EU Poised to Curb China's Access to Medical Device Procurement
EU countries are due to vote on the proposed measure as early as Monday, said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.
The move, if backed by member states, would be the first action taken by the EU based on its International Procurement Instrument, a 2022 law that's meant to promote reciprocity in access to public procurement markets. Implementation of the restrictions could open a new front with China, just as the EU seeks to strike a balance in its relationship with Beijing while navigating US President Donald Trump's tariff war.
A spokesperson for the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, didn't immediately reply to a request for comment.
The EU launched an investigation into China's procurement of medical devices last April, with the probe finding in January that Beijing discriminated against foreign firms. Consultations failed to find alternative solutions, Bloomberg previously reported.
Beijing's focus on local and state-oriented procurement in medical technologies has increased in recent years, as authorities across the country included strict domestic product requirements for many categories of device. The shift turned a €1.3 billion trade deficit in these goods for China in 2019 into a €5.2 billion surplus just one year later, according to data cited in an EU report published last April. The focus of the investigation wasn't to reverse that trend but to enable fair competition.
The EU has long argued that Beijing has been pushing market-distorting measures and practices to implement its 'Made in China' policy and its target of achieving 85% domestic market share for Chinese companies producing 'core medical device components' by 2025. The target is 70% for higher-end devices.
The IPI allows the commission to impose various restrictions on firms seeking to participate in procurements, ranging from score adjustments in tenders to an outright ban from procurement contracts.
With assistance from Ewa Krukowska.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Letters to The Editor — August 21, 2025
Vice-President, the contest The Vice-President is expected to embody neutrality, remain above partisan politics, and uphold an unbiased stance that is free from any rigid political ideology. Traditionally, these posts have been held by eminent individuals whose contributions to society and the nation have been exemplary. By these standards, Justice B. Sudershan Reddy is a good choice. His is a distinguished judicial career. In contrast, C.P. Radhakrishnan, the NDA's nominee, is a seasoned political figure with a long record in public office, and, therefore, may not be perceived as a non-partisan choice for this esteemed role. One hopes that Members of Parliament exercise a 'conscience vote'. May wisdom guide this decision. Varghese George, Secunderabad While the Vice-President of India is also the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha and, therefore, has the duty to conduct proceedings in the House of Elders impartially, it was expected that a scholar with sound knowledge in the tenets of the Constitution would be elected as the next Vice-President in consultation with all the stakeholders, particularly the Opposition. Alas, it is not to be. With the ruling BJP dispensation announcing the candidature of C.P. Radhakrishnan, a hard-core member of the RSS and the BJP, and bypassed going in for a consensus candidate, we now have a situation of a contest. It is unfortunate that some in the BJP in Tamil Nadu have invoked the son of the soil line. The people of Tamil Nadu are well aware that the Union government has always been acting against their interests. One can expect Mr. Radhakrishnan to be another spokesperson of the saffron party. Tharcius S. Fernando, Chennai India-China de-escalation We do need de-escalation at the Line of Actual Control. We also need the display of strong political will at the Centre and robust diplomacy to negotiate peace with China. We must not lose sight of the economic front. We need to settle a trade deal, bypassing American sanctions and also Chinese moves. Manas Agarwal, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh Urban parks Rapid urbanisation in India has only highlighted a key issue — an insufficient number of public parks. Parks serve an important purpose of bringing people from all walks of life together and creating harmony ('Open Page, 'For urban lung space', August 17). Parks improve the aesthetic value of the area and are a major source of green cover in the urban pockets, keeping the temperature under control. According to a study conducted by Pennsylvania State University, the amount of time spent in parks and green common spaces has a direct correlation with the well-being of an individual. R. Sivakumar, Chennai
India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
India and China are developing a special mechanism to tackle...,Trump should be worried because...
India china relations India-China relations: In a significant development between India and China, the two neigbours have agreed that like the Western Sector, a General Level Mechanism will also be set up in the Eastern and Central Sectors to address boundary issues. As a part of the mechanism, a meeting under will also be held soon in the Western Sector to discuss the border dispute. The update is seen as a step meant to strengthen dialogue between the two armies along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). What have India and China agreed for? In a news update that US's Donald Trump should see as a bad news, India and China have agreed for the set up of the General Level Mechanism which refers to Corps Commander level talks between the Indian and Chinese armies. How did India-China relations worsen? Notably, this format began after April 2020, when tensions escalated in Eastern Ladakh. Since the region comes under the 14th Corps of the Indian Army, its Commander represents India in these talks. What China said on boundary dispute with India? 'Regarding the boundary question, the two sides reached new consensus on conducting regular management and control, maintaining peace and tranquility in border areas, appropriately handling sensitive points, and initiating boundary negotiations in areas where conditions are met, Wang said on the boundary dispute with India. Story highlights: India and China have agreed for General Level Mechanism in the Eastern and Central Sectors. The two countries are planning to solve their border disputes. India-China tensions escalated in Eastern Ladakh in 2020. Recently, Chinese Foreign minister visited India. What PM Modi said on India-China relations? 'Glad to meet Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Since my meeting with President Xi in Kazan last year, India-China relations have made steady progress guided by respect for each other's interests and sensitivities. I look forward to our next meeting in Tianjin on the sidelines of the SCO Summit. Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity,' PM Modi stated in a post on X.
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
Explained: How Europe Tried To Speak Trump
A careful selection of cast and roles and a clear strategy to avoid deadlocks. European leaders' charm offensive on Donald Trump to foster Ukraine's cause this week was hastily arranged but followed a scripted plan, say European sources. France's Emmanuel Macron and Britain's Keir Starmer were among seven European leaders who accompanied Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky to the White House on Monday for high-stakes talks with the US President. "There's truly never been anything like it," Trump enthused in an interview on Tuesday. "There's never been such a group," he told Fox News. The summit came on the heels of a meeting between Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska, which raised concerns in Europe that Kyiv would be pressured into making painful political and territorial concessions to Moscow. With nine leaders sitting around a long wooden table at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, the dynamics changed. Trump began the discussions by greeting his guests with a few words before the cameras. "You look great with your tan," he told German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, while Starmer was introduced as "my friend, doing well". EU chief Ursula von der Leyen was told she was "probably more powerful than anyone else around this table". 'Well Prepared, Well Coordinated' Often criticised for their difficulties in communicating with Trump, the Europeans were hoping to steer the famously volatile US president closer to their position on the conflict, ahead of possible peace talks with Putin. "We were well prepared and well coordinated," Merz said after the meeting. "I think that appealed to the American president, in the sense that he noticed that we Europeans were speaking with one voice here." Preparations for the meeting began Saturday when Trump debriefed Zelensky on his Alaska talks. The US president invited his Ukrainian counterpart to the White House and opened the door for a few European leaders to tag along, according to a European official. The proposal was discussed in a series of calls between European capitals. Some were wary of exposing themselves to an ambush in the Oval Office, the kind Zelensky suffered in February during his prior, explosive visit to the White House, according to the source. A team bringing together the leaders of major European powers, France, Germany, Italy and Britain, was nevertheless put together and announced on Sunday morning. Finland's Alexander Stubb, who has befriended Trump by playing golf and leading a country that shares a long border with Russia, was also included. A few hours later, Zelensky made a detour to Brussels and appeared alongside von der Leyen, who completed the line-up with NATO's head Mark Rutte. 'Clumsy Attempts' Each had a pre-scripted role, according to one participant at the summit. Rutte, who has long cultivated his relationship with Donald Trump, was responsible for starting discussions with Trump, the source said. Each leader then addressed a different aspect of the conflict. Von der Leyen, a mother and grandmother, for example, emphasised the plight of Ukrainian children abducted by Russian forces. Whenever Trump seemed to get stuck on an issue, someone would chime in trying to present the matter from a different perspective and refocus the discussion, the source said. In a semantic shift, some avoided using the word "ceasefire" -- disliked by Trump, who, after meeting Putin, has pivoted to seeking a full peace deal -- calling for Russia to "stop the killing" instead. Talk of security guarantees for Ukraine similarly deliberately saw the use of the vague term "presence", the source said. Whether such adjustments will help successfully resolve what promises to be an extremely difficult negotiation process on the future of Ukraine remains to be seen. On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov criticised Europe's "clumsy attempts to change the position of the US president" -- a possible sign that Moscow is concerned about their impact.
