After HC rap, Delhi govt to scrap panel for Chandni Chowk maintenance
The court rapped the authorities for unilaterally forming a high-level committee to oversee Chandni Chowk's maintenance, stating that it had only sought their suggestions during earlier hearing.
'We wanted you (Delhi government) to give your suggestions and instead you formed the committee and now you are taking the plea that you misread the order. We only intended to form the committee just to ensure that the work functions under our supervision,' the court said.
The government counsel said the panel would be immediately scrapped. The court accepted the counsel's submission on recalling of the March 26 government order.
The court then ordered the parties to file their suggestions within four weeks on the setting up of the high-level committee in pursuance to its February order.
In its February 18 order, the court proposed a committee comprising officers at the highest level of all the agencies and other experts to ensure the area was maintained appropriately.
The court had also proposed the terms of reference to such a committee should be preparing a road map for maintaining and preserving the area and other ancillary issues.
The court, however, learnt that on March 26 the Delhi government's Public Works Department had formed a high level committee.
Expressing its astonishment, the court's May 21 order noted the respondents were only required to give its suggestions in respect of the formation of the committee and not for forming the committee itself.
'You have created an authority (Shahjanabad Redevelopment Corporation) and you sanction a hefty amount but the court had to intervene time and again because whatever zeal or effort you were making that is not yielding the desired results. Every time the matter comes up before the court, you show your zeal on paper by filing affidavits,' the court said.
The government's counsel said the area was beautified as photographs would indicate but pointed out an 'extremely high footfall'.
There were miscreants who were destroying public property and authorities were doing the work on a daily basis, the counsel added.
The court was dealing with a plea of Chandni Chowk Sarv Vyapar Mandal which claimed a 'highly neglected, disturbing and pathetic state of affairs' in the area under the Chandni Chowk Redevelopment Project from Lal Quila Road up to Fateh Puri Masjid and its surrounding areas including metro stations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
Consenting Adults Have Right To Choose Partners, Live Together: Delhi High Court
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has called the right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and live together "a facet of their personal liberty and privacy" being immune to the family's disapproval. "The Supreme court has repeatedly affirmed this position and directed the police to safeguard such couples from intimidation or harm," Justice Sanjeev Narula said on August 5. The court, as a result, directed the police to provide protection to a young couple, who married against the wishes of their families and were now being threatened. "The right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and to live together in peace is a facet of their personal liberty, privacy, and dignity protected under Article 21. Family disapproval cannot curtail that autonomy," the order highlighted. The couple sought the court's intervention to ensure their safety in living together, claiming threats, coercion and interference being extended by the family members. The court was urged to direct the woman's family not to harm them or interfere in their peaceful cohabitation. The plea said the woman's family was against their relationship and allegedly issued repeated threats of physical harm. It said due to the hostility and fearing for her safety, the woman left her parental home on July 18 after informing her mother about her intention to marry the man. The couple married in a temple on July 23 on their own free will and has been living together happily, it added. The high court then directed the station house office of the police station concerned to designate an official and sensitise him or her of the court order and provide immediate assistance to the couple in case of any complaint or threat. "The directions issued herein, particularly those concerning police protection, are purely preventive in nature, aimed at ensuring the petitioners' safety and safeguarding their right to life and liberty. They shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the truthfulness of the petitioners' claims, nor as any endorsement," it said. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Choice to marry someone from different faith safeguarded by Constitution: Delhi High Court
New Delhi The choice to marry someone from a different faith is safeguarded under the fundamental right to life and personal liberty, even if it challenges social norms and family expectations, the Delhi High Court has held. (Representative photo) The choice to marry someone from a different faith is safeguarded under the fundamental right to life and personal liberty, even if it challenges social norms and family expectations, the Delhi High Court has held, while directing the Delhi Police to continue protecting an interfaith couple facing threats from their families. A bench of justice Sanjeev Narula made the observation on August 8, while dealing with a plea filed by a 26-year-old Muslim man and a 25-year-old Hindu woman, seeking police protection and accommodation in a safe house. In a petition filed last month, the couple asserted that despite solemnising their marriage after a relationship of over seven years, there was strong opposition from the woman's family. The petition said that despite writing to the deputy commissioner of police for the southeast district on July 23, requesting police protection, the police forcibly separated the woman from her husband and detained her at Nirmal Chhaya Shelter Home on July 24. The plea stated that the woman married the man voluntarily, without any coercion. On July 25, the high court directed the DCP to look into the matter personally and, if the woman affirmed her wish to live with her husband, to ensure appropriate arrangements for the couple's safety. The counsel for the woman's father, on August 8, asserted that his client was deeply troubled by his daughter's decision to marry the man without his consent and that he was concerned for his daughter's welfare. Considering the contentions, the court directed Delhi Police to continue providing them protection and accommodation in a safe house, till they solemnise their marriage under the Special Marriage Act. The bench said that parents' anguish over their daughter choosing her life partner without consultation cannot eclipse the right of an adult to choose a life partner, since Article 21 of the Constitution safeguards an individual's right to marry a person of one's choice. 'The constitutional guarantee under Article 21 enables every adult citizen may shape the course of their own life, free from fear, coercion or unlawful restraint. The choice to marry, especially across lines of faith, may test the resilience of social norms and familial expectations, yet in law, it remains a matter of personal liberty and individual autonomy, immune from any external veto. While the anguish of a parent is understandable, it cannot eclipse the rights of a major to select their life partner,' the court said. It added, 'The court is mindful of the anguish of the girl's father, who opposes the relationship on grounds that he perceives as legitimate and rooted in his concern for his daughter's welfare. However, upon attaining the age of majority, the right to make decisions regarding marriage becomes the individual's personal prerogative. Parental preference, however well-intentioned, cannot legally override that autonomy.' Noting the couple's allegation of being forcibly separated, the court directed the DCP to submit a report on whether any unlawful separation had occurred and, if so, to identify the officer responsible. The direction came after the woman claimed she was taken to a shelter home by the police against her will, while the police maintained that no coercion, unlawful action, or procedural lapse had taken place. The matter will next be heard on September 12. The same bench, in a similar plea filed by another couple, also ruled that a family's disapproval cannot override the right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and live together peacefully. 'The right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and to live together in peace is a facet of their personal liberty, privacy, and dignity protected under Article 21. Family disapproval cannot curtail that autonomy,' the court said in an order on August 5.
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Kerala HC terms right to motorable roads as a Constitutional right, seeks safety and quality audit report within a month
Asserting that the right to motorable roads is a Constitutional right, the Kerala High Court has directed the government to file a road safety and quality audit report within a month. A Bench of Justice Devan Ramachandran added orally that the right to travel is within the compass of the fundamental right while dealing with a case regarding the spate of accidents due to potholes, the poor upkeep of roads in Kerala and the rampant violation of traffic rules. The court cited incidents like one in Thrissur where a two wheeler rider who swerved to avoid a pothole being fatally hit by another vehicle, right in front of his mother, to shed light on the deteriorating conditions of the roads. These are not mere accidents, and ought to have been eye openers. Yet, the court still does not see concrete actions, it added. The amicus curiae for the case Vinod Bhat said that only peripheral work was done, despite multiple orders by the court. Designated engineer Stating that every road had a designated engineer who was prima facie responsible to ensure its upkeep and to prevent accidents due to potholes, the court expressed the hope that stakeholders, including at the highest level, would proactively find feasible and lasting solutions. It specifically mentioned the expected increase in traffic during the impending Onam season. Although the court had earlier sought a comprehensive audit report on road safety and quality from the Public Works department and the Kochi Corporation, the government's counsel sought additional time to submit the report. The matter has been posted for hearing the coming week.
