later. On top of that, her 'media tour' has consisted of going on the soon-to-be-out-of-work Stephen Colbert, where she was at her word salad worst. Not only did she have no message, but she whiffed on a series of softball questions so badly that it can only encourage every other Democratic hopeful. The very fact that Colbert had to ask her who is leading the Democrats was insulting — as the immediate previous nominee, it's supposed to be her. But her non-answer made things worse. Any decent politician would have found a way to maneuver Colbert to declare Harris the leader. Compounding matters, she expressed her disappointment that there has not been enough opposition to Trump. Does Harris realize she just called herself out for being weak and absent? Trump's disapproval rating among Democrats is 93 percent. Yet Harris just declared herself AWOL. The big problem for Harris is the same problem Joe Biden faced after his disastrous debate in June 2024: It's not so much the current moment that is the problem — it's the future. With Biden, there was no chance he could have made it through the campaign — debates, public appearances, speeches. With Harris it is the same thing. She has shown no improvement despite ample experience. She remains unprepared, terrible off-the-cuff, and utterly without original ideas. What could possibly change? And clearly, the people who saw Harris up close when she was Vice President figured this out. In my view, one of the great unreported stories from the Biden Administration is the tryout Team Biden gave Pete Buttigieg during the 2022 midterms to replace Kamala Harris — not necessarily as Vice President, but as the heir-apparent to lead the Democratic Party. Never before had a Secretary of Transportation been so visible and a vice president so invisible during the midterms. Too bad for Buttigieg that he mostly flopped or at least failed to catch fire. But what really showed that Harris is not ready for prime time was her presidential campaign. With the nomination dropped in her lap, she completely choked on the two most critical decisions. First, she chose as her running mate perhaps the only Democratic politician more inept than herself. Tim Walz brought nothing to the ticket — not even Minnesota, which was closer in 2024 than it had been in 2020. Harris could have picked Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a much better vote-getter than Walz, but the howls from the most leftist parts of the party were too loud. Second, she failed to break with Biden. All the polling in the summer was terrible for the president. His favorables were way underwater and his rating on inflation (the top issue) was disastrous. In an environment very hostile to the incumbent, Harris needed to make a break and present herself as something new. But again, she choked. And this is what will sink any chance she ever had of becoming the nominee for a second time. Harris is just not a risk-taker. She is petrified of angering any part of the squabbling Democratic Party, even the much-discredited Biden and his hangers-on. She crumbles in the face of any loud faction and tries to please everyone while saying nothing. Harris has missed the moment. By not breaking with Biden, she threw away her chance to win in 2024. As she stumbles around trying to figure out what to do, other Democrats are charging forward, making their own plans. Nobody is intimidated by her. Even the Biden inner circle — who should be cast out of Democratic politics permanently — have threatened to sink her if she dares criticize them. The nerve of Team Biden is pretty incredible. Even after an avalanche of books ripping Biden's White House staff to shreds, they have no qualms about threatening Harris. And, of course, Harris dutifully defended Biden in her Colbert interview. Pathetic. The true test for any politician is to work without a net. Kamala Harris has proven not only that she cannot work without a net, but also that she can barely crawl forward.


Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Louisiana loses its Independent Party
About 150,000 Louisiana voters lost their party affiliation last week when the state officially did away with the Independent Party. Why it matters: It's part of the logistical and clerical shifts state officials are making as Louisiana prepares to host closed party primaries in 2026 for five elections, which affect all voters, regardless of party affiliation. Be smart: This transition is bound to be complicated for voters, but it's worth paying attention to to make sure your vote counts the way you want it to in 2026 and beyond. The changes will not impact voting in this fall's municipal elections in New Orleans and Jefferson Parish. Catch up quick: At Gov. Jeff Landry's urging, state lawmakers last year approved a shift away from Louisiana's jungle primary system for five of the state's elections. It means that, instead of everyone getting to vote in the same primary elections, party affiliation will determine who you get to vote for in primaries and primary run-offs. There won't be restrictions in general elections. Affected elections include races for the U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, Louisiana Supreme Court, Public Service Commission and the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. Between the lines: Though the change doesn't take effect until 2026, efforts are already underway at Secretary of State Nancy Landry's office to get things organized. That's why state lawmakers approved the dissolution of the Independent Party earlier this year to make way for a slightly more streamlined process for those voters to participate in primaries. How it'll work: Former Independent Party voters are now lumped in with the more than 650,000 other voters already considered "unaffiliated," according to the Secretary of State's office. When those voters arrive at the polls or request to vote by mail, they'll be offered a choice to vote in the Republican or Democrat primaries, or decline to vote in them. That choice will stand for both the primary and the primary runoff, unless a voter formally changes their party between those two dates. Voters who are registered as Republican or Democrat will only be able to vote in the primaries for their party affiliation. Voters who are registered as any of the dozens of other minor parties in the state won't be able to vote in the primaries. Instead, they'll only be able to vote in their local races. What we're watching: Louisiana has long been known for its large population of " ancestral Democrats," which makes the state look more blue than it typically votes. But if those voters want to actually participate in Republican primaries, this may drastically shift the state's data on registered voters as people formally affiliate with the GOP.