logo
Benefit cuts: Welsh ministers express major concerns over plans

Benefit cuts: Welsh ministers express major concerns over plans

BBC News25-06-2025
Disabled people are worried that planned cuts to disability and sickness benefits mean they won't be able to make an ends meet, the Welsh government has said.A senior Labour government minister has formally expressed concerns to the UK government over its controversial welfare plans.In a response to a consultation the Welsh government backed figures that £470m could be lost from the country's economy, and said disabled people were worried about an increased risk of depression and suicide.It comes as Sir Keir Starmer's government faces a significant rebellion, with large numbers of MPs supporting a bid to block the plans.
At least five Welsh Labour MPs - Chris Evans, Andrew Ranger, Steve Witherden, Henry Tufnell and Ruth Jones - are among those backing an amendment that would allow them a vote to reject the proposals.Sir Keir has vowed to press on with the reforms, saying the current welfare system "traps people" on benefits, and was set to fuel "unsustainable" rises in the cost to taxpayers.
Jane Hutt, the Welsh government's social justice minister, said that proposed changes to personal independence payments (Pip) "should be reviewed before any changes are made".She said the reforms had "caused significant concern here in Wales" diverting attention from proposed reforms "which could be positive"."The strength of feeling I have witnessed from disabled people and stakeholder organisations across Wales opposing the proposed changes to the PIP eligibility criteria has been overwhelming.""They have been concerned about not only for the disabled persons themselves but for their carers and families too".In a letter to UK Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Hutt endorsed forecasts from Policy in Practice that nearly 190,000 people in Wales would be affected - or 6.1% of the population.Hutt backed analysis from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation that ten of the top 30 Westminster constituencies have the highest proportion of working-age people in receipt of health related benefits.It suggests changes will have a "disproportionate impact" in Wales, Ms Hutt said.
'Reduce working hours'
Hutt said she had heard from people who "are concerned that if they lost their PIP entitlement they would have to reduce their working hours or leave employment completely".That would be contrary to the UK government's aim of supporting disabled people into employment, Hutt argued.Hutt said she had also heard people's anxiety about facing a significant cut in their household income if they lose their Pip entitlement."These people hold real and understandable fears they would no longer be able to afford their everyday essential living costs, let alone the additional costs they face as a disabled person," the minister wrote.
The Welsh government said that disabled people and other organisations had raised concerns that cuts to PIP would reduce access to crucial treatments and support systems, increasing the risk of "depression, self-harm and suicide".PIP is used to purchase additional therapies, such as counselling and physiotherapy, or used to support day-to-day well being."These purchases would no longer be affordable without Pip, leading to a deterioration in their health, wellbeing, and employment status," the consultation response said.A survey conducted by a disabled people's organisation "indicated feelings associated with welfare reform include anger, anxiety, terror, worry, fear, suicidal thoughts and a sense of being a burden", while there was also concerns about a lack of proper consultation.
'Increase poverty levels'
The letter gives concerns over proposals to reduce the value of the health element of universal credit, saying it will "not be an incentive to work but will increase poverty levels amongst disabled people and people with long term health conditions".Amid suggestions that people could be sanctioned if they receive the health element and do not take part in a "support conversation", Hutt said there was evidence that "these type of sanctions do not work" and actively push people away from the Labour market.
Hutt did praise some of the proposals in the government's green paper, saying it agreed with the "principles of providing support to people into work and protecting people who cannot work".In the Senedd on Tuesday First Minister Eluned Morgan was asked by Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth if she would urge Welsh MPs to rebel "to protect disabled people in Wales and Welsh spending".Morgan said: "I just think we've got to be very serious about this, because this is an issue that's causing concern to a lot of people in Wales."The Department of Work and Pensions has been asked about the letter.
A bill to be voted on next week will make it harder for disabled people with less severe conditions to claim Pip.An amendment has been signed by more than 130 MPs, including 120 Labour MPs. Among the Welsh Labour rebels is Chris Evans, the MP for Caerphilly. In a letter written with his Senedd colleague for Caerphilly, Hefin David, the pair expressed "serious concerns about parts of the green paper and bill as published".They said people will be expected to lose their existing incomes before they find new incomes through work, and criticised a lack of consultation for some of the biggest parts of the changes.
If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this story you can visit BBC Action Line.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour minister says small boat Channel crossings 'unacceptable' as milestone passed
Labour minister says small boat Channel crossings 'unacceptable' as milestone passed

Daily Mirror

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Labour minister says small boat Channel crossings 'unacceptable' as milestone passed

In Home figures described as "unacceptable" by Labour former home secretary Baroness Smith, it also emerged 474 migrants arrived by small boat on Monday alone More than 50,000 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel since Labour won the 2024 general election. ‌ In Home figures described as "unacceptable" by Labour former home secretary Baroness Smith, it also emerged 474 migrants arrived by small boat on Monday alone. Earlier this month, the Government began detaining migrants under a new "one in, one out" deal with France. ‌ UK officials aim to make referrals for returns to France within three days of a migrant's arrival by small boat, while French authorities will respond within 14 days. An approved asylum seeker in France will be brought to the UK under a safe route as part of the exchange. It comes after The Mirror's Kevin Maguire wrote: 'Labour must find engaging story for the UK - or face election wipeout'. ‌ Baroness Smith, who is now an education and women and equalities minister, told BBC Breakfast: "Criminal gangs have got an absolute foothold in the tragic trafficking of people across the Channel. It is an unacceptable number of people." ‌ Earlier this month, the Government began detaining migrants under a new "one in, one out" deal with France. UK officials aim to make referrals for returns to France within three days of a migrant's arrival by small boat, while French authorities will respond within 14 days. An approved asylum seeker in France will be brought to the UK under a safe route as part of the exchange. Last week the government announced it is introducing powers for immediate deportation from prison for all foreign nationals who .

Premier League club in row with council over proposed housing near stadium
Premier League club in row with council over proposed housing near stadium

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Premier League club in row with council over proposed housing near stadium

Premier League newcomers Sunderland have opposed plans to build houses near their Stadium of Light ground, saying development could have 'catastrophic consequences'. Chairman Kyril Louis-Dreyfus said the club will make formal objections to the city council's plans to allow for homes to be built in what had been a buffer zone around the stadium. Sunderland City Council has proposed that 600 homes, including maisonettes, townhouses and family homes, should be built south of the stadium, as part of a wider redevelopment of the city centre. Sunderland City Council chief executive Patrick Melia has insisted that the stadium was a 'key asset for the city' and the redevelopment plans would enhance fans' experience. Former chairman Sir Bob Murray, who oversaw the move from Roker Park to the 49,000-seat ground in 1997, called the change a 'disgrace'. He said the local authority had previously agreed protections which would prevent development near the stadium, thus allowing the club to increase capacity if needed, but that the city council had 'torn them up'. Sir Bob said having houses up close to the Stadium of Light risked hemming it in, which was the cause of the move from Roker Park. Mr Louis-Dreyfus has now spoken out against the plans as well. He said: 'As the custodian of Sunderland AFC, it is my duty to safeguard the future of our club. 'This includes the Stadium of Light – the beating heart of our city. 'Unfortunately, Sunderland City Council has recently taken steps relating to the Sheepfolds development that could have catastrophic operational consequences on our club and, by extension, our community. 'We are under no illusion that the city needs a more appropriate housing provision and support those endeavours fully. 'However, later this week we will be submitting a formal objection against the proposals relating to the Sheepfolds and I encourage all city stakeholders to come together and join us in protecting the future of our football club and the City of Sunderland. 'Together, we have limitless potential, but it will only be realised through delivering on a shared purpose and vision.' There were fears that having homes close to the stadium could impact its ability to host major concerts as well as block any future expansion plans. The Stadium of Light has hosted England games and was built on the site of the former Monkwearmouth Colliery. In response to the objections, council chief Mr Melia said: 'We are very much invested in the future of the Stadium of Light and recognise it as a key asset for the city. 'It is our view that the proposals set out for the Sheepfolds neighbourhoods will improve operations and fan experience in terms of match days and other events and we remain committed to working with SAFC in relation to their plans for the expansion of the Stadium of Light – we have held many discussions with Mr Louis-Dreyfus and his team to this effect. 'This consultation process provides a real opportunity for the public and stakeholders to share their thoughts with us as the local planning authority and we will consider all views and comments prior to determination of the application.'

Council seeks High Court ban on asylum seekers being housed at protest-hit Epping hotel
Council seeks High Court ban on asylum seekers being housed at protest-hit Epping hotel

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Council seeks High Court ban on asylum seekers being housed at protest-hit Epping hotel

Epping Forest District Council has applied for an interim High Court injunction in a bid to stop asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel in the town. Documents were lodged with the High Court in London on Tuesday, the council said in a statement. It comes after a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel, after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Councillor Chris Whitbread, Leader of Epping Forest District Council, said: 'The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago. 'So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel. 'There are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel. The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. 'This will only increase with the start of the new school year. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen. 'In our view placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a clear breach of planning permission. It is not in use as a hotel, and it doesn't function as a hotel. 'The establishment of a centre to accommodate asylum seekers in this particular location, in close proximity to five schools, a residential care home, and the shops and amenities of the market town of Epping is not appropriate in planning terms.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store