logo
Sturgeon: ‘Witch-hunt' MSPs investigating me were being directed by Salmond

Sturgeon: ‘Witch-hunt' MSPs investigating me were being directed by Salmond

Leader Live20 hours ago
The former Scotland first minister wrote in her autobiography, Frankly, that she thought either Mr Salmond or his allies were guiding some opposition MSPs on what to ask her.
She accused her opponents in the special Holyrood committee of a 'witch-hunt' against her.
The committee ultimately found Ms Sturgeon misled the Scottish Parliament over the Salmond inquiry.
However, she said the probe that 'really mattered' was the independent investigation by senior Irish lawyer James Hamilton which cleared her of breaking the ministerial code.
The former SNP leader said that while she was 'certain' she had not breached the code, 'I had been obviously deeply anxious that James Hamilton might take a different view', admitting that 'had he done so, I would have had to resign'.
She said that she felt 'on trial' as part of a wider phenomenon that when men were accused of impropriety, 'some people's first instinct is to find a woman to blame'.
Ms Sturgeon did admit to 'misplaced trust and poor judgment' in her autobiography, which was published early by Waterstones on Monday, having been slated for release this Thursday.
From a shy childhood in working class Ayrshire to wielding power in the corridors of Holyrood, Scotland's longest serving First Minister @NicolaSturgeon shares her incredible story in FRANKLY, coming this August. Signed Edition: https://t.co/9xtiZmBnn7 pic.twitter.com/YKEI1pxF19
— Waterstones (@Waterstones) March 19, 2025
She wrote: 'This feeling of being on trial was most intense when it came to the work of the Scottish Parliament committee set up to investigate the Scottish government's handling of the original complaints against Alex.
'From day one, it seemed clear that some of the opposition members of the committee were much less interested in establishing facts, or making sure lessons were learned, than they were in finding some way to blame it all on me.
'If it sometimes felt to me like a 'witch-hunt', it is probably because for some of them that is exactly what it was.
'I was told, and I believe it to be true, that some of the opposition MSPs were taking direction from Alex himself – though possibly through an intermediary – on the points to pursue and the questions to ask.'
Ms Sturgeon described the inquiry, to which she gave eight hours of sworn evidence, as 'gruelling' but also 'cathartic'.
MSPs voted five to four that she misled them.
The politicians began their inquiry after a judicial review in 2019 found the Scottish Government's investigation into Mr Salmond's alleged misconduct was unlawful, unfair and tainted by apparent bias.
Mr Salmond, who died last year, was awarded £500,000 in legal expenses.
Ms Sturgeon wrote of the inquiry: 'It also gave the significant number of people who tuned in to watch the chance to see for themselves just how partisan some of the committee members were being.
'Not surprisingly, the opposition majority on the committee managed to find some way of asserting in their report that I had breached the ministerial code.
'However, it was the verdict of the independent Hamilton report that mattered.'
She said her infamous falling out with her predecessor was a 'bruising episode' of her life as she accused Mr Salmond of creating a 'conspiracy theory' to defend himself from reckoning with misconduct allegations, of which he was cleared in court.
Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor was 'never able to produce a shred of hard evidence that he was' the victim of a conspiracy.
She went on: 'All of which begs the question: how did he manage to persuade some people that he was the wronged party, and lead others to at least entertain the possibility?
'In short, he used all of his considerable political and media skills to divert attention from what was, for him, the inconvenient fact of the whole business.
'He sought to establish his conspiracy narrative by weaving together a number of incidents and developments, all of which had rational explanations, into something that, with his powers of persuasion, he was able to cast as sinister.'
Ms Sturgeon speaks about Mr Salmond several times in her autobiography, which also has a dedicated chapter to him, simply titled 'Alex Salmond'.
In it, she speaks of an 'overwhelming sense of sadness and loss' when she found out about his death, which she said hit her harder than she had anticipated.
Ms Sturgeon says the breakdown in their relationship happened long before Mr Salmond's misconduct allegations.
She said it had begun to deteriorate when she became first minister in 2014 following his resignation in light of the independence referendum defeat.
Ms Sturgeon claims her former boss still wanted to 'call the shots' outside of Bute House and appeared unhappy that she was no longer his inferior.
She also accuses him of trying to 'distort' and 'weaponise' his alleged victims' 'trauma' through his allegations of conspiracy.
Ms Sturgeon claims that Mr Salmond, who later quit the SNP to form the Alba Party, would rather have seen the SNP destroyed than be successful without him.
Despite her myriad claims against her predecessor, though, Ms Sturgeon said: 'Part of me still misses him, or at least the man I thought he was and the relationship we once had.
'I know I will never quite escape the shadow he casts, even in death.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sturgeon: Salmond happier for SNP to be destroyed than succeed without him
Sturgeon: Salmond happier for SNP to be destroyed than succeed without him

Rhyl Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Sturgeon: Salmond happier for SNP to be destroyed than succeed without him

In her memoir, Frankly, the former first minister said she had come to the realisation that her former friend and mentor 'wanted to destroy me'. She said her relationship with the late politician began to deteriorate as soon as she became leader of Scotland. Mr Salmond, who died last year, quit as SNP leader and first minister in 2014 after the Scottish independence referendum. Ms Sturgeon also claims in her book that Mr Salmond had admitted to her that the 'substance' of one of the sexual harassment complaints had been true. The former Alba Party leader was acquitted of all charges relating to the allegations at court in 2020, while a judicial review found the Scottish Government's own investigation of him was tainted with apparent bias. Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor had created a conspiracy theory about Scotland's core democratic institutions to shield himself from accountability. She said Mr Salmond never produced a 'shred of evidence' to support these claims. She accused him of trying to 'distort' and 'weaponise' the trauma of victims. In her book, which was on sale in some places ahead of schedule on Monday, she said: 'In his (Salmond's) efforts to turn himself into the wronged person, he demonstrated that nothing and no one was sacrosanct for him. 'There was never the merest hint of concern about the damage he did to the party he previously led. 'Indeed, it felt to me that he would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him.' She accused her former boss of having 'impugned the integrity' of the institutions 'at the heart of Scottish democracy', including the Government, Police Scotland and Crown Office. She went on: 'The fact that he never produced a shred of credible evidence that a conspiracy existed, because it didn't, wasn't enough to stop him seeking to damage the reputation of these institutions and shatter the morale of those who worked in them. 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all. 'A jury concluded that what they experienced wasn't criminal, but that does not mean those experiences didn't happen. 'Even if he never said so explicitly, he was accusing them of being liars, of making it all up.' The former SNP leader said Mr Salmond had made his former allies and SNP colleagues 'mortal enemies' in the fallout over misconduct claims against him. 'In that regard,' she wrote, 'I was clearly public enemy number one. For a while, I told myself that the bonds between us would be stronger than his thirst for revenge. 'Eventually, though, I had to face the fact that he was determined to destroy me. 'I was now engaged in mortal political combat with someone I knew to be both ruthless and highly effective. 'It was a difficult reality to reconcile myself to. 'So too was losing him as a friend. I went through what I can only describe as a grieving process. 'For a time after we stopped speaking, I would have conversations with him in my head about politics and the issues of the day. 'I had occasional, but always vivid, dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft.'

'Hyperbolic word salad': Row breaks out as Reform UK politician urges Scots council to rule out low emission zone
'Hyperbolic word salad': Row breaks out as Reform UK politician urges Scots council to rule out low emission zone

Daily Record

time12 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

'Hyperbolic word salad': Row breaks out as Reform UK politician urges Scots council to rule out low emission zone

Councillor Jamie McGuire labelled the schemes in four Scottish cities as "little more than cash cows" in a blistering statement. A row has broken out after a Reform UK politician urged Renfrewshire Council to rule out ever introducing congestion charges or a low emission zone (LEZ). ‌ Councillor Jamie McGuire labelled the schemes as "little more than cash cows" and said the local authority "must have no part in this" in a blistering statement. ‌ But the elected member for Renfrew North and Braehead has been accused of "hyperbolic word salad" on an issue that was settled almost two years ago. ‌ In September 2023, the SNP administration confirmed it was not considering the introduction of an LEZ in Paisley or any other part of Renfrewshire at a full council meeting. Councillor McGuire, who defected from Labour to Nigel Farage's Reform in June, said: "Scotland's four main cities already have LEZs in place and their experience should be a warning. "These schemes have acted as little more than cash cows, generating income for councils while hitting those who can least afford it. ‌ "People on the lowest incomes, who are far more likely to drive older vehicles, have been penalised simply for trying to get to work, take their children to school or care for relatives. "Renfrewshire must have no part in this. A congestion charge or LEZ in our towns would be a hammer blow to local households and businesses. We are a working community that depends on accessible, affordable transport. "Many residents travel across Renfrewshire for work, education, and caring responsibilities, while small enterprises rely heavily on vans and cars to serve customers and move goods. ‌ "Imposing extra charges on them is not just unreasonable, it risks undermining our local economy and making it harder for people to live and work here." He added: "The SNP-led Renfrewshire Council must act now to rule out – clearly, unequivocally and permanently – ever introducing either a congestion charge or a low emission zone in our area. "Residents deserve certainty, not the constant threat of new charges hanging over them." ‌ Councillor Jim Paterson, SNP convener of the planning and climate change policy board, claimed Councillor McGuire was "trying to raise his profile" with the comments. The elected member for Renfrew South and Gallowhill said: "Another day, another fabricated outrage from Councillor McGuire. "The position of the SNP administration and indeed Councillor McGuire on this issue was settled in 2023 when the Conservative group called on the council to rule out establishing any form of LEZ in Paisley and wider Renfrewshire for the duration of this council term. "The SNP position along with a Labour amendment was agreed then by the vast majority of councillors which stated that the council would not consider the introduction of a low emission zone (LEZ/ULEZ) in Paisley or any other parts of Renfrewshire. That position remains unchanged. "Councillor McGuire, like his newfound political hero Nigel Farage, may like to trade in misinformation but to imply that there has been any change to the agreed position of 2023 is just nonsense and to suggest there is a 'constant fear' hanging over residents is just hyperbolic word salad from a councillor desperately trying to raise his profile to secure the top spot in his party's internal list for Holyrood 2026."

Judge increases 'unduly lenient' sentences of two child rapists after appeal
Judge increases 'unduly lenient' sentences of two child rapists after appeal

STV News

time12 minutes ago

  • STV News

Judge increases 'unduly lenient' sentences of two child rapists after appeal

A senior judge has said that sex offenders who rape children should receive harsher sentences than people who commit the same offence on adults. Lord Beckett made the observations in a judgment in which prosecutors succeeded in their bids to increase the jail terms given to two sex offenders. The Lord Justice Clerk – Scotland's second most senior judge – sat with his colleagues Lord Matthews and Lord Armstrong in a case brought against Andrew McMahon, 69, and Christian Lambert, 22. McMahon was given a five-year jail term by Judge Alison Stirling following proceedings at the High Court in Edinburgh in March 2025. Lambert was given three years and four months after two hearings at the same court in the Scottish capital. A jury heard how McMahon raped a 12-year-old girl in a wooded area in Edinburgh and told her not to tell others about what happened to her. Lambert, a former boarding school pupil, pleaded guilty to raping another 12-year-old girl in Slateford, Edinburgh, in March 2024. Judge Lord Summers heard how Lambert told a court-appointed social worker that he felt 'aroused' when he was choking his victim. Prosecutor Paul Harvey went to the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh earlier this year to argue that the sentences given to the pair were unduly lenient and should have been longer. He said the judges didn't properly consider the exact circumstances of the attacks and the impact that they would have had on the victims. The court heard that even McMahon thought the sentence given to him was unduly lenient. Mr Harvey told the appeal judges that the sentences given to the two men should have been longer. In a written judgement published by the court on Tuesday, Lord Beckett writes of how Mr Harvey also invited him and his colleagues to find that rapists convicted under section 18 of the Sexual Offences Scotland Act 2009 – the rape of a young child – should receive longer sentences. He said their sentences should be longer than ones given to rapists prosecuted under section one of the legislation – the rape of an adult. Mr Harvey's submissions succeeded. McMahon's sentence was increased to 11 years – he will also be supervised by the authorities for two years after his release from jail. Lambert's jail term was also increased to five years and three months, with a three-year-long supervision order put in place for his immediate post-release life. In the judgment, Lord Beckett wrote: 'The crime of rape generally is a particularly serious offence. It is apparent that in England, the guidelines have a higher starting point for rape of a young child than for an older person. 'Rape of a young child will generally be more culpable than rape of an older person, serious though both crimes are. 'It is also likely that there will be a higher level of harm. Courts in both England and Scotland have recognised that sexual exploitation of a young child may be comparatively easy to commit given the physical and intellectual advantages of an adult over a young child. 'Both individual and general deterrence is an important sentencing objective. 'Whilst there can be exceptional cases with exceptional circumstances, in general in the absence of exceptional circumstances, the appropriate sentence for rape of a child under 18 will be significantly higher than for rape under s1.' McMahon subjected his victim to sexual assaults on two occasions in Edinburgh in the summer of 2023. During the first attack at a house in the Granton area of the city, he subjected the girl to an oral rape on an occasion between March 28 and August 17 in 2023. McMahon then raped a second victim on August 18 that year in the Niddrie area when he attacked her outdoors and grabbed her, pulled her and pushed her to the ground. The rapist told his child victim not to tell anyone and threatened her after subjecting her to the sexual abuse. After a jury returned guilty verdicts against the sex offender, Judge Alison Stirling told jurors that it was 'a difficult and anxious case'. Meanwhile, the court heard how Lambert pretended to be a teenager in order to sexually assault the child whom he encountered whilst using the Snapchat messaging app. The High Court in Edinburgh heard how the attack took place at a house in the city's Slateford area in March last year. The child thought she was going to meet a boy who was a couple of years older than she was. When Lambert, also of Edinburgh, appeared before Judge Lord Summers for sentencing, the court heard how Lambert was assessed as being at 'high risk' of further sexual offending. The court also heard how Lambert had choked the girl as he raped her. This prompted Lord Summers to send Lambert to jail for three years and four months for the attack. On Tuesday, the appeal concluded that the sentences given to the two men were 'unduly lenient'. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store