Smotrich: We won't withdraw from Lebanon and destroyed villages won't be rebuilt
Extremist Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said Wednesday that the Israeli army will not withdraw from the five points that it occupied in south Lebanon.
'The villages destroyed by the Israeli army in south Lebanon will not be rebuilt,' Smotrich added, in remarks at the settlement of Kiryat Shmona near Lebanon's border.
'The North's residents will no longer see Hezbollah on the border fence,' Smotrich said.
'There is a big possibility that Hezbollah's arms have truly been destroyed and (Iranian supreme leader Ali) Khamenei has abandoned it,' the Israeli minister added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
What options for Hezbollah after govt's decision to disarm it?
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 12:09 The government has decided to task the army with setting a plan to disarm Hezbollah. AFP looks at how the government's decision may be implemented, and whether the Iran-backed militant group can still block it. - Why is the move important? - Tuesday's announcement was the first time a Lebanese government has announced it would disarm Hezbollah, the only armed faction that kept its weapons in the aftermath of the 1975-1990 civil war. Hezbollah has kept its arms in the name of resistance against Israel, which occupied Lebanon's south until 2000. The decision effectively strips Hezbollah's weapons arsenal of political legitimacy, breaking with past government statements that recognized the "resistance" alongside the Lebanese army. The balance of power in Lebanon has shifted after a recent war between Israel and Hezbollah left the group badly weakened, and after the fall of the group's close ally Bashar al-Assad in neighboring Syria. Unprecedented Israeli strikes on Hezbollah backer Iran in June have further weakened its stance. Previous moves to limit or do away with Hezbollah's weapons and logistical network have led to major political and security crises. In May 2008, when the Lebanese government decided to shut down the group's wired communications network, clashes erupted with Hezbollah using its weapons against political opponents in Beirut and beyond. The violence killed at least 65 people. The group's arsenal has remained a divisive issue in Lebanon, with opponents demanding the state control all territories and the government have the sole power to declare war and peace. - What can Hezbollah do? - Hezbollah on Wednesday rejected the government's decision, calling it a "grave sin" and saying it will treat it "as if it did not exist". But the armed group has few choices, which all appear to come at a great cost. Hezbollah could escalate politically by having the four ministers affiliated with it and its allies resign. It could also disrupt the work of parliament, or incite chaos by mobilizing its armed supporters to the streets. Any domestic unrest blamed on Hezbollah would likely have major repercussions for the group's image among Lebanese. "Hezbollah, as much as possible, would want to reduce the chance of itself entering a confrontation with the army, because it knows that the entire country would be against it except for its supporters," said David Wood, a senior Lebanon analyst at the International Crisis Group. "It would be an absolute disaster for its image," he added. Hezbollah lawmaker Ali Ammar dismissed the possibility of any confrontation with the army, saying the two forces "understand" each other. Hezbollah could relaunch attacks against Israel, but this option could easily prove devastating with the country still reeling from last year's war. "Going into war right now, again, will be very devastating to Hezbollah because it does not have a supply line. It lost a lot with the collapse of the Syrian regime," said military analyst Riad Kahwaji. "Its intelligence capabilities, its logistical capabilities have all been severely affected." The war with Israel saw much of Hezbollah's senior leadership killed and a large part of its military arsenal destroyed, as did swathes of Beirut, Lebanon's south and other areas. Receiving weapons shipments from Iran via Syria has become more difficult as Lebanese and Syrian authorities have tightened border controls, and funding has come under stricter oversight. Hezbollah could agree to disarm, but a Lebanese source had told AFP it "would not do so without something in return". Tehran's position may also affect any decision. The Lebanese group may "play for time", according to Atlantic Council researcher Nicholas Blanford. "They can't fully disarm. I think that's impossible for Hezbollah." - How will Lebanon be affected? - Lebanon is under intense Arab and Western pressure to disarm non-state actors, a key demand to secure international support as it emerges from years of political and economic crises. "We must choose: either collapse or stability," President Joseph Aoun said last week. Should Hezbollah insist on keeping its arsenal, Beirut will find itself in a difficult position. "If Hezbollah is determined to keep the weapons, this would be very difficult for the Lebanese government to force it to give them up," said Blanford. "If they can't do it politically," the researcher said the government would not "send the Lebanese army against Hezbollah". "So it has to be a question of a compromise and some kind of agreement, which is not going to be easy." Meanwhile, Israel has already signaled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Lebanon fails to disarm Hezbollah, as stipulated in the ceasefire agreement that ended their latest war.
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Aoun: Arms monopoly to be achieved despite difficulties, obstacles
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 12:42 President Joseph Aoun has said that 'arms monopoly will be achieved despite the difficulties and obstacles,' adding that authorities are 'awaiting the army's plan' on weapons monopolization to 'discuss it and approve it.' 'The implementation of the U.S. paper also requires approval from Syria and Israel as well as guarantees from the U.S. and France,' Aoun added, in remarks to Al-Arabiya TV. 'Achieving arms monopoly in the hand of the state does not harm Lebanon's rights and sovereignty,' he emphasized, adding that 'Cabinet's session today will continue the approval of decisions to implement arms monopolization.' 'We will press on with the implementation of the presidential inauguration speech and the Ministerial Statement,' the president went on to say. His remarks come after Cabinet approved Tuesday a historic decision to disarm Hezbollah and all other armed groups by the year's end, with the army being tasked with presenting a plan to the government before the end of August. Hezbollah rejected the decision and said it will deal with it 'as if it does not exist,' after the ministers of the Shiite Duo walked out of Cabinet in protest.
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Trump to meet Putin in coming days with venue to be announced later
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 12:22 A meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump has been agreed, a Kremlin official said Thursday, and it could possibly take place next week at a venue that has been decided "in principle." "At the suggestion of the American side, it has been agreed in principle to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov told reporters. Next week is the target date for a summit, Ushakov said, while noting that such events take time to organize and no date is confirmed. The possible venue will be announced "a little later," he said. He also played down the possibility of Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky joining the summit meeting to discuss ending Russia's 3-year-old invasion of its neighbor, which the White House said Trump is ready to consider. "We propose, first of all, to focus on preparing a bilateral meeting with Trump, and we consider it most important that this meeting be successful and productive," Ushakov said. A meeting between Putin and Trump would be their first since the Republican president returned to office this year. It would be a significant milestone in thewar, though there's no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting, since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands. Western officials have repeatedly accused Putin of stalling for time in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. Putin has in the past offered no concessions and will only accept a settlement on his terms. It was not clear whether Trump's Friday deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing in Ukraine still stood. Support for continuing the fight wanes in Ukraine A new Gallup poll published Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion. The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. The poll came out on the eve of U.S. President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about 7 in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last month renewed his offer to meet with Russia's Vladimir Putin, but his overture was rebuffed as Russia sticks to its demands, and the sides remain far apart. Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's "very" or "somewhat" likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about 7 in 10 think it's "somewhat" or "very" unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year.
