&w=3840&q=100)
Harvard President Alan Garber takes 25% pay cut amid Trump funding row
The US terminated $450 million in grants to Harvard this week, after earlier freezing more than $2.2 billion in funding
Bloomberg
Harvard University President Alan Garber will take a voluntary 25 per cent pay cut for the academic year that starts July 1, a school spokesman said.
The reduction in compensation comes as the oldest and richest US university grapples with the fallout from its standoff over federal funding with the Trump administration, which has faulted Harvard's handling of antisemitism and alleged discrimination on campus.
Harvard, which earlier this year announced a freeze in hiring, didn't specify Garber's salary. In his former role as Harvard's provost, he earned total compensation of $1.1 million, according to the most recent publicly available tax form for the 2022-2023 academic year. As provost in 2020, Garber was among leaders who took a voluntary 25 per cent pay cut during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Trump administration has assailed Harvard since taking office, blasting the school for failing to protect Jewish students on campus after the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas on Israel. Harvard this week expanded its lawsuit against the Trump administration over the halt in federal funds and what it deems 'unconstitutional demands' that threaten the school's independence.
The funding cuts at Harvard are 'stopping lifesaving research and, in some cases, losing years of important work,' Garber and provost John Manning wrote in a letter Wednesday.
Harvard said it will provide an extra $250 million of university money to help pay for research during the coming year, on top of the approximately $500 million it spends on research annually.
The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school also receives about $300 million in sponsored research funding from non-federal sources. In the last academic year, Harvard received around $700 million in research funding from various federal agencies, including the Departments of Health and Human Services, Defense and Energy.
Separately, Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey on Wednesday announced a hiring freeze across the executive branch to help protect the state's budget priorities in the face of federal economic uncertainty.
In addition to the Harvard funding battle and separate curbs on National Institutes of Health grants, the Trump administration has cut $350 million in direct aid to Massachusetts that supported initiatives including disaster prevention, student mental health services, school security and building upgrades and increased broadband access, according to the governor's office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
15 minutes ago
- The Wire
India's Data Blackout: No Data Means No Accountability
Photo: Mark Owen Wilkinson Hughes/Unsplash Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute Now In any democracy, it is critical for the government to collect data in a timely and accurate manner. No data means no accountability. In response to several questions raised by MPs in parliament, the government has claimed that it does not have data. This includes data on the number of deaths due to lack of oxygen during COVID-19, paper leaks in competitive examinations like NEET, data on the losses caused due to natural calamities and the reasons for farmer suicides. Census The decennial Census, which was conducted in India without a break for 150 years, has not been held since 2011. The Census due in 2021 was delayed citing the COVID-19 pandemic, even as large political rallies and religious congregations were allowed to take place. The Indian government has finally announced that the next population Census will be conducted in 2027. The Census is not just an academic exercise; it has serious implications for policymaking. Not conducting the census directly impacts the lives of millions of people, especially those living at the margins. For instance, as per the National Food Security Act, the number of people to be given ration cards is determined on the basis of the latest census. Estimates suggest that more than 10 crore people have been left out of the ambit of the food security net due to the 2021 Census not being conducted. The absence of updated census figures also fuels misinformation and disinformation in society. It is impossible to verify the authenticity of claims made for political gains about the disproportionate increase in population of religious minorities, improvement in sex ratio etc. Covid deaths Even in cases where data has been collected, there have been very serious concerns about its accuracy. A huge controversy engulfed the data on the number of deaths in the country during COVID. While the government reported only five lakh COVID deaths, independent estimates, including from the World Health Organieation (WHO), placed the figure at over 40 lakh. The government recently released the data for the 2021 Civil Registration System after a lag of nearly four years. The data shows that the excess deaths in 2021 alone were around 21 lakh – suggesting that a figure of around 40 lakh COVID related deaths due to the pandemic is entirely plausible. Missing data The NSO's Consumer Expenditure Survey of 2017-18 was junked. The leaked findings of the survey showed that consumer spending fell for the first time in four decades and consumption declined, indicating an increase in poverty. A report by IndiaSpend showed that at the end of 2024, 16 critical datasets were delayed and nine ministries had not released their annual reports. Among the delayed datasets were the 'Crime in India' report, which provides crucial information on crime statistics including figures on cybercrimes, crimes against women and children, and the 'All India Survey on Higher Education'. Both were last published in 2022. Shooting the messenger? Recently, the Union government dissolved the Standing Committee on Statistics headed by Dr Pronab Sen, former Chief Statistician of India. As per reports, members of the committee had repeatedly raised concerns in the meetings over the delay in conducting the Census. The findings of National Family Health Survey (NFHS) showed an increase in the number of women with anaemia and the persistence of open defecation in the country, contrary to claims of the government. In 2023, the director of the institute responsible for preparing the NFHS was removed. The politics of data The Modi government appears to be extremely wary of data. Availability of objective data empowers people to question the government's functioning and query the propaganda and claims made by those in power. Data enables critical citizens' engagement and ensures accountability of those who govern. A government interested primarily in perception management is seldom inclined to put in place an effective data regime. Watch ' India's Data Blackout- From Census to Covid Deaths | Jaanne Bhi Do Yaaro ', where Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst joins Anjali Bhardwaj and Amrita Johri discuss what's happening to crucial data in the country. Anjali Bhardwaj and Amrita Johri are social activists working on issues of transparency and accountability. Sindhu Koshy is a public-spirited communications professional based in Trivandrum. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
India Today
16 minutes ago
- India Today
He wants to speak to me: Donald Trump on plans to speak to Musk on phone
US President Donald Trump has said he has no immediate plans to speak with tech mogul Elon Musk, amid their escalating feud over the Republican-backed tax and spending bill. However, Trump also hinted he was open to a conversation, telling reporters, "If I were him, I would want to speak to me".Asked whether a phone call with the Tesla and SpaceX chief was on the horizon, Trump responded, "Umm I haven't really thought about it actually. I would imagine he wants to speak to me. Maybe he's already called. You'd have to ask him. Ask him if he's already called. But I'd have no problems with it".advertisementThe latest comments come after a dramatic fallout between Trump and Musk, once considered allies, following Musk's vocal opposition to a Republican tax-cut package championed by the White House. Though Musk hasn't directly addressed Trump in recent days, he has continued to slam the legislation, which included key components of Trump's domestic economic agenda. The rift became public last week when Musk, who had informally advised Trump during his first term, criticised what the president called the "Big, Beautiful Bill". Trump had initially remained silent, but later told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was "very disappointed" in the billionaire a sharp escalation, Musk declared that Trump would have lost the last election without his backing and even floated the idea of impeachment. The tech mogul, who reportedly spent nearly USD 300 million on Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, had previously vowed to reduce his political donations and called for the ouster of lawmakers who "betrayed the American people".advertisementIn response, Trump suggested his administration could sever government ties with Musk's companies, including lucrative contracts involving SpaceX and its satellite internet wing, the height of the standoff, Musk even threatened to withdraw SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft from NASA missions to the International Space Station, a move that would jeopardize the US space program. He later walked back the strained relationship threatens to ripple through Republican circles ahead of the crucial midterm elections next year. With Musk hinting at pulling financial support and other Silicon Valley donors watching closely, the Republicans risk losing a critical source of influence and InMust Watch
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Jr.'s 'Rooftop Koreans' meme sparks outrage as 1992 LA riot imagery resurfaces amid ICE protests
Trump Jr. under fire for referencing 1992 LA riots in controversial post Donald Trump Jr. sparked widespread backlash after posting a meme depicting an armed Korean American atop a rooftop, a reference to the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The image, widely associated with Korean shop owners defending their stores during racially charged unrest, was captioned with "Make Rooftop Koreans Great Again," drawing criticism for glorifying vigilante justice. The post came amid escalating protests in Los Angeles following immigration raids conducted by federal agents. Demonstrators clashed with law enforcement, blocked ICE vans, and set fires. Though Trump Jr. added no comment to the image, the symbolism was interpreted as a call for armed retaliation against protesters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bank Owned Properties For Sale In Cemengbangkalan (Prices May Surprise You) Foreclosed Homes | Search ads Search Now Undo Also read: Trump's ICE war spills onto streets: Where's the US headed? Korean American groups condemn the meme amid ongoing protests The Korean American Federation of Los Angeles (Kafla) condemned Trump Jr.'s meme, stating that it exploited the community's painful history. During the 1992 riots, Korean-owned businesses were specifically targeted, and many Korean Americans were left to defend their property without police support. Live Events 'As the son of the sitting president and a major influencer, his actions carry grave risks amid such a tense atmosphere,' Kafla stated. The group emphasized that the current unrest, while volatile, is not comparable to the chaos of 1992. Kafla also criticized the ongoing immigration raids for lacking due process and fueling confusion within immigrant communities, including Korean Americans. Trump's National Guard deployment reignites tensions with State leaders President Trump's decision to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles was made without California Governor Gavin Newsom's consent, marking the first such move in six decades. The action drew comparisons to the 1992 riots, but key differences remain. Also read: Trump deploys 2,000 national guard troops to LA amid growing anti-ICE protests In 1992, the Guard was deployed at the request of state leaders after the acquittal of LAPD officers in the Rodney King case triggered days of deadly violence. This time, Trump cited Section 12406 of Title 10, asserting federal authority amid protests over immigration enforcement. Newsom, who filed suit against the administration, called the deployment a 'manufactured crisis.' Historic parallels raise concerns about racial polarization The invocation of 1992-era imagery by Donald Trump Jr., coupled with federal deployment of military forces, has renewed fears about deepening racial and political polarization. In 1992, more than 60 people died and over 1,000 buildings were destroyed in a racially charged uprising. Korean Americans, then caught in the crossfire, remain sensitive to any rhetoric that revives that trauma. Also read: Trump vows to "HIT" any protester who spits on police. He pardoned those who did far worse on Jan. 6 This time, the unrest stems from immigration policy and enforcement, but the response is drawing similar imagery and tactics. Civil rights groups warn that such associations risk inflaming public sentiment and creating dangerous environments for minorities.
