Israel approves controversial West Bank settlement plan – DW – 08/20/2025
An Israeli planning committee on Wednesday gave final approval to a controversial plan allowing new settlements in the occupied West Bank.
The plan calls for development in an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, known as E1. Israel's government would build nearly 3,500 new apartments to enlarge the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, which lies next to E1.
"I am pleased to announce that just a short while ago, the civil administration approved the planning for the construction of the E1 neighborhood," the mayor of Maale Adumim, Guy Yifrach, said in a statement.
Plans for new Israeli settlements in the West Bank have been widely condemned and are considered illegal under international law. The UN and Palestinian rights groups have warned that the plan would essentially divide the Palestinian territory and make any two-state solution untenable.
The plans apply to an area of only 12 square kilometers (4.6 square miles). Due to its location, however, the expansion would make it impossible to ever create a contiguous Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital.
Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher at the Ir Amim organization, which opposes Israel's expansion of West Bank settlements, told DW last week that the plan would make a Palestinian state "not possible."
"It breaks up the West Bank into a northern part and the southern part," he said.
Speaking during a visit to Indonesia, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said Wednesday that "such plans, if implemented, would be contrary to international law and would make a two-state solution impossible."
Last week, the German Foreign Ministry called on the Israeli government to "stop settlement construction," adding that Germany would "only recognize changes to the borders of June 4, 1967, that have been agreed upon by the parties to the conflict."
"The settlement construction violates international law and relevant UN Security Council resolutions," the spokesperson added. "It complicates a negotiated two-state solution and an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, as demanded by the International Court of Justice."
Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who announced the plan last week, said Wednesday the approval was "historic," and framed it as a rebuke of Western countries like France and the UK, who recently announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state in September.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"The Palestinian state is being erased from the table not with slogans but with actions," Smotrich said on Wednesday.
Smotrich's office had previously said in a statement that the settlements were "burying the idea of a Palestinian state."
Israel has criticized countries pledging to recognize a Palestinian state, calling such recognition a "reward for Hamas" following the October 7, 2023, terror attacks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
39 minutes ago
- DW
Taiwan's nuclear referendum reveals energy dilemma – DW – 08/21/2025
Taiwan's vote on restarting its last nuclear plant highlights the island's struggle to balance energy security, environmental risks, and geopolitical threats. DW unpacks the stakes behind the referendum. Voters in Taiwan are heading to the polls on Saturday for a referendum on whether to restart the island's Maanshan nuclear plant. It was shut down in May, fulfilling a pledge by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to phase out nuclear power by 2025. Five public debates were held in the run-up to the Taiwan nuclear referendum, highlighting divisions over national security, economic and environmental concerns. The nuclear vote is taking place amid Beijing's increased military aggression around Taiwan, as it considers the self-governing democracy to be Chinese territory and has not ruled out the use of force to "reunify" the island with the mainland. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Going nuclear-free would undermine national security," said Huang Shih-hsiu, the founder of the civic group Nuclear Mythbusters, during a livestreamed debate. "If [China's] People's Liberation Army blockades Taiwan, our natural gas would last less than ten days," he claimed. Chia-wei Chao, of the Taiwan Climate Action Network (TCAN) and an assistant professor at National Taiwan University, told DW in May that energy consumption "would go down, or even halve, in the case of a blockade, so the reserves could last longer." There are also environmental concerns from anti-nuclear activists, many of whom warn that operating nuclear plants carries major risks from natural disasters. "Taiwan faces earthquake-related risks that cannot be underestimated. The Fukushima accident is a warning we must heed," Wu Ya-hsin, a 20-year-old civic representative, said in another broadcast debate, referring to the March 2011 nuclear disaster in Japan. Historically, Taiwan had six nuclear reactors across three sites on the island, each originally expected to operate for 40 years. In May 2025, just days after the Maanshan plant on Taiwan's southern coast was shut down, opposition lawmakers from the Taiwan People's Party (TPP), backed by the much larger Kuomintang Party (KMT), passed a bill for a referendum on whether to keep the plant running "after authorities confirm there are no safety concerns." Recent polls suggested that over 60% of Taiwanese would support restarting the plant. Still, the final decision rests on a government safety assessment. Taiwan held an earlier referendum in 2018 in which voters supported using nuclear power to help achieve green energy goals. But a 2021 ballot on restarting construction of a mothballed nuclear plant failed due to low voter turnout. Taiwan's energy supply heavily relies on imports, which accounted for about 96% of its total, according to the latest official data. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Despite nuclear power contributing merely 4.2% of Taiwan's electricity last year, proponents argue that a full phase-out would leave the island vulnerable in the event of a Chinese blockade in which energy shipments could be disrupted. Several prominent analysts from the United States, including former Deputy National Security Advisor Matt Pottinger, have also publicly emphasized the importance of Taiwan's nuclear power for both energy independence and defense. "Nuclear provides a lot of independence, which might be helpful in situations of crisis, because you can store [nuclear] fuel on site for several years," Martin Pache, spokesperson of German nuclear technology association Kerntechnik Deutschland, told DW. However, Tsaiying Lu, a new energy geopolitics expert at DSET, a Taiwanese technology think tank, emphasized that nuclear energy supply also carries potential risks of instability in a wartime scenario. She highlights that Ukraine's nuclear reactors have experienced temporary shutdowns or disconnections due to damaged power lines and safety precautions amid ongoing Russian military aggression. Instead of focusing on developing nuclear power, Lu told DW that Taiwan should take steps to diversify its energy suppliers. She suggested that a broader mix of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal imports would ensure a "flexible supply mechanism" in times of crises. Amid heated public debate in Taiwan, the European Union's framing of nuclear power as a tool for the green energy transition has also become a central point of contention. The EU has classified nuclear power as environmentally sustainable under its taxonomy — a list of areas in which investments can be made to combat climate change — on the condition that radioactive waste can be safely managed, although no permanent disposal site has yet begun operation in the world. Germany, however, as the leading anti-nuclear voice in Europe, completed its phase-out in 2023 with the closure of its last three power stations. "Taiwan is not Germany," KMT lawmaker Weng Hsiao-ling said during the second public debate. "Germany still has coal, and about 50% of its energy now comes from renewables… Can Taiwan really do the same?" Currently, over 80% of Taiwan's electricity supply comes from fossil fuels, notably natural gas and coal, with a much smaller but growing contribution from renewables sitting at about 12% — falling short of the government's original target of 20% by 2025. However, in Taiwan's Pingtung County, home to the Maanshan plant, locals have voiced serious concerns about the environmental and safety risks if the reactor were restarted, given its location on a seismic fault. During protests against the referendum, several local industry representatives pointed out that Pingtung is a farming and fishing county that cannot afford the risks of a nuclear disaster. "After 40 years of safe operation, the plant was finally shut down," county magistrate Chou Chun-mi told local media. "Yet now the entire country is being asked to decide whether to restart it, a move residents of Pingtung find unacceptable."
DW
40 minutes ago
- DW
Why the US government seeks a stake in chipmaker Intel – DW – 08/21/2025
The Trump administration has confirmed it is in talks to take a 10% stake in struggling semiconductor manufacturer Intel. Some say the move makes perfect strategic sense, but critics warn it could set a risky precedent. The White House has confirmed that the Trump administration is in talks with Intel about acquiring a stake of up to 10% in the chipmaker. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday after days of media speculation over a possible deal. Although it would be unusual for the US government to take a stake in such a large company, it would align with President Donald Trump's trend of intervening in the free market during his second term. Chipmakers Nvidia and AMD recently agreed to pay around 15% of their sales in China to the US government. Another example was the recent sale of US Steel to Japan's Nippon Steel, a deal which gave the US government a so-called "golden share," giving President Trump sweeping veto power over US Steel's corporate decisions and the right to appoint a board member. There was also the announcement last month that the US government would become the biggest shareholder in the US's only operational rare earths mine, owned by MP Materials. "The Trump administration is really taking a broad view of what is possible for US government interventions in the private sector and very much pushing the limit," Geoffrey Gertz, senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told DW. He describes the recent moves as "unusual," drawing a distinction between other administrations' attempts to stimulate entire sectors and Trump's more personal, targeted approach. "They're cutting one-off deals with individual companies," he said. "That's quite a different approach from setting industry-wide industrial policy standards or guidelines." Yet there is plenty of support for Trump's approach, particularly when it comes to sectors seen as strategically important in the US's ongoing rivalry with China, such as semiconductors and rare earths. Sujai Shivakumar, director of the Renewing American Innovation program at the Center for Strategic & International Studies in Washington, DC, says the global semiconductor industry is not a "level-playing field" given the massive state support provided in countries like China and elsewhere. "Intel is more than just a company, and I think the decision to invest should be applauded," he told DW. "It's time to understand that this kind of industrial policy is now the norm across advanced economies and that governments are providing this form of extensive support," he said. "If we hold to this myth of a purely pure market here in the US, it risks ceding the ground for one of the most strategic industries of the century." Meanwhile, Gertz says it is not "inherently wrong" for the government to invest in Intel. "I do think there are strategic sectors, and there is a case for active industrial policy, again, particularly where there's national security spillovers," he said. Both the Biden and Trump administrations shared the goal of boosting the US's capacity to build advanced chips, needed for practically every aspect of the modern, high-tech industry. The Biden administration introduced the CHIPS Act in 2022, legislation that received bipartisan support. The act earmarked substantial federal assistance and grants for companies such as Intel, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC) and Samsung to boost production on US soil. Given that Samsung is from South Korea and TSMC is from Taiwan, Intel represents the most obvious prospect in terms of production within the US. However, the company has been beset by problems in recent years. It has struggled to compete with TSMC in manufacturing the most advanced semiconductors for external clients and has also not captured a share of the market for AI data chips, dominated by Nvidia. Its revenues have been sluggish, and its share price has plunged. Trump, who has been critical of the CHIPS Act, called for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's resignation earlier this month. However, after meeting with Tan, his approach changed when the move to invest in the company gathered steam. Sujai Shivakumar says Intel is the only US-headquartered firm within striking distance of regaining US dominance in advanced chipmaking and believes the company's potential justifies the US government stepping in. "It needs commercial demand for its products to be viable, but it needs that viability to secure demand," he said. "So it's stuck in this rut. And unless there's a strong signal that it can actually find the traction to get out, it's going to be spinning its wheels." Bloomberg reports that the deal could entail the US government taking an equity stake in exchange for some of the grants awarded to Intel through the CHIPS Act. United States Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick is negotiating on behalf of the US government. He told CNBC that the US should "benefit" from that arrangement, saying "that is exactly Donald Trump's perspective, which is: 'why are we giving a company worth $100 billion this kind of money?'" To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video If the deal goes through, it is likely to raise some concerns over the Trump administration's increasingly robust approach to direct intervention in corporate America. "There are risks of crony capitalism," says Geoffrey Gertz. "You can get to a situation where you're undermining competition, undermining long-term innovation by having a few favored companies who can frankly be a bit lazy because they know they are protected by the state." Sujai Shivakumar says the key is to balance genuine strategic concerns and market forces. "It's not that we should write a blank check," he says. "We can't leave everything up to the market. There needs to be some balance, a smart industrial policy that can help the company restore confidence among its customers, investors, and suppliers."
Int'l Business Times
40 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Ukrainian Suspect Arrested In Italy Over Nord Stream Blasts
A Ukrainian suspect has been arrested in Italy over the sabotage of the Nord Stream underwater gas pipelines from Russia to Europe in 2022, German prosecutors said Thursday. The suspect, identified as Serhii K., is accused of being part of a cell "who placed explosive devices on the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines", they said. He is "believed to have been one of the coordinators of the operation" in which a group allegedly hired a yacht in the German Baltic Sea port of Rostock to carry out the attacks. The Nord Stream pipelines that long shipped Russian gas to Europe were hit by huge explosions in September 2022, several months after Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine. Western powers were initially quick to blame Russia, which in turn accused them. German investigations then pointed to a Ukrainian cell of five men and one woman believed to have chartered the yacht "Andromeda" to carry out the attack, according to Der Spiegel magazine and other media. Their aim was to destroy the pipelines to prevent Russia from profiting in future from gas sales to Europe. Serhii K. was arrested in the early hours of Thursday in the Italian province of Rimini on a European arrest warrant, the prosecutors said. He and his accomplices are accused of using forged identity documents to hire the yacht that departed Rostock to carry out the attacks, the prosecutors said. German Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig thanked investigators for what she called a "highly complex operation" leading to the arrest. Nord Stream's pipelines had long been controversial for allowing Russian gas to bypass eastern European transit routes and leaving Germany overly reliant on cheap energy from Moscow. After Russia launched its Ukraine invasion in February 2022, Western powers sanctioned Moscow, which then switched off the gas flow. Then, in September, seismic institutes reported the underwater blasts and four gas leaks were discovered off the Danish island of Bornholm as gas spewed to the surface. Two of the leaks were in Denmark's exclusive economic zone and two in Sweden's. German prosecutors last year issued an arrest warrant for another Ukrainian man, named as Volodymyr Z., a diving instructor whose last known address was in Poland. He was suspected of being one of the divers who planted the explosive devices in an operation that also involved a married couple who ran a diving school, according to public broadcaster ARD and other media. The case is awkward for Germany and Ukraine, as Berlin has strongly backed Kyiv politically and with defence equipment in its fight against Russia. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said his government knew nothing about any plan to blow up the pipelines. German and British media have recently reported that Washington and Moscow had discussed the idea of reviving Nord Stream 2, possibly to be run by an American company, during talks to end the Ukraine war. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in May, shortly after taking office, that his government would "do everything... to ensure that Nord Stream 2 cannot be put back into operation".
