Ahead of setting school budgets, Michigan education leaders brace for federal cuts
As the U.S. Department of Education's future is uncertain, school leaders across Michigan are pondering an intimidating reality as they plan next school year's budget: What if a portion — or all — of the state's annual federal funding goes away?
Michigan receives roughly $2 billion in federal education funding annually.
Nikolai Vitti, superintendent of Detroit Public Schools Community District, held a budget update on Wednesday. Vitti, in the virtual meeting with over 1,000 attendees, said his district, the largest in the state, disproportionately relies on federal funding, compared with other districts in the state.
"You can imagine the hurt and pain that we will experience by losing federal funds," he said. Adding later that the direction the federal government has taken under President Donald Trump is "defunding the future of the most disadvantaged children in this country."
"This is no longer a drill," he said. "We have to stop thinking, 'Oh it's rhetoric; it's just an executive order.'... This is real, folks. ... We cannot wait, we cannot hope. We cannot pray alone to think that we're going to get through this without changing direction and advocating for something different and something better."
The U.S. Department of Education's workforce has already been about cut in half, with cuts to some grant and research programs. Federal education funding makes up about 9% of the state's education budget, according to the Michigan League for Public Policy. No concrete cuts to federal funding have been put forward and even if Congress eliminated the federal education department, funding wouldn't automatically be cut. But speculation over what could be cut has proliferated. A federal budget resolution approved Friday does not lay out many specific streams of education funding, Education Week reported, prompting even more speculation about what could be slashed by Congress.
School budgets have to be completed by June 30. And a lot could happen between now and then. But already, administrators have started to use the word "cut" — hopefully, judiciously, Vitti said, if federal cuts happen.
"What I don't want to do is go to a world where many of you lived once where everyone gets a pink slip saying we don't know if your job is there next year," he said.
Novi Community School District Superintendent Ben Mainka said he is preparing for both the best- and worst-case scenarios as budget uncertainty looms.
"We're kind of operating under the auspices of, let's be prepared, but let's also not do something rash and reduce programming or something like that ahead of hearing any information about actual cuts," Mainka said.
In Wayne County alone, schools receive $421 per student in federal Title I funding, which is meant to help schools that educate a disproportionate amount of students from low-income homes.
The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, which allocates money for services for students with disabilities, is federal law. Michigan schools received about $460 million in federal funding for special education in 2024, about 15% of the funding for special education services, according to the Michigan League for Public Policy.
State funding remains the largest source of education funding. Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's proposed budget includes a 4.1% increase to the foundation allowance for Michigan students, raising it to $10,000 per pupil, up from $9,608. But whether Whitmer's proposed budget will be passed as-is is up to lawmakers, who will likely agree on their own proposals before passing a budget, expected sometime in the summer.
While 10% of state education funding is federal, about 32% of federal funding constitutes Detroit Public Schools budget, Vitti said, which is because the district has a weak local tax base and a larger population of vulnerable students than many districts in the state.
Vitti said he is particularly concerned that Congress, in service of cutting $2 trillion from the budget, could eliminate portions of Title I funding, funding for teacher training, funding for English Learners, funding for programs that help low-income students improve learning experiences, Medicaid funding that helps students with disabilities, and funding for school lunch programs.
In Detroit, $124 million in Title I funding for the 2024-25 school year went to paying academic interventionists, funding for assistant principals, funding for literacy programs, and more purposes. If Congress cut 25% of Title I funding, the superintendent said, Detroit would see $30 million gone.
Vitti, stressing that no idea has been finalized, discussed several strategies district officials have thought up to address any potential budget cuts, including: accelerating the closure of schools that district had already planned to close, reducing discretionary funds for purposes such as professional development and STEM programs, freezing hiring for vacant roles, delaying technology upgrades and eliminating commercial property insurance coverage.
"Myself and the board is already thinking about ways to keep people employed, mainly protect school staffing, protect student programming so reform can continue despite these cuts for the next year or two," he said.
In Warren on Wednesday, educators, parents and students held school "walk-ins" to protest recent cuts to the federal education department. Robert Callender, a chemistry teacher and president of the Warren Education Association, wrote in a news release that federal education funding is critical to educating vulnerable students in particular.
'Dismantling the Department of Education would be devastating for local students with special needs and students from lower-income families, as our schools rely on federal resources to support special education programs, tutoring, school meals and more,' Callender wrote in a news release. 'This would cause permanent harm to Warren students, who need and deserve more support — not less.'
Education leaders also stressed that federal funding for students with disabilities has never been fully funded: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act promised to fund 40% of special education funding, but has largely hovered around the 15% mark, according to the American Speech–Language–Hearing Association. Many districts, even with state special education funding, have to dip into general education funding to cover special education expenses.
"We're seeing a significant amount of challenges that relates to costs" of special education services, Mainka said. "Because, obviously, to support our children in the way that they need to be supported — and we're adamant that they get that support — it costs a lot of money."
Wendy Zdeb, executive director of the Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals, wrote in an email response to questions from the Detroit Free Press that part of the frustration among education leaders is the pace at which the federal government is making cuts.
"Compounding this is the lack of communication from the federal government," she wrote. "It seems as though cuts are happening so quickly in other departments of the government and schools need time to react to these things. It is pretty unnerving to just be watching the headlines learning about what is happening at the same time as the public."
Contact Lily Altavena: laltavena@freepress.com.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Michigan education leaders brace for federal cuts amid speculation
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
43 minutes ago
- CBS News
New York Rep. Jerry Nadler says DHS agent handcuffed his staff member at congressional office
New York Rep. Jerry Nadler says a member of his staff was handcuffed by a Department of Homeland Security agent at his congressional office Wednesday. The incident was caught on video. According to a DHS spokesperson, Federal Protective Service officers were responding to reports that protesters were inside Nadler's district office in Manhattan. "Upon arrival, officers were granted entry and encountered four individuals. Officers identified themselves and explained their intent to conduct a security check, however, one individual became verbally confrontational and physically blocked access to the office. The officers then detained the individual in the hallway for the purpose of completing the security check. All were released without further incident," DHS said in a statement. In a statement released Saturday, Nadler said the DHS agents "forcefully" entered his office and handcuffed a member of his staff. "The decision to enter a Congressional office and detain a staff member demonstrates a deeply troubling disregard for proper legal boundaries. If this can happen in a Member of Congress's office, it can happen to anyone–and it is happening," Nadler said, in part. In the statement, Nadler accuses President Trump and the DHS of "sowing chaos in our communities, using intimidation tactics against both citizens and non-citizens in a reckless and dangerous manner," and calls on both the president and the agency to stop using what he calls "dangerous tactics." Nadler said no arrests were made and "the situation was quickly deescalated."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Joni Ernst doubles down on bleak ‘We are all going to die' comments in sarcastic non-apology
Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst doubled down on her bleak comments in response to potential Republican Medicaid cuts by posting a sarcastic apology video on social media. The senator went viral after she said, 'We all are going to die,' when responding to a question about the proposed cuts in President Donald Trump's tax legislation during a town hall in Parkersburg on Friday. As Ernst began to answer the question, a person in the audience shouted, 'People will die!' "People are not — well, we all are going to die. For heaven's sakes, folks,' she said in response. The comment received national media attention and was widely criticized by Democrats who have slammed the possible ramifications of the proposed cuts to Medicaid. Ernst shared a video on her Instagram story on Saturday where she spoke directly to the camera, seemingly from a cemetery. "Hello everyone. I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall," said before going on to describe what happened. "I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth," she added. "So I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.' "But for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my lord and savior, Jesus Christ," said Ernst. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Republican tax bill will cut Medicaid spending by $723 billion over the next 10 years. The number of uninsured people could rise by as much as 7.6 million. During the town hall event in Parkersburg, Ernst argued that the goal of the legislation is to ensure that those not eligible for Medicaid don't get the benefits. "What you don't want to do is listen to me when I say that we are going to focus on those that are most vulnerable," she said. "Those that meet the eligibility requirements for Medicaid, we will protect. We will protect them. Medicaid is extremely important here in the state of Iowa. If you don't want to listen, that's fine." She subsequently went on to blame the "hysteria that's out there coming from the left" for the criticism of her initial statement. Former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger responded to Ernst's Instagram story on X, writing: 'Whelp. No sense of goodness left in her now.' 'I'm sorry… is she walking through a cemetery as she makes this?' Democratic strategist Tim Hogan added.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans in Congress pull out all the stops to protect Trump tariffs
Warning signs flashed this week that Donald Trump's tariffs were beginning to destabilize what had, at the start of his term, appeared to be a solid economy. But in Congress, Republican leaders pulled out all the stops to protect his signature trade policy. The threat appeared in the form of a Senate resolution sponsored by the Republican Rand Paul and Democrat Ron Wyden that targeted the levies and looked like it had a shot at passing a chamber in which the Republican majority had previously shown little inclination of resisting the president. But even before the first votes were cast, Trump and his allies moved to ensure it would go nowhere. First, the White House issued a veto threat against the resolution, which would have repealed the national emergency Trump declared earlier in the month to impose sweeping 10% tariffs on imports and, briefly, even higher levies on many trading partners. Then the GOP-controlled House of Representatives enacted a rule to prevent consideration of the Senate resolution until at least the end of September. When the resolution came up for a vote in the Senate on Wednesday, Paul, a libertarian-leaning conservative, described it as necessary to take back power Congress had ceded to the president, and pleaded with fellow Republicans to get onboard. 'The founders would not have expected the upper chamber, the Senate, to let the novel use of a statute traditionally used to sanction adversaries to become used for tariffs, to tax American people and to let it go unchallenged. This is not constitutionalism. This is cowardice,' the Kentucky lawmaker said. While all Democrats in attendance voted for the bill, only the moderate Republicans Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine heeded Paul's words, and the measure deadlocked, with 49 votes both in favor and against. Not long after, Vice-President JD Vance appeared in the Capitol to break the tie on a procedural motion that made certain the resolution was dead for good. Trump has moved to ensure that a similar fate will befall any other attempts percolating through the Senate to undermine his tariffs. He has threatened to veto both a bipartisan bill that would set a 60-day deadline for Congress to approve new tariffs, and a resolution to block his tariffs on Canada, which made it through the chamber but has been stopped in the House. This week's vote took place against the release of data showing the US economy shrank in the first three months of the year, its first contraction since 2022 and a consequence, economist say, of a rush of imports prompted by unease over the new president's trade policies. 'A major culprit is unquestionably Donald Trump and his senseless global tariffs,' Wyden said on the Senate floor. 'If this continues to be our tariff policy, every major economist and forecaster is unfortunately predicting recession, job losses and the misery that was all over our news feeds this morning.' The vote might have succeeded if the Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse and Republican Mitch McConnell, who has spoken out against tariffs, were present. But the Democratic minority leader, Chuck Schumer, told reporters on Thursday that the situation was a 'win-win either way' because it presented an opportunity to get Republicans on the record supporting the levies. 'We've already forced them to vote on tariffs a couple of times, and we may try to do that again in the future,' Schumer said, adding he expected the policy to come up as Republicans negotiate a forthcoming bill expected to approve Trump's tax and immigration policies while making cuts to social safety net programs. 'Republicans own it. They cared so much about tariffs, they had to bring JD Vance to come in and break the 50-49 tie, and they own it now … they're stuck.' Better economic news arrived on Friday, when government data showed employers hired more people than expected in April. Earlier in the week, Mike Johnson, the House speaker and ardent defender of Trump's agenda, had acknowledged a 'rocky start' to the tariff policy, but described them as a gamble that would pay off. 'Right now, even today, people are beginning to see the dust settle on that. They understand there's a master strategy behind this, and they're seeing the results,' Johnson said at a Tuesday press conference. 'We're going to have 100 countries – by some counts, it may be higher – renegotiate their trade policies with America, because of what President Trump did.' Asked why he deployed parliamentary tactics to prevent the consideration of the Senate's attempts to undo Trump's tariffs, Johnson replied: 'We're using the rules of the House to prevent political hijinks and political stunts. And that's what the Democrats have.'