Winding road back for Rolls: Mini nuclear power plant deal could spark a chain reaction, says ALEX BRUMMER
Almost a decade has passed since a team of Rolls' engineers visited the Daily Mail's City office to make the case for a new generation of smaller, British-made nuclear reactors.
It planned to use the tried-and-tested turbines which power UK submarines.
The Rolls-Royce design was innovative, would be infinitely cheaper than the super-reactor being built at Hinkley in Somerset and now destined for Sizewell C in Suffolk, and would be flexible.
The reactor could be constructed on, or near, the sites of Britain's fading nuclear fleet or close to where reliable baseload power would be needed.
No one quite knew at the time that the climate change agenda and demand for data centres to power AI and the digital economy would catapult SMR technology to prominence.
Rolls has been straining at the leash to pursue a technology that could transform British industrial capability and exports with a potential market of $250billion to $400billion by 2035 to 2040.
As the sand slipped through the egg-timer over the last several years, the world's other big electrical engineers woke up to the potential. Westinghouse of Canada (sold off by Gordon Brown), GE-Hitachi and British rival Holtec moved into the territory.
Bizarrely, Rolls-Royce was kept waiting while the UK conducted an open auction, giving rivals the opportunity to play catch-up.
While Britain sat on its hands, the Czech Republic became the first major customer for SMRs made by a Rolls-Royce consortium.
Only now have licences and some £2.5billion of support been provided for three pioneering modular reactors in the UK. Since Labour came to office, the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and Great British Energy have been focused on windfarms and solar power, to the detriment of everything else.
Britain's fading nuclear capability meant we were stuck with a power system dependent on the wind blowing, the sun shining and still undeveloped fuel cell storage capacity.
It is to the credit of the Government, and one suspects Keir Starmer's obsession with big tech, that SMRs are being embraced along with a second super-reactor to be built by France's state-owned EDF.
The opportunity for Rolls in the UK and overseas to create a new business to sit alongside its Trent family of aerospace engines and defence capabilities is enormous.
The thirst for electric power by Google, Amazon, Apple and Bitcoin miners, among others, is unrelenting. Several contracts, with UK makers, have already been signed by the Silicon Valley giants.
New nuclear has zero carbon emissions but decommissioning and waste are still big unresolved issues.
Nevertheless, the volumes of spent fuel from new generation modern reactors is a fraction of their late 20th century forbearers.
Rolls-Royce shares (which I hold) have been on a tear since chief executive Tufan 'Turbo' Erginbilgic has been at the helm.
The shares are up 690 per cent over the last five years placing a value on the group of £75.6billion defying dissonance with London listings. Wow.
Comeback kid
The long haul back for Marks & Spencer after the cyber-attack has taken a significant step. Shoppers will again be able to access fashion items such as clothing for home delivery.
They will have to be a little more patient if they want beauty products or homeware. Food has been less of a problem as deliveries are already in the hands of Ocado through what, until now, has been a fraught joint venture.
There can be few causes for cheer in something so disruptive which has cost an estimated £300million, undermined consumer confidence in the security of personal data and asserted downward pressure on the shares. Before the attack, M&S was on an upward trajectory.
The cyber shock should assist chief executive Stuart Machin in overcoming executive complacency about progress. Having taken the opportunity to update sclerotic systems, it is quite possible that with a following wind it will come back stronger.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
TUC in call for gender equality over pensions
Retired women effectively go more than four months every year without getting a pension because of a gender gap, according to research. The TUC estimated women were losing the equivalent of £7,600 a year on average. The union organisation said compared to men, retired women effectively stop receiving pension income from today. The income gap between men and women in retirement is now 36.5%, according to research from the Prospect union. The Government has revived the Pension Commission, which will bring together unions, employer and independent experts to look into the causes of the gap. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: 'Everyone deserves dignity and security in retirement, but too many retired women have been left without enough to get by. 'We must make sure that these inequalities are addressed for future generations. 'That's why reviving the Pensions Commission – bringing together unions, employers and independent experts – is a vital step forward. 'We now have a chance to make sure everyone, including women, receive the decent retirement income that all workers need.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We're determined to close the gender pensions gap, and the new state pension has already reduced historic inequalities faced by women and low earners. 'Alongside this, the Pensions Commission will tackle barriers to close the gender pensions gap in private pensions to ensure women have the dignity and security they deserve in retirement.'
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Arsenal silently hijacked Spurs' Eberechi Eze transfer well before anyone knew
Just hours before Arsenal clinched a deal for Eberechi Eze, somewhat cruelly, Tottenham Hotspur finally put in the offer they felt would be acceptable to Crystal Palace. There had been a verbal agreement. Spurs just never got a proper answer. After days of difficult and painstaking negotiations between Daniel Levy and Steve Parish, Arsenal had appeared to steal in within a matter of mere hours. That has already seen this move cast as the mother of all transfer hijackings, especially with how it is another North London derby victory. Except, it wasn't really a hijacking at all. The Independent can now reveal that Arsenal had actually struck the principles of an agreement with Palace as early as the morning of Sunday 10 August. They managed to keep it extraordinarily quiet, as illustrated by how it was only after Wednesday evening's sensations that multiple sources were willing to talk about it. There was also the fact that, in those nine days, it didn't look like Arsenal would follow through on that agreement. The word put out was that they wanted to sell before any other purchase, and that they preferred a left winger. Interest in Eze was repeatedly played down. There had been a lot of mixed messages, which fit with the whole summer as regards Arsenal and the Palace star. Levy might certainly feel that now. The situation has led to some surprising sympathy for the Spurs chairman within the game. Their own negotiations for Eze had encountered repeated difficulties, as first reported by The Independent on Saturday night. The problems actually preceded that. Talks almost collapsed the Thursday before, and there were constant hold-ups over issues like add-ons and how much was being paid up front. Just when one issue was solved, another would arise. One description over the last few days was that 'the deal is both almost done and constantly at the point of collapse'. There is now a belief, especially within Spurs, that Palace were stalling. They were waiting for Arsenal to come back. It nevertheless looked so remote by Saturday that Eze himself had accepted Arsenal wasn't going to happen. He even spoke to Parish to try and get his move sorted, as Levy and the Palace chairman met on Monday morning. Eze was genuinely excited about joining Tottenham. It just wasn't the one he really wanted. His dream was a move to Arsenal. That suddenly looked like it would become a reality on Wednesday morning. Arsenal finally acted on that deal. That shift will be linked to Kai Havertz's injury but there is actually hope the German's absence won't be that long, maybe less than three months. The Havertz development just accelerated everything. Arsenal wanted to make sure they didn't miss out. Parish and Arsenal executive vice-chairman Tim Lewis have a closer relationship than Parish and Levy, even if they often bicker. They WhatsApp a lot about regulations and other in-game issues. That helped by Wednesday, especially given that Sunday 10 August agreement. Arsenal also have more players they can offer who Palace need. It is possible a deal is next done for Jakub Kiwior, given how Oliver Glasner's side need a centre-half on that side. Everything could happen very quickly. Arsenal, for their part, still had to pay more than the initial agreement. That was to ensure it actually got done over Spurs. Whereas the previous deal had been for £50m plus £10m in add-ons, this is for £60m and £7.5m in add-ons – pretty much exactly Eze's release clause, which expired for this window on Thursday. It is understood to have been superior to Spurs' offer. Parish played that part masterfully. He got the best possible deal for his club, which was the best-case scenario if you're forced to lose one of the greatest legends in your club history. Eze did just deliver the first major trophy in the club's trophy. Queens Park Rangers will also be celebrating, since they stand to receive 15 per cent of any deal. The Loftus Road hierarchy are now aiming to complete more business of their own, as they are set to receive more money than they've had in years. Eze has ultimately preferred Arsenal because they offer better opportunities for more trophies than the FA Cup – that he can prove a missing piece for – but also because of that dream. The connection was there. When Eze posted on instagram on 26 May celebrating Palace's FA Cup success, the fifth and last picture was a conspicuous image of Ian Wright. It is still to be confirmed whether Eze will play in the Europa Conference League play-off against Fredrikstad on Thursday. There would obviously be romance in this club hero putting in the performance that properly delivers Palace to Europe, while also getting the opportunity for an emotional goodbye. Except, amid all this talk of dreams, a realism must exist. This is a huge transfer, with a lot of money at stake. Levy knows the cost of that now. He will face even greater questions having lost out on two big transfers late on this summer, after Morgan Gibbs-White. Fan protests at Spurs are likely to heat up again. Arsenal have meanwhile signed a game-changer, in the way that some felt might be missing against Liverpool's and Manchester City's business. They've now pulled off the deal of the summer. It could be hugely significant in the season.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Urgent warning to Brits as experts reveal thousands of personal ALARMS are about to stop working – is your device affected?
They're a lifeline for 1.8 million older adults, people with disabilities and those recovering from illness or injury in the UK. But if you use a personal alarm, experts have warned that it might soon stop working. That's because network providers are switching over from analogue landlines to digital telephone systems – rendering many popular device useless. The final deadline for the switch to digital is January 2027. However, a growing majority of the UK has already made the transition, meaning analogue telecare systems may no longer be reliable. Despite this, researchers from Which? found that older generations of devices are still available online and providers are not always making it clear they will soon not work. Sue Davies, head of consumer protection policy, said: 'The deadline for the switch–over is fast approaching, and the vast majority of the UK has been migrated to digital networks. 'It is shocking that certain telecare providers continue to sell analogue products when they could be putting lives at risk. Careline365 offers 'reasonably clear' explanations on their website regarding the digital switchover, but Which? argue they are sending mixed signals by continuing to sell these products at all 'Which? has informed these sellers that their products should be removed from sale immediately.' She urged the government and regulators to take 'decisive action' to prevent the sale of these devices, and act if companies continue to do so. For their investigation, the team looked at the websites of seven telecare providers at the beginning of this month. They found three were selling analogue devices. These alarms are generally cheaper than the digital alternatives, raising concerns that consumers may be tempted to choose them based on price without fully appreciating the risks. Most concerning was SureSafe, which was selling three devices requiring an analogue landline. The product listings made no mention of the digital transition or the risk that the devices may not work properly. The company has since updated their website after being contacted by Which?, adding advice that the three devices are analogue only and removing them from its list of digital alarms. While Careline365 and LifeConnect24 offer reasonably clear explanations on their websites that their analogue alarms may not work or will soon stop working, Which? argue they are sending mixed signals by continuing to sell these products at all. Another analogue SureSafe product. Devices such as these will no longer work once the transition to digital is complete This analogue alarm is 'not compatible' with the digital switchover, Suresafe's website states, but is still available for sale LifeConnect24 frames their digital alternatives as a 'strongly recommended' upgrade, but experts said the language of 'upgrade' is at best problematic since it fails to convey the potentially life–saving need for switching to digital alarms. In 2023, two vulnerable people died when their personal alarms failed to work after their landlines were switched off. This prompted the government to initiate a charter requiring all providers to temporarily pause the migration from analogue to digital. The other providers Which? looked at – Careium, Helpalert, Taking Care and Telecare24 – only sell digital alarms that are compatible with the UK's modernised digital network. In the government's Telecare National Action Plan, published in February this year, they wrote: 'For analogue telecare devices to be phased out, the sale and purchasing of analogue devices needs to be stopped. 'Companies that supply telecare equipment, known as 'telecare suppliers', should no longer be manufacturing analogue equipment and the government expects sellers to have stopped selling them.' Experts say that while some consumers may still be unaware of the digital switchover, there is no such excuse for businesses operating in the sector. Stephen Kinnock, Minister at the Department of Health and Social Care, said: 'People rely on their telecare devices to keep them safe and connected to help when they need it most – the safety of users is vital. 'We are working with industry to deliver the digital switchover for telecare devices, ensuring people are protected – and last year we wrote to suppliers urging them to put an end to the sale of analogue–only devices. 'We welcome Which?'s campaign – which will have a positive impact and support people to make an informed choice when it comes to their telecare device, encouraging them to buy devices that will be safer and more reliable in future.' A spokesman for Careline365 and LifeConnect24 said: 'We have been preparing for the digital switchover for many years, and as a result, the vast majority of products we sell are digital devices. 'However, there remains a small minority of vulnerable consumers for whom an analogue device may be the only way to ensure their safety and that they remain protected during the transition to digital.' Meanwhile, a representative from SureSafe said: 'SureSafe has been a mobile–first alarm provider since 2015, with 99% of all alarms sold being SIM–based and fully digital–ready. We shifted to mobile both to support the digital switchover and because mobile offers features unavailable with in–home devices. 'The remaining need for analogue devices is very limited, only where no mobile signal or internet exists and an analogue line remains. 'We welcome Which?'s efforts to highlight the switchover's importance and have refined our messaging in response to make this clearer for our customers using analogue as their only option.' I have an analogue personal alarm – what are my options? Analogue personal alarms may not reliably work on digital phone lines after the switchover. If you have a telecare system, you should contact your landline provider to let them know as soon as possible. You could ask to be excluded from the digital upgrade for now – but this should not be a long–term solution as analogue telephone lines will no longer be maintained after 2027. The best and most reliable solution will be to change your personal alarm to a digital model. Which?'s website reads: 'Be reassured that you will not be asked to move to a digital phone service until your landline provider and telecare company are confident you will have a compatible and functional telecare device. 'If you or a relative are concerned about the impact of the move to digital phone lines on your telecare device, it's worth contacting its provider – usually either a local authority or a private provider – to check whether the device will still work with a digital landline. 'Larger providers are likely to know which devices won't work using digital phone services and have been planning around this.'
