Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone.
The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service.
'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April.
Loading
The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property.
Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services.
Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
11 minutes ago
- The Age
Vilifying art-lovers at the NGV is a step too far
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. PROTESTS Exiting the NGV on Sunday, I was confronted by women protesting. My first instinct was to think they are women like me. As a teacher and Christian leader I've worked for peace, justice and reconciliation in education, churches and communities creating meaningful ways of offering hopeful transformation. I am a protester. But my instinct was wrong about these women as I don't target individuals and vilify them as they did to hundreds of us. A woman with the megaphone claimed 'anyone entering the NGV was ensuring the NGV thinks it's OK to hang out with fascists. You have blood on your hands and you support Zionism.' She then got personal to one woman saying 'you in the hat, you are supporting genocide entering the NGV'. I was collecting my bike nearby and foolishly engaged suggesting we can protest but it's wrong to target individuals as perpetrators of genocide. She then directed the megaphone at me chanting 'you support genocide'. She's right; we are all complicit in systemic and collective sins of commission and omission. But broad scale public vilification is not protest. It polarises, shuts down empathy and divides us further. Sally Apokis, South Melbourne Albanese should offer more than a gesture Anthony Albanese is correct in that the government should not recognise Palestine as a gesture only. He should do it as a commitment to the people of Palestine (''We won't make a decision as a gesture': Albanese says no imminent move to recognise Palestine ', 28/7). At the moment Albanese is gesturing, not acting. He is unprepared to take a bold stand, whether it be to recognise Palestine or sanction Israel for its blatant crimes. While acknowledging the heartbreak of seeing children starve, he makes no mention of genocide or ethnic cleansing. It's time he be a true leader. Lorel Thomas, Blackburn South Australia must act Sadly it appears the world's leaders are deaf and blind to what has been happening in Gaza. And as Sean Kelly noted (' Mere words won't pass our moral test ', 28/7) only two months after the horrific Hamas attacks on Israelis on October 7, 2023, already 93 per cent of people were in phases 3, 4 or 5 of food insecurity. In May UN experts noted that 'while States debate terminology — is it or is it not genocide? — Israel continues its relentless destruction of life in Gaza, through attacks by land, air and sea, displacing and massacring the surviving population with impunity'. When will the Australian government take action? It's time we say to the US and the UK that we will not proceed with AUKUS unless arms supplies to Israel stop. Where is the power of leaders if they take no action to stop this carnage in Gaza? Peta Colebatch, Hawthorn Blame not so simple Regarding Sean Kelly, the Geneva Conventions allow the blocking of aid if the enemy is stealing or using it. Kelly cites a New York Times story denying Hamas is doing so, but a Washington Post report set out in detail, citing many witnesses including Gazans, how Hamas is in financial crisis because Israel has stopped it taxing aid, or stealing and selling it. Kelly writes about famine starting within months of the war beginning, but those warnings were retracted by the Famine Early Warning System, a US-funded monitoring group. The UN is also culpable. After ending its nine-week blockade in May, after having allowed enough aid into Gaza to last for some months, Israel not only facilitated the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has distributed around 95 million meals, but also resumed UN access. However, there were recently 900 truckloads of aid inside Gaza checkpoints the UN hadn't collected. As for the suggestion of recognising a Palestinian state, only Palestinian Authority intransigence has prevented such a state. Hamas would say recognition only happened because of the October 7 atrocities. Recognition would simply encourage further Palestinian rejectionism and terrorism. Jamie Hyams, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council Statehood for Palestine The people of the world claiming statehood for Palestine are living in a world of delusion. There are so many questions that still need to be asked. Some of these are: What are the geographical boundaries that define this state called Palestine? Who are the citizens of Palestine and who makes the decisions as to who becomes a citizen? What are the institutions that govern this state called Palestine? Are Jews allowed to be citizens of this new state called Palestine? These are only a few of the questions that need to be considered. No leader nor a member of the lobby groups that are advocating for statehood have made proposals that define this state. It's disingenuous on all people wishing for a state called Palestine because it's a falsehood. The people who are most vulnerable and exploited are once again being led up a path of others making. Graham Haupt, Glen Waverley Revert to 1947 borders Yes, as several correspondents to this page have stated, there are other serious human massacres also occurring, right now, in Yemen, and in Sudan. The difference is that those wars are not openly supported by a vocal and prominent segment of Australians, or accepted by Australian governments. Injustice for the people of Gaza stings our collective conscience. Here, and around the world. The only fair and long-term solution is to formally recognise those 1947 UN borders and allow the two states to exist as equals — with equal rights to exist, and also equal rights to have the military capability to defend themselves. Geoffrey McNaughton, Glen Huntly
Sydney Morning Herald
41 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Innocent life matters': The photographs of children that captured the world's conscience
Warning: Graphic content The photograph of an emaciated child broke Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's heart. 'For anyone with any sense of humanity, you have to be moved by that, and you have to acknowledge that every innocent life matters, whether it be Israeli or Palestinian,' Albanese said. 'A one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter, and the civilian casualties and death in Gaza is completely unacceptable,' he told ABC's Insiders on Sunday. 'That boy isn't challenging Israel's right to existence, and nor are the many who continue to suffer from the unavailability of food and water.' The image of Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq being cradled by his mother Hedaya al-Muta'wi, captured on July 21 and distributed by the photographic network Getty, evoked previous pictures that shocked the world. There is the photograph of Phan Thi Kim Phuc running from a napalm attack in 1972 during the Vietnam War, Steve McCurry's portrait of Afghan refugee Sharbat Gula in 1984, and a haunting image of a vulture stalking a Sudanese child amid widespread famine in 1993. In each case, the ethics behind the photograph have become disputed. Was the image exploitative? Should the photographer have intervened? What toll did it take on the individual who became a symbol for wider suffering? The Israeli embassy in Australia went further on Monday. Deputy head of mission, Amir Meron, told journalists that there was no starvation in Gaza and that 'false pictures' of the situation in the territory were spreading. 'This is a false campaign that is being [led] by Hamas, taking advantage of sick children in order to show a false claim and false presentation of hunger and starvation in the Gaza strip,' Meron said, without specifically referring to the image of al-Matouq.
The Age
41 minutes ago
- The Age
Hanson tests Coalition resolve on net zero
'We are the Reform of [Australia] because everything that Nigel Farage stands for, I've been talking about for years, for nearly 30 years.' Hanson's anti-immigration party, which has courted controversy for decades for its stances on minority groups, added two senators at the May election, doubling its number of seats. Joyce's campaign has gained support from backbenchers Garth Hamilton, Tony Pasin, Alex Antic, a slew of Nationals, and the expanded right-wing Senate bloc of One Nation and United Australia Party's Ralph Babet. Frontbencher Andrew Hastie has also been fighting internally to overturn the net zero pledge, with the policy currently under review within the Coalition. Liberals have also spoken out about Indigenous welcome ceremonies after Ley indicated support for the practice. And in another sign of internal angst, former frontbencher Sarah Henderson argued in last week's private party room meeting that the Coalition should adopt as formal policy a push by Antic to enshrine in law the existence of only two genders. Henderson declined to comment. Taken together, the thrusts underline the depth of feeling among right-wing Coalition MPs as Ley aims to correct course from the perceived failings of the Dutton era. Institute of Public Affairs deputy head Daniel Wild said in Australia, as in the UK, there was a growing gap between the wishes of right-wing voters and the offerings of centre-right parties on cultural issues, immigration and green energy. 'What you're now seeing is a new bloc, whether it's people from One Nation or Barnaby Joyce, and others, giving voice to those concerns in a way that they haven't before,' Wild said. 'I don't think Liberals are going to die out, but I think the risk of irrelevancy is increasing.' Hume, one of only two Liberals to vote against Hanson's motion, pushed back against the One Nation leader, saying voters 'made it clear at the ballot box that they expect serious, credible action on climate change'. 'How can we keep the seats we have and win back the seats we've lost, without hearing that message?' she said. The UN's chief climate diplomat has urged Australia to continue its push towards net zero, warning that failure to stabilise the climate would cut living standards $7000 per person per year by 2050. 'Climate disasters are already costing Australian home owners $4 billion a year – and that figure is only going one way,' said Simon Stiell, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Outspoken conservative backbencher Hamilton warned of the risks of a Labor-lite agenda. 'We need to be wary of what's happened to our sister party in the UK,' he said, cautioning that Australia's preferential and compulsory system provided some protection from a third-party takeover. Loading Hamilton said public debate on the Coalition's direction should not be silenced, arguing Dutton did not lose because Australians rejected conservative values, but rather because of the Coalition's deficient policy agenda. Hanson said she was open to picking off Coalition MPs who felt uncomfortable with Ley's more centrist approach that has seen her spruik the case for quotas for preselecting women, dump the idea of building nuclear plants, and install Paul Scarr – who on Monday highlighted the positives of migration – into the immigration portfolio. The Nationals and Liberal Party briefly split after the election. During that period, Liberal MPs discussed privately the prospect of creating a new city-based party to espouse small-l liberal values unencumbered by conservative regional MPs. Scott Morrison canvassed the idea among his close colleagues after the 2022 election, according to several sources involved in those talks who did not want to be identified. Political historian Paul Strangio, an emeritus professor at Monash University, said Ley's message of modernising the party risked her being received 'as a kind of apostate'. 'Diagnosing what needs to be done doesn't mean Ley can magic away a quarter of a century of a conservative populist creep by the Liberals dating back to the Howard era that in essence has involved the party fighting a rearguard action against the evolving direction of Australian society,' he said. 'The resistance she will inevitably encounter is already evident in the incipient revolt within the Coalition against a net zero carbon emissions target. 'A major question looms over whether Ley has the requisite network of allies, intellectual and rhetorical force, strategic nous and fortitude to perform the diabolically difficult task of reversing 25 years of rightwards Liberal drift.'
