
Kamala Harris stumbles right out of the gate
The Harris disaster is history in the making. Never before has a putative presidential campaign failed so badly in getting anything right.
Harris should be dominant in the Democratic Party. She entered the post-Biden world with strong approval among Democrats, sky-high name recognition and the benefit of 95 percent of Democrats having voted for her in 2024. Plus, she had a built-in excuse for losing — the colossal unpopularity of Joe Biden was clearly a drag for her and rocket fuel for President Trump.
But Harris and her team have squandered these advantages in record time. They have demonstrated no coherent plan and no political sense. They don't appear to have any allies in the media or the punditry.
Her brief flirtation with running for governor of California is emblematic of her incoherence. Running for major office is not like buying a used car. You either want it or you don't. If Harris truly wanted to plant herself in California and be governor, her pause to 'consider' running would have been a delaying tactic to plan her announcement and her campaign.
Instead, it appears that dropping out of sight was her way of preparing to announce basically nothing. She isn't going to run for governor and she is going to release a book about her campaign — not now, but later. On top of that, her 'media tour' has consisted of going on the soon-to-be-out-of-work Stephen Colbert, where she was at her word salad worst.
Not only did she have no message, but she whiffed on a series of softball questions so badly that it can only encourage every other Democratic hopeful. The very fact that Colbert had to ask her who is leading the Democrats was insulting — as the immediate previous nominee, it's supposed to be her. But her non-answer made things worse. Any decent politician would have found a way to maneuver Colbert to declare Harris the leader.
Compounding matters, she expressed her disappointment that there has not been enough opposition to Trump. Does Harris realize she just called herself out for being weak and absent? Trump's disapproval rating among Democrats is 93 percent. Yet Harris just declared herself AWOL.
The big problem for Harris is the same problem Joe Biden faced after his disastrous debate in June 2024: It's not so much the current moment that is the problem — it's the future. With Biden, there was no chance he could have made it through the campaign — debates, public appearances, speeches.
With Harris it is the same thing. She has shown no improvement despite ample experience. She remains unprepared, terrible off-the-cuff, and utterly without original ideas. What could possibly change? And clearly, the people who saw Harris up close when she was Vice President figured this out.
In my view, one of the great unreported stories from the Biden Administration is the tryout Team Biden gave Pete Buttigieg during the 2022 midterms to replace Kamala Harris — not necessarily as Vice President, but as the heir-apparent to lead the Democratic Party. Never before had a Secretary of Transportation been so visible and a vice president so invisible during the midterms. Too bad for Buttigieg that he mostly flopped or at least failed to catch fire.
But what really showed that Harris is not ready for prime time was her presidential campaign. With the nomination dropped in her lap, she completely choked on the two most critical decisions.
First, she chose as her running mate perhaps the only Democratic politician more inept than herself. Tim Walz brought nothing to the ticket — not even Minnesota, which was closer in 2024 than it had been in 2020. Harris could have picked Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a much better vote-getter than Walz, but the howls from the most leftist parts of the party were too loud.
Second, she failed to break with Biden. All the polling in the summer was terrible for the president. His favorables were way underwater and his rating on inflation (the top issue) was disastrous. In an environment very hostile to the incumbent, Harris needed to make a break and present herself as something new.
But again, she choked. And this is what will sink any chance she ever had of becoming the nominee for a second time. Harris is just not a risk-taker. She is petrified of angering any part of the squabbling Democratic Party, even the much-discredited Biden and his hangers-on. She crumbles in the face of any loud faction and tries to please everyone while saying nothing.
Harris has missed the moment. By not breaking with Biden, she threw away her chance to win in 2024. As she stumbles around trying to figure out what to do, other Democrats are charging forward, making their own plans. Nobody is intimidated by her. Even the Biden inner circle — who should be cast out of Democratic politics permanently — have threatened to sink her if she dares criticize them.
The nerve of Team Biden is pretty incredible. Even after an avalanche of books ripping Biden's White House staff to shreds, they have no qualms about threatening Harris. And, of course, Harris dutifully defended Biden in her Colbert interview. Pathetic.
The true test for any politician is to work without a net. Kamala Harris has proven not only that she cannot work without a net, but also that she can barely crawl forward.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
16 minutes ago
- CNN
Sanders: US run by ‘extremely greedy people' who ‘want it all'
Kicking off a new swing of his 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) sat down with CNN's Dana Bash to explain why he believes the US political system is 'broken and corrupt." The progressive senator also called on Democrats to take a bolder stand for working-class Americans.


New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ultra-wealthy Illinois Dem gov hits back at Mamdani for declaring billionaires shouldn't exist
Billionaire Illinois Dem Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday ripped socialist New York City mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani's contention that people of his net worth shouldn't exist. 'Look, how much money you have doesn't determine what your values are,' Pritzker fired back on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Mamdani had declared shortly after his shock Democratic primary win in June that he that he doesn't want Americans to be allowed to amass billion-dollar fortunes. Advertisement 3 Illinois Dem Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday defends his progressive bona fides despite being a billionaire. NBC 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality, and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' he told 'Meet the Press' at the time. But Pritzker, an heir to the Hyatt hotel fortune, Sunday rattled off his beliefs in universal healthcare, free public education, democracy and opposition to 'MAGA Republicans' as evidence that he is a legit Democrat. Advertisement 'It does not matter what your income level is. What matters is what your values are. And that's what makes me a Democrat,' the ultra-wealthy pol contended. 3 Leading Big Apple mayoral contender Zohran Mamdani has ripped into the notion that billionaires even exist. James Keivom Pritzker, who has led Illinois since 2019 and is one of the richest politicians in the country, has an estimated net worth of about $3.6 billion, according to Forbes. His fortune stems almost entirely from his family's wealth from its ownership of the Hyatt hotel chain, which was founded by his late uncle, Jay. Some of the gov's wealth comes from other investments, such as the Pritzker Group. Advertisement The Pritzkers have been a fixture on Forbes' 'America's Richest Families' for decades. The Illinois Democrat has donated heavily to the party throughout the years and tapped into his deep pockets for his own runs, having spent an estimated $323 million on his two campaigns for governor. Now he's gearing up to seek a third term — although he hasn't ruled out a 2028 presidential run. 3 Mamdani once floated the idea of the government seizing means of production. James Keivom Advertisement Mamdani's campaign did not respond to a Post request for comment. As with many top Democrats, Pritzker has refrained from backing Mamdani outright. The governor has meanwhile made headlines for welcoming Texas Democrats to Illinois in a bid to disrupt GOP redistricting efforts in the Lone Star State. Pritzker shrugged off Republican attacks on him for being hypocritical, given that his state has one of the most heavily gerrymandered maps in the country. 'What Texas is trying to do is, again, violate the Voting Rights Act. We didn't,' Pritzker claimed. 'We held public hearings, legislative hearings. People attended them. They spoke out. There was a map that was put out. There were actually changes made to the map.' Democrats control 14 of Illinois' 17 congressional seats — or 82%. Former Vice President Kamala Harris won the state in November with 54% of the vote. By comparison, Republicans have 26 of the 38 congressional seats in Texas — or 68%. President Trump won Texas in November with 56% of the vote. Trump is hoping to squeeze another five seats out of Texas through the proposed mid-decade redistricting. Texas Democrats have held up the redistricting effort so far by fleeing the state to stop the state legislature from passing it.


The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday shrugged off the idea of Vice President Vance being the likely Republican frontrunner for the 2028 presidential elections. 'Neither Trump, nor he nor the Republicans of today have anything of significance to say to working class people,' he said on CNN's State of the Union with Dana Bash. 'Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he added. President Trump said on Tuesday that Vance would be the 'most likely' successor of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) Movement in 2028. 'So it's too early to talk about it, but certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point,' Trump said. Bash reminded Sanders that Vance is from a working-class family in Ohio and could appeal to many voters in red states, but Sanders shrugged off the idea that the vice president could be a threat to Democrats in 2028. 'What they are trying to do is divide us up, 'you're a Muslim, you're undocumented, you're black, you're gay, let's divide everybody up so the rich can become richer'. Our job is to bring people together. Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he continued. Trump also said Tuesday that he would 'probably not' try to bridge a third term and touted the idea that Secretary of State Marco Rubio could run alongside Vance as vice president in 2028. In February, Vance was already seen as a favorite successor to Trump in a Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) poll. Sixty-one percent of respondents said they would support Vance as the future of the Republican party. Other Republican politicos and media personalities have been rumored to be thinking about campaigning in 2028, including Secretary Rubio, right-wing influencer Steve Bannon and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.