logo
‘Closest target': Why is Donald Trump so focused on Canada?

‘Closest target': Why is Donald Trump so focused on Canada?

Al Jazeera12-03-2025
Montreal, Canada – In his first speech as Canada's prime minister-designate, Mark Carney delivered what observers have described as a stunning statement.
'I know that these are dark days,' Carney told a room full of supporters on Sunday after he won the race to lead the governing Liberal Party. 'Dark days brought on by a country we can no longer trust.'
The country in question? An ally with which Canada shares the world's longest undefended land border and, until recently, seemingly unshakeable ties: the United States.
'That is jaw-dropping in the broader context,' Jon Parmenter, a history professor at Cornell University in New York state, said of Carney's remark.
Experts say the idea that the US can no longer be trusted reflects a sentiment that has been spreading rapidly across Canada in recent months, however.
In that time, Canadians have watched with a mixture of shock, confusion and anger as US President Donald Trump repeatedly took aim at their country — both as part of his global trade policies and his expansionist ambitions.
Trump has imposed steep tariffs on Canadian goods and threatened more. He regularly calls for the annexation of Canada, and he has made unfounded and disparaging claims about outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Canadian electoral system.
'The damage to the relationship is substantial,' Parmenter told Al Jazeera. 'It's going to be long-lasting.'
Yet, as Trump's attacks against his country's northern neighbour continue unabated, many observers are now asking: Why?
Why is the president targeting a country that had widely been viewed as one of the US's most reliable partners? Why does Trump seem so fixated on Canada?
'Closest target'
While the current US-Canada trade war is 'unprecedented' in modern history, it is unsurprising in the context of Trump, according to Aaron Ettinger, a political science professor at Carleton University in Ottawa.
The US president pursued similar 'America First' economic policies during his first term, Ettinger noted, including imposing tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminium imports in 2018.
'None of this is new. We know this is coming. He's telegraphed everything. But now he's talking about 50-percent rates of tariffs. The aggressiveness is jacked up more than it was seven or eight years ago,' Ettinger told Al Jazeera.
Within the scope of the Trump administration's adversarial approach to foreign policy, Ettinger said he doesn't believe Canada is particularly special. Instead, it 'just happens to be the closest target, along with Mexico'.
'Trump treats all countries as if they are subordinates to his wishes. He loves their leaders when the leaders play along, and he doesn't when they don't,' Ettinger said.
'So Canada is going to get hit with tariffs, just like European Union countries and Mexico. Canada just happens to be close by. Canada also happens to be playing against type and fighting back pretty hard right now.'
The Canadian government has imposed retaliatory tariffs on billions of dollars worth of American goods, further stoking Trump's ire. It has said the measures will remain in place until the US president rescinds and removes the threat of levies.
Personal animosity
Yet, Trump's focus on Canada goes beyond tariffs and economic policy alone.
Even before he re-entered the White House in January, the Republican leader began urging Canada to become the 51st US state. He has repeatedly referred to Trudeau as a 'governor' instead of a prime minister.
Trump also has framed the plan to annex Canada as a boon for Canadians and a way to dodge US tariffs.
'The people would pay much less tax than they're paying right now. They'd have perfect military protection,' Trump recently said.
While Trudeau and other Canadian leaders at first shrugged off the remarks as good-natured ribbing, they quickly began to take Trump's repeated calls for annexation more seriously.
Last week, Trudeau told reporters that Trump wants 'a total collapse of the Canadian economy because that'll make it easier to annex us'. The outgoing prime minister said Canada will never become part of the US and called the administration's tariffs a 'very dumb' policy.
Trump and Trudeau never had a particularly warm relationship, and they publicly clashed in 2018 over trade and tariffs as well.
That animosity could be playing a role in Trump's recent rhetoric against Canada, said Geoffrey Kabaservice, vice president of political studies at the Niskanen Center, a centre-right think tank in Washington, DC.
'Trump is always looking for a way to exact revenge and retribution against people who have criticised him in the past, and certainly Trudeau would fall into that category,' he told Al Jazeera.
A '19th-century' vision
But Kabaservice said Trump's 'very 19th-century idea' of what it means to be a great power is at the heart of his annexation rhetoric.
'When Trump talks about wanting to 'Make America Great Again', one component of what he has in mind by greatness is a country that's expansive, that reaches for and claims new territory, that enlarges itself,' he explained.
That said, when the US president says he wants Canada to be the 51st state, he likely isn't thinking about what that would mean in practice, including how absorbing a country of 40 million people would alter American politics, said Kabaservice.
'It's sort of like just [a] boy's fantasy: 'Wouldn't it be great if America could expand to take in all these other countries? Wouldn't it be great if America was like Britain back in its imperial days, when the world map was covered in red?'
'I think that's the level on which he thinks of these things.'
And while Trump's base may not have annexing Canada on its list of priorities, Kabaservice said, the US president's supporters enjoy when he proposes things 'that make his enemies and even many of his allies unhappy'.
'They applaud what they see as his audacity, his willingness to envision a new world, and his ability to 'own the libs' and make them cry.'
According to Amy Koch, a Republican political strategist, Trump's policies vis-a-vis Canada should also be seen as part of a wider push for dominance in the Western hemisphere.
Tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods, calls to retake control of the Panama Canal and acquire Greenland, and an executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico the 'Gulf of America' are all elements of that effort.
'It is [about] fully establishing dominance in the Western Hemisphere, and I think Canada is a part of that,' Koch told Al Jazeera.
'Tactics without strategy'
Wherever Trump's real motivation lies, observers agree that his stance towards Canada could have a lasting effect.
'The whole point about Donald Trump is that he is a bully, and bullies bully people who are susceptible to their strengths. And that's what he's doing,' said Kabaservice.
'Trump can do things like levy tariffs because he has the leverage over Canada and he has the latitude in terms of the responsibility of the chief executive … But we're also in the process of destroying trust with our allies and that will be immensely difficult to rebuild.'
Ettinger added that, while people in the US and Canada keep trying to find the rationale behind Trump's actions, the president may ultimately be 'employing tactics without strategy'.
For example, US stock markets plunged this week amid the uncertainty around Trump's tariffs push, raising fears that the country could slip into a recession.
'He knows that he wants to hit hard, or he wants to put tariffs, or he wants to escalate. But there's no strategic means-to-ends calculation going on here,' Ettinger said. 'And that makes the guy fundamentally irrational.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Afghans in US mark Taliban Kabul takeover amid Trump immigration crackdown
Afghans in US mark Taliban Kabul takeover amid Trump immigration crackdown

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

Afghans in US mark Taliban Kabul takeover amid Trump immigration crackdown

Four years have passed since Hanifa Girowal fled Afghanistan on a US evacuation flight. But every August, her mind returns to the same place. Like many Afghans evacuated amid the August 15 Taliban takeover of Kabul, Girowal, who worked in human rights under the former Afghan government, still remains stuck in 'legal limbo' in the United States. She is steadfastly pursuing a more stable status in the US, even as the political landscape surrounding her, and thousands of other Afghans in similar situations, shifts. 'I somehow feel like I'm still stuck in August 2021 and all the other Augusts in between, I can't remember anything about them,' Girowal told Al Jazeera. She often recalls the mad dash amid a crush of bodies at the crowded Kabul International Airport: people shot in front of her, a week of hiding, a flight to Qatar, then Germany and then finally, the US state of Virginia. Followed by the early days of trying to begin a new life from the fragments of the old. 'Everything just comes up again to the surface, and it's like reliving that trauma we went through, and we have been trying to heal from since that day,' she said. The struggle may have become familiar, but her disquiet has been heightened since US President Donald Trump took office on January 20. His hardline immigration policies have touched nearly every immigrant community in the US, underscoring vulnerabilities for anyone on a precarious legal status. There is a feeling that anything could happen, from one day to the next. 'I have an approved asylum case, which gives a certain level of protection, but we still don't know the future of certain policies on immigration,' Girowal said. 'I am very much fearful that I can be subjected to deportation at any time.' Unheeded warnings Four years after the US withdrawal, much remains unclear about how Trump's policies will affect Afghans who are already in the US, estimated to total about 180,000. They arrived through a tangle of different avenues, including 75,000 flown in on evacuation flights in the immediate aftermath of the withdrawal, as the administration of US President Joe Biden undertook what it dubbed 'Operation Allies Welcome'. Thousands more have since sought asylum by making treacherous journeys across the world to traverse the US southern border. Some have relocated via so-called Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs), reserved for individuals who worked directly with the US military in Afghanistan, under a notoriously backlogged programme. Others have been resettled through a special State Department programme, known as Priority 1 (P1) and Priority 2 (P2), launched by the administration of President Biden, meant for Afghans who face persecution for having worked in various capacities on behalf of the US government or with a US-based organisation in Afghanistan. Adam Bates, a supervisory policy counsel at the International Refugee Assistance Programme, explained that some of those pathways, most notably the SIV and refugee programmes, provide a clear course towards US residency and, eventually, citizenship. But, he clarified, others do not – a fact that advocates have warned leaves members of the population subject to perpetual uncertainty and political whims. 'A lot of the advocacy to the Biden administration officials was about finding more permanent legal pathways for Afghans,' Bates told Al Jazeera. 'That was with one eye towards the potential of giving the Trump administration this opportunity to really double down and target this community.' Pressure on Afghans in the US During Trump's new term, his administration has taken several concrete – and at times contradictory – moves that affect Afghans living in the US. It ended 'temporary protected status' (TPS) for Afghans already in the country at the time of the Taliban takeover, arguing the country shows 'an improved security situation' and 'stabilising economy', a claim contradicted by several human rights reports. At the same time, the Trump administration added Afghanistan to a new travel ban list, restricting visas for Afghans, saying such admissions broadly run counter to US 'foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism'. These actions underscore that 'the situation in Afghanistan seems to be whatever it needs to be, from the Trump administration's perspective,' according to Bates. Trump has offered his contradictory messaging, criticising the Biden administration on the campaign trail for its handling of the withdrawal, and as recently as July, pledging to 'save' evacuated Afghans subject to deportation from the United Arab Emirates. Meanwhile, the administration terminated a special status for those who entered the US via the CBP One app in April, potentially affecting thousands of Afghans who entered via the southern border. Advocates warn that many more Afghans may soon be facing another legal cliff. After being evacuated in 2021, tens of thousands of Afghans were granted humanitarian parole, a temporary status that allowed them to legally live and work in the US for two years, with an extension granted in 2023. That programme is soon set to end. While many granted the status have since sought other legal avenues, most often applying for asylum or SIVs, an unknown number could be rendered undocumented and subject to deportation when the extension ends. Legislation creating a clearer pathway to citizenship has languished in Congress for years. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has not publicly released how many evacuated Afghans remain in the US on humanitarian parole, and did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for the data. Evacuated Afghans' unease has been compounded by Trump's aggressive approach to immigration enforcement, which has increasingly seen those without criminal histories targeted for deportations and permanent residents targeted for their political advocacy. 'It's just an escalation across the board and a compounding of fear and instability in this community,' Bates said. 'It's hard to make life decisions if you aren't sure what's going to happen tomorrow or next week or in a year'. 'Pulled the rug out' Meanwhile, for the thousands of Afghans continuing to seek safety in the US from abroad, pathways have been severely constricted or have become completely blocked. The Trump administration has paused asylum claims at the US southern border, citing a national emergency. It has almost completely suspended the US Refugee Program (USRAP), allowing only a trickle of new refugees in amid an ongoing legal challenge by rights groups. Advocates say the special P1 and P2 programme created for Afghan refugees appears to have been completely halted under Trump. The administration has not published refugee admission numbers since taking office, and did not reply to Al Jazeera's request for data. 'It feels as if we have pulled the rug out from many of our Afghan allies through these policy changes that strip legal protection for many Afghans in the US and limit pathways for Afghans who are still abroad to come to the US safely,' Kristyn Peck, the chief executive officer of the Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area, told Al Jazeera. She noted that the SIV pipeline has continued to operate under Trump, although there have been some limitations, including requiring those approved for relocation to pay for their own travel. Meanwhile, resettlement agencies like Lutheran have been forced to seriously curtail their operations following a stop-work order from the administration on January 24. As of March, Peck said, the organisation has been forced to let go of about 120 of its staff. Susan Antolin, the executive director of Women for Afghan Women, a non-profit organisation that offers mental health, legal and social support to Afghans in the US, said organisations like hers are also bracing for sustained uncertainty. 'We are diversifying our funding and trying very hard, as so many other organisations are, to find other avenues to bring in that funding to continue to support our programmes,' she told Al Jazeera. 'As organisations that deal with this kind of work, we have to step up. We have to do 10 times more, or 100 times more, of the work.' 'No more a priority for the world' The unstable situation in the US reflects a broader global trend. The Taliban government, despite promising reforms in a push for international recognition, has continued to be accused of widespread human rights abuses and revenge killings. Still, it has upgraded diplomatic ties with several governments in recent years, and in July, Russia became the first country to formally recognise the group as the legitimate government of Afghanistan. At the same time, the governments of Pakistan and Iran have accelerated expulsions of Afghans back to Afghanistan, with more than 1.4 million Afghans either being expelled or leaving Iran alone from January to July of 2025, according to UNHCR. The Reuters news agency also reported in July that the UAE had notified Washington that it had begun returning evacuated Afghans. Germany, too, has begun deporting Afghans back to Afghanistan, in July, it conducted its second deportation flight since the Taliban came to power, despite continuing not to recognise or maintain diplomatic ties with the group. The collective moves send a clear message, evacuee Girowal said: 'We know that Afghanistan is no more a priority for the world.' Still, she said she has not abandoned hope that the US under Trump's leadership will 'not forget its allies'. 'I know the resilience of our own Afghan community. We are trained to be resilient wherever we are and fight back as much as we can,' she said. 'That's one thing that gives me hope.'

What to expect when Trump and Putin meet in Alaska
What to expect when Trump and Putin meet in Alaska

Al Jazeera

time7 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

What to expect when Trump and Putin meet in Alaska

What to expect when Trump and Putin meet in Alaska NewsFeed US President Donald Trump is meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, but the White House is signalling that major agreements are unlikely. Trump gives the talks a 25 percent chance of failure, while European Union leaders and the Ukranian leader worry he could concede too much. Video Duration 01 minutes 04 seconds 01:04 Video Duration 03 minutes 00 seconds 03:00 Video Duration 01 minutes 01 seconds 01:01 Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46 Video Duration 02 minutes 42 seconds 02:42 Video Duration 01 minutes 00 seconds 01:00 Video Duration 00 minutes 35 seconds 00:35

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store