Travel ban upends lives in Haiti, heightens fears for Haitian immigrants
Planning the trip had been difficult. Travel logistics in Haiti are challenging with major airlines only operating in the northern part of the country. Haitian travelers who wanted to come to the States had to provide assurance at their visa appointments that they would stay no longer than allowed.
But Raymond, 42, was willing to jump through all those hoops to meet with the board of Project Rouj, which he cofounded with Zionsville-based Jamalyn Williamson. The initiative aims to end the cycle of poverty in Haiti by hiring Haitians to build homes made with materials purchased within the country
During his month-long trip to Indiana, Raymond planned to attend trainings and speak with donors and follow-up with another trip next February, for Project Rouj's annual fundraiser.Those plans were put on indefinite hold June 4 when President Donald Trump's administration issued a full ban on travel from the Caribbean nation, making it the only country in the Western Hemisphere with fully restricted travel. The ban took effect June 9, barring nationals from 11 other countries and heightening travel restrictions for those from seven additional countries, including Venezuela and Cuba.
Williamson, who spent two years living in Fondwa, a rural community two hours from the capital, said she cried when she heard her colleague will have to remain in Haiti indefinitely.
'(Raymond) has carried this organization on his back,' she said. 'And we wanted desperately to be able to see him face to face, but also to help him understand that what he's doing is making a big difference, and we trust him and we believe in what he's doing.'
Raymond is just one of the countless Haitians and would-be visitors from the 18 other countries impacted by the policies. Haitians who travel to Miami or New York to do business can no longer make the trip. Those who planned to travel to the U.S. for life-saving medical care may be forced to turn instead to Haiti's dwindling hospitals, which are often understaffed and in dire need of medical supplies and fuel.
The Trump administration cited high visa overstay rates and national security concerns as reasons for issuing the ban against Haiti. Haitians who currently hold visas or green cards are exempt from the ban, as well as children being adopted, people applying for visas in connection with immediate family members who are U.S. citizens and athletes competing in the World Cup or Olympics.
Long before Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince, became consumed by gang violence, Pastor Lucame Charles lived and worked there. As a member of the Haitian National Police, he saw firsthand how quickly the political situation was deteriorating and left the country in 2006.
Six days a week, Charles drives a truck for a company that contracts with the U.S. Postal Service. His passion, however, comes from his role as a pastor at the Jesus Christ Worship Center in northwest Indianapolis, which he does without pay.
The congregation sits at 400-500, he said, but Sunday attendance has slipped amid increased U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations and anti-immigrant rhetoric.
'People are afraid to go out or go to church,' Charles said.
The sudden shift in the country's approach to immigration, accompanied by a litany of orders that are often challenged in court, has left immigrants in a state of limbo. Some Haitians who have legal status still fear deportation, Williamson said, unsure of their protections as new orders like the travel ban continue to be announced.
"Not everyone is 100% sure what's right, what's not," she said. "You know, they're scared of ICE. They're scared of just kind of being outside."
The stakes are particularly high for Haitians. Unlike immigrants from some other countries, most Haitians do not come to the U.S. for economic opportunity, Charles said. Instead they come to escape violence.
In some cases, they extend their trip beyond the dates on their visas because there's nowhere safe for them to go.
'They're overstaying because they can't go home,' Exodus Refugee Immigration CEO Cole Varga said.
Now even Haitians who have been granted temporary protected status, a status the U.S. government gives to those living here who cannot safely return to their home countries, face an uncertain future in the U.S.
As the situation deteriorated in Haiti, former president Joe Biden extended this status for Haitians until February 2026, but Trump cancelled that extension earlier this year. TPS status for Haitians is expected to expire Aug. 3, leaving those who currently hold this status vulnerable to deportation.
"Since Trump took office, it's been just an assault on all fronts for all immigrants," Varga said.
The ban is yet another locked door for the thousands of people from restricted countries who just one month ago enjoyed the ability to travel freely to the U.S, immigration advocates say.
For Raymond, learning he would be barred from the U.S. ahead of his travel plans left him feeling embarrassed.
Raymond said he understands why the U.S. might restrict some people — such as criminals — from entering. Still, he said, he hopes the Trump administration will modify its restrictions to allow people like himself the chance to visit America.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
After Trump-backed peace deal, survivors recount rebel massacre in Congo
The Washington Post interviewed three witnesses to the initial massacre, as well as six residents of the nearest town, and reviewed photographs and videos from the aftermath. Locals described farmers being gunned down indiscriminately by M23 fighters as they worked the fields and survivors hiding for days among the dead. They spoke on the condition of anonymity, communicating by voice notes on borrowed phones, out of fear for their safety. Advertisement Rwanda has always denied backing M23 — despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary from UN experts — and the rebels were not signatories to the US-backed peace deal. M23 representatives and the government of Congo signed an agreement on July 19 pledging to establish a ceasefire as part of a separate peace process mediated by Qatar, though M23 told the BBC on Monday it was pulling out of the Doha-based talks, saying Kinshasa had reneged on the deal. Advertisement It was not immediately clear how the killings would affect the US-backed peace deal. Earlier this month, the US Treasury Department announced new sanctions on an armed group opposed to M23, as well as Chinese and Congolese mining companies, which it said were fueling the region's illicit mineral trade. The announcement noted that the 'Rwanda-backed' M23 group 'has rapidly expanded its territorial control in eastern DRC and is responsible for human rights abuses.' US officials, however, have made no public comment about the recent killings, and the president claimed again on Monday to have 'settled six wars in six months,' a count that includes the conflict in Congo. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last month. Massad Boulos, Trump's Senior Africa Advisor, said in a statement to The Post that 'we will continue to work through any challenges to ensure that 30 years of war come to an end, and people can live in peace.' The White House press office said Trump had secured a 'historic agreement' between Rwanda and Congo and that his administration would ensure that all sides 'honor their commitments.' In an Aug. 7 post on X, Congo's ministry of information said M23 had killed more than 300 civilians in the North Kivu region; M23 swiftly denied any role in the killings and dismissed what it called 'false accusations.' Advertisement In an interview with The Post, Congolese Information Minister Patrick Muyaya called for an international investigation: 'Any kind of violence must be condemned by the US,' he said, urging American officials to 'continue to put pressure so we can fully implement the Washington accord and get Rwandan troops out of DRC.' Rwanda's government spokeswoman, Yolande Makolo, said the country's forces had 'absolutely nothing to do' with the latest violence, adding that M23 is not 'Rwandan-controlled.' Lawrence Kanyuka, the M23 spokesman targeted with sanctions by the US government in February, did not respond to a request for comment. Kigali accuses Congo of supporting the remnants of ethnic Hutu militias responsible for the 1994 Rwandan genocide; Congo accuses Rwanda of using proxy forces, including M23, to terrorize Hutu communities and loot the country's vast but underdeveloped mineral reserves. In January, M23 fighters seized control of the regional capital of Goma in a lightning offensive and have taken more Congolese territory in recent months, including the area where the July killings took place. Support from the Rwandan Defense Forces 'played a critical role in the territorial expansion of [M23] and its occupation of new territories,' a report by a UN panel of experts found last month. The latest massacres happened near Binza, about 65 miles north of Goma, in mid-July, but information has been slow to trickle out because phone networks are unreliable and locals fear further reprisals from M23. Residents and survivors told The Post that the violence originated with clashes between M23, which controls the town, and the Wazalendo, a loose array of local militias often supported by the Congolese government. After losing a skirmish, M23 fighters turned against civilians working in the fields of Binza on July 13, three survivors said. Advertisement A man told The Post he began to run as soon as he heard the first shots, tripping on a body as he fled. Many victims came from different villages, he said, and his brother was still missing. 'I saw many dead people on the way home,' he said. He estimated that at least 50 people were killed that day. The Post could not independently verify the toll. Terrified residents told him 'the M23 were killing anyone they found,' the man said. A woman who escaped the initial massacre said she spent three days hiding among corpses with no food or water. When she finally made her way back to the town of Nyamilima, she said, she walked past at least 20 bodies. 'It was the M23,' she told The Post. 'People were massacred … and until now they have not been buried.'
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump administration expands ‘good moral character' requirement to become naturalized citizen
ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow The Trump administration is expanding the requirement for immigrants who are hoping to become US citizens to display 'good moral character,' in a move that some immigration lawyers denounced as a troubling change that adds uncertainty to the naturalization process. US Citizenship and Immigration Services, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security that administers the country's legal immigration system, directed its officers in a memo last week to more heavily consider both positive and negative 'attributes or contributions' of people going through the naturalization process to become US citizens. The memo, which was sent to USCIS officers on Friday, requires them to take a more 'holistic approach in evaluating whether or not an alien seeking naturalization has affirmatively established that he or she has met their burden of establishing that they are worthy of assuming the rights and responsibilities of United States Citizenship.' The agency said in a statement that the new policy is intended to ensure its officers are accounting more heavily for an immigrant's positive attributes, rather than simply the 'absence of misconduct,' to reflect their character. 'U.S. citizenship is the gold standard of citizenship—it should only be offered to the world's best of the best,' USCIS spokesperson Matthew J. Tragesser said in a statement. The standard to show good moral character has long been part of the naturalization process in the US. But immigration attorneys told CNN that the memo is designed in a way that places additional burdens on people going through the process. Emily Ryo, a professor of law and sociology at Duke University whose research focuses on immigration, said the 'mandate is likely to introduce a great deal of uncertainty, unpredictability, and administrative burden.' 'What does it mean to require that a noncitizen 'affirmatively' establish that they are 'worthy' of US citizenship?' Ryo said in an email. 'What kind of documentation will noncitizens be required to provide to make this affirmative showing, and how exactly are the officials to weigh and verify such evidence?' Susan Ramos, an immigration attorney based in Arizona, described the policy change as 'troubling' and said it 'appears to effectively change the substantive requirements for naturalization without notice and comment, just by policy.' 'It creates a new subjective standard without providing the analysis that will be performed in adjudicating an application for naturalization,' Ramos said. 'For example, how much volunteer work is enough to tip the scales in favor of the applicant? Who decides that formula, and using what analysis? What will USCIS consider sufficient achievement for someone who doesn't work?' And because the directive is broadly written, it makes it more difficult to challenge an individual officer's decision on whether the character standard has been met, said Kathrin Mautino, a California-based immigration attorney. 'Generally, it will give individual officers more authority to ask about private lives,' Mautino said. But the memo does contain some more concrete and stringent requirements for potential new citizens. Previously, immigrants who owed overdue taxes were required to only show they were participating in a payment plan with the IRS to meet the character standard, Mautino said. But the new memo now requires the 'full payment' of overdue taxes, as well as other obligations including child-support payments. USCIS said in the memo this is to make sure immigrants 'who have engaged in wrongdoing are properly rehabilitated and reformed.' People who have multiple traffic tickets can now be found to lack good moral character, as well as people who engage in 'harassment or aggressive solicitation,' though it is not clear what the memo means by that. The updated policy is just one way the Trump administration is more heavily scrutinizing the lives of people applying for citizenship or for the right to live, work or study in the United States. In late May, the US State Department ordered embassies to pause visa interviews for international students so they could more heavily scrutinize students' social media. The pause was lifted after the State Department told embassies to screen for 'hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' On Tuesday, USCIS announced that type of vetting will expand to seek out 'anti-American' attitudes in those seeking immigration-related benefits such as the right to live or work in the US.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Nashville Pride faces catastrophic shortfall after corporations pull funding
Nashville Pride's future is in jeopardy after corporate sponsorships cratered this year, creating a catastrophic budget shortfall for the LGBTQ+ nonprofit. Why it matters: The organization launched an emergency fundraiser to "save Nashville Pride." Organizers say if they don't hit their $250,000 goal, "we risk losing not just a weekend of celebration, but a safe space for tens of thousands of LGBTQ+ people and allies all year long." Nashville Pride set a deadline of Oct. 11, which is National Coming Out Day. The big picture: Pride festivals nationwide have been pushed to the brink this year. Longtime corporate allies are backing away and pulling funding. The trend is fueled by the Trump administration's opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion. State of play: In Nashville, funding from corporate sponsors dropped by $270,000 in 2025. That's down 40% from 2024. Nashville Pride organizers said many of the losses were unexpected, last-minute decisions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which previously contributed medical support at the festival, pulled out in mid-May, only a few weeks before this year's festival, Pride spokesperson Brady Ruffin tells Axios. As a result, organizers had to find and pay for a new provider, Ruffin says, racking up $30,000 in expenses. A VUMC spokesperson declined to comment. Between the lines: Past Nashville Pride sponsor Nissan, one of the companies that stepped back this year, said its Pride retreat was part of a broad review of marketing and sales spending, per a Nissan spokesperson. Zoom in: Bad weather during this year's festival exacerbated revenue problems. Organizers said storms cut attendance by more than 15,000 people. What they're saying:"These challenges left Nashville Pride with a gap that no single organization can fix," Nashville Pride board president Tina Tousignant, said in a statement Wednesday. Driving the news: Nashville Pride said growing opposition to LGBTQ+ issues at the state and federal levels underscored the significance of the fundraising effort. Tennessee has long been seen as a leader in anti-transgender policies. Lawmakers have pushed restrictions on drag queens and gender-affirming health care. The Nashville-based Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution this year supporting efforts to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that legalized same-sex marriage 10 years ago. "Pride isn't just a party — it's survival," Nashville Pride vice president Alycia Ehimen said in the Wednesday statement.
