
Speaker Johnson, Bessent say SALT deal is ‘very, very close'
Johnson and Bessent met with GOP senators during their lunch on Friday to pitch them on the framework they agreed to with a handful of moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), who was at the gathering, said the proposal would make the SALT deduction cap $40,000 for five years, then $10,000 for the following five years.
Emerging from the huddle, both Johnson and Bessent said talks were nearing the end.
'I believe they will,' Johnson said when asked if Senate Republicans would accept the SALT plan. 'They're gonna digest the final calculations but I think we're very, very close to closing that issue out.'
Bessent echoed that sentiment, saying negotiations were 'very, very close' and noting that the reception among Senate GOP members to the proposal was 'varied.'
The SALT deduction cap has been one of the thorniest hangups stalling progress on the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill,' which leaders are trying to send to President Trump by their self-imposed July 4 deadline.
The House's version of the bill included a $40,000 deduction cap — quadruple the $10,000 cap in current law — for individuals making $500,000 or less. The Senate's edition of the legislation, however, proposed a $10,000 cap, sparking howls among House Republicans.
Many Senate Republicans have wanted to chop down the House's deduction cap, threshold and phaseouts to increase savings, especially as none of them are from high-tax blue states.
News surfaced of a potential SALT breakthrough Friday morning, with sources telling The Hill that the administration and key members of the SALT Caucus were zeroing in on an agreement.
Not all lawmakers in the SALT Caucus, however, are on board. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), who has been one of the most vocal in the group, told reporters earlier on Friday that he 'heard of a deal' involving a $40,000 cap for five years and then a $10,000 cap for the following five years, which was a non-started for him.
'I'm a hard no on that,' he said of the blueprint, saying the proposal 'just affirms the very thing I've been against for so long.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Was Trump right to send National Guard to Washington, D.C.?
David Bumcrot Belmont Heather Mac Donald cites several shooting incidents in Washington, D.C., including two heinous crimes involving the shooting deaths of innocent young children. Nowhere does she mention how Republicans block every effort at enacting gun-control legislation. Also left out is the number of convicted felons that President Trump has pardoned. Let's stop pretending this isn't just Trump's attempt to initiate martial law. Advertisement Robyn King Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Ipswich In Trump's political theater, Washington becomes a prop President Trump's National Guard deployment to Washington, D.C. is less about public safety and more about political theater. D.C.'s violent crime rates have fallen sharply since 2023. Cherry-picking a few brutal crimes to paint the city as in crisis ignores the data and serves a narrative, not the truth. If homicide rates alone justified military involvement, other US cities — some worse off than D.C. — would already be occupied by federal troops. The National Guard's limited 'command presence' won't fix longstanding issues of gun violence, juvenile crime, or car theft. Lasting reductions come from targeted policing, intelligence-driven enforcement, and community partnerships — not a 30-day show of force. Advertisement Worse, the move undermines D.C.'s elected leadership and sets a dangerous precedent for federal overreach. Washington's majority-minority residents have endured decades of over-policing. Imposing military oversight without an emergency inflames mistrust, chills cooperation with police, and treats citizens like subjects. Real safety is built, not staged. This deployment is a political stunt masquerading as crime control — and Washington deserves better than to be used as a prop in someone else's campaign. Paul Swindlehurst Londonderry, N.H. For this administration, an easy distraction It seems our president has found the secret for making the Jeffrey Epstein controversy go away: Invade Washington, D.C. It's amazing how short the media's attention span is. They are so easily distracted by the next outrageous thing President Trump and his representatives do or say. There is no follow-up, no accountability — essentially just narration and public relations. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was so right: 'Flood the zone,' and you can do anything. Patricia Fabbri Lynnfield

Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.— A former political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials in Albuquerque, including the current state House speaker.

USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Over 300 protests held Saturday against Trump redistricting push
Pro-democracy activists and labor groups held hundreds of rallies and other events across the United States on Saturday, Aug. 16, protesting the Trump administration's push for Texas to redraw its congressional map in favor of Republicans. Former Congressman Beto O'Rourke was among those who spoke on Saturday in Texas, from which dozens of Democratic state lawmakers fled to deny Republicans the quorum needed to vote on a redistricting plan that President Donald Trump had demanded. "They do this because they are afraid," O'Rourke told an audience on Saturday, speaking of those attempting redistricting. "They fear this power they see here today." More: Obama calls Texas GOP redistricting an 'assault' on democracy Drucilla Tigner, executive director of pro-democracy coalition Texas For All, told Reuters pro-democracy and labor groups held over 300 events attended by tens of thousands of people in 44 states and Washington, D.C. Many of the more than 50 Texas Democrats who fled the state have been staying in Illinois, also the site of protests on Saturday. The Texas lawmakers in Illinois are out of reach of civil arrest warrants that could be acted on within Texas. The Texas Democrats kept the map from coming to a vote during a special session Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called that ended Friday. Abbott immediately called a second special session. Abbott said that redistricting plans, legislation to increase flash flood safety in the wake of deadly July flooding, and other legislative work remain undone because Democrats are absent. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom on Thursday, Aug. 14 unveiled a redistricting plan in his state that he says would give Democrats there five more Congressional seats, possibly offsetting any Republican gains in Texas. The Texas House Democrats said in a written statement on Thursday that they will only return to Texas if their state's special legislation is ended and once California's redistricting maps are introduced.