ASB forecasts Reserve Bank may need to make deeper OCR cuts
Inflation risks are raised by tariffs and trade wars, justifying a high OCR.
Photo:
RNZ
The Reserve Bank may have to cut its benchmark cash rate even further to support the economy after the government said it would slash the amount available for new policies to $1.3 billion, according to an economist.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis
in a pre-budget speech said the 22 May Budget would be no "lolly scramble" with any increase in spending going to targeted priorities in health, education, and defence, with some modest support for business growth.
ASB senior economist Mark Smith the government had a clear intention of getting its house in order, and in doing so would reduce its stimulus for the economy.
"Really, what it's doing, is to put more onus on the Reserve Bank to try and provide more support to the economy. Trimming operational spending increases will result in a more contractionary impulse.
"As a result, the official cash rate (OCR) will be lower than it would otherwise be."
The
RBNZ
has previously signalled the OCR to fall to a neutral rate around 3.0 percent by the end of the year, but noted in its April decision that there was much uncertainty and future cuts would be influenced by medium-term inflation expectations continuing to fall.
Smith said the government's Budget cut would cut about 0.3 percent off the value of the economy, which would be a dampener on an already struggling economy.
That would help ease possible inflation pressures, but raised the prospect the RBNZ might need to support the economy with interest rate cuts and cheaper borrowing costs.
But too much stimulation can cause inflation, while inflation risks are raised by tariffs and trade wars, justifying a high OCR.
BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis said "Trumpflation" - a simultaneous mix of rising inflation and poor growth caused by higher tariffs - was causing leading central banks around the world headaches in forecasting and pointing to their interest rate strategies.
The RBNZ might find itself following the lead of the Bank of Canada and the European Central Bank in not issuing guidance on interest rates in the May 28 monetary policy statement, he said.
Slowing growth and rising inflation - stagflation - is not in the playbook, and will have the RBNZ dusting of one of its favourite soundbites - "least worse choice".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
30 With Guyon Espiner: Netflix ‘Doesn't Need Us' Or Our ‘Silly' Levy
Global streaming giant Netflix 'doesn't need us' and a proposal to force them in to funding local shows is 'silly,' says TV production pioneer Dame Julie Christie. Dame Julie, a founding force in reality TV and an internationally successful format producer, is the latest guest on RNZ's multimedia talk show 30 with Guyon Espiner. She is critical of proposals suggested by industry groups and the government that would compel global streamers to invest more in local productions or face bans. More focus needs go on funding ideas and formats that will garner international success, she says. People should not 'stand around and whine, or do silly things like threatening Netflix – 'If you don't make more local productions, we'll turn you off in this country.' You can imagine the public reaction to that.' Christie, whose production company Touchdown helped define and export iconic shows like Treasure Island and Game of Two Halves, said New Zealand needs to be more realistic about its size and global influence. 'Netflix doesn't need us,' she says, dismissing suggestions that a levy on streaming giants would fix the problem. 'And who's going to decide what's made with that revenue? Netflix. I just don't think it will work.' Instead, the country should focus on producing globally appealing content in genres where New Zealand can compete – particularly in unscripted formats and documentaries. 'True crime is the biggest genre in the world … and we're not making it, because you usually can't get it publicly funded,' she says. 'As a result, we're not making what the world wants.' NZ On Air has become too narrowly focused on funding projects that meet too specific cultural criteria, often at the expense of international interest. 'The number one thing you have to have to get funded by New Zealand on Air is to reflect our cultural identity. Now, what is our cultural identity now?' Highlighting her experience producing a docu-series about Auckland's Football Club, Forever FC, Christie says: 'If you go to Auckland FC, it's very different [to NZ On Air criteria]. It's 20 immigrant families within one team. I think that we have to really open up about what we think our culture is.' New Zealand's small population, while a challenge, could be turned into a strength if the industry embraced creating distinctively local stories and tailoring them for international sale. 'We're belly-gazing, basically,' she says. 'We don't think, 'If I adjust this show by 20%, I might be able to sell it to Australia or a smaller American channel.'' NZ On Air needs to adapt to the new global content environment and stop treating cultural identity and commercial potential as mutually exclusive. 'There should be a massive tick if you've got international viability in anything,' she says. Scrambling for cash Christie welcomes the increase in screen production rebates announced in the Budget, but says we should be aiming higher. 'It's working in bringing film production into New Zealand. That provides jobs. The problem is, it's working for wages,' she says. 'It is less than half the cost to make shows here than most places in the world. 'We should be taking huge advantage of that, while creating our own IP … creating things we own.' New Zealand used to have a stronger international outlook, but the industry has become bogged down in local funding battles, Christie says. 'We were leading the world in creating formats in the early 2000s. Now we just don't do it because we're all scrambling to get that little bit of New Zealand On Air money.' * Watch the full interview with Dame Julie Christie on 30 With Guyon Espiner.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Concerns KiwiSaver Is Being Used As ‘Piggy Bank' To Solve Financial Woes
Article – RNZ A growing number of New Zealanders are making hardship withdrawals from their retirement savings. , Money Correspondent KiwiSaver is in danger of being considered a 'piggy bank' to solve all of New Zealanders' financial woes, one provider says, and too many people are tapping into their savings on hardship grounds. Founder of Kōura KiwiSaver scheme Rupert Carlyon was wary of calls for settings to be changed to allow people to use their money to buy farms. He said KiwiSaver was already being called on to solve the country's housing and infrastructure crises. Carlyon said changing the rules to allow more withdrawals sent the wrong message to people, who should be using KiwiSaver for their retirement. Instead, they were tapping into KiwiSaver in growing numbers. In April, 4220 people withdrew savings for financial hardship reasons, up from 3700 in April 2024. They withdrew a combined $37.6 million. 'It encourages more and more people to think about it like a piggybank. It's scary what's happening in that space,' he said. He said he saw people making repeated hardship withdrawals, depleting their balance. 'People come back multiple times with the same claims… it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.' He said it would now not be possible to close the 'hardship loophole' because people expected it to be available and any change could dent confidence in the scheme. But he said it should be tightened up so there was a limit on the number of withdrawals that could be made within a certain timeframe. 'The other part is it's very resource intensive. We spend on average up to six hours per financial hardship claim… It's hard on staff because they often have to say no when they want to say yes.' A spokesperson for Public Trust, one of the KiwiSaver supervisors, said people were not required to repay hardship withdrawals if it was found they were not necessary. 'Their future self might not thank them for dipping into their retirement savings. We see situations of real and urgent need… there are strict rules and checks in place to help ensure withdrawals are only approved for genuine financial hardship, and applicants need to sign a legal declaration confirming their situation. 'If someone doesn't use funds as intended, it could affect their ability to make another hardship withdrawal in the future.'
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Documents Reveal Why Adrian Orr Suddenly Quit As Reserve Bank Governor
The Reserve Bank Governor resigned in March after seven years of service. The Reserve Bank has revealed a dispute over funding was behind Adrian Orr's abrupt resignation as governor. A raft of documents – released by the central bank under the Official Information Act – reveal an 'impasse' as Orr argued Finance Minister Nicola Willis was not providing enough funding for the next five years. In an accompanying statement, an RBNZ spokesperson said it became clear in late February that the board – chaired by Neil Quigley – was willing to agree to a 'considerably' smaller sum that Orr thought was needed. 'This caused distress to Mr Orr and the impasse risked damaging necessary working relationships, and led to Mr Orr's personal decision that he had achieved all he could as Governor of the Reserve Bank and could not continue in that role with sufficiently less funding than he thought was viable for the organisation.' Both sides engaged lawyers to negotiate an exit agreement, resulting in an immediate departure and 'special leave'. On 5 March, the Reserve Bank revealed Orr's sudden resignation, with three years still to run in his five-year term. At the time, Quigley said it was for 'personal reasons' but would not be drawn on any details. Orr had been expected to open a conference on 6 March with his resignation to be announced the following week, but that plan was nixed after Orr raised concerns that people were already aware of his intentions. Curiously, an email from Orr – shortly after midday on 5 March – indicated at that stage he intended to still attend the conference. 'I will proudly open the conference tomorrow morning, noting I am there to discuss today's news. I am proud to have worked with and for you all, and I know you will succeed ahead.' Orr ultimately did not attend or speak at the conference, nor did he take questions from media. The bank's statement also addressed speculation that the debate around banks' capital-holding was behind the resignation, saying the documents do not indicate those discussions were significant to Orr's decision.
