logo
Speaker's role set to play big part in Tasmanian parliament's future

Speaker's role set to play big part in Tasmanian parliament's future

When the Tasmanian parliament returns next week, the first order of business will be selecting the speaker of the House of Assembly.
While the no-confidence motion promised by Labor leader Dean Winter in Premier Jeremy Rockliff looms over the first sitting day, the vote to select the speaker will be a first test of how the new parliament might function.
Whoever assumes the speakership will be required to chair the lower house — or House of Assembly.
Usually, the government will nominate one of its own members as a candidate for speaker, and for governments with a large enough majority, losing one vote (as the speaker will only vote when there is a tie) won't make passing legislation more difficult.
But for a minority government, the choice of speaker is "critical", according to political scientist Richard Herr.
"It is actually the first electoral act of the parliament," Dr Herr said.
Tasmania's political history provides some insight into just how critical that appointment can be.
The first sitting day of parliament in 2018 was a case in point.
Long-serving Liberal MP Rene Hidding had given up his ministerial portfolios after then-premier Will Hodgman announced him as the party's nominee as speaker.
It seemed assured, with the Liberals holding a majority of votes by one seat.
The speaker is expected to adopt an apolitical approach while presiding over the passage of new legislation.
Their casting vote as a tie-breaker won't necessarily fall along party lines, with convention being the speaker keeps the status quo in the event of tied votes.
But it was freshly minted Liberal MP Sue Hickey who took the speakership, after a surprise nomination orchestrated and supported by Labor and the Greens.
The manoeuvre blindsided the Liberals — but Mr Hidding told the ABC later that morning he wasn't surprised.
Ms Hickey remained a member of the Liberal Party after the speakership coup and promised to support the government with a guarantee of confidence and supply.
But the Hodgman government's grasp on majority was now tenuous, with Ms Hickey holding the casting vote and vowing to vote on each bill on its merits.
The maverick speaker voted with Labor and the Greens to pass landmark transgender reforms and mandatory sentencing for serious child sexual assaults.
She was ultimately disendorsed by the party in 2021.
After the 2024 election, the Liberals didn't put a candidate for speaker forward, to avoid "unnecessary division and dissent" after realising their nominee wouldn't get enough votes.
The make-up of that parliament was similar to the current arrangement; the Liberals with 14 seats, Labor with 10, the Greens with four, the Jacqui Lambie Network with three and three independents.
The Liberal minority government got rolled on the first day of parliament, with Labor and the crossbench voting together to install long-serving Labor MP Michelle O'Byrne in the role — the first speaker from the opposition in more than 60 years.
In that instance, it wasn't a total surprise for the government.
The three Jacqui Lambie Network MPs had given the government advance notice of their intention to vote for Ms O'Byrne.
Her speakership would further undermine Mr Rockliff's control over parliament, with Ms O'Byrne providing the pivotal vote to pass the no-confidence motion that led to last month's election.
"No one in this chamber could realistically expect me to provide confidence to a Liberal government," she told parliament at the time.
Now, Mr Rockliff's new cabinet has been announced and parliament will return in just over a week.
"The next speaker is not determined by the Liberal Party, the next speaker is determined by the parliament," Mr Rockliff said last Wednesday.
"To that end, I commend the previous speaker, Michelle O'Byrne, who in my personal opinion did an outstanding job as speaker of the House of Assembly."
Ms O'Byrne retired from Tasmanian parliament at the election after spending 25 years in federal and state politics.
Asked who he would nominate as speaker, Mr Rockliff said there was "a lot of water to go under the bridge yet".
"But that's up to our party."
Dr Herr said without the numbers, it was not clear the Liberals would nominate one of their own this time.
Instead, he said an independent such as former Labor leader-turned-crossbencher, David O'Byrne, could be nominated.
But Mr O'Byrne has said he isn't interested in becoming speaker or a minister.
An independent member hasn't assumed the position in Tasmania since 1949.
Dr Herr said there is another potential scenario.
"But then the Greens might feel that that's wedging them out of having a policy influence or even the possibility of forcing Labor to change its rules and accept a Green minister."
The first sitting day for the new Tasmanian parliament will be on Tuesday, August 19.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court forced to apologise to ex-MP
Court forced to apologise to ex-MP

Perth Now

time43 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Court forced to apologise to ex-MP

A South Australian court has apologised for a system error which logged a guilty finding against an ex-MP who was accused of blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas. Annabel Digance is suing Mr Malinauskas for damages, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her to further his own political ambitions and crush a parliamentary inquiry into alleged bullying in the Labor Party. During a hearing in the South Australian Supreme Court in late July, Justice Graham Dart told the court that Ms Digance and her husband Greg had been found guilty of blackmailing Mr Malinauskas. The court was told their charges were later dropped, according to court records. Annabel Digance (right) and Greg Digance. NewsWire/Naomi Jellicoe. Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Digance and her husband Greg were charged with blackmailing Mr Malinauskas in 2021. The SA Courts Administration Authority (CAA) said in a statement on Tuesday that neither Ms or Mr Digance had been found guilty. The court said that in April 2023 a nolle prosequi order was made, meaning the prosecution was abandoned. SA Premier Peter Malinauskas. NewsWire/David Beach. Credit: NewsWire 'There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants,' the court said in a statement. The court said that a document which stated that a finding of guilt had been made was 'generated in error and is incorrect'. 'The CAA unreservedly apologises to the parties for this error,' the court said in a statement. 'The CAA will review all court matters with orders made in the same circumstances to ensure that court records are accurate. 'The CAA will also commission an external assurance review into this matter.' In Ms Digance's statement of claim in her civil lawsuit, she argued that her arrest and prosecution caused 'injury, loss, damage and harm' and that Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to pursue her. She is suing both the premier and the State of South Australia and is seeking $2.3m in damages. The matter is scheduled to return to court in September.

Concerns expressed over Australia's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood
Concerns expressed over Australia's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

Concerns expressed over Australia's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood

"The recognition itself is probably important from a symbolic point of view, but to be honest, it's not what we've been calling for in the last two years, or indeed for the last 57 years or or 77 years since 1948." That's Palestinian-Australian Mussa Hijazi. The Canberra-based lawyer was born in Australia and grew up in the Occupied West Bank. He's concerned the Albanese government's announcement that Australia would soon recognise a Palestinian state is a distraction from what's happening on the ground. "We haven't been marching for recognition. We have been marching and calling out for an end to the genocide that is taking place in Palestine." Protesters have been taking to the streets of Australia each week for the last 20 months, with the largest demonstration since the war escalated in 2023 being the tens of thousands of people who marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge earlier this month. Organisers claimed around 300,000 people participated in the protest, while New South Wales Police put the figure lower, at 90,000. "All this is doing in the meantime is creating a distraction from what is happening on the ground." In a 2024 interim ruling the International Court of Justice found it plausible that the Israeli offensive had violated the UN Genocide Convention, which the Israeli government strongly denies. It says it is fighting to defeat Hamas and to bring back Israeli hostages still held in Gaza. The decades-long conflict escalated in October 2023 when Hamas killed around 1,200 people in southern Israel and took 250 hostages. Israel's subsequent military campaign has since killed more than 61,000 people in Gaza. Mr Hijazi says there are practical actions the Australian government could take. "I think it's important to recognise that we do export F35 parts. We that we're at the stage now where our politicians, our Labor government, is telling us that they're non-lethal parts. Apparently, there are parts of the F35 jet that's been dropped that has been dropping 2,000-pound bombs on Palestinian civilians and destroying half city blocks at the time, apparently, some of the parts for that airplane that we manufacture here are apparently not, are not lethal." Australia has consistently denied sending weapons to Israel, but senior ministers have confirmed that parts of F35 fighter jets have been exported as part of a global supply chain program. Labor says any action on Australia's exports of component parts to Israel is unlikely to have an impact on the war in Gaza. People on the streets of Western Sydney have told SBS Arabic the move to recognise a Palestinian state is a step in the right direction. "I think that's great. And definitely I think, you know, the killings of innocent children, like anywhere in anything like it should be globally recognised, that this is just a wrong thing to do. And Inshallah, like all the eyes, like all eyes on Palestine now, so that it can, that we can stop this." "It should have happened a long time ago, there was too late now, after 50,000 people died, and I think the Palestinians should have their sovereignty. It's not up to the Australian government who cannot rule Gaza." "It's good step, you know? It's the right direction. And of course, because we have to follow England, England beat us first. So it's normal for especially the Labor Party, to support the state of Palestine. And it's very good step for all Aussies, especially when we had the big demonstration a couple of weeks ago, one of the biggest demonstrations on Harbor Bridge. So that it's a good wake-up call for all humanity, you know." The plan to recognise the state is based on assurances from the Palestinian Authority which governs the West Bank. It's conditional on Hamas, the Palestinian political-militant group and de facto government in Gaza that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation in Australia, playing no role in the future state's government. Adviser to the Palestinian Authority's Foreign Minister Ahmed al Deek has welcomed the move towards recognition. "We welcome the announcement made by Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese regarding Australia's decision to recognize the State of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly. We will build on this recognition to strengthen bilateral relations with Australia across all fields. Once again, we renew our call for all countries that have not yet recognised Palestine to take this step, as a means of safeguarding the two-state solution and contributing to resolving the conflict and achieving peace." But the move has been condemned by Israel's ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon. He told the ABC it won't lead to lasting peace. "It's important to emphasize that we reject the recognition, unilateral recognition. It will not change anything on the ground, it will not bring a ceasefire. It would not bring about a release of the hostages, and it will not bring the two parties closer." President of the Zionist Federation of Australia, Jeremy Leibler, told SBS Hebrew he's disappointed by the government's move. "While Hamas is still in control of significant parts of Gaza, ultimately, it's going to send a message to those in the region, including Hamas, that here is a reward for terrorism and the most barbaric act of terrorism committed on Jews since the Holocaust. So we think it's extremely misguided. Ultimately, this is not going to help Palestinians on the ground." Executive Director of the New Israel Fund Australia, Kate Rosenberg, has told SBS Hebrew she supports the move. "While this move alone won't end the conflict, it affirms the Palestinian rights are not up for negotiation, and that equality must be the foundation for any lasting future."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store