Travel ban upends lives in Haiti, heightens fears for Haitian immigrants
Luckner Raymond of Haiti was just a month away from his visa appointment when he learned he would no longer be allowed to travel to Indianapolis to meet with U.S.-based colleagues at the charitable non-profit for which he runs Haitian operations.
Planning the trip had been difficult. Travel logistics in Haiti are challenging with major airlines only operating in the northern part of the country. Haitian travelers who wanted to come to the States had to provide assurance at their visa appointments that they would stay no longer than allowed.
But Raymond, 42, was willing to jump through all those hoops to meet with the board of Project Rouj, which he cofounded with Zionsville-based Jamalyn Williamson. The initiative aims to end the cycle of poverty in Haiti by hiring Haitians to build homes made with materials purchased within the country
During his month-long trip to Indiana, Raymond planned to attend trainings and speak with donors and follow-up with another trip next February, for Project Rouj's annual fundraiser.Those plans were put on indefinite hold June 4 when President Donald Trump's administration issued a full ban on travel from the Caribbean nation, making it the only country in the Western Hemisphere with fully restricted travel. The ban took effect June 9, barring nationals from 11 other countries and heightening travel restrictions for those from seven additional countries, including Venezuela and Cuba.
Williamson, who spent two years living in Fondwa, a rural community two hours from the capital, said she cried when she heard her colleague will have to remain in Haiti indefinitely.
'(Raymond) has carried this organization on his back,' she said. 'And we wanted desperately to be able to see him face to face, but also to help him understand that what he's doing is making a big difference, and we trust him and we believe in what he's doing.'
Raymond is just one of the countless Haitians and would-be visitors from the 18 other countries impacted by the policies. Haitians who travel to Miami or New York to do business can no longer make the trip. Those who planned to travel to the U.S. for life-saving medical care may be forced to turn instead to Haiti's dwindling hospitals, which are often understaffed and in dire need of medical supplies and fuel.
The Trump administration cited high visa overstay rates and national security concerns as reasons for issuing the ban against Haiti. Haitians who currently hold visas or green cards are exempt from the ban, as well as children being adopted, people applying for visas in connection with immediate family members who are U.S. citizens and athletes competing in the World Cup or Olympics.
Long before Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince, became consumed by gang violence, Pastor Lucame Charles lived and worked there. As a member of the Haitian National Police, he saw firsthand how quickly the political situation was deteriorating and left the country in 2006.
Six days a week, Charles drives a truck for a company that contracts with the U.S. Postal Service. His passion, however, comes from his role as a pastor at the Jesus Christ Worship Center in northwest Indianapolis, which he does without pay.
The congregation sits at 400-500, he said, but Sunday attendance has slipped amid increased U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations and anti-immigrant rhetoric.
'People are afraid to go out or go to church,' Charles said.
The sudden shift in the country's approach to immigration, accompanied by a litany of orders that are often challenged in court, has left immigrants in a state of limbo. Some Haitians who have legal status still fear deportation, Williamson said, unsure of their protections as new orders like the travel ban continue to be announced.
"Not everyone is 100% sure what's right, what's not," she said. "You know, they're scared of ICE. They're scared of just kind of being outside."
The stakes are particularly high for Haitians. Unlike immigrants from some other countries, most Haitians do not come to the U.S. for economic opportunity, Charles said. Instead they come to escape violence.
In some cases, they extend their trip beyond the dates on their visas because there's nowhere safe for them to go.
'They're overstaying because they can't go home,' Exodus Refugee Immigration CEO Cole Varga said.
Now even Haitians who have been granted temporary protected status, a status the U.S. government gives to those living here who cannot safely return to their home countries, face an uncertain future in the U.S.
As the situation deteriorated in Haiti, former president Joe Biden extended this status for Haitians until February 2026, but Trump cancelled that extension earlier this year. TPS status for Haitians is expected to expire Aug. 3, leaving those who currently hold this status vulnerable to deportation.
"Since Trump took office, it's been just an assault on all fronts for all immigrants," Varga said.
The ban is yet another locked door for the thousands of people from restricted countries who just one month ago enjoyed the ability to travel freely to the U.S, immigration advocates say.
For Raymond, learning he would be barred from the U.S. ahead of his travel plans left him feeling embarrassed.
Raymond said he understands why the U.S. might restrict some people — such as criminals — from entering. Still, he said, he hopes the Trump administration will modify its restrictions to allow people like himself the chance to visit America.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Accused of 'Grievous Harm' to Groups Fighting Abuse of Women
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A national group of 17 state domestic violence and sexual assault coalitions today sued the Trump administration today, accusing it of causing "grievous harm" by imposing unlawful restrictions on grants issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ). Newsweek reached out to the DOJ for comment. Why It Matters President Donald Trump successfully ran for office in part on social and cultural issues like reducing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across the federal government and in areas like education. Following his first successful election victory in 2017, Trump and federal officials weighed "dramatic cuts" in funding for initiatives to end sexual and domestic violence against women. What To Know The 80-page lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island is backed by 17 plaintiffs from domestic violence and sexual assault coalitions in the following states: Rhode Island, California, Colorado, Wisconsin, Idaho, Iowa, Massachusetts, Kansas, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Virginia and Wisconsin. "Plaintiffs file this action to enjoin Defendants' unlawful actions that are causing Plaintiffs' grievous harm," the lawsuit states. "The new OVW (Office on Violence Against Women) funding conditions violate the Constitution. Congress has the power of the purse, and the Executive Branch may not place conditions on funding that Congress did not authorize, nor can it impose conditions that run contrary to those Congress directly imposed." The Department of Justice (DOJ) building headquarters in Washington, D.C. The Department of Justice (DOJ) building headquarters in Washington, D.C. Getty Images The defendants in the suit are U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Ginger Baran Lyons, acting director of the OVW. The OVW is under the guise of DOJ. The suit was filed by local attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island, the Lawyers' Committee for Rhode Island, Democracy Forward, Jacobson Lawyers Group, and the National Women's Law Center. Newsweek reached out to plaintiffs for comment. "The Trump administration now demands loyalty oaths to its destructive and discriminatory policies," Sandra Henriquez, CEO of the California-based nonprofit ValorUS, told Newsweek on Monday. "We will not be complicit in our government's ongoing terror inflicted on survivors. Let's be clear: VALOR's loyalty lies with survivors and communities working to end sexual violence." Plaintiffs challenge that funding conditions violate due process and the First Amendment "in leveraging federal funds to force grantees to voice the Administration's views on gender and in attempting to prohibit grantees from promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion even when not using federal funds." "The conditions exceed Defendants' statutory authority and in many cases outright conflict with statutory commands—OVW's decision to implement these conditions is arbitrary and capricious in virtually every way that an agency action can be arbitrary and capricious. OVW's imposing of these funding conditions is clearly unlawful, and it must be brought to an immediate end," the suit says. Fears expressed by plaintiffs are that the administration's new requirements place them in a precarious and "impossible" situation, between attaining funding necessary to provide services and fulfill missions while accepting and certifying compliance with conditions that are in tension with their statutory duties, unlawfully vague, restrictive of speech, in violation of other constitutional and statutory requirements, and at odds with their values and missions. Grant requirements put forward by the administration bar organizational plaintiffs from promoting "gender ideology" or any diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs "that do not advance the policy of equal dignity and respect." The organizations are also barred from engaging in "activities that frame domestic violence or sexual assault as systemic social justice issues rather than criminal offenses" and from "promoting" the "violation of federal immigration law." There were 880 grants awarded by OVW in fiscal year 2024, totaling $684 million in funding. In May, 34 Democratic Women's Caucus members penned a letter to Bondi, criticizing the administration's attacks on survivors of domestic violence through the rolling back of gun policies aimed at preventing abusers from legally possessing firearms. OVW administers grant programs authorized by the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 1994 and subsequent legislation. What People Are Saying Lucy Rios, executive director of the Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence (RICADV), in a statement: "The frameworks that inform our mission and the knowledge and research from our field are also at risk. Domestic violence is unequivocally a public health and social justice issue. We refuse to renounce this understanding that is central to our work." Krista Colón, executive director of the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, in a statement: "Instead of discriminating against survivors for their gender identity and immigration status, OVW grants should open the way to safety, healing and services for every one of the millions of Californians looking for help during the most dangerous and traumatic times of their lives." Brie Franklin, executive director of the Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault, in a statement: "Since there is no regular state funding for victim services, programs in Colorado have no choice but to sign the certifications and risk unintentionally violating them due to the vague language and conflicts with the VAWA statute. Without federal funds, vital services for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence will cease to exist in our state." What Happens Next The lawsuit seeks relief and to declare the DOJ's funding mechanisms as "unlawful" and aims to vacate the defendants' policy of including "out-of-scope" funding conditions and anti-DEI certification requirements in the general terms and conditions in OVW grants and notices of funding opportunities.

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trump vetoes Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
June 16 (UPI) -- U.S. President Trump cautioned Israel against taking out the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as part of its military offensive targeting the country's nuclear program and, potentially, toppling the regime. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly discussed with Trump an opportunity that had opened up for Israel to kill Khamenei, but Trump shut it down, saying it wouldn't be a good idea, three U.S. officials told CBS News on Sunday. The conversation occurred at an unspecified point over the weekend and after Israel launched its first wave of massive strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities early Friday. The two leaders have been in close contact since before the crisis and are maintaining almost daily contact, speaking at the beginning of last week, on Thursday, Friday and at the weekend, according to a Washington-based Israeli official. Israel's four-day wave of airborne assaults, some from covert units operating on Iranian soil, has been concentrated on the country's nuclear development program, military and energy targets and its senior military commanders and top nuclear scientists, 12 of whom have been killed. The commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard's elite Quds Force, Gen. Esmail Qaani was also killed in an Israeli strike Saturday, five years after replacing Qassem Soleimanikilled on Trump's orders in what he said was a preventative strike in January 2020 during his first term. The political leadership has so far remained off limits in Israel's calculus in its confrontation with Tehran. However, an Israeli official said that while there was a general policy of not carrying out political assassinations, he warned that senior Iranian figures with the final say on military and nuclear matters ought to be looking over their shoulders. "The Supreme Leader should be changing bedrooms at night," he said. There has been no official comment from Trump or the White House. Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump pledged to bring the conflict to an end, citing his recent interventions in confrontations between India and Pakistan and between Egypt and Ethiopia, in which he dangled the prospect of increased trade with the United States, as a template. "Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal, just like I got India and Pakistan to make, in that case by using trade with the United States to bring reason, cohesion, and sanity into the talks with two excellent leaders who were able to quickly make a decision and STOP! "Likewise, we will have peace, soon, between Israel and Iran! Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the people understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!" Later Sunday, as he was departing for a meeting of the leaders of the G7 group of countries in Alberta, Trump, declined to answer a question on whether he had requested Israel de-escalate, saying only that the United States would continue to support Israel in its defense. The United States has significant military and surveillance assets deployed in the vicinity, including a P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol, reconnaissance planes and a U.S. Navy destroyer diverted to the area to join two others and a carrier strike group already in situ. Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed more than 20,000 U.S.-supplied anti-drone missiles bound for Ukraine were instead headed to the Middle East. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


Fox Sports
2 hours ago
- Fox Sports
Inquiries say social media fueled violence after a Maccabi-Ajax soccer match
Associated Press THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Social media posts coupled with a lack of official information fueled the violence that followed a Maccabi Tel Aviv soccer match in Amsterdam last year, two inquiries into the events said in reports Monday. Dozens were arrested and five people were treated in hospital in a series of violent overnight incidents following a November match between the Dutch team Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv. 'The events have left their mark on the city and led to fear, anger and sadness,' Amsterdam Mayor Femke Halsema wrote in a letter to the city council presenting one of the reports. Ahead of the game, pro-Palestinian demonstrators were banned by local authorities from gathering outside the stadium, and video showed a large crowd of Israeli fans chanting anti-Arab slogans on their way to the game. Afterward, youths on scooters and on foot crisscrossed the city in search of Israeli fans, punching and kicking them and then fleeing quickly to evade police. The Rotterdam-based Institute for Safety and Crisis Management, tasked by the Amsterdam government to investigate the response to the violence, said the lack of official communication from the city allowed rumors on social media to flourish. It noted that there was little to no official communication during the early hours of Nov. 8, in part because the situation was so unclear. In a separate report, the inspectorate for the Justice Ministry concluded that the police were prepared for large-scale demonstrations, not the 'flash attacks' perpetrated across the city and sparked by social media. 'Calls and images spread rapidly, reinforce existing tensions and can lead to group formation and confrontations on the street within a short period of time,' the 57-page report found. Both reports cautioned that even with improved communication, the authorities still could not have fully controlled the rapidly spreading violence. The Justice Ministry's report noted that "incidents, such as the removal of a Palestinian flag by Maccabi supporters, were shared, interpreted and magnified within minutes." More than a dozen people have been charged in connection with the violence and several have already been convicted. Over the weekend, the public prosecution service announced it had dropped investigations into several Maccabi supporters because the city's tram company GVB had deleted footage which could have been used as evidence. The company replaced recording equipment at two metro stations in Amsterdam after the attacks and footage from the night was lost. On Sunday, tens of thousands of demonstrators in the Netherlands donned red clothing and marched through The Hague, demanding that the Dutch government do more to oppose Israel's policies in Gaza. Dutch public support for the Israeli military campaign has dropped in recent months. in this topic