logo
Labour accused of unleashing ‘stealth tax' on pensions

Labour accused of unleashing ‘stealth tax' on pensions

Yahooa day ago

Labour is preparing to unleash a 'stealth tax' on pensions, critics have warned.
The new Pension Schemes Bill will give the Government the power to force pension funds to invest in British assets to help spark growth.
Yet critics of the reform argue the change, laid out in the Treasury's Pensions Investment Review published Thursday, risks lower returns for savers.
Pension industry experts also called into question government claims that the package of reforms could leave retirement savers £6,000 better off.
Tory MP Neil O'Brien called the plans 'a massive stealth tax' and said pension savers will 'get lower returns' so the Government can reduce its borrowing costs.
Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said the move was an extraordinary overreach. He said: 'Labour is crossing the Rubicon into directing the public's savings. Pension pots are there to secure retirements, not to bankroll a government.'
Last month major pension providers said they would voluntarily commit to investing 5pc of their total funds into UK assets by 2030. However, the new reserve power would go further and mandate how much of savers' money needs to go into UK plc.
Experts within the industry have also thrown scorn on the plans. Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, said the move 'puts a gun to schemes' heads and will create those mandatory targets in all-but-name'.
Laura Myers, partner and head of DC pensions at consultancy LCP, said the threat of the Government telling trustees how they should invest was 'a step too far' that 'risks losing sight of the primacy of member interests'.
James Carter, of investment firm Fidelity International, labelled the power to direct pension scheme investments in the future 'a concern'.
Publication of the review follows the news this week that HM Revenue and Customs is exploring plans to tax pension contributions made via salary sacrifice work schemes. If implemented the changes would cost the average earner more than £500 a year in extra income tax and National Insurance – and whittle away their pension pot and their retirement potential.
The Government has said that the changes within the new review will result in an additional £6,000 on average being added to an individual's pension pot over a lifetime of saving, as revealed by the Telegraph.
However, Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister and now a partner at LCP, has said he would not 'put any weight' on the figure.
He said that while lower cost pensions due to reforms could see savers add to their pots, the increase will only be marginal and there is a risk that costs actually rise, adding: 'Even the assertion that there will be overall cost savings is far from obvious.'
Mr Selby added: '£6,000 isn't exactly a big potential 'gain' over the course of a retirement in return for the extra risk that is likely to be taken on. Entirely possible the gains will be higher but they could also be lower.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia Says US Not Making Demands Over Chinese-Owned Port
Australia Says US Not Making Demands Over Chinese-Owned Port

Bloomberg

time16 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Australia Says US Not Making Demands Over Chinese-Owned Port

Australia's deputy prime minister said the national government has consistently opposed Chinese ownership of the Port of Darwin and isn't under added pressure from the Trump administration to find a new buyer for the facility that is under increased scrutiny in Canberra. 'We don't think it is appropriate that that piece of infrastructure was in the hands of a Chinese publicly-owned entity, a Chinese government-controlled entity,' Richard Marles, also Australia's defense minister, said Saturday in an interview with Bloomberg Television on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. 'We are working through to get a better resolution to the ownership structure of the port.'

Fears of 'water rationing' without controversial reservoir, government claims
Fears of 'water rationing' without controversial reservoir, government claims

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fears of 'water rationing' without controversial reservoir, government claims

Oxfordshire campaigners against plans for a mega reservoir near Abingdon have dismissed government claims Britain will face water shortages. Water Minister Emma Hardy warned that the country will face 'water rationing like we have in the Mediterranean' without new reservoirs. It comes as controversial plans to start on massive infrastructure projects near Abingdon are pushed ahead by Labour with the South East Strategic Reservoir south west of the town expected to be nearly as big as Gatwick Airport, holding 150 billion litres of water. READ MORE: Murder probe after death of 40-year-old woman in Abingdon The minister suggested that water shortages could hit households and businesses in the next decade if the government fails to build new artificial lakes as she unveiled plans to speed up the planning approvals process. Abingdon Reservoir has been a controversial project for more than a decade (Image: Thames Water) The government plans to bring in legislation that make reservoir proposals 'nationally significant' in terms of planning, giving ministers, rather than local councils, the final say on whether projects go ahead. At the same time, Environment Secretary Steve Reed intervened to bring two projects planned in Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire into the 'nationally significant' category. Flash Sale Alert! 🌟 Dive deeper into the stories that shape Oxfordshire with Oxford Mail. Unlimited local news, an ad-free app, and a digital replica of our print edition—all with 80 per cent fewer ads on our site. 🗞️ 👇#StayInformed — Oxford Mail (@TheOxfordMail) May 26, 2025 But campaigners against the Abingdon project said the changes were for nothing. READ MORE: Abingdon locals 'worried' as Abbey Gardens shut by police Derek Stork, spokesperson for Group Against Reservoir Development or GARD, said: 'This statement is just the government trying to look as though it is taking action, when really it's not taking action at all. 'These reservoirs, as is the case with the SESRO proposal, were already nationally significant projects so won't be sped-up.' Water minister Emma Hardy meets schoolchildren (Image: West Oxfordshire District Council) Mr Stork said that the government already took control of the Abingdon reservoir project by approving the development consent order, to allow the £2.7million project to go ahead without a public enquiry. GARD, along with organisations Safer Waters and CPRE Oxfordshire, will be appealing this decision at a High Court judicial review hearing, scheduled for two days starting June 26. ​READ MORE: Red Arrows to fly over Oxfordshire: When and where to watch Mr Stork said: 'We started off opposing this reservoir, but what we've got round to is the system is just totally not fit for purpose. That's why we're taking the government to court. This reservoir is only symptomatic of what's wrong with the system.' 'We think the way these mega projects are proposed and analysed is totally wrong. We can't find valid justifications for it – because they aren't there. 'A successful public inquiry into against the biggest project is what's going to change the government's thinking about this. 'By winning the public inquiry we hope not only to defeat SESRO, but also to change the system. That decision would really resonate.' READ MORE: Police urge public to avoid popular Oxfordshire park Current plans are for the reservoir to be delivered by Thames Water to supply water in the southeast. This is the second attempt at building the mega reservoir, after an attempt under the Conservative government failed following a public enquiry in 2010. Thames Water previously said it 'welcomes the government's plans to improve infrastructure across the region'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store